Hypersensitivity reactions to vaccines in children: from measles to SARS-CoV-2.

Allergic individuals at risk for hypersensitivity reactions to measles vaccine marketed for a long time are well established. On the other hand, risk factors for hypersensitivity reactions to the new mRNA COVID-19 vaccines currently include a history of allergy, allergy to excipient of the vaccine, or hypersensitivity reactions to the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine. In the last two cases, the recipient should be assessed by an allergist before vaccination to share a decision on the choice of vaccination. Studies on skin testing accuracy and desensitization protocols to the COVID-19 vaccines and the efficacy of potential alternatives in patients with confirmed hypersensitivity reactions to the first COVID-19 vaccine are necessary to improve the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

Radiocontrast Media Hypersensitivity Reactions in Children.

Hypersensitivity reactions to radiocontrast media seem to be rare in children. Furthermore, the use of radiocontrast media in children remains quite safe in terms of the severity of reactions. Since pediatric guidelines are lacking, the diagnostic workup employed in adults could be adapted to children, taking into account that results have not yet been validated in this age group. Specific protocols for risk stratification and management of severe reactions have been proposed so far.

Novel diagnostic techniques and therapeutic strategies for IgE-mediated food allergy.

Background: Immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated food allergy is a potentially life-threatening condition and represents a heavy burden for patients and their families. Identification of the most suitable way for management of each patient has currently become the primary goal for physicians. Methods: This study reviewed the current literature related to IgE-mediated food allergy. Results: The use of innovative diagnostic tools, such as allergen-specific IgG4 determination, basophil activation test, and component-resolved diagnostics, is currently available to facilitate a proper diagnosis of food allergy. After several decades of "passive clinical management" of the disease, which was based only on avoidance of the allergenic food and the use of epinephrine in the event of anaphylaxis, there has been a switch to active treatment. The most recent evidence-practice guidelines strongly recommend the use of immunotherapy as an effective therapeutic option, particularly in cases of allergy to cow's milk, egg, or peanut. The use of omalizumab, in association with immunotherapy or alone, has been tested in several studies, and results on its effectiveness seemed to be encouraging. Other biologics, such as dupilumab, reslizumab, mepolizumab, and other anticytokines therapies, are being investigated. Another interesting future treatment strategy could be the use of DNA vaccines. Conclusion: In recent years, the management of IgE-mediated food allergy has greatly improved. Knowledge of pathogenetic mechanisms, understanding of the disease course, and the introduction of novel biomarkers led to more accurate diagnoses along with the active treatment of patients.

Linguistic Measures of the Therapeutic Process in Carl Rogers's Case of Miss Vib.

In the "parallel studies" project led by Carl Rogers at the Counseling Center of the University of Chicago over 70 years ago, measures of personality organization and other clinical ratings were applied to 10 recorded and transcribed cases. This paper applied computerized measures of the referential process to the treatment by Rogers of the client known as Miss Vib. The treatment was considered successful and used by Rogers to illustrate his theory of personality, and his view of the therapeutic process. Using the DAAP system, the measures were applied to therapist and client speech at embedded levels of magnification, including measures for the treatment as a whole to be compared to other treatments in the referential process data base; measures for individual sessions to show progression across the trajectory of a treatment for comparison with the clinical ratings; and measures representing word by word variation within a session to enable close examination of the process. The initial prediction concerning the relation of the referential process measures to the clinical measures was not confirmed. Close examination of pivotal sessions provided an account of the results beyond that emphasized in the client-centered approach.

Hypersensitivity reactions to proton pump inhibitors in childhood.

Hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are mainly described in adults. Anyway, increased use of PPIs in childhood has been observed in recent years. In the literature, only case reports are published on children. Most of the PPI HRs are IgE-mediated. Skin test concentrations and allergy workup protocols used for adults are also applied in children. This study underlies that multicentric pediatric studies focusing on PPI reactions in children are needed.

Omalizumab in children and adolescents with chronic spontaneous urticaria: Case series and review of the literature.

The recent EAACI/GA2 LEN/EDF/WAO guidelines recommend omalizumab (anti-IgE) for the management of patients aged ≥12 years with chronic urticaria unresponsive to high-doses second-generation H1 -antihistamines (antiH1 ). However, there is little published information on the success of omalizumab for such a treatment in children. We reported our experience of six patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) treated with omalizumab. Mean age of our case series was 14.7 years (range 11-16 years) with a prevalence of male gender (66.7%). All six patients were treated with at least one 6-months course of omalizumab. The average follow-up period was 13 ± 6 months. Only one patient was no responder to omalizumab therapy. Thus far, two patients have experienced a complete CSU regression over 12 months after the final omalizumab administration. The remaining three patients needed a second course of treatment. Our experience demonstrates that omalizumab is effective and safe as treatment option for CSU unresponsive to antiH1 , even in adolescent age.

Omalizumab for treatment of refractory severe atopic dermatitis. A pediatric perspective.

Omalizumab is a monoclonal antibody, targeting Fc receptor of IgE, approved for the treatment of allergic asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria. Its utility in atopic dermatitis appears controversial from data in literature since the molecule is well tolerated but it seems less effective than other medications used in adult patients (eg, Dupilumab). At present, the use of Dupilumab is not approved in pediatric patients therefore there are no second level treatments available in this age group. Here we report two clinical cases of patients (15 and 16 years old) suffering from both atopic dermatitis and asthma, treated with Omalizumab. Our experience suggests that atopic eczema of young patients with allergic comorbidities can benefit from asthma treatment with Omalizumab observing improvement on both conditions.

Hypersensitivity Reactions to Monoclonal Antibodies in Children.

Biologic drugs are widely used in pediatric medicine. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in particular are a therapeutic option for rheumatic, autoinflammatory and oncologic diseases. Adverse drug reactions and hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to mAbs may occur in children. Clinical presentation of HSRs to mAbs can be classified according to phenotypes in infusion-related reactions, cytokine release syndrome, both alpha type reactions and type I (IgE/non-IgE), type III, and type IV reactions, all beta-type reactions. The aim of this review is to focus on HSRs associated with the most frequent mAbs in childhood, with particular attention to beta-type reactions. When a reaction to mAbs is suspected a diagnostic work-up including in-vivo and in-vitro testing should be performed. A drug provocation test is recommended only when no alternative drugs are available. In selected patients with immediate IgE-mediated drug allergy a desensitization protocol is indicated. Despite the heavy use of mAbs in childhood, studies evaluating the reliability of diagnostic test are lacking. Although desensitization may be effective in reducing the risk of reactions in children, standardized pediatric protocols are still not available.

Anaphylaxis to cutaneous exposure to bovine colostrum based cream.

Children who are highly sensitive to milk may also have severe allergic reactions after exposure to cow's milk proteins(CMP) through a different administration route than the oral one. We describe the case of a 16-year-old Caucasian boy with a clinical history of persistent cow's milk allergy (CMA), who developed one episode of anaphylaxis following cutaneous application of a bovine colostrum containing cream to a surgical wound. UniCAP testing showed a significant elevation in specific IgE antibodies to whey milk proteins. Until now, only three cases of anaphylaxis following cutaneous application of products containing milk proteins were available in the scientific literature.

Evaluating children with suspected allergic reactions to vaccines for infectious diseases.

BACKGROUND: Vaccines often contain potentially allergenic material in addition to pathogen-specific immunogens that may induce allergic reactions. Parents and physicians often suspect that adverse reactions to vaccines are allergic in etiology. The concern that some of the substances contained in vaccines may trigger an anaphylactic reaction may lead to a low vaccination adherence with emergence of infectious disease epidemics. OBJECTIVE: To provide practical suggestions for managing children suspected to have an allergic reaction to a vaccine. METHODS: Information was obtained from a search of guidelines and relevant studies on allergic reactions to vaccines for infectious diseases. RESULTS: True allergic reactions elicited by a vaccine are rare. Skin testing to the vaccine and to its components may identify the triggering agent. Graded dosing desensitization is helpful in children sensitized to the offending vaccine. CONCLUSION: All children with a suspected allergic reaction to a vaccine should be carefully evaluated by routine allergy tests. When it is necessary, further immunization should be given under strict medical surveillance, which ensures that every child can safely complete the vaccination schedule.

Safety profile of oral immunotherapy with cow's milk and hen egg: A 10-year experience in controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) for food allergy is gaining interest due to the favorable clinical results reported with cow's milk, hen egg and peanut. The safety of the procedure remains a critical aspect that can limit the introduction of OIT in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: We described herein, in detail, the occurrence and characteristics of adverse events (AE) with OIT in children who participated in controlled trials at our unit. METHODS: The clinical records of 68 children who received active treatment (40 for cow's milk and 28 for hen egg) were carefully reviewed. The inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the grading of AEs were the same across the trials. Of the 68 children involved, 6 (9%) had to discontinue the OIT procedure due to severe AEs. Fifty percent of the children underwent the buildup and maintenance phases without AEs. Mild-to-moderate AEs were documented in 28 patients, who could complete the desensitization. The majority of reactions were mild or moderate, occurred during an acute intercurrent illness and required only symptomatic treatment. CONCLUSION: A careful review of the patients who received food OIT in controlled trials confirmed that AEs were not rare but that ∼90% of children could achieve an effective desensitization. The procedure remains investigational and should be performed only by trained physicians, especially in the pediatric setting.

Risk factors for drug hypersensitivity reactions in children.

Drug hypersensitivity reactions are common in children. Risk factors predisposing to IgE-mediated drug allergies and delayed drug reactions are a matter of debate. Gender, age, previous reactions to the same drug or to another drug, reduced drug metabolism, chronic diseases, polypharmacy, drug doses are linked with the onset of hypersensitivity reactions in some children. Novel advances in genetic polymorphisms can rapidly change the approach to the prevention of reactions since gene testing can be a useful screening test for severe cutaneous adverse reactions. Viral infections may act as cofactors in susceptible individuals. Polypharmacy, high doses, repeated doses and parental route of administration are also risk factors. Clinicians should take into account risk factors to allow the risk-benefit balance to be maintained.

Local Anesthetic Hypersensitivity Reactions in Pediatric Patients: Recognition and Management.

Local anesthetics (LAs) are commonly used in all medical specialties, particularly in association with surgery, obstetrics, dentistry, and emergency departments. Most individuals, starting from young children, are exposed to LAs during life. LA hardly induces adverse events when used in recommended doses and with proper injection techniques. However, immediate anaphylactic reactions to LA injections may be a rare but life-threatening manifestation. A comprehensive report of the event and performing a specialist examination are crucial to prevent further episodes. The diagnosis should be based on history, medical records, skin and challenge tests.

Association between Second-Hand Exposure to E-Cigarettes at Home and Exacerbations in Children with Asthma.

Several studies have shown the effects of e-cigarettes in adults. Nowadays, few data are available in the pediatric population. This study aims to assess the relationship between asthma exacerbations and home exposure to e-cigarettes. We conducted a pilot, retrospective, monocenter, observational study. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including number of asthma exacerbations, need for rescue therapy and/or therapeutic step-up, and Asthma Control Test (ACT) and children-Asthma Control Test (c-ACT) scores. The cohort consisted of 54 patients (5-17 years old), divided into two groups: A, including patients exposed to e-cigarette aerosols; B, including unexposed patients. The statistical analysis showed no relevant variation in the number of asthma symptomatic days and need for rescue therapy in group A versus group B (p = 0.27 and 0.19, respectively). There were no statistically significant variations when also considering the number of patients who needed a therapeutic step-up (p = 0.3). The mean values of ACT and c-ACT were, respectively, 17.2 ± 7.6 and 18.3 ± 5.6 in group A and 19.6 ± 3.8 and 14.6 ± 5.8 in group B (p = 0.3 and 0.4, respectively). Although we did not find a statistically significant correlation between second-hand e-cigarette exposure and asthma exacerbations, our findings suggest that asthmatic children exposed second-hand to e-cigarettes may have increased risk of asthma symptomatic days. Future research is warranted.

Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis in Children.

Drug-induced anaphylaxis in children is less common than in adults and primarily involves beta-lactams and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Epidemiological studies show variable prevalence, influenced by age, gender, and atopic diseases. The pathophysiology includes IgE-mediated reactions and non-IgE mechanisms, like cytokine release reactions. We address drug-induced anaphylaxis in children, focusing on antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, neuromuscular blocking agents, and monoclonal antibodies. Diagnosis combines clinical criteria with in vitro, in vivo, and drug provocation tests. The immediate management of acute anaphylaxis primarily involves the use of adrenaline, coupled with long-term strategies, such as allergen avoidance and patient education. Desensitization protocols are crucial for children allergic to essential medications, particularly antibiotics and chemotherapy agents.

Early Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Biologics in Pediatric Allergic Diseases: Preliminary Results from a Prospective Real-World Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing interest in biologics for the management of allergic diseases, sparse real-world data are still available in the pediatric population. This study aimed to evaluate the early real-life efficacy and safety of omalizumab for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), and Dupilumab for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: A prospective study enrolling children aged 6-18 years was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of biologic drugs at 16 weeks of treatment (T1). The effectiveness was measured using validated questionnaires (ACQ-5 for asthma, UAS7 for CSU, and EASI score for AD). Secondary outcome measures included reductions in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dosages, asthma-related hospitalizations/exacerbations, and quality of life (QoL) indicators (iNRS, sNRS, DLQI/cDLQI) for CSU and AD. Safety was expressed according to the descriptions of adverse events provided by EMA and FDA. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of eighteen children (mean age 12.9 ± 3.4 years). The omalizumab treatment significantly reduced ACQ-5 and UAS7 scores (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). In patients with asthma, decreased ICS dosage and hospitalization/exacerbation rates were observed. QoL parameters significantly improved in CSU and AD patients. No severe adverse events were reported for either treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings validate omalizumab and dupilumab as effective and safe therapeutic options for managing moderate-to-severe allergic diseases in children and adolescents.

Comparison between two maintenance feeding regimens after successful cow's milk oral desensitization.

BACKGROUND: Cow's milk allergy is common in infancy, and total avoidance of this food is the only effective approach. In alternative, oral immunotherapy has been proposed to achieve tolerance. Once desensitization is achieved, daily intake of milk is recommended to maintain it, but this may be impractical for children/parents. We assessed whether a twice weekly maintenance regimen is effective. METHODS: Children who were successfully desensitized with oral immunotherapy were randomized to two maintenance regimens for 1 year: group A had to eat 150-200 ml milk daily, group B had to eat 150-200 ml milk twice weekly. Both regimens were associated to a totally free diet. Maintenance of tolerance and adverse events were recorded during 1 year. Specific IgE, IgG4 and prick-by-prick test to milk were carried out before immunotherapy (T0), before maintenance (T1), and after 1 year (T2). RESULTS: Recorded episodes included asthma, oral itching, urticaria, rhinitis, abdominal pain variously combined, usually associated with concomitant illness or exercise. The episodes were 8 in group A and 9 in group B, with no difference. None of the children discontinued the feeding maintenance. Specific IgG4 increased at T1 and remained high at T2. Specific IgE and skin reactivity significantly decreased at T2. There was no difference in those parameters between the groups. CONCLUSION: After achieving desensitization to cow milk with oral immunotherapy, a maintenance regimen with milk given twice weekly is as effective as the daily maintenance.

Long-Term Safety of Omalizumab in Children with Asthma and/or Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A 4-Year Prospective Study in Real Life.

Background: Insufficient data are available on the long-term "real-life" safety profile of omalizumab in children. This study evaluated the long-term safety of omalizumab in a pediatric cohort with severe asthma or chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Methods: A monocentric, prospective study evaluated the long-term safety of omalizumab in patients aged 6-18 years. Each patient completed the standardized MedDRA questionnaire to identify adverse events (AEs). Results: In total, 23 patients, median age 15 (14-18) years, affected by severe asthma (60.8%) or CSU (39.2%), treated with omalizumab for 2 (1-4) years were enrolled. The most common AEs belong to the system organ class (SOC) of general disorders and administration-site conditions (37.17%). Skin and subcutaneous tissue problems represent the second most frequently reported AEs (24.35%). Central nervous system and musculoskeletal disorders were quite frequent (15.38% and 8.97%, respectively). Other adverse events were tachycardia (5.12%), vertigo and abdominal pain (2.60% and 3.86%, respectively), and dry eye (1.3%). Only one patient reported herpes virus infection during treatment (1.3%). No cases of anaphylaxis, hemopathies, uronephropathies, respiratory, psychiatric, hepatobiliary, or oncological pathologies were reported. Conclusions: Long-term "real-life" treatment with omalizumab in children appears well tolerated. Its safety and efficacy profile makes omalizumab an excellent alternative in severe asthma and CSU in children.