RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Data from recently trials have provided practice-changing recommendations in management of the axilla in early breast cancer (eBC). However, further controversies have been raised, resulting in heterogeneous diffusion of these recommendations. Our purpose was to obtain a better homogeneity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2021, the Tuscan Breast Network (TBN) established a consensus with the aim to update recommendations in this area. We performed a literature review on axillary management in eBC patients which led to an expert Delphi consensus aiming to explore the gray areas, build consensus and propose evidence-based suggestions for an appropriate management. Thereafter, we investigate their implementation in clinical practice. RESULTS: (1) DCIS patients should have SLN biopsy only in case of mastectomy or in conservative surgery if tumor is in a location that would preclude future nodal sampling or in case of a mass; (2) ALND may be omitted for 1-2 positive SLN patients undergoing BCS in T1-2 tumors with 1-2 SLN positive, eligible for whole-breast irradiation and adjuvant systemic therapies; (3) consider the option of RNI in patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes and one or more high-risk characteristics; (4) the population identified in 2) should NOT undergo lymph node irradiation as an alternative to axillary surgery and (5) patients with clinically (pre-operatively) positive axilla, or undergoing primary systemic therapy, or outside the criteria reported in 2) must receive additional ALND and/or RT as per local policy. CONCLUSION: This consensus provided a practical tool to stimulate local and national breast surgical and radiotherapy protocols.
Asunto(s)
Axila , Neoplasias de la Mama , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Femenino , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Italia , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Consenso , Metástasis Linfática , MastectomíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is highly prevalent in middle-aged or elderly patients. Eribulin is a nontaxane microtubule inhibitor, approved for the treatment of pretreated MBC. This multicentric study (sponsored by GIOGer, Italian Group for Geriatric Oncology) was designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of eribulin, according to parameters usually used in geriatric oncology. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: An observational study was conducted on 50 consecutive elderly patients with MBC. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the change in items score of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Italian versions of the CGA and HRQL questionnaires were administered at baseline, before the third and fifth cycles, and then every three cycles until treatment discontinuation. Secondary endpoints were efficacy and safety. RESULTS: Overall, both EQ-5D scores and EQ-5D-3 L visual analogic scale did not significantly change from baseline; the percentage of subjects without problems doing usual activities tended to decrease during treatment (p for linear trend .018), and the percentage of patients with minor problems performing usual activities tended to increase (p for linear trend.012). Among CGA items, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living tended to decrease during treatment and Geriatric Depression Scale tended to increase. After 12 months follow-up, 24 patients (out of 47) showed clinical benefits; median progression-free survival was 4.49 months (2.10-10.33) and median OS was 7.31 months (3.70-14.03). The treatment was associated with mild toxicity. CONCLUSION: Eribulin treatment preserved quality of life and geriatric parameters included in the CGA, except for instrumental functioning and geriatric depression, in elderly patients with MBC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: A collaboration between oncologist and geriatric specialists is essential in the management of patients with metastatic breast cancer, who are frequently elderly or frail. The assessment of geriatric parameters in the decision-making process can contribute to direct toward the most appropriate therapeutic plan and preserve the quality of life of patients. Eribulin does not seem to affect quality of life or worsen the overall geriatric status; therefore, it can be considered a suitable option for elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Furanos/administración & dosificación , Cetonas/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Moduladores de Tubulina/administración & dosificación , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Furanos/efectos adversos , Evaluación Geriátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia , Cetonas/efectos adversos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Moduladores de Tubulina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
AIMS: To explore the cardiac safety of adjuvant Non-Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (NPL-DOX) plus Cyclophosphamide (CTX) followed by weekly Paclitaxel, in elderly women (≥ 65 years) with high-risk breast cancer. Previously, we described no symptomatic cardiac events within the first 12 months from starting treatment. We now reported the updated results after a median follow-up 76 months. METHODS: The cardiac activity was evaluated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) echocardiograms assessments, before starting chemotherapy and every 6 months, until 30 months from baseline, then yearly for at least 5 years. RESULTS: Forty-seven women were recruited by two Units of Medical Oncology (Ethics Committee authorization CESM-AOUP, 3203/2011; EudraCT identification number: 2010-024067-41, for Pisa and Pontedera Hospitals). An episode of grade 3 CHF (NCI-CTCAE, version 3.0) occurred after 18 months the beginning of chemotherapy. The echocardiograms assessments were performed comparing the LVEF values of each patient evaluated at fixed period of time, compared to baseline. We observed a slight changed in terms of mean values at 48, 60, 72 and 84 months. At these time points, a statistically significant reduction of - 3.2%, - 4.6%, - 6.4% and - 7.1%, respectively, was observed. However, LVEF remained above 50% without translation in any relevant clinical signs. No other cardiac significant episodes were reported. To this analysis, in 13 patients (28%) occurred disease relapse and, of them, 11 (23%) died due to metastatic disease. Eight patients died of cancer-unrelated causes. CONCLUSIONS: The combination including NPL-DOX in elderly patients revealed low rate of cardiac toxic effects. Comparative trials are encouraged.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Doxorrubicina , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Ribociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor and ovarian function suppression is the preferred first-line option for pre-/perimenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. We opened an italian managed access program (MAP) that permitted access to ribociclib to selected patients and allowed to collect informative results on the clinical impact of the therapy. The MAP (April 2018-May 2020) included 64 premenopausal patients, with characteristics similar to those of the MONALEESA-7 trial. Of 57 patients with a known response, 48 (84.2%) achieved a clinical benefit (i.e., complete response, N = 7 (12.3%); partial response, N = 17 (29.8%); stable disease, N = 24 (42.1%)), while 9 (15.8%) experienced tumor progression. Some patients (N = 15-23.4%) needed ribociclib dose reduction because of adverse events. Thereafter, the treatment was well tolerated, and no new safety signals emerged. Our study is the first reported Italian real-world evidence of ribociclib effectiveness in premenopausal HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients. Response and clinical benefit rates were particularly encouraging compared with those of the ribociclib group of MONALEESA-7. Our work confirms that ribociclib in combination with endocrine therapy is highly effective in the treatment of premenopausal HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients with an expected safety profile.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Aromatasa , Neoplasias de la Mama , Aminopiridinas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina , Humanos , Purinas , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ribociclib plus letrozole demonstrated manageable safety and efficacy profiles in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in the Phase 3b CompLEEment-1 trial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ribociclib plus letrozole in the Italian subpopulation with HR+, HER2- ABC from the CompLEEment-1 trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HR+, HER2- ABC received ribociclib (600 mg/day, 3 weeks on/1 week off) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/day) while men and premenopausal women additionally received goserelin. Patients were allowed with ≤ 1 line of prior chemotherapy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 2. The primary outcome included safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Of the 554 Italian patients, 246 (44.4 %) patients completed treatment. The reasons for treatment discontinuation included progressive disease (PD; 36.6 %), adverse events (AEs; 11.9 %), and death (1.6 %). All-grade AEs and grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred in 98.9 % and 77.8 % patients, respectively. The most common treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (73.6 %), followed by leukopenia (32.1 %), and nausea (25.3 %). The overall response rate was 28.2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 24.4-32.1); clinical benefit rate was 71.7 % (95 % CI, 67.7-75.4); and median time to progression was 26.7 months (95 % CI, 24.8-non-estimable). Health-related quality of life scores were maintained during treatment. CONCLUSION: The safety and efficacy profiles of ribociclib plus letrozole in the Italian subpopulation was found to be consistent with the CompLEEment-1 global population result, MONALEESA-2, and MONALEESA-7 outcomes, which reaffirm ribociclib plus letrozole as the frontline treatment option in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION: NCT02941926 (30 November 2016).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Humanos , Femenino , Letrozol/farmacología , Letrozol/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Calidad de Vida , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
To investigate pharmacogenetic interactions among VEGF-A, VEGFR-2, IL-8, HIF-1α, EPAS-1, and TSP-1 SNPs and their role on progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated with bevacizumab plus first-line paclitaxel or with paclitaxel alone. Analyses were performed on germline DNA, and SNPs were investigated by real-time PCR technique. The multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) methodology was applied to investigate the interaction between SNPs. The present study was an explorative, ambidirectional cohort study: 307 patients from 11 Oncology Units were evaluated retrospectively from 2009 to 2016, then followed prospectively (NCT01935102). Two hundred and fifteen patients were treated with paclitaxel and bevacizumab, whereas 92 patients with paclitaxel alone. In the bevacizumab plus paclitaxel group, the MDR software provided two pharmacogenetic interaction profiles consisting of the combination between specific VEGF-A rs833061 and VEGFR-2 rs1870377 genotypes. Median PFS for favorable genetic profile was 16.8 vs. the 10.6 months of unfavorable genetic profile (p = 0.0011). Cox proportional hazards model showed an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.5-0.9; p = 0.004). Median OS for the favorable genetic profile was 39.6 vs. 28 months of unfavorable genetic profile (p = 0.0103). Cox proportional hazards model revealed an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.5-1.01; p = 0.058). In the 92 patients treated with paclitaxel alone, the results showed no effect of the favorable genetic profile, as compared to the unfavorable genetic profile, either on the PFS (p = 0.509) and on the OS (p = 0.732). The pharmacogenetic statistical interaction between VEGF-A rs833061 and VEGFR-2 rs1870377 genotypes may identify a population of bevacizumab-treated patients with a better PFS.
RESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Several studies have evaluated cardioprotective strategies to prevent myocardial dysfunction in patients who are receiving cardiotoxic therapies. However, the optimal approach still represents a controversial issue. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pharmacological cardioprevention could reduce subclinical heart damage in patients with breast cancer who are being treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The SAFE trial was a 4-arm, randomized, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, national multicentric study conducted at 8 oncology departments in Italy. It was a prespecified interim analysis on the first 174 patients who had completed cardiac assessment at 12 months. The study recruitment was conducted between July 2015 and June 2020. The interim analysis was performed in 2020. Patients were eligible for trial inclusion if they had indication to receive primary or postoperative systemic therapy using an anthracycline-based regimen. Patients with a prior diagnosis of cardiovascular disease were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Cardioprotective therapy (bisoprolol, ramipril, or both drugs compared with placebo) was administered for 1 year from the initiation of chemotherapy or until the end of trastuzumab therapy in case of ERBB2-positive patients. Doses for all groups were systematically up-titrated up to the daily target dose of bisoprolol (5 mg, once daily), ramipril (5 mg, once daily), and placebo, if tolerated. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was defined as detection of any subclinical impairment (worsening ≥10%) in myocardial function and deformation measured with standard and 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and global longitudinal strain (GLS). RESULTS: The analysis was performed on 174 women (median age, 48 years; range, 24-75 years) who had completed a cardiological assessment at 12 months and reached the end of treatment. At 12 months, 3D-LVEF worsened by 4.4% in placebo arm and 3.0%, 1.9%, 1.3% in the ramipril, bisoprolol, ramipril plus bisoprolol arms, respectively (P = .01). Global longitudinal strain worsened by 6.0% in placebo arm and 1.5% and 0.6% in the ramipril and bisoprolol arms, respectively, whereas it was unchanged (0.1% improvement) in the ramipril plus bisoprolol arm (P < .001). The number of patients showing a reduction of 10% or greater in 3D-LVEF was 8 (19%) in the placebo arm, 5 (11.5%) in the ramipril arm, 5 (11.4%) in the bisoprolol, arm and 3 (6.8%) in the ramipril plus bisoprolol arm; 15 patients (35.7%) who received placebo showed a 10% or greater worsening of GLS compared with 7 (15.9; ramipril), 6 (13.6%; bisoprolol), and 6 (13.6%; ramipril plus bisoprolol) (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The interim analysis of this randomized clinical trials suggested that cardioprotective pharmacological strategies in patients who were affected by breast cancer and were receiving an anthracycline-based chemotherapy are well tolerated and seem to protect against cancer therapy-related LVEF decline and heart remodeling. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT2236806.
Asunto(s)
Antraciclinas , Neoplasias de la Mama , Antraciclinas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Volumen Sistólico , Trastuzumab/efectos adversos , Función Ventricular IzquierdaRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: The combination of a triple-drug chemotherapy regimen with an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agent as a first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed promising activity along with safety concerns in single-arm phase 2 trials. The role of maintenance following chemotherapy and anti-EGFR and the optimal regimen to be adopted are not established. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the activity and safety of cetuximab plus modified FOLFOXIRI (mFOLFOXIRI) and explore the role of maintenance with cetuximab or bevacizumab in RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In a prospective, noncomparative, open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial, patients aged 18 to 75 years with unresectable, previously untreated RAS and BRAF wild-type (before amendment, KRAS wild-type) mCRC were recruited from 21 oncology units in Italy from October 19, 2011, to March 1, 2015 (followed up through May 31, 2017). In total, 323 patients were screened and 143 were randomized to 2 treatment arms to receive as a first-line induction a regimen of mFOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab followed by cetuximab (arm A) or bevacizumab (arm B) until disease progression. Primary analyses were conducted in a modified intention-to-treat population. INTERVENTIONS: mFOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab repeated every 2 weeks for up to 8 cycles, followed by maintenance with cetuximab or bevacizumab until disease progression. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the 10-month progression-free rate (PFR); secondary end points included progression-free and overall survival, response rate, rate of metastases resection, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of 143 patients randomized, 116 (81.1%) (median [interquartile range (IQR)] age, 59.5 [53-67] years; 34 [29.3%] women) had RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. At a median (IQR) follow-up of 44.0 (30.5-52.1) months, 10-month PFRs were 50.8% (90% CI, 39.5%-62.2%) in arm A and 40.4% (90% CI, 29.4%-52.1%) in arm B. The overall response rate was 71.6% (95% CI, 62.4%-79.5%). Main grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (occurring in 36 patients [31%]), diarrhea (in 21 patients [18%]), skin toxic effects (in 18 patients [16%]), asthenia (in 11 patients [9%]), stomatitis (in 7 patients [6%]), and febrile neutropenia (in 3 patients [3%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although neither of the 2 arms met the primary end point, the findings indicate that a 4-month induction regimen of mFOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab is feasible and provides relevant activity results, leading to a high surgical resection rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02295930.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Cetuximab , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bevacizumab/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/efectos adversos , Cetuximab/administración & dosificación , Cetuximab/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia de Inducción/métodos , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia de Mantención/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is an active agent in metastatic cancers. The standard administration every 3 weeks frequently causes gastrointestinal toxicity and severe myelosuppression. These are rare with a weekly docetaxel regimen, which instead produces severe asthenia. To develop a new docetaxel schedule associated with mild myelosuppression and less fatigue, we conducted this pilot study to determine the feasibility and the maximum tolerated dose of a day one and eight every three weeks administration of docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The first 3 patients were treated with a dose of 40 mg/m2 on day one and eight, which was then escalated by increments of 5 mg/m2 on both days up to determine the maximum tolerated dose, defined as the dose level associated with the same dose-limiting toxicity in at least 33% of patients. RESULTS: Twenty-one metastatic cancer patients entered the study, with a median age of 57 years and a median performance status of 1. The escalation of dose continued up to 55 mg/m2, where 2 of the 6 enrolled patients presented grade 3 diarrhea, which was our dose-limiting toxicity. Myelosuppression was mild, and no febrile neutropenia was observed. None of the patients showed grade 4 non-haematological toxicity. Only 9.5% of them presented grade 3 asthenia, whereas grade 3 diarrhea and mucositis were revealed in 19% and 9.5%, respectively. All grade 3 non-hematological toxicities were observed in heavily pretreated or elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose of docetaxel was 50 mg/m2, but the regimen could not be recommended in heavily pretreated patients. However, it could become an option in an outpatient setting after a phase II study that better defines its toxicity profile and evaluate its antitumor activity.
Asunto(s)
Metástasis de la Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Docetaxel , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucositis/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/patología , Proyectos Piloto , Taxoides/toxicidadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the cardiac safety of adjuvant Non-Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (NPL-DOX) combined to Cyclophosphamide (CTX) and followed by weekly Paclitaxel, in older patients (≥65 years) with diagnosis of high risk breast cancer. The main end point of this prospective study was the detection of early episodes of symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS: The cardiac function was evaluated by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements with repeated echocardiograms, performed 2 weeks before the beginning of chemotherapy and every 6 months, until 30 months after the study entry; then yearly for at least 5 years. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were enrolled from two Italian Divisions of Medical Oncology. Final results revealed no early episodes of symptomatic CHF within the first 12 months from the enrolment. Only two cardiac events were observed: an episode of atrial flutter after the first cycle of NPL-DOX and CTX, with a quick return to normal rhythm, and a grade 3 (scored to NCI-CTCAE, version 3.0) CHF episode, 18 months later chemotherapy start. No other relevant toxicities were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This adjuvant combination including NPL-DOX in elderly patients, resulted in a low rate of cardiac toxic effects. Comparative trials should be encouraged to confirm these findings.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/inducido químicamente , Corazón/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/análogos & derivados , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Volumen SistólicoRESUMEN
VEGFR-2 and P2X7 receptor (P2X7R) have been described to stimulate the angiogenesis and inflammatory processes of prostate cancer. The present study has been performed to investigate the genetic interactions among VEGFR-2 and P2X7R SNPs and their correlation with overall survival (OS) in a population of metastatic prostate cancer patients. Analyses were performed on germline DNA obtained from blood samples and SNPs were investigated by real-time PCR technique. The survival dimensionality reduction (SDR) methodology was applied to investigate the genetic interaction between SNPs. One hundred patients were enrolled. The SDR software provided two genetic interaction profiles consisting of the combination between specific VEGFR-2 (rs2071559, rs11133360) and P2X7R (rs3751143, rs208294) genotypes. The median OS was 126 months (95% CI, 115.94-152.96) and 65.65 months (95% CI, 52.95-76.53) for the favorable and the unfavorable genetic profile, respectively (p < 0.0001). The genetic statistical interaction between VEGFR-2 (rs2071559, rs11133360) and P2X7R (rs3751143, rs208294) genotypes may identify a population of prostate cancer patients with a better prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Receptores Purinérgicos P2X7/genética , Receptor 2 de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/genética , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Italia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenotipo , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
AIM: To investigate pharmacogenetic interactions among VEGF-A, VEGFR-2, IL-8, HIF-1α, EPAS-1 and TSP-1 SNPs and their role on progression-free survival in a population of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with bevacizumab in combination with first-line paclitaxel. PATIENTS & METHODS: Analyses were performed on germline DNA obtained from blood samples and SNPs were investigated by real-time polymerase chain reaction technique. The multifactor dimensionality reduction methodology was applied to investigate the interaction between SNPs. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen patients were enrolled from eight Italian Oncology Units ( clinicaltrial.gov : NCT01935102). The multifactor dimensionality reduction software provided two pharmacogenetic interaction profiles consisting of the combination between specific VEGFR-2 rs11133360 and IL-8 rs4073 genotypes. The median progression-free survival was 14.1 months (95% CI: 11.4-16.8) and 10.2 months (95% CI: 8.8-11.5) for the favorable and the unfavorable genetic profile, respectively (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.66, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The pharmacogenetic statistical interaction between VEGFR-2 rs11133360 and IL-8 rs4073 genotypes may identify a population of patients with a better outcome.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Interleucina-8/genética , Farmacogenética , Receptor 2 de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/genética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Factores de Transcripción con Motivo Hélice-Asa-Hélice Básico/genética , Bevacizumab , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Humanos , Subunidad alfa del Factor 1 Inducible por Hipoxia/genética , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Trombospondina 1/genética , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/genéticaRESUMEN
Recent data reported an association between VEGF-A genotype of tumors and median overall survival as well as grade 3 or 4 hypertension when using bevacizumab in metastatic breast cancer. In the present case we report a discordant VEGF-A genotype between tumor and normal tissue in a patient with a responsive hepatic lesion of chemoresistant breast cancer treated with bevacizumab and paclitaxel. Moreover, we show that, despite the very low VEGF-A protein expression, the neoplastic lesion was well vascularized and responded to bevacizumab therapy. The discordance of VEGF-A polymorphisms in tumor and germline DNA may suggest the importance of obtaining both information in order to predict a superior overall survival or a lower risk of hypertension in patients treated with taxanes and bevacizumab.