Isolated sulfite oxidase deficiency: identification of 12 novel SUOX mutations in 10 patients.

We report twelve novel mutations in patients with isolated sulfite oxidase deficiency. The mutations are in SUOX, the gene that encodes the molybdohemoprotein sulfite oxidase. These include two frameshift mutations, a four-basepair deletion (562del4) and a single-basepair insertion (113insC), both resulting in premature termination. Nonsense mutations predicting Y343X and Q364X substitutions were identified in a homozygous state in three patients, the latter in two sibs. The remaining eight are missense mutations generating single amino acid substitutions. From the position of the substituted residues, seven of these mutations are considered to be causative of the enzyme deficiency: I201L, R211Q, G305S, R309H, K322R, Q339R, and W393R. The eighth, a C>T transition, predicts an R319C substitution, which could affect the binding of the molybdenum cofactor and thus severely reduce sulfite oxidase activity. This mutation, however, is downstream of a frameshift mutation and is therefore not the causative mutation in this individual.

Complete DiGeorge syndrome: development of rash, lymphadenopathy, and oligoclonal T cells in 5 cases.

BACKGROUND: Five patients with DiGeorge syndrome presented with infections, skin rashes, and lymphadenopathy after the newborn period. T-cell counts and function varied greatly in each patient. Initial laboratory testing did not suggest athymia in these patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the patients had significant immunodeficiency. METHODS: Research testing of peripheral blood included immunoscope evaluation of T-cell receptor beta variable gene segment repertoire diversity, quantification of T-cell receptor rearrangement excision circles, and detection of naive T cells (expressing CD45RA and CD62L). RESULTS: The patients were classified as having DiGeorge syndrome on the basis of syndromic associations and heart, parathyroid, and immune abnormalities. Immunoscope evaluation revealed that the T-cell repertoires were strikingly oligoclonal in all patients. There were few recent thymic emigrants, as indicated by the very low numbers of naive T cells (<50/mm(3)) and the absence of T-cell receptor rearrangement excision circles. These studies showed that all 5 patients were athymic. Two patients died, one from infection. No thymus was found during the complete autopsy performed on one patient. CONCLUSION: Patients with DiGeorge syndrome, skin rash, and lymphadenopathy should undergo analysis of naive T-cell numbers and of T-cell receptor beta variability segment repertoire to determine whether they are athymic, even if they have T cells with mitogen responsiveness. It is important for physicians to realize that patients with complete DiGeorge syndrome remain profoundly immunodeficient after development of these atypical features (rash, lymphadenopathy, and oligoclonal T cells). Prompt diagnosis is necessary for appropriate management.