Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39019488

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We sought to elicit key informant (KI) perspectives regarding decisional needs of Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) who are initiating insomnia disorder and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Polytrauma/TBI System of Care (PSC). Specifically, we sought to understand: (1) information regarding treatment options that Veterans with mTBI require in order to make an informed decision; and (2) values used to guide decision-making (ie, personally meaningful aspects of the decision used to compare treatment options). SETTING: Nationwide VHA PSC sites. PARTICIPANTS: Clinicians included VHA providers and policymakers involved in the management of mTBI and/or sleep disorders in the VHA PSC (n = 29). Veterans included those with a clinician-confirmed mTBI who received care for insomnia disorder and/or OSA within the past year (n = 20). DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews with the 49 KIs were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Themes were identified using a descriptive and interpretive approach to qualitative analysis. MAIN MEASURES: Not applicable. RESULTS: Informational needs identified by both KI groups included information regarding outcomes and downsides of treatment, accessible delivery, treatment candidates, description of diagnosis, and level of commitment. Values used to guide decision-making for both insomnia disorder and OSA treatment included benefits, downsides, and availability of treatments. Values used to decide on insomnia treatments alone included time commitment, intrinsic management of sleep, beliefs regarding mental health treatment, and time course of benefit. Values used to decide on OSA treatment alone included intrusiveness of the treatment, appearance, and impact on bed partners. CONCLUSIONS: The current study revealed the decisional needs of Veterans with mTBI who are initiating sleep disorder treatment. Findings can inform the development of decision aids and other efforts aimed at promoting patient-centered management of comorbid mTBI and sleep disorders, thereby improving care quality and clinical outcomes.

2.
Behav Sleep Med ; 22(4): 553-570, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38420915

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To understand factors influencing adherence to recommended treatment for insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). METHOD: Semi-structured interviews (n = 49) with 29 clinical stakeholders and 20 Veterans were conducted. Clinical stakeholders included Veterans Health Administration providers and policymakers involved in the management of mTBI and/or sleep disorders. Veterans included those with a clinician-confirmed mTBI with a recent history of insomnia disorder and/or OSA treatment. Themes were identified using a Descriptive and Interpretive approach. RESULTS: Barriers to sleep disorder treatment adherence included factors associated with the patient (e.g., negative appraisal of treatment benefit), intervention (e.g., side effects), health conditions (e.g., cognitive challenges), health care system (e.g., limited availability of care), and socioeconomic status (e.g., economic instability). Similarly, facilitators of adherence included patient- (e.g., positive appraisal of treatment benefit), intervention- (e.g., flexible delivery format), condition- (e.g., accommodating cognitive impairments), health care system- (e.g., access to adherence support), and socioeconomic-related factors (e.g., social support). CONCLUSIONS: Interviews revealed the multi-faceted nature of factors influencing adherence to sleep disorder treatment among Veterans with mTBI. Findings can inform the development of novel interventions and care delivery models that meet the complex needs of this population.


Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Veteranos , Humanos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/psicología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/terapia , Estados Unidos , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Cumplimiento y Adherencia al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 20(5): 801-812, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38189353

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We elicited perspectives of clinical stakeholders and Veterans regarding barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making (SDM) for comorbid mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and sleep disorders in the Veterans Health Administration. We also compared the perspectives of clinical stakeholders and Veterans regarding determinants of SDM. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 29 clinical stakeholders and 20 Veterans (n = 49). Clinical stakeholders included Veterans Health Administration providers and policymakers involved in the management of mTBI and/or sleep disorders (insomnia disorder, obstructive sleep apnea). Veterans included those with a clinician-confirmed mTBI who received care for insomnia disorder and/or obstructive sleep apnea within the past year. Themes were identified using a descriptive and interpretive approach to qualitative analysis. We compared results across clinical stakeholders and Veterans. RESULTS: Barriers to implementing SDM were identified by both groups at the patient (eg, mTBI sequalae), provider (eg, deprioritization of Veteran preferences), encounter (eg, time constraints), and facility levels (eg, reduced care access). Similarly, both groups identified facilitators at the patient (eg, enhanced trust), provider (eg, effective communication), encounter (eg, decision support), and facility levels (eg, mitigating access barriers). Integrated services and provider discontinuity were factors identified by clinical stakeholders and Veterans alone, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed factors shaping the implementation of SDM at the levels of the patient, provider, encounter, and facility. Findings can inform the development of strategies aimed at implementing SDM for comorbid mTBI and sleep disorders, promoting patient-centered care and enhancing clinical outcomes. CITATION: Kinney AR, Brenner LA, Nance M, et al. Factors influencing shared decision-making for insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea treatment among Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(5):801-812.


Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Veteranos , Humanos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/psicología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/terapia , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/terapia , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Investigación Cualitativa , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA