Impact of continuous glucose monitoring on everyday life of young children with type 1 diabetes and their parents: An evaluation of 114 families.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of type 1 diabetes is increasing worldwide. The advent of new monitoring devices has enabled tighter glycemic control. AIM: To study the impact of glucose monitoring devices on the everyday life of young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their parents. METHODS: A questionnaire was addressed to parents of children with T1D under the age of 6 years with an insulin pump treated in one of the hospitals of the ADIM network in France between January and July 2020. RESULTS: Among the 114 families included in the study, 53% of parents (26/49) woke up every night to monitor blood glucose levels when their child had flash glucose monitoring (FGM), compared with 23% (13/56) of those whose child had continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Overall, 81% of parents (86/108) found that glucose monitoring improved their own sleep and parents whose child had CGM were significantly more likely to report improved sleep (86% vs 73%, p = 0.006). Forty-nine percent of parents (55/113) declared that they (in 87% of cases, the mother only) had reduced their working hours or stopped working following their child's T1D diagnosis. Maternal unemployment was significantly associated with the presence of siblings (p = 0.001) but not with glycemic control (p = 0,87). Ninety-eight percent of parents (105/107) think that glucose monitoring improves school integration. CONCLUSION: In these families of children with T1D, new diabetes technologies reduced the burden of care but sleep disruption remained common. Social needs evaluation, particularly of mothers, is important at initial diagnosis of T1D in children.

[Health care in non-insulin dependent diabetics in lower Normandy]. / Etude de la prise en charge de diabétiques non insulinodépendants en Basse-Normandie.

To contribute to better quality health care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus living in the French Department Basse-Normandie, the Regional Union of General Practitioners (URML) and the Regional Union of the Nation Health Insurance (URCAM) studied ambulatory practices in this population in 1999. Eight hundred diabetics whose health care reimbursements suggested they were not followed by a specialized center were studied: 400 received a mailed questionnaire and for the 400 others, another questionnaire was filed out by the primary care physician. The physicians' responses demonstrated that they do not feel certain recommended complementary investigations are always necessary for following diabetic patients (microalbuminuria, glycated hemoglobin, search for neuropathy, ophthalmology consultation). Interaction with diabetologists, nutritionists and chiropodists was found to be insufficient. Globally, the responses of the diabetics was coherent with the physicians' statements, providing further precision concerning health care delivery and propositions for improvement. These results can be used to better target education programs for associations, specialists and general practitioners.