RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To develop a patient risk adjustment model for experience of care (EOC) quality measures for long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) that includes mode of survey administration. To assess presence of nonresponse bias in the adjusted facility-level scores. DESIGN: We tested 3 modes of collecting the EOC data: mail-only, mixed (ie, mail with telephone follow-up), and in-facility. This study used sequential modeling and impact analysis, specified a risk and mode adjustment model, and evaluated presence of nonresponse after adjustment. SETTING: LTCHs. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=1364) and 69 LTCHs. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk and mode adjusted responses to 28 survey questions and 6 facility-level scores derived from survey responses. RESULTS: Mode of data collection and patient risk variables (age, sex, overall health, overall mental health, marital status, education, race, and whether a proxy responded) were included in the model. Clinical variables were not significant. The in-facility mode was associated with significantly higher performance scores than the other modes. When the recommended risk and mode adjustment model was applied, nonresponse bias was not observed in any mode. CONCLUSIONS: LTCH EOC data should be adjusted for patient risk variables including mode of data collection.
Asunto(s)
Recolección de Datos/métodos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Sesgo , Femenino , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Regresión , Ajuste de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
We compared individuals in same-sex couples to those in different-sex married couples on various health care indicators using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Compared to individuals in different-sex married couples, individuals in same-sex couples were more likely to report difficulty seeing specialists, getting medical care when needed, and delays getting necessary prescription drugs. They were also more likely to report dissatisfaction with the level of respect shown by and time spent with providers. This study suggests that individuals in same-sex couples are more likely to face barriers to care and that individuals in same-sex couples have less positive perceptions of provider interactions.