Vestibular syndromes, diagnosis and diagnostic errors in patients with dizziness presenting to the emergency department: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the frequency of vestibular syndromes, diagnoses, diagnostic errors and resources used in patients with dizziness in the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients presenting with dizziness. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We collected clinical data from the initial ED report from July 2015 to August 2020 and compared them with the follow-up report if available. We calculated the prevalence of vestibular syndromes and stroke prevalence in patients with dizziness. Vestibular syndromes are differentiated in acute (AVS) (eg, stroke, vestibular neuritis), episodic (EVS) (eg, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, transient ischaemic attack) and chronic (CVS) (eg, persistent postural-perceptual dizziness) vestibular syndrome. We reported the rate of diagnostic errors using the follow-up diagnosis as the reference standard. RESULTS: We included 1535 patients with dizziness. 19.7% (303) of the patients presented with AVS, 34.7% (533) with EVS, 4.6% (71) with CVS and 40.9% (628) with no or unclassifiable vestibular syndrome. The three most frequent diagnoses were stroke/minor stroke (10.1%, 155), benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (9.8%, 150) and vestibular neuritis (9.6%, 148). Among patients with AVS, 25.4% (77) had stroke. The cause of the dizziness remained unknown in 45.0% (692) and 18.0% received a false diagnosis. There was a follow-up in 662 cases (43.1%) and 58.2% with an initially unknown diagnoses received a final diagnosis. Overall, 69.9% of all 1535 patients with dizziness received neuroimaging (MRI 58.2%, CT 11.6%) in the ED. CONCLUSIONS: One-fourth of patients with dizziness in the ED presented with AVS with a high prevalence (10%) of vestibular strokes. EVS was more frequent; however, the rate of undiagnosed patients with dizziness and the number of patients receiving neuroimaging were high. Almost half of them still remained without diagnosis and among those diagnosed were often misclassified. Many unclear cases of vertigo could be diagnostically clarified after a follow-up visit.

Frequency, aetiology, and impact of vestibular symptoms in the emergency department: a neglected red flag.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the incidence of all vestibular symptoms in a large interdisciplinary tertiary emergency department (ED) and to assess stroke prevalence, and frequency of other life-threatening aetiologies. METHODS: In this 1-year retrospective study, we manually screened all medical records of 23,608 ED visits for descriptions of vestibular symptoms. Symptoms were classified according to the International Classification of Vestibular Disorders of the Bárány Society. We evaluated all patients older than 16 years in whom vestibular symptoms were the main or accompanying complaint. We extracted clinical, radiological, and laboratory findings as well as aetiologies from medical records. RESULTS: We identified a total of 2596 visits by 2464 patients (11% of ED visits) who reported at least one vestibular symptom. In 1677/2596 visits (64.6%), vestibular symptoms were the main reason for the ED consultation. Vestibular symptoms were classified as dizziness (43.8%), vertigo (33.9%), postural symptoms (6.5%), or more than one symptom (15.8%). In 324/2596 visits (12.5%), cerebrovascular events were the aetiology of vestibular symptoms, and in 355/2596 visits (13.7%), no diagnosis could be established. In 23.8% of visits with vestibular symptoms as the main complaint, the underlying condition was life-threatening. CONCLUSION: Frequency and impact of vestibular symptoms in patients visiting the ED were higher than previously reported, and life-threatening aetiologies such as strokes are common. Therefore, awareness among physicians regarding the importance of vestibular symptoms has to be improved.