Hemodiafiltration With Endogenous Reinfusion Improved Microinflammation and Endothelial Damage Compared With Online-Hemodiafiltration: A Hypothesis Generating Study.

Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) after ultrafiltrate passage through a resin cartridge combines adsorption, convection, and diffusion. Our prospective single-center crossover study compared HFR and online-hemodiafiltration (OLHDF) effects on two uremic toxins and 13 inflammatory, endothelial status, or oxidative stress markers. After an 8-week run-in period of high-flux hemodialysis, 17 eligible stable dialysis patients (median age 65 years, 10 male) without overt clinical inflammation were scheduled for four 8-week periods in the sequence: HFR/OLHDF/HFR/OLHDF. Relative to OLHDF, HFR was associated with greater indoxyl sulfate removal and lesser abnormalities in all other study variables, namely circulating interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, proportions of activated proinflammatory (CD14+CD16+, CD14++CD16+) monocytes, endothelial progenitor cells, apoptotic endothelial microparticles, vascular endothelial growth factor, vascular cellular adhesion molecule, angiopoietins 2 and 1, annexin V, and superoxide dismutase. Differences were significant (P < 0.05) in median values of 13/15 variables. Study period comparisons were generally consistent with dialysis technique comparisons, as were data from the subgroup completing all study periods (n = 9). Our investigation provides hypothesis-generating results suggesting that compared with OLHDF, HFR improves protein-bound toxin removal, inflammatory and endothelial status, and oxidative stress.

Post-dilution high convective transport improves microinflammation and endothelial dysfunction independently of the technique.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We examined the effects of different online hemodiafiltration techniques on microinflammation and endothelial damage/repair. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective crossover study. Flow cytometry was used to measure CD14(+)CD16(+) monocytes, apoptotic endothelial microparticles (EMPs), and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). RESULTS: Patients treated with high-flux hemodialysis showed a marked chronic inflammatory state (HF-HD 11 ± 2) versus healthy subjects (HS 3.9 ± 2.3; p < 0.05). High convective transport, independent of the technique used, improves microinflammatory parameters (OL-HDF 7.3 ± 2.1 or MID 6.5 ± 3.4; p < 0.05) and the endothelial damage/repair balance compared to HF-HD (EPCs HF-HD 0.3 ± 0.2), with no differences found between the two modalities (EPCs OL-HDF 0.6 ± 0.1, MID 0.6 ± 0.2; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: An increase in convective transport improves the microinflammatory state and the endothelial damage/repair of these patients independently of the technique used.

Effects of intravenous iron on mononuclear cells during the haemodialysis session.

BACKGROUND: This study analysed, in vivo and in vitro, the effects of four different intravenous iron preparations (iron gluconate, iron sucrose, iron dextran and ferric carboxymaltose) on activation and damage of mononuclear cells. METHODS: A randomized prospective study was conducted in 10 haemodialysis (HD) patients. Blood samples were collected at baseline (T0); 1 h after starting HD, just before the iron or saline administration (T1); 30 min after the iron or saline infusion (T2) and at the end of HD (T3). In addition, peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 10 healthy individuals and 9 chronic kidney disease Stage-5 (CKD-5) without HD treatment were cultured with the 4 iron preparations. RESULTS: Iron infusion during the HD session increased the percentage of mononuclear cells with reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, Inter-Cellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and apoptosis. There were no significant differences between the four iron preparations. Culture of mononuclear cells from healthy individuals and CKD-5 patients with the different iron preparations resulted in a significant increase in ROS, ICAM-1 and apoptosis as compared with control. In an additional study, the effect of original iron sucrose formulation on mononuclear cells was compared with that of one generic formulation. The generic formulation produced a greater increase in ROS, ICAM-1 and apoptosis than the original iron sucrose. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that intravenous iron has deleterious effects on mononuclear cells. The four iron compounds evaluated produced similar effects on oxidative stress, cell activation and apoptosis. However, the effects of iron compounds with the same formulation were different, thus further investigation may be required to establish the safety of iron preparations that theoretically have the same composition.

Tandem plasmapheresis and hemodialysis: efficacy and safety.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) and plasmapheresis (PE) are usually performed independently on patients who require renal replacement therapy. We analyzed our experience using a technique that performs both modalities simultaneously. METHODS: Thirty-six patients who were treated with 287 tandem PE and HD (TPH) sessions (mean 7.97 ± 5.6 per patient) were included. PE was connected 30 min after HD started. The mean HD blood flow was 313.7 ± 44 mL/min, the mean PE blood flow was 141 ± 25 mL/min, and the duration of TPH was no longer than 240 min. The heparin dose was similar to that used for a standard HD procedure. RESULTS: In 287 TPH sessions performed, 10.45% experienced minor complications. There were significant changes in mean blood pressure after connection of the PE system. However, these differences were not clinically relevant since patients remained asymptomatic and they did not require saline infusion. At the end of treatment, 38.9% of patients were no longer dependent on dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that TPH is a safe and effective treatment that decreases exposure to an extracorporeal circuit, reducing the risks that are associated with anticoagulation agents and improving the comfortability of the patient.