Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on HIV Test Uptake Among People Who Inject Drugs in the Context of an HIV Outbreak.

Glasgow, Scotland's largest city, has been experiencing an HIV outbreak among people who inject drugs (PWID) since 2015. A key focus of the public health response has been to increase HIV testing among those at risk of infection. Our aim was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on HIV testing among PWID in Glasgow. HIV test uptake in the last 12 months was quantified among: (1) PWID recruited in six Needle Exchange Surveillance Initiative (NESI) surveys (n = 6110); linked laboratory data for (2) people prescribed opioid agonist therapy (OAT) (n = 14,527) and (3) people hospitalised for an injecting-related hospital admission (IRHA) (n = 12,621) across four time periods: pre-outbreak (2010-2014); early-outbreak (2015-2016); ongoing-outbreak (2017-2019); and COVID-19 (2020-June 21). From the pre to ongoing period, HIV testing increased: the highest among people recruited in NESI (from 28% to 56%) and on OAT (from 17% to 54%) while the lowest was among people with an IRHA (from 15% to 42%). From the ongoing to the COVID-19 period, HIV testing decreased markedly among people prescribed OAT, from 54% to 37% (aOR 0.50, 95% CI 0.48-0.53), but increased marginally among people with an IRHA from 42% to 47% (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08-1.31). In conclusion, progress in increasing testing in response to the HIV outbreak has been eroded by COVID-19. Adoption of a linked data approach could be warranted in other settings to inform efforts to eliminate HIV transmission.

Examining the impact of the first wave of COVID-19 and associated control measures on interventions to prevent blood-borne viruses among people who inject drugs in Scotland: an interrupted time series study.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has likely affected the delivery of interventions to prevent blood-borne viruses (BBVs) among people who inject drugs (PWID). We examined the impact of the first wave of COVID-19 in Scotland on: 1) needle and syringe provision (NSP), 2) opioid agonist therapy (OAT) and 3) BBV testing. METHODS: An interrupted time series study design; 23rd March 2020 (date of the first 'lockdown') was chosen as the key date. RESULTS: The number of HIV tests and HCV tests in drug services/prisons, and the number of needles/syringes (N/S) distributed decreased by 94% (RR=0.062, 95% CI 0.041-0.094, p < 0.001), 95% (RR=0.049, 95% CI 0.034-0.069, p < 0.001) and 18% (RR = 0.816, 95% CI 0.750-0.887, p < 0.001), respectively, immediately after lockdown. Post-lockdown, an increasing trend was observed relating to the number of N/S distributed (0.6%; RR = 1.006, 95% CI 1.001-1.012, p = 0.015), HIV tests (12.1%; RR = 1.121, 95% CI 1.092-1.152, p < 0.001) and HCV tests (13.2%; RR = 1.132, 95 CI 1.106-1.158, p < 0.001). Trends relating to the total amount of methadone prescribed remained stable, but a decreasing trend in the number of prescriptions (2.4%; RR = 0.976, 95% CI 0.959-0.993, p = 0.006) and an increasing trend in the quantity prescribed per prescription (2.8%; RR = 1.028, 95% CI 1.013-1.042, p < 0.001) was observed post-lockdown. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 impacted the delivery of BBV prevention services for PWID in Scotland. While there is evidence of service recovery; further effort is likely required to return some intervention coverage to pre-pandemic levels in the context of subsequent waves of COVID-19.

Evaluation of the scale-up of HIV testing among people who inject drugs in Scotland in the context of an ongoing HIV outbreak.

BACKGROUND: A large outbreak of HIV among people who inject drugs (PWID) has been ongoing in Glasgow city centre (GCC), Scotland since early 2015. The outbreak is associated with high levels of homelessness, cocaine injecting and injecting in public places. A key component of the public health response was the scale-up of HIV testing in a range of services engaged with PWID. Our aims were to: 1) evaluate the extent of and change in HIV testing over the course of the outbreak and 2) examine factors associated with reporting an HIV test. METHODS: Self-report of an HIV test in the last 12 months was collected for 15,081 PWID interviewed in six national cross-sectional bio-behavioural surveys during 2008-2018. Multi-variate logistic regression was undertaken to determine trends in HIV testing by region of recruitment (GCC; rest of Glasgow; other Scottish city centres (SCC); and rest of Scotland) and outbreak period (pre: 2008-14; early: 2015-16; ongoing: 2017-18). RESULTS: HIV testing increased across all regions and was most pronounced in GCC comparing the ongoing (67%) to the pre-outbreak period (33%) (aOR=4.68, 95% CI 3.23 to 6.77, p<0.001). However, compared to other SCCs pre-outbreak (with 46% reporting testing), those recruited in GCC had a lower odds of HIV testing early outbreak (aOR=0.37, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.54, p<0.001) and more modest increased odds in the ongoing outbreak period (aOR=1.41, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.05, p=0.069). Among PWID recruited in the whole of Glasgow in the ongoing phase, reporting an HIV test was associated with injecting cocaine or in public places (aOR=2.20, 95% CI 1.53 to 3.17, p<0.001), receipt of methadone (aOR=1.48, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.17, p=0.042) and incarceration in the last year (aOR=1.72, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.51, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Relatively low levels of HIV testing pre- and early-outbreak likely hindered efforts to control the spread of infection among PWID in Glasgow. Uptake has since increased with expansion of testing across multiple settings, particularly among those at high risk of infection. Further effort is needed to ensure the vast majority of PWID are regularly tested, not just in the epicentre of the outbreak but in other areas with low population prevalence of infection.

Quick starting contraception after emergency contraception: have clinical guidelines made a difference?

OBJECTIVE: When initiating contraception after emergency contraception (EC), conventional practice had been to wait until the next menses. Since 2010, UK guidelines have endorsed quick starting (QS) contraception, namely offering immediate start when requested. We conducted an audit to assess clinical practice before and after QS guidance publication. METHODS: A full cycle audit was performed on the clinical notes of women requesting EC during two 2-month periods in 2010 and 2011 in an Integrated Sexual Health Service. All case notes were identified using the National Sexual Health database of sexual health records (Scotland). Information was collated and interpreted using Microsoft Excel and SPSS V.17. RESULTS: During January and February 2010 and 2011, 190 and 180 women, respectively, attended for EC, of whom 96 and 97 were identified as potential quick starters. Between 2010 and 2011, a statistically significant increase in QS practice was noted from 20.8% (n=20) to 37.1% (n=36) (p=0.011), with a corresponding decrease in the percentage of women traditionally started on hormonal contraception (HC): 24% (n=23) and 14.6% (n=14), respectively. There was also a decrease in those advised to return for commencement of HC [55.2% (n=53) vs 49% (n=47)]. Of those advised to return, 26.4% (n=14) and 31.9% (n=15) had no further contact with the service within at least 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: QS practice increased after the introduction of clinical guidelines. However, overall provision of HC remained low, with only around half of women prescribed a hormonal method.