Pharmacokinetics of amoxicillin in obese and nonobese subjects.

AIMS: To compare the pharmacokinetics of amoxicillin (AMX) in obese and nonobese subjects, given as single dose 875-mg tablets. METHODS: A prospective, single-centre, open-label, clinical study was carried out involving 10 nonobese and 20 obese subjects given a dose of an AMX 875-mg tablet. Serial blood samples were collected between 0 and 8 hours after administration of AMX and plasma levels were quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetic parameters (PK) were calculated by noncompartmental analysis and means of the 2 groups were compared using Student t-test. Analysis of correlation between covariates and PK was performed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Ten nonobese subjects (mean age 30.6 ± 7.12 y; body mass index 21.56 ± 1.95 kg/m2 ) and 20 obese subjects (mean age 34.47 ± 7.03 y; body mass index 33.17 ± 2.38 kg/m2 ) participated in the study. Both maximum concentration (Cmax ; 12.12 ± 4.06 vs. 9.66 ± 2.93 mg/L) and area under the curve (AUC)0-inf (34.18 ± 12.94 mg.h/L vs. 26.88 ± 9.24 mg.h/L) were slightly higher in nonobese than in obese subjects, respectively, but differences were not significant. The volume of distribution (V/F) parameter was statistically significantly higher in obese compared to nonobese patients (44.20 ± 17.85 L vs. 27.57 ± 12.96 L). Statistically significant correlations were observed for several weight metrics vs. AUC, Cmax , V/F and clearance, and for creatinine clearance vs. AUC, Cmax and clearance. CONCLUSION: In obese subjects, the main altered PK was V/F as a consequence of greater body weight. This may result in antibiotic treatment failure if standard therapeutic regimens are administered.

Resource Utilization After Snakebite Severity Score Implementation into Treatment Algorithm of Crotaline Bite.

BACKGROUND: Crotaline envenomation clinical manifestations vary considerably among patients. Current recommendations for treatment with Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab require assessment of envenomation control. Determining control of envenomation, particularly when patients are evaluated by different providers in separate clinical settings, can be difficult. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a difference in total vials of Crotalidae antivenin therapy exists between pre-protocol and post-Snakebite Severity Score (SSS) protocol. METHODS: Retrospective medical record review at an academic medical and regional Level I trauma center. Resource utilization in patients with a diagnosis of "snakebite" was compared between patients treated pre- and post-SSS protocol implementation. RESULTS: One hundred forty-six patients were included in the evaluation. One hundred twenty-seven (87.0%) patients received antivenin, n = 80 (90.9%) in the pre-protocol group and n = 47 (81.0%) in the post-protocol group. Median total number of antivenin vials per patient was lower in the post-protocol group than the pre-protocol group, 16 (10-24 interquartile range) vs. 12 (10-16 interquartile range), p = 0.006. This decreased utilization correlates to an approximate $13,200 savings per patient. Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, opioid use, incidence of blood product transfusion, need for surgical intervention, or need for intubation were not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A snakebite protocol with SSS utilization to guide antivenin administration results in significantly decreased antivenin therapy in snakebite patients without increase in other health care utilization.

Retrospective analysis of levetiracetam compared to phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis in adults with traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Phenytoin is standard of care for seizure prophylaxis following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Levetiracetam, an alternative antiepileptic drug, is utilized for seizure prophylaxis despite limited data supporting its use. OBJECTIVE: Our primary outcome was post-TBI seizure activity measured by electroencephalogram (EEG) for levetiracetam versus phenytoin. Secondary outcomes were length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, requirement for additional antiepileptic drugs (AED), and drug and monitoring costs. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients admitted to neurosurgical or surgical trauma ICU. Adult patients with at least 1 day of EEG monitoring were included. Patients were excluded if they had history of epilepsy, prior TBI, less than 48 hours of AED therapy, or additional AED prior to EEG monitoring. RESULTS: A total 90 patients met inclusion criteria, with 18 receiving levetiracetam and 72 receiving phenytoin. Prevalence of EEG-confirmed seizure activity was similar between the levetiracetam and phenytoin groups (28% vs 29%; P = .99). ICU length of stay (13 vs 18 days; P = .28), time to EEG-confirmed seizure activity (4 vs 6 days; P = .24), and duration of seizure prophylaxis (9 vs 14 days; P = .18) were also similar. The median daily cost of levetiracetam therapy was $43 compared to $55 for phenytoin therapy and monitoring (P = .08). When all anticonvulsant therapy and monitoring were included, costs were lower for the levetiracetam group ($45 vs $83; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Levetiracetam may provide an alternative treatment option for seizure prevention in TBI patients in the ICU. Total antiepileptic drug and monitoring costs were lower for levetiracetam patients.

Validation of rapid and simple LC-MS/MS method for determination of voriconazole in rat plasma.

A rapid, simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS analytical method was developed and validated for the determination of voriconazole (VRC) in rat plasma, using ketoconazole as internal standard (IS). Analysis was performed on a Shimadzu HPLC system using a Shimadzu C18 column and isocratic elution with acetonitrile-water-formic acid (60:40:0.05, v/v/v), at a flow of 1.0 mL/min (split ratio 1:5), and a mass spectrometer Micromass, equipped with a double quadrupole and an electrospray ionization interface, operated in a positive mode. Plasma samples were deproteinized with methanol (1:2) and 30 microL of the supernatant was injected into the system. The retention times of VRC and IS were approximately 3.3 and 2.7 min, respectively. Calibration curves in spiked plasma were linear over the concentration range of 50-2500 ng/mL with determination coefficient >0.98. The lower limit of quantification was 50 ng/mL. The accuracy of the method was within 5%. Intra- and inter-day relative standard deviations were less or equal to 12.5 and 7.7%, respectively. The applicability of the LC-MS-MS method for pharmacokinetic studies was tested using plasma samples obtained after intravenous administration of VRC to male Wistar rats. The reported method provided the necessary sensitivity, linearity, precision, accuracy, and specificity to allow the determination of VRC in pre-clinical pharmacokinetic studies.

Development and validation of a LC-MS/MS method with electrospray ionization for determination of LASSBio-579 in rat plasma.

A simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS analytical method was developed and validated for the determination of LASSBio-579 in plasma rat, using fluconazole as internal standard. Analyses were performed on a Shimadzu HPLC system using a Shimadzu C18 column and isocratic elution with acetonitrile-water (80:20, v/v), containing 0.4mM ammonium hydroxide and 0.2 mM acetic acid at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min (split ratio 1:5). A Micromass triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, equipped with an electrospray ionization interface, operated in the positive mode. Plasma samples were deproteinized with acetonitrile (1:2) and 50 microl of the supernatant were injected into the system. The retention times of LASSBio-579 and IS were approximately 4.7 and 2.4 min, respectively. Calibration curves in spiked plasma were linear over the concentration range of 30-2000 ng/ml with determination coefficient >0.98. The lower limit of quantification was 30 ng/ml. The accuracy of method was within 15%. Intra- and inter-day relative standard deviations were less or equal to 13.5% and 6.4%, respectively. The applicability of the LC-MS/MS method for pharmacokinetic studies was tested using plasma samples obtained after intraperitoneal administration of LASSBio-579 to male Wistar rats. No interference from endogenous substances was observed, showing the specificity of the method developed. The reported method can provide the necessary sensitivity, linearity, precision, accuracy, and specificity to allow the determination of LASSBio-579 in pre-clinical pharmacokinetic studies.

Dissociated Agonist of Glucocorticoid Receptor or Prednisone for Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: Effects on P1NP and Osteocalcin Pharmacodynamics.

Fosdagrocorat (PF-04171327), a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor, has potent anti-inflammatory activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with reduced adverse effects on bone health. To identify fosdagrocorat doses with bone formation marker changes similar to prednisone 5 mg, we characterized treatment-related changes in amino-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (P1NP) and osteocalcin (OC) with fosdagrocorat (1, 5, 10, or 15 mg) and prednisone (5 or 10 mg) in a phase II randomized trial (N = 323). The time course of markers utilized a mixed-effects longitudinal kinetic-pharmacodynamic model. Median predicted changes from baseline at week 8 with fosdagrocorat 5, 10, and 15 mg were -18, -22, and -22% (P1NP), and -7, -13, and -17% (OC), respectively. Changes with prednisone 5 and 10 mg were -15% and -18% (P1NP) and -10% and -17% (OC). The probability of fosdagrocorat doses up to 15 mg being noninferior to prednisone 5 mg for P1NP and OC changes was >90%.

Model-Informed Development and Registration of a Once-Daily Regimen of Extended-Release Tofacitinib.

Extended-release (XR) formulations enable less frequent dosing vs. conventional (e.g., immediate release (IR)) formulations. Regulatory registration of such formulations typically requires pharmacokinetic (PK) and clinical efficacy data. Here we illustrate a model-informed, exposure-response (E-R) approach to translate controlled trial data from one formulation to another without a phase III trial, using a tofacitinib case study. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). E-R analyses were conducted using validated clinical endpoints from phase II dose-response and nonclinical dose fractionation studies of the IR formulation. Consistent with the delay in clinical response dynamics relative to PK, average concentration was established as the relevant PK parameter for tofacitinib efficacy and supported pharmacodynamic similarity. These evaluations, alongside demonstrated equivalence in total systemic exposure between IR and XR formulations, provided the basis for the regulatory approval of tofacitinib XR once daily by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Cardiovascular Safety Assessment in Early-Phase Clinical Studies: A Meta-Analytical Comparison of Exposure-Response Models.

Exposure-response analysis of QT interval in clinical studies has been proposed as a thorough QT study alternative. Many exposure-response model structures have been proposed for cardiovascular (CV) safety markers, but few studies have compared models across multiple drugs. To recommend preferred drug-effect exposure-response models on vital signs and electrocardiogram (ECG) intervals, an individual-level model-based meta-analysis (39 studies and 1,291 subjects) compared 90 model structures. Models were selected to describe the data and cross-validate studies on the same drug. The most commonly selected baseline model was an unstructured model (estimation of a value at each study nominal time) for all measures but blood pressure. The unstructured model estimated a better cross-validated drug-effect when considering all markers. A linear model was the most commonly selected to characterize drug-effect on all markers. We propose these models as a starting point assisting with CV safety exposure-response assessment in nondedicated small studies with healthy subjects.