Factors that promote successful endoscopic management of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leaks.

INTRODUCTION: Staple line leaks following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoluminal techniques, including stent placement and endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVAC), have become viable options to treat these patients without the need for additional surgery. The purpose of this study was to define the conditions where certain endoscopic therapies are most likely to succeed compared to surgery. METHODS: An IRB approved prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients treated for gastrointestinal leaks from July 2013 to March 2019. All patients who were treated for gastrointestinal leaks following LSG were included. Endpoints include success of leak closure and hospital-related morbidity for the patients treated solely by endoscopic only methods (EP) compared to the additional surgery group (SP). RESULTS: There were 39 patients (33 females; 6 males) with a median age of 45.9 years. The EP group included 23 patients (59%), whereas SP included 16 patients (31%). On average, the SP had longer days from sentinel surgery to our hospital admission (70 vs 41), a higher percentage of previous bariatric surgery prior to sentinel LSG (50% vs 17%), and a higher readmission rates following discharge (50% vs 39%). Total length of stay was also higher in the SP compared to the EP (45.4 vs 11). Using this data, a treatment algorithm was developed to optimally treat future patients who suffer from gastrointestinal leaks following LSG. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic therapies, such as EVAC, stent placement, internal drainage, and over-the-scope clips, have a higher chance of success if performed earlier to their sentinel surgery and if patients have had no prior bariatric surgeries. Patients who require additional surgery tend to have longer hospital stays and readmission rates. Using the treatment algorithm provided can help determine when endoscopic therapies are likely to succeed.

Comparison of Objective Intermediate-Term Outcomes Between per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Show Equivalence.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical gold standard for esophageal motility disorders is laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a less invasive flexible endoscopic alternative. We compare their intermediate-term outcomes. METHODS: Data were collected on consecutive LHM and POEM patients treated for esophageal motility disorders from January 2015 to December 2019. All patients were invited for a comprehensive workup between 6 and 12 months post-myotomy including symptom evaluation, pH testing off medications, manometry, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Primary outcomes include swallowing function and development of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). RESULTS: There were 100 patients (46 LHM and 54 POEM). Patient demographics and presenting symptoms were comparable. Follow-up data were obtained from 49% of patients. Average length of follow-up for all patients was 10 months. Mean Eckardt scores for LHM decreased from 6.6 to 2.4 (P < .05) and from 7.06 to 2.2 for POEM (P < .05). Mean integrated relaxation pressure decreased from 22.8 preoperatively to 11 postoperatively in LHM patients and from 24.6 to 11.5 in POEM patients. POEM patients had a lower incidence of objective postoperative GERD with lower average DeMeester scores (20 vs 29.4) and a higher percentage of patients with a normal DeMeester score (47% vs 31%) compared to LHM patients. However, postoperative GERD health related quality of life scores (11.7 vs 14.1), the percent of patients on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (40% vs 53%), and frequency of grade C/D esophagitis (4.3% vs 5.6%) were lower in LHM patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intermediate-term symptom resolution and esophageal physiology are improved equally with both procedures. The development of postoperative GERD is equivalent.

The role of preoperative workup in predicting dysphagia, dilation, or explantation after magnetic sphincter augmentation.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a surgical treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease using a ring of titanium beads to improve the function of the lower esophageal sphincter. Prior to implantation, a comprehensive preoperative esophageal workup is required to determine patient candidacy in an effort to reduce the dysphagia, dilation, and explantation rate of the device. This study was designed to assess the best predictors for these endpoints. METHODS: A prospectively maintained IRB-approved database was retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing MSA implantation. Patients were divided into 3 groups, those that needed no intervention, those that needed medical intervention with oral steroids for reported dysphagia, and surgical intervention, which included endoscopic dilation and/or surgical explantation. Primary endpoints included preoperative objective and subjective testing from a comprehensive esophageal workup including intraoperative notation of number of beads on the device. RESULTS: There were 99 patients eligible for the study with a mean age of 52 and mean follow-up of 10.2 months. Mean BMI was 27 and 59% were female. The no-intervention group had 59 patients, medical intervention group had 25 patients, and surgical intervention group had 15 patients. Preoperative esophageal manometry findings, pH testing off medications, endoscopic and radiologic evaluation showed no difference between the 3 groups. No differences were seen in preoperative subjective evaluations based on GERD-HRQL or RSI scores. There was no difference in average number of beads on the device between the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive esophageal workup is important to confirm the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and rule out other esophageal pathology. However, this study shows that a preoperative comprehensive esophageal workup does not predict which patients will develop dysphagia or require either medical or surgical interventions following MSA implantation.

Impella 5.5 Bridge to Heart Transplant: An Institutional Series and a Closer Look at Device Removal Technique.

Limited donor organ availability often necessitates mechanical circulatory support, and recently the Impella 5.5, as a bridge to heart transplant. Of 175 Impella 5.5-supported patients at our institution, 45 underwent transplantation in the largest series to date, for whom we analyzed outcomes. Two methods of complete device explant were evaluated: central Impella transection and removal via axillary graft. Median Impella days were 25 (16-41); median waitlist days were 21 (9-37). Eighty-nine percent (40/45) of patients had device placement via right axillary artery. Seventy-six percent (34/45) underwent central transection for device removal. Four patients (8.9%) required short-term venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (VA ECMO) postoperatively for primary graft dysfunction (PGD). Two patients (4.4%) suffered postoperative stroke. Five patients (11.1%) required new RRT postoperatively. One patient (2.2%) returned to the operating room (OR) for axillary graft bleeding. A higher chance of procedural complications was found with the axillary removal technique (p = 0.014). Median intensive care unit (ICU) days, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative days to discharge were 46 (35-63), 59 (49-80), and 18 (15-24), respectively. Ninety-eight percent (44/45) survived to discharge. Thirty-day survival was 95.6% (43/45), with 1 year survival at 90.3% (28/31). Eighty-eight percent (37/42) remain without rejection. In our institutional experience, Impella 5.5 is a safe and reliable bridge to transplant.

Later Brain Death Declaration Correlates to Favorable Donor Characteristics but Decreased Heart Acceptance.

BACKGROUND: With rates of potential donor heart discard as high as 66% nationally, quality improvement efforts must seek to optimize donor utilization. Whether the timing of donor brain death declaration (BDD) influences organ acceptance is understudied. The authors sought to characterize the impacts of time between donor hospital admission and BDD on heart utilization and posttransplant outcomes. METHODS: All potential heart donors and recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were identified (2006-2021). Admission-to-BDD cohorts were: 1 to 2 d (n = 52 469), 3 to 4 d (n = 44 033), 5 to 7 d (n = 24 509), and 8 to 10 d (n = 8576). Donor clinical characteristics were compared between cohorts, and donor acceptance was assessed using multivariable binary logistic regression. Recipient posttransplant survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Donor demographics and comorbidity profiles (diabetes and hypertension) were comparable across cohorts. Anoxia/overdose deaths were more common (10% > 21% > 24% > 18%, respectively) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation requirements were higher (37% > 52% > 58% > 47%) when BDD occurred longer after admission. Renal dysfunction (44% > 44% > 35% > 29%) and inotrope requirements (52% > 25% > 36% > 29%) were lower in the later BDD cohorts. Proportions of hepatic dysfunction (18%-21%) and left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (13%-16%) were clinically equivalent. Donor acceptance differed by admission-to-BDD cohort (36% [1-2 d], 34% [3-4 d], 30% [5-7 d], and 28% [8-10 d]). Admission-to-BDD >4 d was independently associated with lower odds of acceptance on multivariable analysis (odds ratio 0.79, P < 0.001). Recipients experienced equivalent posttransplant survival for all donor admission-to-BDD cohorts ( P = 0.999 adults and P = 0.260 pediatrics). CONCLUSIONS: Heart donors with later BDD were disproportionately discarded despite similar-to-favorable overall clinical profiles, resulting in nearly 3000 fewer transplants during the study. Increased utilization of donors with later BDD and "high-risk" characteristics (eg, anoxia/overdose, cardiopulmonary resuscitation requirement) can improve rates of transplantation without compromising outcomes.

The Double Barrel Impella Exchange: A Reliable Method for Uninterrupted Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Classic Impella exchange interrupts flow when the old device is pulled into the aorta before advancing the new device across the aortic valve, threatening circulatory collapse and loss of left ventricular access. In "double barrel," uninterrupted Impella exchange, the new device is placed into the ventricle alongside the old, where flow is first transitioned completely. Of thirty-one consecutive patients undergoing this procedure, none experienced intraoperative cardiac arrest and 96.8% (30/31) had no new aortic insufficiency. One vascular complication ensued following known preoperative iliac injury. One patient suffered nonembolic stroke; another had subarachnoid hemorrhage. Fifty-five percent (17/31) of patients survived, with 22.6% (7/31) recovering, 25.8% (8/31) undergoing transplant, and 6.5% (2/31) transitioning to durable LVAD. Impella-only survival (83.3%, 10/12) was significantly higher than Impella-ECMO survival (36.8%, 7/19) (OR 14.46, 95% CI 1.74-119.93, p=0.01). We conclude "double barrel" technique is reliable in device-dependent cardiogenic shock patients, offering significant advantage and minimal risk.

Surgical Resection of a Symptomatic Ascending Aortic Mural Thrombus.

Aortic mural thrombus (AMT) is a rare disease with an unclear optimal treatment strategy. AMT in the ascending aorta is particularly uncommon and is associated with the additional risk of embolization to the brain. Resection of an ascending AMT is particularly challenging given the high risk of thrombus dislodgment during aortic cannulation and cross-clamp application. This case demonstrates successful surgical resection of a symptomatic ascending AMT without the use of hypothermic circulatory arrest, with complete excision of the thrombus and replacement of the abnormal aorta using graft material.

Gastroparesis managed with peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Gastroparesis is delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Cases are attributed to narcotic use, smoking, diabetes, and postsurgical complications; however, several incidences are unknown. Treatment options include diet modification, gut-stimulating medications (e.g., metoclopramide, domperidone), laparoscopic pyloroplasty, and, in the most severe cases, partial gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Recently, a novel therapy has been developed, peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP). This procedure is similar to a laparoscopic pyloroplasty; however, it is performed completely endoscopically, thus negating the need for incisions. Here we present a case of gastroparesis treated with this novel technique.

Zenker's diverticulum treated via per-oral endoscopic myotomy.

Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is a rare disorder of the esophagus that occurs in approximately 0.1% of the population. Recently, new minimally invasive techniques have been used to treat ZD. Similar to a per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia, ZD can be treated using an endoscopic myotomy with a standard endoscope. This technique offers the benefit of a purely endoscopic procedure without the added morbidity associated with the traditional open technique. This is a description of the first per-oral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's diverticulum (Z-POEM) performed at Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas.

Minimally invasive repair of a lumbar hernia utilizing the subcutaneous space only.

Lumbar hernias are from weakened areas in the posterior lateral abdominal wall. Minimally invasive techniques are recommended for nonmidline abdominal wall hernias. Endoscopic methods utilizing the subcutaneous space only are rarely reported. A 66-year-old man presented with abdominal pain and a computed tomography (CT) scan revealing a lumbar hernia. The procedure was done utilizing the subcutaneous space to open the hernia sac and repair the defect in layers. A sublay mesh and an onlay mesh were used within the subcutaneous pocket. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged home. A subsequent CT scan showed that the completed repair remained intact. Few endoscopic lumbar hernia repairs are reported despite the advantageous aspects of the procedure in avoiding the peritoneal cavity and the retroperitoneum.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a gastric mass.

This case report describes the first endoscopic submucosal dissection performed at Baylor University Medical Center for high-grade dysplasia of the stomach. The patient, a 76-year-old man with multiple medical comorbidities, presented with 4 months of abdominal pain. Endoscopy found a mass on the lesser curvature, and endoscopic ultrasound confirmed that it did not invade the submucosa. A complete endoscopic resection was performed, alleviating the need for surgical intervention. Endoscopic submucosal dissection offers a minimally invasive treatment for premalignant lesions and early stage cancers of the stomach. Endoscopic resection is as effective as gastrectomy, with less morbidity in select patients with early stage lesions.