RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate treatment modalities for children with extremity indwelling catheter (EIC)- or cardiac catheter-related arterial thrombosis. STUDY DESIGN: The treatment of consecutive cases of catheter-related arterial thrombosis (CAT) at our institution between 2002 and 2017 was analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 242 CATs developed in 224 children. Of these, 125 (52%) were EIC-related and 117 (48%) were cardiac catheter-related. Treatment included heparin alone in 60 cases (25%), acetylsalicyclic acid (ASA) alone in 6 cases (2%), heparin followed by ASA in 171 cases (71%), heparin followed by vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in 4 cases (1.5%), and VKA alone in 1 case (0.5%). Complete resolution of CAT was observed in 173 cases (71.5%), partial resolution in 13 cases (5.4%), and no resolution in 56 cases (23.1%). No statistical significance in the resolution rate was observed between treatment groups (P = .23). In 66% of cases, complete resolution occurred at a median of 18 days (range, 4-44 days) with heparin alone. A switch from heparin to ASA in children with partial or no resolution of CAT did not increase the resolution rate at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Heparin is an efficient treatment modality for CAT in pediatric patients. Long-term, subsequent treatment with ASA does not increase the resolution rate.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Arteria Femoral , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Arteria Ilíaca , Trombosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trombosis/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To analyse the relapse pattern and influence of second-line treatment after recurrence of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in patients who had previously undergone multimodality treatment. METHODS: Between September 1999 and December 2013, 136 patients underwent macroscopic complete resection (MCR) by extrapleural pneumonectomy after induction chemotherapy for MPM. We analysed 106 patients who presented with recurrent disease until October 2014. Data were retrieved from our mesothelioma database, with additional information regarding precise localization gathered by reviewing the imaging and medical records. RESULTS: The overall recurrence rate was 78% (106/136 patients). The median freedom from recurrence was 9 months after surgery [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 7-10]. Local recurrence only was observed in 33 patients (31%), distant metastases only in 27 patients (26%) and simultaneous distant and local recurrence in 46 patients (43%). Local recurrence was observed significantly less frequently in patients having received adjuvant radiotherapy (19 vs 47%, P = 0.003), but there was no significant impact on overall survival (OS) [radiation: 22 months (95% CI 19-24); no-radiation: 23 months (95% CI 18-27), P = 0.6]. The median OS was 22 months (95% CI 21-24), median post-recurrence survival (PRS) was 7 months (95% CI 5-9) and patients with local recurrence only survived significantly longer (12 months, 95% CI 8-16) compared with patients with distant recurrence only (5 months, 95% CI 2-8) or distant plus local relapse (6 months, 95% CI 3-9; P = 0.04). A total of 78 patients received a second-line therapy after tumour recurrence: chemotherapy (n = 48), local radiotherapy (n = 9), surgery (n = 10) or a combination thereof (n = 11). Patients undergoing second-line treatment survived significantly longer compared with patients not receiving therapy (P < 0.0005). The median PRS after surgery was significantly longer than that of patients receiving chemo-, radio- or chemo-radiotherapy (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Local recurrence of MPM remains the most frequent type of relapse even after multimodality treatment including MCR. In the present cohort, active treatment seems beneficial to the patient since surgical excision of local tumour relapse has good long-term outcome in selected patients. Thus, second-line treatment may prolong PRS; however, these results need to be confirmed in a prospective manner.