Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Skeletal Radiol ; 2023 Nov 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38015230

RESUMEN

Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) is a rare and usually painful condition, representing about 1% of all bone tumors. A geographical lytic, expansile, and septated radiological pattern, with fluid-fluid levels on MRI, is classically displayed. ABC can be a primary bone lesion (70% of patients) or can arise in an underlying condition and is subsequently named "ABC-like changes" (30%). ABC-like changes are more frequently encountered in skeletal segments affected by chondroblastoma, fibrous dysplasia, giant cell tumor, osteoblastoma, non-ossifying fibroma, and osteosarcoma. In this article, we describe the first case of ABC-like changes developed in association with an ultra-rare sclerosing bone disease: melorheostosis. Melorheostosis is characterized by recognizable patterns on radiological studies with a pathological increased bone density and a cortical thickening within the periosteal or endosteal space, usually with a "dripping candle wax" appearance. More rarely, other different radiological patterns can be observed, such as "osteopatia striata-like," "osteoma-like," "myositis ossificans-like," and mixed patterns. Pain and limb hypotrophy are the most common clinical manifestations. We report the case of a Caucasian male with a clinic-radiological diagnosis of melorheostosis (with epiphyseal osteopoikilosis) since the age of twelve. At the age of nineteen, he suffered from increased pain in the proximal right thigh, and the radiological control revealed an expansive septated lesion at the right proximal femoral bone. The diagnosis of ABC-like changes developed in melorheostosis was obtained after CT-guided bone biopsy and confirmed by open-incisional biopsy.

2.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 479(6): 1296-1308, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33497066

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Massive bone allograft with or without a vascularized fibula is a potentially useful approach for femoral intercalary reconstruction after resection of bone sarcomas in children. However, inadequate data exist regarding whether it is preferable to use a massive bone allograft alone or a massive bone allograft combined with a vascularized free fibula for intercalary reconstructions of the femur after intercalary femur resections in children. Because the addition of a vascularized fibula adds to the time and complexity of the procedure, understanding more about whether it reduces complications and improves the function of patients who undergo these resections and reconstructions would be valuable for patients and treating physicians. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In an analysis of children with bone sarcomas of the femur who underwent an intercalary resection and reconstruction with massive bone allograft with or without a vascularized free fibula, we asked: (1) What was the difference in the surgical time of these two different surgical techniques? (2) What are the complications and number of reoperations associated with each procedure? (3) What were the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores after these reconstructions? (4) What was the survival rate of these two different reconstructions? METHODS: Between 1994 and 2016, we treated 285 patients younger than 16 years with a diagnosis of osteosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma of the femur. In all, 179 underwent resection and reconstruction of the distal femur and 36 patients underwent resection and reconstruction of the proximal femur. Additionally, in 70 patients with diaphyseal tumors, we performed total femur reconstruction in four patients, amputation in five, and a rotationplasty in one. The remaining 60 patients with diaphyseal tumors underwent intercalary resection and reconstruction with massive bone allograft with or without vascularized free fibula. The decision to use a massive bone allograft with or without a vascularized free fibula was probably influenced by tumor size, with the indication to use the vascularized free fibula in longer reconstructions. Twenty-seven patients underwent a femur reconstruction with massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula, and 33 patients received massive bone allograft alone. In the group with massive bone allograft and vascularized fibula, two patients were excluded because they did not have the minimum data for the analysis. In the group with massive bone allograft alone, 12 patients were excluded: one patient was lost to follow-up before 2 years, five patients died before 2 years of follow-up, and six patients did not have the minimum data for the analysis. We analyzed the remaining 46 children with sarcoma of the femur treated with intercalary resection and biological reconstruction. Twenty-five patients underwent femur reconstruction with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula, and 21 patients had reconstruction with a massive bone allograft alone. In the group of children treated with massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula, there were 17 boys and eight girls, with a mean ± SD age of 11 ± 3 years. The diagnosis was osteosarcoma in 14 patients and Ewing sarcoma in 11. The mean length of resection was 18 ± 5 cm. The mean follow-up was 117 ± 61 months. In the group of children treated with massive bone allograft alone, there were 13 boys and eight girls, with a mean ± SD age of 12 ± 2 years. The diagnosis was osteosarcoma in 17 patients and Ewing sarcoma in four. The mean length of resection was 15 ± 4 cm. The mean follow-up was 130 ± 56 months. Some patients finished clinical and radiological checks as the follow-up exceeded 10 years. In the group with massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula, four patients had a follow-up of 10, 12, 13, and 18 years, respectively, while in the group with massive bone allograft alone, five patients had a follow-up of 10 years, one patient had a follow-up of 11 years, and another had 13 years of follow-up. In general, there were no important differences between the groups in terms of age (mean difference 0.88 [95% CI -0.6 to 2.3]; p = 0.26), gender (p = 0.66), diagnosis (p = 0.11), and follow up (mean difference 12.9 [95% CI-22.7 to 48.62]; p = 0.46). There was a difference between groups regarding the length of the resection, which was greater in patients treated with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula (18 ± 5 cm) than in those treated with a massive bone allograft alone (15 ± 4 cm) (mean difference -3.09 [95% CI -5.7 to -0.4]; p = 0.02). Complications related to the procedure like infection, neurovascular compromise, and graft-related complication, such as fracture and nonunion of massive bone allograft or vascularized free fibula and implant breakage, were analyzed by chart review of these patients by an orthopaedic surgeon with experience in musculoskeletal oncology. Survival of the reconstructions that had no graft or implant replacement was the endpoint. The Kaplan-Meier test was performed for a survival analysis of the reconstruction. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The surgery was longer in patients treated with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula than in patients treated with a massive bone allograft alone (10 ± 0.09 and 4 ± 0.77 hours, respectively; mean difference -6.8 [95% CI -7.1 to -6.4]; p = 0.001). Twelve of 25 patients treated with massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula had one or more complication: allograft fracture (seven), nonunion (four), and infection (four). Twelve of 21 patients treated with massive bone allograft alone had the following complications: allograft fracture (five), nonunion (six), and infection (one). The mean functional results were 26 ± 4 in patients with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula and 27 ± 2 in patients with a massive bone allograft alone (mean difference 0.75 [95% CI -10.6 to 2.57]; p = 0.39). With the numbers we had, we could not detect a difference in survival of the reconstruction between patients with a massive bone allograft and free vascularized fibula and those with a massive bone allograft alone (84% [95% CI 75% to 93%] and 87% [95% CI 80% to 94%], respectively; p = 0.89). CONCLUSION: We found no difference in the survival of reconstructions between patients treated with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula and patients who underwent reconstruction with a massive bone allograft alone. Based on this experience, our belief is that we should reconstruct these femoral intercalary defects with an allograft alone and use a vascularized fibula to salvage the allograft only if a fracture or nonunion occurs. This approach would have resulted in about half of the patients we treated not undergoing the more invasive, difficult, and risky vascularized procedure.Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Fémur/cirugía , Peroné/trasplante , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tempo Operativo , Osteosarcoma/cirugía , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma de Ewing/cirugía , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 66(6): e27653, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30724024

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ewing sarcoma (ES) is the second most common bone tumor in adolescents and children. Staging workup for ES includes imaging and bone marrow biopsy (BMB). The effective role of BMB is now under discussion. PROCEDURE: A monoinstitutional retrospective analysis reviewed clinical charts, imaging, and histology of patients with diagnosis of ES treated at the Rizzoli Institute between 1998 and 2017. RESULTS: The cohort included 504 cases of ES of bone; 137 (27%) had metastases at diagnosis, while the remaining 367 had localized disease. Twelve patients had a positive BMB (2.4%). Eleven had distant metastases detected at initial workup staging with imaging assessment: six patients presented with bone metastases, five with both bone and lung metastases. Only one patient with ES of the foot (second metatarsus) was found to have bone marrow involvement with negative imaging evaluation (0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our data, we suggest reconsidering the effective role of BMB in initial staging workup for patients with ES with no signs of metastases by modern imaging techniques. In metastatic disease, the assessment of the bone marrow status may remain useful to identify a group of patients at very high risk who could benefit from different treatment strategies.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Médula Ósea/secundario , Médula Ósea/patología , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Sarcoma de Ewing/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Médula Ósea/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Médula Ósea/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Médula Ósea/cirugía , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedades del Pie , Humanos , Lactante , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma de Ewing/diagnóstico por imagen , Sarcoma de Ewing/cirugía , Adulto Joven
4.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 44(2): 215-223, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27645694

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important prognostic factor in patients with osteosarcoma (OS) and Ewing sarcoma (EWS). The aim of this study was to assess baseline primary tumour FDG uptake on PET/CT, and serum values of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), to establish whether these factors are correlated with tumour necrosis and prognosis. METHODS: Patients treated between 2009 and 2014 for localized EWS and OS, who underwent FDG PET/CT as part of their staging work-up, were included. The relationships between primary tumour SUVmax at baseline (SUV1), SUVmax after induction chemotherapy (SUV2), metabolic response calculated as [(SUV1 - SUV2)/SUV1)] × 100, LDH and ALP and tumour response/survival were analysed. A good response (GR) was defined as tumour necrosis >90 % in patients with OS, and grade II-III Picci necrosis (persitence of microscopic foci only or no viable tumor) in patients with Ewing sarcoma. RESULTS: The study included 77 patients, 45 with EWS and 32 with OS. A good histological response was achieved in 53 % of EWS patients, and 41 % of OS patients. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) was 57 % in EWS patients and 48 % OS patients. The median SUV1 was 5.6 (range 0 - 17) in EWS patients and 7.9 (range 0 - 24) in OS patients (p = 0.006). In EWS patients the GR rate was 30 % in those with a high SUV1 (≥6) and 72 % in those with a lower SUV1 (p = 0.0004), and in OS patients the GR rate was 29 % in those with SUV1 ≥6 and 64 % in those with a lower SUV1 (p = 0.05). In the univariate analysis the 3-year EFS was significantly better in patients with a low ALP level (59 %) than in those with a high ALP level (22 %, p = 0.02) and in patients with a low LDH level (62 %) than in those with a high LDH level (37 %, p = 0.004). In EWS patients the 3-year EFS was 37 % in those with a high SUV1 and 75 % in those with a low SUV1 (p = 0.004), and in OS patients the 3-year EFS was 32 % in those with a high SUV1 and 66 % in those with a low SUV1 (p = 0.1). Histology, age and gender were not associated with survival. In the multivariate analysis, SUV1 was the only independent pretreatment prognostic factor to retain statistical significance (p = 0.017). SUV2 was assessed in 25 EWS patients: the median SUV2 was 1.9 (range 1 - 8). The GR rate was 20 % in patients with a high SUV2, and 67 % in those with a low SUV2 (p = 0.02). A good metabolic response (SUV reduction of ≥55 %) was associated with a 3-year EFS of 80 % and a poor metabolic response with a 3-year EFS of 20 % (p = 0.05). In the OS patients the median SUV2 was 2.7 (range 0 - 4.5). Neither SUV2 nor the metabolic response was associated with outcome in OS patients. CONCLUSION: FDG PET/CT is a useful and noninvasive tool for identifying patients who are more likely to be resistant to chemotherapy. If this finding is confirmed in a larger series, SUV1, SUV2 and metabolic response could be proposed as factors for stratifying EWS patients to identify those with high-grade localized bone EWS who would benefit from risk-adapted induction chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Sarcoma de Ewing/diagnóstico por imagen , Sarcoma de Ewing/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Terapia Neoadyuvante/mortalidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Radiofármacos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Sarcoma de Ewing/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
5.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 475(5): 1322-1337, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27995558

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intercalary reconstruction of tibial sarcomas with vascularized fibula autografts and massive bone allografts is reliable with predictable long-term results. However, inadequate data exist comparing free and pedicled vascularized fibula autografts in combination with a massive bone allograft in patients undergoing intercalary tibia reconstructions. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Among patients undergoing large-segment intercalary allografting, we sought to compare supplemental free vascularized fibular autografts with supplemental pedicled vascularized fibular autografts, in terms of (1) oncologic results, (2) complications associated with surgery, (3) Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores, and (4) surgical time. METHODS: Between 1994 and 2013, we treated 320 patients, younger than 40 years, with tibial sarcomas. Thirty-five patients (11%) underwent amputations. One hundred ninety-five patients (61%) were treated with intraarticular resection of the tibia, which constituted 104 tumor endoprostheses, 63 proximal tibia allograft prosthetic composites, 21 osteoarticular allografts, and seven arthrodeses with allografts. Ninety patients (28%) underwent joint-sparing intercalary reconstruction. Forty-one (13%) of these 90 patients were treated with allografts alone, two (1%) with vascularized fibula grafts, and 47 (15%) with intercalary allografts supplemented by autografts (free fibular autografts, 22 patients, 7%; pedicled fibular autografts, 25 patients, 8%). During the study period, we used free vascularized fibular autografts in association with massive bone allograft for a resection longer than 12 cm with a very small periarticular residual segment. The choice for using a pedicled fibula harvested in the ipsilateral leg initially was for patients having only diaphyseal resections and the indication was later extended to intraepiphyseal osteotomies with a small periarticular residual segment. The goals of this study are to present the long-term results in this group of patients and compare their results based on the type of vascularized fibula harvest. There were 33 male and 14 female patients with mean age of 14 ± 6 years. The median followup was 84 months (range, 7-231 months). No patients were lost to followup before 1 year. Four patients died and were not available for followup after 18 months. The mean tibia resection length was 15 ± 4 cm and mean length of the harvested vascularized fibula was 18 ± 4 cm. RESULTS: Overall 5- and 10-year oncologic survival rates in this study were 87% ± 5% and 83% ± 6% respectively. With the numbers available, we observed no difference in survivorship free from death from disease between the study groups (85% ± 8% [95% CI, 174-232 months] of the free vascularized group versus 82% ± 8% [95% CI, 148-206 months] of the pedicled fibula graft group; p = 0.741). At last followup, 40 patients had no evidence of disease and seven had died of disease. Local recurrence was observed in two patients in the supplemental free vascularized fibula group and three patients in the supplemental pedicled vascularized fibula group, whereas metastases was observed in eight patients. With the numbers available, we observed no difference in the proportion of patients experiencing surgical complications between those treated with free vascularized fibula grafts and those treated with pedicled grafts (eight of 22 [36%] versus nine of 25 [36%] respectively; p = 0.605). With the numbers available, we observed no difference in mean MSTS scores between patients treated with free vascularized fibula grafts and those treated with pedicled grafts (24 ± 9 versus 25 ± 8; mean difference, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.54-4.6; p = 0.858). Mean surgical time was longer in the free vascularized fibula and massive bone allograft group at 9.4 ± 1.7 hours compared with that of the pedicled vascularized fibula and massive bone allograft group at 5.7 ± 1.3 hours (mean difference, 3.73 hours; 95% CI, 2.8-4.6 hours; p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intercalary reconstruction of tibia sarcomas with massive bone allografts supplemented with vascularized fibula grafts provide predictable results. Complications occur as expected in a biologic reconstruction, but are salvageable, preserving the original construct. The pedicled fibula can be an alternative to a free contralateral fibula for intraepiphyseal resections. Comparative technical ease, shorter surgical time, avoidance of additional microvascular anastomosis, and avoidance of surgery on the contralateral leg are notable advantages of pedicled vascularized fibula over free fibula grafts to supplement allografts when indicated in intercalary tibia resections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Peroné/irrigación sanguínea , Peroné/trasplante , Sarcoma/cirugía , Tibia/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Aloinjertos , Autoinjertos , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Trasplante Óseo/efectos adversos , Trasplante Óseo/mortalidad , Niño , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Osteotomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Sarcoma/secundario , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Tibia/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
6.
Paediatr Child Health ; 26(2): 69-70, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33747299
8.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 473(9): 3003-13, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25995179

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the distal femur after resection for malignant bone tumors in skeletally immature children is challenging. The use of megaprostheses has become increasingly popular in this patient group since the introduction of custom-made, expandable devices that do not require surgery for lengthening, such as the Repiphysis(®) Limb Salvage System. Early reports on the device were positive but more recently, a high complication rate and associated bone loss have been reported. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) what are the clinical outcomes using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system after 5-year minimum followup in patients treated with this prosthesis at one center; (2) what are the problems and complications associated with the lengthening procedures of this implant; and (3) what are the specific concerns associated with revision of this implant? METHODS: At our institute, between 2002 and 2007, the Repiphysis(®) expandable prosthesis was implanted in 15 children (mean age, 8 years; range, 6-11 years) after distal femoral resection for malignant bone tumors. During this time, the general indication for use of this implant was resection of the distal femur for localized malignant bone tumors in pediatric patients. Alternative techniques used for this indication were modular prosthetic reconstruction, massive (osteoarticular or intercalary) allograft reconstruction, or rotationplasty. Age and tumor extension were the main factors to decide on the surgical indication. Of the 15 patients who had this prosthesis implanted during reconstruction surgery, five died with the implant in situ or underwent amputation before 5 years followup and the remaining 10 were evaluated at a minimum of 5 years (mean, 104 months; range, 78-140 months). No patients were lost to followup. These 10 patients were long-term survivors and underwent the lengthening program. They were included in our study analysis. The first seven lengthening procedures were attempted in an outpatient setting; however, owing to pain and burning sensations experienced by the patients, the procedures failed to achieve the desired lengthening. Therefore, other procedures were performed with the patients under general anesthesia. We reviewed clinical data at index surgery for all 15 patients. We further analyzed the lengthening procedures, implant survival, radiographic and functional results, for the 10 long-term survivors. Functional results were assessed according to the MSTS scoring system. Complications were classified according to the International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) classification system. RESULTS: Nine of the 10 survivors underwent revision of the implant for mechanical failure. They had a mean MSTS score of 64% (range, 47%-87%) before revision surgery. At final followup the 10 long-term surviving patients had an average MSTS score of 81% (range, 53%-97%). In total, we obtained an average lengthening of 39 mm per patient (range, 17-67 mm). Exact expansion of the implant was unpredictable and difficult to control. Nine of 10 of the long-term surviving patients underwent revision surgery of the prosthesis-eight for implant breakage and one for stem loosening. At revision surgery, six patients had another type of expandable prosthesis implanted and three had an adult-type megaprosthesis implanted. In five cases, segmental bone grafts were used during revision surgery to compensate for loss of bone stock. CONCLUSIONS: We could not comfortably expand the Repiphysis(®) prosthesis in an outpatient setting because of pain experienced by the patients during the lengthening procedures. Furthermore, use of the prosthesis was associated with frequent failures related to implant breakage and stem loosening. Revisions of these procedures were complex and difficult. We no longer use this prosthesis and caution others against the use of this particular prosthesis design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo/efectos adversos , Alargamiento Óseo/instrumentación , Neoplasias Femorales/cirugía , Fémur/cirugía , Osteotomía , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Falla de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Factores de Edad , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Trasplante Óseo , Niño , Femenino , Neoplasias Femorales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Femorales/patología , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fémur/patología , Fémur/fisiopatología , Humanos , Italia , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/cirugía , Selección de Paciente , Diseño de Prótesis , Radiografía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Skeletal Radiol ; 44(5): 743-8, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25351420

RESUMEN

We report the case of an 11-year-old boy who came to our observation with localized pain in the left arm for nearly 5 months. No previous history of trauma was referred in an otherwise healthy patient. Radiographs, isotope bone-scan, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging of the lesion involving the left humerus are discussed. Histological diagnosis from biopsy of the humerus was metastasis from mucinous adenocarcinoma. The primary tumor site was identified in the sigmoid-descending colon, and at presentation, in addition to the left humerus, the disease had already developed in multiple skeletal sites. This report also considers literature concerning such a rare disease in children. This is, to our knowledge, the first report of childhood colorectal cancer diagnosed because of a bone metastasis.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/secundario , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico , Húmero/diagnóstico por imagen , Niño , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Humanos , Húmero/patología , Masculino , Radiografía , Cintigrafía
10.
Int Orthop ; 37(12): 2429-36, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24158237

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma (MIFS) is a rare soft tissue tumour first identified at the end of the 1990s. This study presents our experience and literature reviews focusing on risk of recurrence. METHODS: Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute database and literature were searched for patients with MIFS observed from 1997 to 2012. Data were analysed in a new database. RESULTS: Five patients underwent surgery at our institute, and 133 cases were retrieved from the literature. Not all clinicopathological data were available: 76/138 were men (55%), median age was 45 [interquartile range (IQR) 34-56] years, median tumour size was three (IQR two to five) centimetres. Common sites of occurrence were hand (24%), fingers (23%) and foot (20%). Pain was present at diagnosis in 14/82 patients (17%), with a median duration of seven (IQR three to 12) months. Surgery was performed for a suspected benign tumour in 88 patients (74%). Resection was incomplete in 45/71 cases (63%); re-excision was performed in 32/45 (71%). At a median follow-up of 26 months, 26/118 patients (22%) developed recurrent disease; median time to recurrence was 15 months (IQR seven to 26). Actuarial relapse-free survival (RFS) at one, three and five years was 93%, 72% and 67%, respectively. At univariate analysis, only symptom duration of six months or less was significantly associated with a worse RFS (p = 0.046). Metastatic disease to lymph nodes and/or lungs was observed in four patients (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicopathological findings confirm the low-grade nature of MIFS. However, local recurrence occurs, and patients may be affected by aggressive forms with a potential for distant metastases. Follow-up is strongly advised.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Sarcoma/epidemiología , Sarcoma/secundario , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Adulto , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
11.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(14)2023 Jul 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37510093

RESUMEN

CT-guided bone biopsies are currently the diagnostic tool of choice for histopathological (and microbiological) diagnoses of skeletal lesions. Several research works have well-demonstrated their safety and feasibility in almost all skeletal regions. This comprehensive review article aims at summarizing the general concepts in regard to bone biopsy procedures, current clinical indications, the feasibility and the diagnostic yield in different skeletal sites, particularly in the most delicate and difficult-to-reach ones. The choice of the correct imaging guidance and factors affecting the diagnostic rate, as well as possible complications, will also be discussed. Since the diagnostic yield, technical difficulties, and complications risk of a CT-guided bone biopsy significantly vary depending on the different skeletal sites, subdivided analyses of different anatomical sites are provided. The information included in the current review article may be useful for clinicians assisting patients with possible bone neoplasms, as well as radiologists involved in the imaging diagnoses of skeletal lesions and/or in performing bone biopsies.

12.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(10)2023 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37238257

RESUMEN

While nowadays, CT-guided bone biopsy represents the gold standard tool for histopathological and microbiological diagnosis of skeletal lesions, the role of US-guided bone biopsy has not yet been fully explored. US-guided biopsy offers several advantages, such as the absence of ionizing radiation, fast acquisition time, as well as good intra-lesional echo, and structural and vascular characterization. Despite that, a consensus in regard to its applications in bone neoplasms has not been established. Indeed CT-guided technique (or fluoroscopic ones) still represents the standard choice in clinical practice. This review article aims to review the literature data about US-guided bone biopsy, underlying clinical-radiological indications, advantages of the procedure and future perspectives. Bone lesions taking the best advantages of the US-guided biopsy are osteolytic, determining the erosion of the overlying bone cortex and/or with an extraosseous soft-tissue component. Indeed, osteolytic lesions with extra-skeletal soft-tissue involvement represent a clear indication for US-guided biopsy. Moreover, even lytic bone lesions with cortical thinning and/or cortical disruption, especially located in the extremities or pelvis, can be safely sampled with US guidance with very good diagnostic yield. US-guided bone biopsy is proven to be fast, effective and safe. Additionally, it offers real-time needle evaluation, an advantage when compared to CT-guided bone biopsy. In the current clinical settings, it seems relevant to select the exact eligibility criteria for this imaging guidance since the effectiveness can vary depending on the type of lesion and body site involved.

13.
Clin Pract ; 13(6): 1369-1382, 2023 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37987424

RESUMEN

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is an extremely rare and aggressive soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) subtype with poor prognosis and limited response to radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Prompt recognition and referral to sarcoma centers for appropriate management are crucial for patients' survival. The purpose of this study was to report ASPS pre-treatment imaging features and to examine the existing literature on this topic. Twelve patients (7 women, 5 men-mean age 27.1 ± 10.7 years) were included from our single-center experience. Ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) available were reviewed according to an analysis grid incorporating features from the latest research on STS. Clinical, histological, and outcome data were collected. MRI was available in 10 patients (83.3%), US in 7 patients (58.3%), and CT in 3 patients (25%). Mean longest tumor diameter was 7.6 ± 2.9 cm, and all tumors were deeply seated. Large peritumoral feeding vessels were systematically found and identified on ultrasonography (7/7), MRI (10/10), and CT (3/3). US revealed a well-defined heterogeneous hypoechoic pattern, with abundant flow signals in all patients (7/7). In all patients, MRI showed mildly high signal intensity (SI) on T1-WI and high SI on T2-WI and peritumoral edema. Moreover, flow-voids (due to arteriosus high-flow) into the peritumoral/intratumoral feeding vessels were detected in the MRI fluid-sensitive sequences of all patients. At baseline, whole-body contrast-enhanced CT revealed metastases in 8/12 (66.7%) patients. A pre-treatment longest diameter > 5 cm was significantly associated with distant metastases at diagnosis (p = 0.01). A maximum diameter > 5 cm represents a risk of metastatic disease at diagnosis (odds ratio = 45.0000 (95% CI: 1.4908-1358.3585), p = 0.0285). In the comprehensive literature review, we found 14 articles (case series or original research) focusing on ASPS imaging, with a total of 151 patients included. Merging our experience with the data from the existing literature, we conclude that the hallmark of ASPS imaging at presentation are the following characteristics: deep location, a slight hyperintense MRI SI on T1-WI and a hyperintense SI on T2-WI, numerous MRI flow voids, high internal vascularization, and large peritumoral feeding vessels.

14.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 12(11)2022 Nov 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36428872

RESUMEN

The aim of our study is to report our experience on CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for osteoid osteoma (OO) in children under 4 years of age and to review the literature regarding this atypical, early onset of the disease. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological records of the patients treated with CT-guided RFA for OO at our institution (2006−2021), including those under 4 years of age. Data regarding technical success, clinical success, and biopsy diagnostic yield were collected. Moreover, we performed a literature review including previous articles on early-onset OO. We found only 12 patients that were under 4 years of age (12/842−1.4%) at the time of RFA treatment: 4 F and 8 M, mean age at the time of the treatment 35.3 months (range 22−46 months). The mean follow-up was 22.8 months (range 6−96 months). Technical success was achieved in all cases (12/12). In all patients (12/12), a complete remission of the pain symptoms was achieved at clinical follow-up controls. No recurrence of pain or complications were documented. The histopathological diagnosis was confirmed in 4 patients (4/12−33.3%). Moreover, we found another 9 articles in the literature with a main focus on early-onset OO (<4 years old), with a total of 12 patients included; 6 of those patients (6/12−50%) were treated with CT-guided RFA, with success reported 5 cases (5/6−83.3%). Our series of cases treated at a single institution, together with the existing data from the literature, confirms that CT-guided RFA is effective and safe for the treatment of osteoid osteoma, even in atypical, early onset in children under 4 years of age.

15.
Acad Radiol ; 29(7): 1065-1084, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34548230

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although curative surgery remains the cornerstone of the therapeutic strategy in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS), neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy (NART and NACT, respectively) are increasingly used to improve operability, surgical margins and patient outcome. The best imaging modality for locoregional assessment of STS is MRI but these tumors are mostly evaluated in a qualitative manner. OBJECTIVE: After an overview of the current standard of care regarding treatment for patients with locally advanced STS, this review aims to summarize the principles and limitations of (i) the current methods used to evaluate response to neoadjuvant treatment in clinical practice and clinical trials in STS (RECIST 1.1 and modified Choi criteria), (ii) quantitative MRI sequences (i.e., diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI), and (iii) texture analyses and (delta-) radiomics.


Asunto(s)
Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma/terapia , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Surg Oncol ; 45: 101886, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36442456

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Vascularized fibular autografts (VFA) are used in the oncologic skeletal reconstructions of long bones, alone or combined with massive bone allografts (MBA). Data regarding the role of imaging in assessing these complex skeletal reconstructions are lacking, and have mainly focused on Computed Tomography (CT). Our aim was to evaluate if early conventional radiography (CR) findings are correlated with the outcome of these skeletal reconstructions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent oncologic resection of lower limbs long bones followed by VFA reconstruction were included in this single-center retrospective study. We compared the CR obtained immediately after surgery with the CR at the 6-month control, as well as the CR at 6 months with the CT at 6 months when available. The following scores were assigned to the VFA: 0 (unchanged), 1 (osteopenia-cortical bone thinning), 2 (increase in bone density-cortical thickening). We then investigated whether this score correlated with the implant outcome within 12 months (optimal integration, suboptimal integration, integration requiring further surgery or lack of integration) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses, considering the occurrence of integration and the duration time before the surgical removal of the whole bone reconstruction. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included (32 men [71.1%], mean age 14.6 years), 26 affected by osteosarcoma, 14 by Ewing sarcoma, 3 by adamantinoma and 2 operated for the failure of previous reconstructions for bone sarcoma. VFA changes on 6-month CR were significantly associated with optimal integration of the implants (log-rank P = 0.0137, multivariate Hazard ratio = 7.62, 95% confidence interval = 1.13-51.25). None of the other clinical and surgical features were associated with the implant outcome. The findings on 6-month CR and CT follow-up were not significantly different. CT at 6 months was available in 36 patients (80.0%). CONCLUSION: The assessment of VFA morphological changes on CR performed at 6 months can predict the outcome of the skeletal implant. This data should be considered for clinical decision-making, selecting patients requiring additional images (CT), and possible subsequent revision surgical procedures.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Osteosarcoma , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Autoinjertos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Radiografía , Peroné/diagnóstico por imagen , Peroné/cirugía , Extremidad Inferior , Osteosarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteosarcoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía
17.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 31(1): 56-64, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21150733

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus, although a common site for primary bone sarcomas, finds scant mention in literature as far as options and outcome of reconstruction in the skeletally immature skeleton are concerned. Reconstruction after resection of proximal humeral sarcomas in the immature skeleton poses specific challenges to the surgeon, and there has been a definite evolution of these techniques over the decades. We studied the evolution and compared the outcome of various techniques for such reconstruction over 3 decades at a single institution. METHODS: All 61 children younger than 13 years of age and treated for a primary sarcoma of the proximal humerus at Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, from 1976 to 2006 were studied for techniques of resection and reconstruction, complications, surgical procedures needed during follow up, and functional and radiologic outcomes during and at final follow-up. The functional outcomes after various procedures were compared using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system. RESULTS: A definite trend from amputation in the first decade, to the use of nonbiological reconstruction (endoprostheses, K nail cement spacer) in the second and biological reconstruction (vascular proximal fibula autograft, osteoarticular allograft, and allograft prosthesis composite) in the third decade was seen. There was a trend of improvement in the functional outcome over the 3 decades, although the complication rates and the need for repeated surgical procedures remained a major problem in all the techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of proximal humerus after resection for sarcomas is a challenging task. Although endoprostheses do have a definite role to play in reconstruction of proximal humerus in children, the use of biological techniques in well-selected patients is being carried out more often now than before, as is reflected in this series, with a potentially improved functional outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Retrospective comparative study.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Húmero/cirugía , Osteosarcoma/cirugía , Sarcoma de Ewing/cirugía , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Húmero/patología , Masculino , Osteosarcoma/patología , Prótesis e Implantes , Diseño de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma de Ewing/patología
18.
Curr Med Imaging ; 17(2): 166-178, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32842945

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This article represents a review of the use of image-guided cryotherapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal tumor lesions. Cryotherapy is able to induce a lethal effect on cancer cells through direct and indirect mechanisms. In this manuscript, we combined our experience with that of other authors who have published on this topic in order to provide indications on when to use cryotherapy in musculoskeletal oncology. DISCUSSION: Image-Guided percutaneous cryotherapy is a therapeutic method now widely accepted in the treatment of patients with musculoskeletal tumors. It can be used both for palliative treatments of metastatic bone lesions and for the curative treatment of benign bone tumors, such as osteoid osteoma or osteoblastoma. In the treatment of bone metastases, cryotherapy plays a major role in alleviating or resolving disease-related pain, but it has also been demonstrated that it can have a role in local disease control. In recent years, the use of cryotherapy has also expanded for the treatment of both benign and malignant soft tissue tumors. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous cryotherapy can be considered a safe and effective technique in the treatment of benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumors. Cryotherapy can be considered the first option in benign tumor lesions, such as osteoid osteoma, and a valid alternative to radiofrequency ablation. In the treatment of painful bone metastases, it must be considered secondarily to other standard treatments (radiotherapy, bisphosphonate therapy, and chemotherapy) when they are no longer effective in controlling the disease or when they cannot be repeated (for example, radiotherapy).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Osteoblastoma , Osteoma Osteoide , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Crioterapia , Humanos , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia
19.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 468(2): 581-9, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19727994

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: The grade of chondrosarcoma relates to the likelihood of local recurrence and metastases. Many Grade I chondrosarcomas behave benignly if aggressively, and the question arises regarding whether wide resection is essential to control the disease. We therefore asked whether intralesional surgery also could be extended to Grade I chondrosarcomas without an increase in recurrence. We retrospectively reviewed 31 patients with Grade I chondrosarcomas of the limbs. The minimum followup was 66 months (mean, 157 months; range, 66-296 months). None of the 16 patients treated by resection had recurrences during the followup and two of the 15 patients with intralesional excision had recurrences, both of which resolved with resection of the site involved by the recurrence without progression of the disease. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores averaged 72% in patients treated with wide resection compared with 89% in the 15 patients treated by intralesional surgery. The two recurrences occurred in patients whose radiographs showed thinning of the cortex combined with bone enlargement and marked endosteal scalloping; histologic examination in these two patients also showed a correlation between radiographic aggressiveness and the presence of myxoid areas and hypercellularity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Condrosarcoma/cirugía , Fémur/cirugía , Húmero/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Tibia/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Trasplante Óseo , Condrosarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Condrosarcoma/patología , Legrado , Femenino , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fémur/patología , Humanos , Húmero/diagnóstico por imagen , Húmero/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Osteotomía , Radiografía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Tibia/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
20.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 30(8): 919-27, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21102223

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of distal femur or proximal tibia in growing patients is a challenge for the high rate of complications and limb length discrepancy at the end of growth. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of children affected by high-grade osteosarcoma of the knee region, reconstructed by osteoarticular bone allograft of distal femur, and proximal tibia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients treated for high-grade osteosarcoma, 13 in the distal femur and 12 in the proximal tibia. The mean follow-up was 124 months. Clinical and radiologic evaluation was carried out in the 20 long-term survivors with a minimum follow-up of 7 years from surgery. The rates of survival of the implants were estimated with use of the Kaplan-Meier method. Functional and radiographic evaluation was done according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system at the time of the latest follow-up in all the patients that still had the allograft. RESULTS: Five patients died during the first 2 years of follow-up for disease-related causes. Of the remaining 20 osteoarticular allografts (10 of the distal femur and 10 of the proximal tibia), 12 failed: 4 in the distal femur and 8 in the proximal tibia. All the failures were related to a graft fracture, but in 4 patients with subchondral collapse the graft was maintained and converted into an allograft prosthetic composite. No deep infection of the primary reconstruction was observed. The overall rate of allograft survival was 70% at 5 years and 58% at 10 years in the distal femur, and 45% at 5 years and 20% at 10 years in the proximal tibia. At final follow-up, 8 patients still walked on the primary implant, 6 in the distal femur, and 2 in the proximal tibia. The functional outcome of these patients was evaluated as good in 5 patients (3 with distal femoral and 2 with proximal tibial allograft), and poor in 3. CONCLUSIONS: Although mechanical complications significantly affect the outcome, osteoarticular allografts may represent a viable option for reconstruction in children older than 8 with high-grade sarcomas about the knee. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Fémur/trasplante , Articulación de la Rodilla , Osteosarcoma/cirugía , Tibia/trasplante , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA