RESUMEN
TeamSTEPPS is a validated, formal patient safety curriculum created by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) for the development of high-functioning multidisciplinary teams. TeamSTEPPS was implemented in an academic emergency department (ED), including all ED hospital staff as well as physicians and residents. It was hypothesized that extensive interprofessional education combined with implementation of specific tools would increase knowledge of TeamSTEPPS principles, attitudes, and behaviors. The TeamSTEPPS knowledge test and the AHRQ Hospital Survey attitude test were administered at 0, 45, and 90 days after training. Behaviors were evaluated using an observation tool that was developed to document huddle occurrence. Knowledge and attitudes significantly improved 45 days from baseline (P < .05) and were sustained by day 90. In this pilot study, the implementation of TeamSTEPPS training in a multidisciplinary team in an academic ED led to increased knowledge and improved communication attitudes. Adoption of a specific behavior, the huddle, also was observed.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Capacitación en Servicio/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Curriculum , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Seguridad del Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
An electronic sepsis surveillance system (ESSV) was developed to identify severe sepsis and determine its time of onset. ESSV sensitivity and specificity were evaluated during an 11-day prospective pilot and a 30-day retrospective trial. ESSV diagnostic alerts were compared with care team diagnoses and with administrative records, using expert adjudication as the standard for comparison. ESSV was 100% sensitive for detecting severe sepsis but only 62.0% specific. During the pilot, the software identified 477 patients, compared with 18 by adjudication. In the 30-day trial, adjudication identified 164 severe sepsis patients, whereas ESSV detected 996. ESSV was more sensitive but less specific than care team or administrative data. ESSV-identified time of severe sepsis onset was a median of 0.00 hours later than adjudication (interquartile range = 0.05). The system can be a useful tool when implemented appropriately but lacks specificity, largely because of its reliance on discreet data fields.