Expanding Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra® and LF-LAM testing for diagnosis of tuberculosis among HIV-positive adults admitted to hospitals in Tanzania and Mozambique: a randomized controlled trial (the EXULTANT trial).

INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis (TB) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among people living with HIV (PLHIV). Current WHO-recommended strategies for diagnosing TB among hospitalized PLHIV rely on symptom screening and disease severity to assess eligibility for urine lipoarabinomannan lateral flow (LF-LAM) and molecular testing. Despite these recommendations, autopsy studies show a large burden of undiagnosed TB among admitted PLHIV. The EXULTANT trial aims to assess the impact of an expanded screening strategy using three specimens (sputum, stool, and urine) for TB diagnosis among PLHIV admitted to hospitals in two high HIV and TB burden African countries. METHODS: This is a multicenter, pragmatic, individually randomized controlled trial conducted across eleven hospitals in Tanzania and Mozambique. Participants in the intervention arm will be tested with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra® from expectorated sputum, stool, and urine samples, with additional urine LF-LAM testing in the first 24 h after hospital admission, irrespective of the presence of the symptoms. The control arm will implement the WHO standard of care recommendations. Hospitalized adults (≥ 18 years) with a confirmed HIV-diagnosis, irrespective of antiretroviral (ART) therapy status or presence of TB symptoms will be assessed for eligibility at admission. Patients with a pre-existing TB diagnosis, those receiving anti-tuberculosis therapy or tuberculosis preventive treatment in the 6 months prior to enrolment, and those transferred from other hospitals will not be eligible. Also, participants admitted for traumatic reasons such as acute abdomen, maternal conditions, scheduled surgery, having a positive SARS-CoV2 test will be ineligible. The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants with microbiologically confirmed TB starting treatment within 3 days of enrolment. DISCUSSION: The EXULTANT trial investigates rapid implementation after admission of a new diagnostic algorithm using Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra® in several non-invasive specimens, in addition to LF-LAM, in hospitalized PLHIV regardless of TB symptoms. This enhanced strategy is anticipated to detect frequently missed TB cases in this population and is being evaluated as an implementable and scalable intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial reference number: NCT04568967 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on 2020-09-29.

Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for tuberculosis diagnosis in the context of passive and active case finding.

AIMS: We present a field evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF ("Xpert") and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra ("Ultra") using two cohorts in a high tuberculosis/HIV burden setting in Southern Mozambique. METHODS: Single respiratory specimens from symptomatic adults accessing healthcare services (passive case finding (PCF) cohort) and from household and community close contacts (active case finding (ACF) cohort) were tested by smear microscopy, culture, Xpert and Ultra. Liquid and solid culture served as a composite reference standard. We explored the impact of trace results on specificity via their recategorisation to negative (in all and just among those previously treated individuals). RESULTS: 1419 and 252 participants were enrolled in the PCF and ACF cohorts, respectively. For the PCF cohort, Ultra showed higher sensitivity than Xpert overall (0.95 (95% CI 0.90-0.98) versus 0.88 (96% CI 0.82-0.93); p<0.001) and among smear-negative patients (0.84 (96% CI 0.71-0.93) versus 0.63 (96% CI 0.48-0.76)). Ultra's specificity was lower than Xpert's (0.96 (96% CI 0.95-0.97) versus 0.98 (96% CI 0.97-0.99); p=0.008). For ACF, sensitivities were the same (0.67 (95% CI 0.22-0.96) for both tests), although Ultra detected a higher number of microbiologically confirmed samples than Xpert (4.7% (12 out of 252) versus 2.7% (seven out of 252)). Conditional recategorisation of trace results among previously treated participants maintained differences in specificity in the PCF cohort. CONCLUSION: These results add evidence on the improved sensitivity of Ultra and support its use in different case finding scenarios.