RESUMEN
Medical students from the University of Lausanne volunteered rapidly and in great number to bolster health facilities across Switzerland in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. At Unisanté, Center for general practice and public health, University of Lausanne, students recruited as interns discovered the different aspects of primary care. This extraordinary period naturally involves considerable challenges but represents also a precious learning opportunity for future doctors.
Les étudiants en médecine de l'Université de Lausanne se sont rapidement et massivement portés volontaires pour soutenir les institutions de soins en Suisse face à la pandémie du Covid-19. À Unisanté, Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique de Lausanne, les étudiants engagés comme médecins stagiaires ont pu découvrir les différentes facettes de la médecine de premier recours. Cette situation extraordinaire comporte naturellement ses défis, mais représente également une opportunité précieuse d'apprentissage pour les futurs médecins.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Suiza/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
We prospectively followed a cohort of 26 subjects for an average period of 41 months who benefited from occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) in the context of chronic refractory headaches. In 17 patients treated, the frequency of headache decreased, and quality of life scores improved significantly. Among these patients, the "very good" response rate was 34 %. In this cohort, treatment-related adverse events are relatively common (42 %) but not severe. While it is difficult to anticipate the risk factors for non-response to treatment, we estimate that the risk of failure may not be related to the duration of the disease, but rather to the number of different preventives attempted prior to ONS.
Nous avons suivi prospectivement durant une période d'en moyenne 41 mois une cohorte de 26 patients romands qui ont bénéficié d'une stimulation du nerf occipital (ONS) dans le cadre de céphalées chroniques réfractaires. Chez 17 patients non explantés, la fréquence des céphalées a diminué et les scores de qualité de vie se sont améliorés de façon significative. Parmi ces patients, le taux de « très bonne ¼ réponse est de 34 %. On constate dans cette cohorte que les effets indésirables liés au traitement sont relativement courants (42 %) mais non sévères. Même s'il est difficile d'anticiper les facteurs de risque de non-réponse au traitement, nous estimons que la probabilité d'échec ne serait pas corrélée à la durée de la maladie mais plutôt au nombre de traitements préventifs tentés avant l'ONS.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Trastornos de Cefalalgia , Cefalea/terapia , Trastornos de Cefalalgia/terapia , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to investigate whether subjective and objective measures of pain habituation can be used as potential markers for central sensitization across various chronic pain patients. METHODS: Two blocks of contact-heat stimuli were applied to a non-painful area in 93 chronic pain patients (low back pain, neuropathic pain, and complex regional pain syndrome) and 60 healthy controls (HC). Habituation of pain ratings, contact-heat evoked potentials (CHEP), and sympathetic skin responses (SSR) was measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in any measure of pain habituation between patients and HC. Even patients with apparent clinical signs of central sensitization showed no reduced pain habituation. However, prolonged baseline CHEP and SSR latencies (stimulation block 1) were found in patients compared to HC (CHEP: Δ-latency = 23 ms, p = 0.012; SSR: Δ-latency = 100 ms, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Given the performed multimodal neurophysiological testing protocol, we provide evidence indicating that pain habituation may be preserved in patients with chronic pain and thereby be of limited use as a sensitive marker for central sensitization. These results are discussed within the framework of the complex interactions between pro- and antinociceptive mechanism as well as methodological issues. The prolonged latencies of CHEP and SSR after stimulation in non-painful areas may indicate subclinical changes in the integrity of thermo-nociceptive afferents, or a shift towards antinociceptive activity. This shift could potentially affect the relay of ascending signals. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings challenge the prevailing views in the literature and may encourage further investigations into the peripheral and central components of pain habituation, using advanced multimodal neurophysiological techniques.