Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Euro Surveill ; 29(3)2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38240057

RESUMEN

Under International Health Regulations from 2005, a human infection caused by a novel influenza A virus variant is considered an event that has potential for high public health impact and is immediately notifiable to the World Health Organisation. We here describe the clinical, epidemiological and virological features of a confirmed human case of swine influenza A(H1N2)v in England detected through community respiratory virus surveillance. Swabbing and contact tracing helped refine public health risk assessment, following this unusual and unexpected finding.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae , Enfermedades de los Porcinos , Animales , Humanos , Porcinos , Subtipo H1N2 del Virus de la Influenza A , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Inglaterra/epidemiología
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 30(3): 380-386, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38103638

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Limited evidence exists for the diagnostic performance of point-of-care tests for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza in community healthcare. We carried out a prospective diagnostic accuracy study of the LumiraDx™ SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A or B assay in primary care. METHODS: Total of 913 adults and children with symptoms of current SARS-CoV-2 infection were recruited from 18 UK primary care practices during a period when Omicron was the predominant COVID variant of concern (June 2022 to December 2022). Trained health care staff performed the index test, with diagnostic accuracy parameters estimated for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza against real-time reverse-transcription PCR (rtRT-PCR). RESULTS: 151/887 participants were SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR positive, 109 positive for Influenza A, 6 for Influenza B. Index test sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 was 80.8% (122 of the 151, 95% CI, 73.6-86.7%) and specificity 98.9% (728 of the 736, 95% CI, 97.9-99.5%). For influenza A, sensitivity was 61.5% (67 of the 109, 95% CI, 51.7-70.6%) and specificity 99.4% (771 of the 776, 95% CI, 98.5-99.8%). Sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2 and influenza dropped sharply at rtRT-PCR cycle thresholds (Ct) > 30. DISCUSSIONS: The LumiraDx™ SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B assay had moderate sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic patients in primary care, with lower performance with high rtRT-PCR Ct. Negative results in this patient group cannot definitively rule out SARS-CoV-2 or influenza.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gripe Humana , Rapaces , Adulto , Niño , Animales , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Estudios Prospectivos , Respuesta Patológica Completa , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Atención Primaria de Salud , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Prueba de COVID-19
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA