Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Ann Behav Med ; 51(2): 199-213, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27658913

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain patients increasingly seek treatment through mindfulness meditation. PURPOSE: This study aims to synthesize evidence on efficacy and safety of mindfulness meditation interventions for the treatment of chronic pain in adults. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with meta-analyses using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random-effects models. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Outcomes included pain, depression, quality of life, and analgesic use. RESULTS: Thirty-eight RCTs met inclusion criteria; seven reported on safety. We found low-quality evidence that mindfulness meditation is associated with a small decrease in pain compared with all types of controls in 30 RCTs. Statistically significant effects were also found for depression symptoms and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: While mindfulness meditation improves pain and depression symptoms and quality of life, additional well-designed, rigorous, and large-scale RCTs are needed to decisively provide estimates of the efficacy of mindfulness meditation for chronic pain.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Meditación/métodos , Atención Plena/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Humanos , Meditación/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Public Health Nutr ; 20(7): 1279-1285, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28069099

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pilot study to assess the feasibility of modifying food truck meals to meet the My Plate guidelines as well as the acceptability of healthier meals among consumers. DESIGN: We recruited the owners of Latino food trucks (loncheras) in 2013-2014 and offered an incentive for participation, assistance with marketing and training by a bilingual dietitian. We surveyed customers and we audited purchases to estimate sales of the modified meals. SETTING: City of Los Angeles, CA, USA. SUBJECTS: Owners or operators of Latino food trucks (loncheras) and their customers. RESULTS: We enrolled twenty-two lonchera owners and eleven completed the intervention, offering more than fifty new menu items meeting meal guidelines. Sales of the meals comprised 2 % of audited orders. Customers rated the meals highly; 97 % said they would recommend and buy them again and 75 % of participants who completed the intervention intended to continue offering the healthier meals. However, adherence to guidelines drifted after several months of operation and participant burden was cited as a reason for dropout among three of eleven lonchera owners who dropped out. CONCLUSIONS: Lonchera owners/operators who participated reported minimal difficulty in modifying menu items. Given the difficulty in enrolment, expanding this programme and ensuring adherence would likely need to be accomplished through regulatory requirements, monitoring and feedback, similar to the methods used to achieve compliance with sanitary standards. A companion marketing campaign would be helpful to increase consumer demand.


Asunto(s)
Dieta Saludable/economía , Comida Rápida/economía , Comidas , Adulto , Conducta de Elección , Comercio/economía , Comportamiento del Consumidor/economía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Preferencias Alimentarias , Humanos , Los Angeles , Masculino , Mercadotecnía/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Restaurantes/economía , Factores Socioeconómicos
3.
Psychiatr Serv ; 69(10): 1081-1086, 2018 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30041587

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Information sharing between mental health providers (MHPs) and primary care providers (PCPs) is important for persons with mental illnesses. The authors determined the level of information continuity between MHPs who saw a patient for a new consult and PCPs and whether continuity varied between providers with and without access to a shared electronic health record (EHR). METHODS: Data were analyzed for 141 randomly selected enrollees in six Medicare Advantage plans receiving a new outpatient mental health consultation in 2012. Medical records of MHPs and PCPs were abstracted to evaluate whether PCP records recognized the consultation, documented mental health hospitalizations and emergency department visits, and acknowledged psychotropic medications. Measures were compared between patients whose providers used and did not use mutual-access EHRs. RESULTS: For 21% of patients, the PCP record documented communication from the MHP within three months of the consultation. The PCP record showed evidence of timely communication (within seven days) for 42% of mental health hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Of 152 medications recorded by MHPs, 103 (68%) were acknowledged in the PCP record by the next visit. For patients with mutual-access EHRs, provider communication about the consultation was documented for a greater percentage of patients, compared with those without mutual-access EHRs (46% versus 11%, p<.001), as was communication about psychotropic medication (100% versus 57%, p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This small but detailed study of patients receiving new outpatient mental health consults found poor continuity of information between MHPs and PCPs. A mutual-access EHR facilitated but did not guarantee such information sharing.


Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare Part C/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA