Outcomes of chronic myeloid leukemia patients after therapeutic failure to conventional tyrosine kinase inhibitors and asciminib.

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who have failed conventional tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cTKIs) and asciminib constitute a complex group of patients with few therapeutic options. A retrospective descriptive multicenter observational study was carried out including patients with CML who had presented a therapeutic failure to ≥ 2 cTKIs and asciminib, and had received or were not candidates to ponatinib. Of the 19 patients enrolled, 8 patients failed asciminib due to intolerance and 11 due to resistance. The most common strategy for intolerant patients was to initiate a previously administered cTKI (6/8) with dose adjustments or symptomatic management of adverse events (AEs). Of the patients who failed due to resistance, only patients who underwent progenitor transplantation achieved profound long-term responses. A frequent strategy was to use ponatinib (4/11) in patients previously considered non-candidates, with poor responses in patients in whom dose reductions were used, and severe AEs in patients at standard doses. In the remaining patients, cTKIs and other agents (interferon, hydroxyurea, citarabine, busulfan) were used with poor responses. Patients who progressed to advanced stages had a dismal prognosis. With a median follow-up of 11.2 months, overall survival of the global cohort was 73%; 100% for intolerant patients, 71% for resistant patients and 25% for those who discontinue asciminib in accelerated/blastic phase.

Toxicity of Asciminib in Real Clinical Practice: Analysis of Side Effects and Cross-Toxicity with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

(1) Background: Despite the prognostic improvements achieved with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a minority of patients still fail TKIs. The recent introduction of asciminib may be a promising option in intolerant patients, as it is a first-in-class inhibitor with a more selective mechanism of action different from the ATP-competitive inhibition that occurs with TKIs. Therefore, our goal was to analyze toxicities shown with asciminib as well as to study cross-toxicity with previous TKIs. (2) Methods: An observational, multicenter, retrospective study was performed with data from 77 patients with CML with therapeutic failure to second-generation TKIs who received asciminib through a managed-access program (MAP) (3) Results: With a median follow-up of 13.7 months, 22 patients (28.5%) discontinued treatment: 32% (7/22) due to intolerance and 45% (10/22) due to resistance. Fifty-five percent of the patients reported adverse effects (AEs) with asciminib and eighteen percent grade 3-4. Most frequent AEs were: fatigue (18%), thrombocytopenia (17%), anemia (12%), and arthralgias (12%). None of the patients experienced cardiovascular events or occlusive arterial disease. Further, 26%, 25%, and 9% of patients required dose adjustment, temporary suspension, or definitive discontinuation of treatment, respectively. Toxicities under asciminib seemed lower than with prior TKIs for anemia, cardiovascular events, pleural/pericardial effusion, diarrhea, and edema. Cross-toxicity risk was statistically significant for thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, vomiting, and pancreatitis. (4) Conclusion: Asciminib is a molecule with a good safety profile and with a low rate of AEs. However, despite its new mechanism of action, asciminib presents a risk of cross-toxicity with classical TKIs for some AEs.

Predictive value of interim ¹8F-FDG-PET/CT for event-free survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma homogenously treated in a phase II trial with six cycles of R-CHOP-14 plus pegfilgrastim as first-line treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The predictive value of interim PET/computed tomography (I-PET/CT) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is controversial. Our aim was to evaluate the predictive value of I-PET/CT for an event-free survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed patients with DLBCL included in a prospective clinical trial who were treated with six cycles of dose-dense R-CHOP followed by pegfilgrastim and who had undergone an I-PET/CT (after two cycles) and a final PET [F-PET/CT (60 days after the sixth cycle)]. Event was defined as nonresponse, relapse, or death. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included. Their median age was 60 years; 54% were male, 25% had bulky disease, and 67% had an International Prognostic Index of 0-2. The median follow-up duration was 28.8 months. I-PET/CT was positive in 34 (49%) patients and F-PET/CT was positive in 12 (17.4%). The 3-year event-free survival was 86% for patients who were I-PET/CT negative as against 64% for those who were I-PET/CT positive (P=0.036). The negative and positive predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity of I-PET/CT for an event were 83, 32, 65, and 56%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis including baseline characteristics, I-PET/CT, and F-PET/CT, F-PET/CT was the only significant predictor (P<0.0005). CONCLUSION: In patients with DLBCL treated with dose-dense R-CHOP plus pegfilgrastim, a negative I-PET/CT is highly predictive of a favorable outcome and a positive I-PET/CT is of limited clinical value. These results do not support treatment intensification after a short course of chemotherapy based solely on a positive I-PET/CT.