RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Controversy remains regarding the appropriate screening for intracranial aneurysms or for the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) for patients without known high-risk factors for rupture. This study aimed to assess how sex affects both aSAH presentation and outcomes for aSAH treatment. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients treated at a single institution for an aSAH during a 12-year period (August 1, 2007-July 31, 2019). An analysis of women with and without high-risk factors was performed, including a propensity adjustment for a poor neurologic outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score > 2) at follow-up. RESULTS: Data from 1014 patients were analyzed (69% [n = 703] women). Women were significantly older than men (mean ± SD, 56.6 ± 14.1 years vs 53.4 ± 14.2 years, p < 0.001). A significantly lower percentage of women than men had a history of tobacco use (36.6% [n = 257] vs 46% [n = 143], p = 0.005). A significantly higher percentage of women than men had no high-risk factors for aSAH (10% [n = 70] vs 5% [n = 16], p = 0.01). The percentage of women with an mRS score > 2 at the last follow-up was significantly lower among those without high-risk factors (34%, 24/70) versus those with high-risk factors (53%, 334/633) (p = 0.004). Subsequent propensity-adjusted analysis (adjusted for age, Hunt and Hess grade, and Fisher grade) found no statistically significant difference in the odds of a poor outcome for women with or without high-risk factors for aSAH (OR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.4-1.2, p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: A higher percentage of women versus men with aSAH had no known high-risk factors for rupture, supporting more aggressive screening and management of women with unruptured aneurysms.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Intracraneal , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/epidemiología , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Caracteres Sexuales , Aneurisma Intracraneal/complicaciones , Aneurisma Intracraneal/diagnóstico , Aneurisma Intracraneal/epidemiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Optimal definitive treatment timing for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains controversial. We compared outcomes for aSAH patients with ultra-early treatment versus later treatment at a single large center. METHOD: Patients who received definitive open surgical or endovascular treatment for aSAH between January 1, 2014, and July 31, 2019, were included. Ultra-early treatment was defined as occurring within 24 h from aneurysm rupture. The primary outcome was poor neurologic outcome (modified Rankin Scale score > 2). Propensity adjustment was performed for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Hunt and Hess grade, Fisher grade, aneurysm treatment type, aneurysm type, size, and anterior location. RESULTS: Of the 1013 patients (mean [SD] age, 56 [14] years; 702 [69%] women, 311 [31%] men) included, 94 (9%) had ultra-early treatment. Compared with the non-ultra-early cohort, the ultra-early treatment cohort had a significantly lower percentage of saccular aneurysms (53 of 94 [56%] vs 746 of 919 [81%], P <0 .001), greater frequency of open surgical treatment (72 of 94 [77%] vs 523 of 919 [57%], P <0 .001), and greater percentage of men (38 of 94 [40%] vs 273 of 919 [30%], P = .04). After adjustment, ultra-early treatment was not associated with neurologic outcome in those with at least 180-day follow-up (OR = 0.86), the occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia (OR = 0.87), or length of stay (exp(ß), 0.13) (P ≥ 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: In a large, single-center cohort of aSAH patients, ultra-early treatment was not associated with better neurologic outcome, fewer cases of delayed cerebral ischemia, or shorter length of stay.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Roto , Isquemia Encefálica , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aneurisma Roto/diagnóstico , Aneurisma Roto/cirugía , Infarto Cerebral , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The incidence and severity of stroke are disproportionately greater among Black patients. In this study, the authors sought to examine clinical outcomes among Black versus White patients after mechanical thrombectomy for stroke at a single US institution. METHODS: All patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy at a single center from January 1, 2014, through March 31, 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were grouped based on race, and demographic characteristics, preexisting conditions, clinical presentation, treatment, and stroke outcomes were compared. The association of race with mortality was analyzed in multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: In total, 401 patients (233 males) with a reported race of Black (n = 28) or White (n = 373) underwent mechanical thrombectomy during the study period. Tobacco use was more prevalent among Black patients (43% vs 24%, p = 0.04), but there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to insurance, coronary artery disease, diabetes, illicit drug use, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia. The mean time from stroke onset to hospital presentation was significantly greater among Black patients (604.6 vs 333.4 minutes) (p = 0.007). There were no differences in fluoroscopy time, procedural success (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 2b or 3), hospital length of stay, or prevalence of hemicraniectomy. In multivariable analysis, Black race was strongly associated with higher mortality (32.1% vs 14.5%, p = 0.01). The disparity in mortality rates resolved after adjusting for the average time from stroke onset to presentation (p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Black race was associated with an increased risk of death after mechanical thrombectomy for stroke. The increased risk may be associated with access-related factors, including delayed presentation to stroke centers.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Trombectomía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment of small ruptured aneurysms (SRAs) remains controversial, with literature reporting difficulty with endovascular versus microsurgical approaches. This paper analyzes outcomes after endovascular coiling and microsurgical clipping among patients with SRAs prospectively enrolled in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial (BRAT). METHOD: All BRAT patients were included in this study. Patient demographics, aneurysm size, aneurysm characteristics, procedure-related complications, and outcomes at discharge and at 1-year and 6-year follow-up were evaluated. A modified Rankin scale (mRS) score > 2 was considered a poor outcome. RESULTS: Of 73 patients with SRAs, 40 were initially randomly assigned to endovascular coiling and 33 to microsurgical clipping. The rate of treatment crossover was significantly different between coiling and clipping; 25 patients who were assigned to coiling crossed over to clipping, and no clipping patients crossed over to coiling (P < 0.001). Among SRA patients, 15 underwent coiling and 58 underwent clipping; groups did not differ significantly in demographic characteristics or aneurysm type (P ≥ 0.11). Mean aneurysm diameter was significantly greater in the endovascular group (3.0 ± 0.3 vs 2.6 ± 0.6; P = 0.02). The incidence of procedure-related complications was similar for endovascular and microsurgical treatments (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.0 [0.1-10.0], P = 0.98). Both groups had comparable overall outcome (mRS score > 2) at discharge and 1-year and 6-year follow-up (P = 0.48 and 0.73, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Most SRA patients in the BRAT underwent surgical clipping, with a high rate of crossover from endovascular approaches. Endovascular treatment was equivalent to surgical clipping with regard to procedure-related complications and neurologic outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Roto/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Intracraneal/cirugía , Microcirugia/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Outcomes for octogenarians and nonagenarians after an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are particularly ominous, with mortality rates well above 50%. The present analysis examines the neurologic outcomes of patients ≥ 80 years of age treated for aSAH. METHOD: A retrospective review was performed of all aSAH patients treated at Barrow Neurological Institute from January 1, 2003, to July 31, 2019. Patients were placed in 2 groups by age, < 80 vs ≥ 80 years. The ≥ 80-year-old group of octogenarians and nonagenarians was subsequently analyzed to compare treatment modalities. Poor neurologic outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of > 2. RESULTS: During the study period, 1418 patients were treated for aSAH. The mean (standard deviation) age was 55.1 (13.6) years, the mean follow-up was 24.6 (40.0) months, and the rate of functional independence (mRS 0-2) at follow-up was 54% (751/1395). Logistic regression analysis found increasing age strongly associated with declining functional independence (R2 = 0.929, p < 0.001). Forty-three patients ≥ 80 years old were significantly more likely to be managed endovascularly than with open microsurgery (67% [n = 29] vs 33% [n = 14], p < 0.001). Compared with younger patients, those ≥ 80 years old had an increased risk of mortality and poor neurologic outcomes at follow-up. In the ≥ 80-year-old group, only 4 patients had good outcomes; none of the 4 had preexisting comorbidities, and all 4 were treated endovascularly. CONCLUSIONS: Age is a significant prognostic indicator of functional outcomes and mortality after aSAH. Most octogenarians and nonagenarians with aSAH will become severely disabled or die.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Subaracnoidea , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background and Purpose- The CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial) demonstrated equivalent composite outcomes between carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) for treating carotid stenosis. We investigated nationwide trends in these procedures and associated periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction, death, cost, and readmission rates since CREST outcomes were published. Methods- We queried the Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify patients undergoing CEA and CAS for asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis from 2010 to 2015. Patients were matched based on demographics, comorbidities, and severity of illness. Results- In total, 378 354 CEA and 57 273 CAS patients were treated during this 6-year period. CEA volume decreased by an average of 2669 procedures annually (P=0.001) with stable CAS volume (P=0.225). After matching, CEA patients had a higher rate of periprocedural stroke than CAS patients, driven by increased stroke risk in symptomatic CEA patients (8.1% versus 5.6%; odds ratio, 1.47 [CI, 1.29-1.68]; P<0.001) but a lower rate of overall inpatient mortality (0.8% versus 1.4%; odds ratio, 0.57 [CI, 0.48-0.68]; P<0.001). CEA patients were less likely to be readmitted within 30 days (7.2% versus 8.0%; odds ratio, 0.90 [CI, 0.84-0.96]; P=0.018) and 90 days (12.3% versus 14.1%; odds ratio, 0.86 [CI, 0.81-0.90]; P<0.001), and mean hospital costs were lower for CEA compared with CAS ($14 433 versus $19 172; P<0.001). Conclusions- The procedural treatment of carotid stenosis has changed dramatically in the post-CREST era. When matched for characteristics and illness severity, patients undergoing CEA had a higher rate of perioperative stroke than patients undergoing CAS, primarily among symptomatic patients. These findings are in contrast to the findings of CREST, which showed nearly twice the risk of stroke in CAS patients compared with CEA patients. CEA was associated with lower procedure cost and readmission rate.
Asunto(s)
Arterias Carótidas/cirugía , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea/tendencias , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angioplastia/métodos , Arteria Carótida Común/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Stents/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Several institutions recently published their experiences with unplanned readmissions rates after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary lesions. Readmission rates on a national level, however, have not been explored in depth. We investigated nationwide trends in this procedure and associated independent predictors, costs, and causes of 30-day readmission. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify patients 18 and older who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary lesion resection (2010-2015). National trends and statistical variances were calculated based on weighted, clustered, and stratified sample means. RESULTS: Of the weighted total of 44,759 patients treated over the 6-year period, 4658 (10.4%) were readmitted within 30 days. Readmission rates did not change across the survey period (P = 0.71). Patients readmitted had a higher prevalence of comorbidities than those not readmitted (82.5% vs. 78.4%, respectively, P < 0.001), experienced more postoperative complications (47.2% vs. 31.8%, P < 0.001), and had a longer length of stay (6.59 vs. 4.23 days, P < 0.001) during index admission. The most common causes for readmission were SIADH (17.5%) and other hyponatremia (16.4%). Average total readmission cost was $12,080 with no significant trend across the study period (P = 0.25). Predictors for readmission identified included diabetes mellitus, psychological disorders, renal failure, and experiencing diabetes insipidus during the index admission. CONCLUSION: Unplanned readmission is an important quality metric. While transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is a relatively safe procedure, 30-day readmission rates and costs have not declined. Future studies on institutional protocols targeting these identified predictors to prevent readmission are necessary to decrease readmission rates on a national scale.
Asunto(s)
Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades de la Hipófisis/cirugía , Hipófisis/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Hiponatremia/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Patients who undergo transsphenoidal surgery can experience hormonal, electrolyte, and fluid disturbances in the postoperative period leading to outpatient readmissions for medical management. Our goal was to determine whether use of a wrist-mounted physiologic tracking device is feasible in this setting and whether changes or trends in these parameters after discharge can help predict aberrant physiology in these patients. METHODS: Wrist-mounted physiologic tracking devices that transmit data via Bluetooth to a mobile device were used to monitor patients. Preoperative baseline data and postoperative data were aggregated daily to compare within-patient and between-patient trends. RESULTS: Of 11 patients enrolled in the study, 1 was readmitted for symptomatic hyponatremia. Device data completeness ranged from 78 to 93% with the exception of oxygen saturation (25% completeness). The patient with hyponatremia had a significantly lower baseline level of activity compared with other patients. Nonreadmitted patient activity variables (steps, calories, and distance) decreased by 48-52% after the operation (P < 0.001). The activity variables for the patient with hyponatremia were statistically unchanged after the operation; however, the patient did experience a significant decrease in heart rate compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: Deployment of a wrist-based physiologic tracking device is feasible for surgical patients in elective clinical practice. Overall, the device was associated with good patient adherence and high patient satisfaction. Patient activity significantly decreased after surgery. A significant decrease in heart rate was detected in a patient with hyponatremia who required readmission, which reflects the known intravascular volume expansion in this state.
Asunto(s)
Hiponatremia/diagnóstico , Monitoreo Ambulatorio/métodos , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/diagnóstico , Seno Esfenoidal/patología , Muñeca , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Hiponatremia/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Periodo Posoperatorio , Seno Esfenoidal/cirugía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Venous interruption through surgical clip ligation is the gold standard treatment for ethmoidal dural arteriovenous fistula (e-dAVF). Their malignant natural history is attributable to the higher predilection for retrograde cortical venous drainage. This video illustrates an e-dAVF in a 70-year-old man with progressive tinnitus and headache. Angiogram revealed bilateral e-dAVFs (Borden III-Cognard III) with one fistula draining into cavernous sinus and another to the sagittal sinus. A bifrontal craniotomy was utilized for venous interruption of both e-dAVFs. Postoperative angiography confirmed curative obliteration with no postoperative anosmia. Bilateral e-dAVFs are rare but can be safely treated simultaneously through a single craniotomy.The video can be found here: https://youtu.be/666edwKHGKc.
Asunto(s)
Seno Cavernoso/cirugía , Malformaciones Vasculares del Sistema Nervioso Central/cirugía , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Anciano , Malformaciones Vasculares del Sistema Nervioso Central/diagnóstico , Craneotomía/métodos , Humanos , Ligadura/métodos , Masculino , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/prevención & control , Fumar Marihuana/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Isquemia Encefálica/etiología , Constricción Patológica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mitocondrias/patología , Estrés Oxidativo , Puntaje de Propensión , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe an intuitive and useful method for measuring the global impact of a medical scholar's research ideas by examining cross-border citations (CBCs) of peer-reviewed neurosurgical publications. METHODS: Publication and citation data for a random sample of the top 50 most academically productive neurosurgeons were obtained from Scopus Application Programming Interface. We characterized an author-level global impact index analogous to the widely used h-index, the hglobal-index, defined as the number of published peer-reviewed manuscripts with at least the same number of CBCs. To uncover socioeconomic insights, we explored the hglobal-index for high-, middle-, and low-income countries. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) number of publications and CBCs were 144 (62-255) and 2704 (959-5325), respectively. The median (interquartile range) h-index and hglobal-index were 42 (23-61) and 32 (17-38), respectively. Compared with neurosurgeons in the random sample, the 3 global neurosurgeons had the highest hglobal-indices in low-income countries at 17, 13, and 9, despite below-average h-index scores of 33, 38, and 19, respectively. CONCLUSION: This intuitive update to the h-index uses CBCs to measure the global impact of scientific research. The hglobal-index may provide insight into global diffusion of medical ideas, which can be used for social science research, author self-assessment, and academic promotion.
Asunto(s)
Neurocirugia , Humanos , Neurocirugia/métodos , Publicaciones , Países en Desarrollo , Neurocirujanos , BibliometríaRESUMEN
Flow diversion is a unique interventional tool with evolving roles in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.1 Although flow diversion strategies can be highly effective in appropriately selected patients, their off-label use is controversial. As flow diversion indications have expanded, so has the incidence of treatment failure, resulting in an evolving subgroup of patients with atypical lesions that require complex salvage strategies, such as cerebrovascular bypass.2,3 We report a residual dolichoectatic superior cerebellar artery aneurysm in which flow diversion failed, which was treated through superficial temporal artery to superior cerebellar artery bypass.4,5 Being a single case report, institutional review board approval was not needed. Patient consent was obtained. Used with permission from Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Microsurgical resection is the only curative intervention for symptomatic brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCMs), but the management of these lesions in older adults (≥65 years) is not well described. This study sought to address this gap by examining the safety and efficacy of BSCM resection in a cohort of older adults. METHODS: Records of patients who underwent BSCM resection over a 30-year period were reviewed retrospectively. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between older (≥65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients. RESULTS: Of 550 patients with BSCM who met inclusion criteria, 41 (7.5%) were older than 65 years. Midbrain (43.9% vs 26.1%) and medullary lesions (19.5% vs 13.6%) were more common in the older cohort than in the younger cohort ( P = .01). Components of the Lawton BSCM grading system (ie, lesion size, crossing axial midpoint, developmental venous anomaly, and timing of hemorrhage) were not significantly different between cohorts ( P ≥ .11). Mean (SD) Elixhauser comorbidity score was significantly higher in older patients (1.86 [1.06]) than in younger patients (0.66 [0.95]; P < .001). Older patients were significantly more likely than younger patients to have poor outcomes at final follow-up (28.9% vs 13.8%, P = .01; mean follow-up duration, 28.7 [39.1] months). However, regarding relative neurological outcome (preoperative modified Rankin Scale to final modified Rankin Scale), rate of worsening was not significantly different between older and younger patients (23.7% vs 14.9%, P = .15). CONCLUSION: BSCMs can be safely resected in older patients, and when each patient's unique health status and life expectancy are taken into account, these patients can have outcomes similar to younger patients.
Asunto(s)
Hemangioma Cavernoso del Sistema Nervioso Central , Microcirugia , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Microcirugia/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemangioma Cavernoso del Sistema Nervioso Central/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Neoplasias del Tronco Encefálico/cirugía , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Tronco Encefálico/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Edad , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preoperative embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains controversial. This study sought to analyze the cost-effectiveness of preoperative embolization of AVMs. METHODS: Patients who underwent AVM resection at a single institute (January 1, 2015-December 31, 2020) were analyzed. Patients with preoperative embolization (embolization cohort) were compared with those without preoperative embolization (nonembolization cohort). Cost-effectiveness score (CE) was the primary outcome of interest and was determined by dividing the total 1-year cost by effectiveness, which was derived from a validated preoperative to last follow-up change in the modified Rankin Scale utility score. A lower CE signifies a more cost-effective treatment strategy. RESULTS: Of 188 patients, 88 (47%) underwent preoperative embolization. The mean (SD) total cost was higher in the embolization group than in the nonembolization group ($117 594 [$102 295] vs $84 348 [$82 326]; P < .001). The mean (SD) CE was higher in the embolization cohort ($336 476 [$1 303 842]) than in the nonembolization cohort ($100 237 [$246 255]; P < .001). Among patients with Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade I and II AVMs, the mean (SD) CE was higher in the embolization (n = 40) than in the nonembolization (n = 72) cohort ($164 950 [$348 286] vs $69 021 [$114 938]; P = .004). Among patients with SM grade III AVMs, the mean (SD) CE was lower in the embolization (n = 33) than in the nonembolization (n = 25) cohort ($151 577 [$219 130] vs $189 195 [$446 335]; P = .006). The mean (SD) CE was not significantly different between cohorts among patients with higher-grade AVMs (embolization cohort [n = 3] vs nonembolization cohort [n = 15]: $503 639 [$776 492] vs $2 048 419 [$4 794 758]; P = .49). The mean CE for embolized SM grade III aneurysms was nonsignificant in the ruptured group; however, for the unruptured group, CE was significantly higher in the embolization cohort (n = 26; $160 871 [$240 535]) relative to the nonembolization cohort (n = 15; $108 152 [$166 446]) ( P = .006). CONCLUSION: Preoperative embolization was cost-effective for patients with SM grade III AVMs but not for patients with lower-grade AVMs.
Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The timing of surgical resection is controversial when managing ruptured arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and varies considerably among centers. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze clinical outcomes and hospital costs associated with delayed treatment in a ruptured cerebral AVM patient cohort. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgical treatment for a ruptured cerebral AVM (January 1, 2015-December 31, 2020) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent emergent treatment of a ruptured AVM because of acute herniation were excluded, as were those treated >180 days after rupture. Patients were stratified by the timing of surgical intervention relative to AVM rupture into early (postbleed days 1-20) and delayed (postbleed days 21-180) treatment cohorts. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were identified. The early treatment cohort comprised 75 (86%) patients. The mean (SD) length of time between AVM rupture and surgical resection was 5 (5) days in the early cohort and 73 (60) days in the delayed cohort ( P < .001). The cohorts did not differ with respect to patient demographics, AVM size, Spetzler-Martin grade, frequency of preoperative embolization, or severity of clinical presentation ( P ≥ .15). Follow-up neurological status was equivalent between the cohorts ( P = .65). The associated mean health care costs were higher in the delayed treatment cohort ($241 597 [$99 363]) than in the early treatment cohort ($133 989 [$110 947]) ( P = .02). After adjustment for length of stay, each day of delayed treatment increased cost by a mean of $2465 (95% CI = $967-$3964, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Early treatment of ruptured AVMs was associated with significantly lower health care costs than delayed treatment, but surgical and neurological outcomes were equivalent.
Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rotura , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/cirugía , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/complicaciones , Radiocirugia/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Disorders of consciousness impair early recovery after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Modafinil, a wakefulness-promoting agent, is efficacious for treating fatigue in stroke survivors, but data pertaining to its use in the acute setting are scarce. This study sought to assess the effects of modafinil use on mental status after aSAH. METHODS: Modafinil timing and dosage, neurological examination, intubation status, and physical and occupational therapy participation were documented. Repeated-measures paired tests were used for a before-after analysis of modafinil recipients. Propensity score matching (1:1 nearest neighbor) for modafinil and no-modafinil cohorts was used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: Modafinil (100-200 mg/day) was administered to 21% (88/422) of aSAH patients for a median (IQR) duration of 10.5 (4-16) days and initiated 14 (7-17) days after aSAH. Improvement in mentation (alertness, orientation, or Glasgow Coma Scale score) was documented in 87.5% (77/88) of modafinil recipients within 72 hours and 86.4% (76/88) at discharge. Of 37 intubated patients, 10 (27%) were extubated within 72 hours after modafinil initiation. Physical and occupational therapy teams noted increased alertness or participation in 47 of 56 modafinil patients (83.9%). After propensity score matching for baseline covariates, the modafinil cohort had a greater mean (SD) change in Glasgow Coma Scale score than the no-modafinil cohort at discharge (2.2 [4.0] vs. -0.2 [6.32], P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A temporal relationship with improvement in mental status was noted for most patients administered modafinil after aSAH. These findings, a favorable adverse-effect profile, and implications for goals-of-care decisions favor a low threshold for modafinil initiation in aSAH patients in the acute-care setting.
Asunto(s)
Modafinilo , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea , Promotores de la Vigilia , Humanos , Modafinilo/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/complicaciones , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/uso terapéutico , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown an association between surgical treatment volume and improved quality metrics. This study evaluated nationwide results in carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedural readmission rates, costs, and length of stay based on hospital treatment volume. METHODS: We used the Nationwide Readmissions Database for carotid stenosis from 2010 to 2015. Patients receiving CAS were matched based on demographics, illness severity, and relevant comorbidities. Patients were matched 1:1 between low- and high-volume centers using a non-parametric preprocessing matching program to adjust for parametric causal inferences. Nearest-neighbor propensity score matching was performed using logit distance. RESULTS: Low- and high-volume centers admitted a mean (SD) of 4.68 (3.79) and 25.10 (16.86) patients undergoing CAS per hospital, respectively. Comorbidities were significantly different and initially could not be adequately matched. Because of significant differences in baseline patient population characteristics after attempted matching between low- and high-volume centers, we used propensity adjustment with multivariate analysis. Using this alternative approach, no significant differences were observed between low- and high-volume centers for the presence of any complication, postoperative stroke, postoperative myocardial infarction, and readmission at 30 days. CONCLUSION: In 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching with a high number of patients, our analysis did not result in well-matched cohorts for the effect of case volume on outcomes. Comparing analytical techniques for various outcomes highlights that outcome disparities may not be related to quality differences based on hospital size, but rather variability in patient populations between low- and high-volume institutions.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Estenosis Carotídea/epidemiología , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Stents/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Arterias Carótidas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transradial artery access (TRA) for neurointerventional procedures is gaining widespread acceptance. However, complications that were previously rare may arise as TRA procedures increase. Here we report a series of retained catheter cases with a literature review. METHODS: All patients who underwent a neurointerventional procedure during a 23-month period at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed for a retained catheter in TRA cases. In cases of retained catheters, imaging was reviewed for anatomical variances in the radial artery, and clinical and demographic case details were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1386 nondiagnostic neurointerventional procedures were performed during the study period, 631 (46%) initially via TRA. The 631 TRA cases were performed for aneurysm embolization (n=221, 35%), mechanical thrombectomy (n=116, 18%), carotid stent/angioplasty (n=40, 6%), arteriovenous malformation embolization (n=38, 6%), and other reasons (n=216, 34%). Thirty-nine (6%) TRA procedures crossed over to femoral access, most commonly because the artery of interest could not be catheterized (26/39, 67%). A retained catheter was identified in five cases (1%), and one (0.2%) patient had an entrapped catheter that was recovered. All six patients with a retained or entrapped catheter had aberrant radial anatomy. CONCLUSION: Retained catheters for neurointerventional procedures performed via TRA are rare. However, this complication may be associated with variant radial anatomy. With the increased use of TRA for neurointerventional procedures, awareness of anatomical abnormalities that may lead to a retained catheter is necessary. We propose a simple protocol to avoid catheter entrapment, including in emergent situations such as TRA for stroke thrombectomy.
Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Radial/cirugía , Cateterismo , Catéteres/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) contributes significant morbidity and mortality after brain aneurysm rupture. However, the association between vascular territory of vasospasm and clinical outcome has not been studied. We present a hypothesis-generating study to determine whether the location of vasospasm within the intracranial circulation is associated with functional outcome after SAH. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospective, intention-to-treat trial for aneurysmal SAH was performed to supplement trial outcomes with in-hospital angiographic imaging and treatment variables regarding vasospasm. The location of vasospasm and the position on the vessel (distal vs proximal) were evaluated. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) outcomes were assessed at discharge and 6 months, and predictive models were constructed. RESULTS: A total of 406 patients were included, 341 with follow-up data at 6 months. At discharge, left-sided vasospasm was associated with poor outcome (odds ratio (OR), 2.37; 95% CI, 1.25 to 4.66; P=0.01). At 6 months, anterior cerebral artery (ACA) vasospasm (OR, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.29 to 11.88; P=0.02) and basilar artery (BA) vasospasm (OR, 6.22; 95% CI, 1.54 to 27.11; P=0.01) were associated with poor outcome after adjustment. A model predicting 6-month mRS score and incorporating vasospasm variables achieved an area under the curve of 0.85 and a net improvement in reclassification of 13.2% (P<0.01) compared with a previously validated predictive model for aneurysmal SAH. CONCLUSIONS: In aneurysmal SAH, left-sided vasospasm is associated with worse discharge functional status. At 6 months, both ACA and BA vasospasm are associated with unfavorable functional status.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Intracraneal , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea , Vasoespasmo Intracraneal , Humanos , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/complicaciones , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vasoespasmo Intracraneal/etiología , Vasoespasmo Intracraneal/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Aneurisma Intracraneal/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The main treatment for moyamoya disease (MMD) is revascularization surgery. Most bypasses use the superficial temporal artery (STA) as the donor vessel. However, even if the STA-middle cerebral artery (MCA) bypass is functioning, the affected hemisphere can continue to be symptomatically malperfused. We sought to assess the efficacy of salvage direct revascularization surgery using the occipital artery (OA) as a donor vessel in patients with ischemic MMD who experience continued cerebral malperfusion despite previous successful STA-MCA bypass. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the cerebrovascular databases of 2 surgeons and described patients in whom the OA was used as the donor vessel for direct revascularization. RESULTS: Seven patients were included (5 women). Previous STA-MCA bypasses were direct (n = 2), indirect (n = 3), or combined/multiple (n = 2). The mean (SD) interval between STA-MCA and OA-MCA procedures was 29.2 (13.1) months. Despite an intact STA-MCA bypass in all 7 cases, all 7 patients had recurrent symptoms and demonstrated residual impaired cerebral perfusion. All 7 patients underwent successful OA-MCA direct revascularization. Follow-up perfusion imaging was obtained for 6 of 7 patients. All 6 of these patients demonstrated improved cerebral blood flow to the revascularized hemispheres. All 7 patients demonstrated clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ischemic MMD who have continued symptoms and cerebral malperfusion despite previous successful STA-MCA bypass present a challenging clinical scenario. Our series highlights the potential utility of the OA-MCA direct bypass as a salvage therapy for these patients.