An Immersive Virtual Reality Curriculum for Pediatric Hematology Clinicians on Shared Decision-making for Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Anemia.

Although hydroxyurea (HU) is an effective treatment for sickle cell anemia, uptake remains low. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a recommended strategy for HU initiation to elicit family preferences; however, clinicians lack SDM training. We implemented an immersive virtual reality (VR) curriculum at 8 pediatric institutions to train clinicians on SDM that included counseling virtual patients. Clinicians' self-reported confidence significantly improved following the VR simulations on all communication skills assessed, including asking open-ended questions, eliciting specific concerns, and confirming understanding (Ps≤0.01 for all). VR may be an effective method for educating clinicians to engage in SDM for HU.

Resident perspectives on communication training that utilizes immersive virtual reality.

BACKGROUND: Communication skills can be difficult to teach and assess in busy outpatient settings. These skills are important for effective counseling such as in cases of influenza vaccine hesitancy. It is critical to consider novel educational methods to supplement current strategies aimed at teaching relational skills. METHODS: An immersive virtual reality (VR) curriculum on addressing influenza vaccine hesitancy was developed using Kern's six-step approach to curriculum design. The curriculum was meant to teach best-practice communication skills in cases of influenza vaccine hesitancy. Eligible participants included postgraduate level (PL) 2 and PL-3 pediatric residents (n = 24). Immediately following the curriculum, a survey was administered to assess residents' attitudes toward the VR curriculum and perceptions regarding the effectiveness of VR in comparison to other educational modalities. A survey was administered 1 month following the VR curriculum to assess trainee-perceived impact of the curriculum on clinical practice. RESULTS: All eligible residents (n = 24) completed the curriculum. Ninety-two percent (n = 22) agreed or strongly agreed that VR simulations were like real-life patient encounters. Seventy-five percent (n = 18) felt that VR was equally effective to standardized patient (SP) encounters and less effective than bedside teaching (P < 0.001). At 1-month follow-up, 67% of residents (n = 16) agreed or strongly agreed that the VR experience improved how they counseled families in cases of influenza vaccine hesitancy. DISCUSSION: An immersive VR curriculum at our institution was well-received by learners, and residents rated VR as equally effective as SP encounters. As such, immersive VR may be a promising modality for communication training.

Multiuser immersive virtual reality simulation for interprofessional sepsis recognition and management.

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a leading cause of pediatric mortality. While there has been significant effort toward improving adherence to evidence-based care, gaps remain. Immersive multiuser virtual reality (MUVR) simulation may be an approach to enhance provider clinical competency and situation awareness for sepsis. METHODS: A prospective, observational pilot of an interprofessional MUVR simulation assessing a decompensating patient from sepsis was conducted from January to June 2021. The study objective was to establish validity and acceptability evidence for the platform by assessing differences in sepsis recognition between experienced and novice participants. Interprofessional teams assessed and managed a patient together in the same VR experience with the primary outcome of time to recognition of sepsis utilizing the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique analyzed using a logistic regression model. Secondary outcomes were perceived clinical accuracy, relevancy to practice, and side effects experienced. RESULTS: Seventy-two simulations included 144 participants. The cumulative odds ratio of recognizing sepsis at 2 min into the simulation in comparison to later time points by experienced versus novice providers were significantly higher with a cumulative odds ratio of 3.70 (95% confidence interval: 1.15-9.07, p = .004). Participants agreed that the simulation was clinically accurate (98.6%) and will impact their practice (81.1%), with a high degree of immersion (95.7%-99.3%), and the majority of side effects were perceived as mild (70.4%-81.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our novel MUVR simulation demonstrated significant differences in sepsis recognition between experienced and novice participants. This validity evidence along with the data on the simulation's acceptability supports expanded use in training and assessment.

Impact of a Virtual Reality Curriculum on Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: A Pilot Trial.

Although the strongest predictor of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is a high-quality recommendation, physicians often provide weak recommendations. Thus, the authors developed Virtual Immersive Communication Training on Recommending Immunizations (VICTORI), a virtual reality (VR)‒based intervention that provided physicians the opportunity to deliberately practice recommendation behaviors. VICTORI included VR simulations during which participants counseled caregiver avatars hesitant to vaccinate. Before participation in VICTORI, participants reviewed a smartphone application on recommendation behaviors. A nonrandomized control trial of VICTORI was conducted with licensed and resident physicians. The intervention group completed the application and VICTORI simulations, whereas a comparison group completed only the application. The hypothesis was that HPV vaccination rates would increase for patients in the intervention group. The preintervention period was defined as the 6 months before allocated training (February 1, 2020-July 31, 2020), and the postintervention period was the 6 months after (October 1, 2020-March 31, 2021). The primary outcome was a change in the rates of human papillomavirus vaccine initiation among eligible patients presenting to clinic before and after. Of 142 eligible physicians, 134 (94%) chose to participate, with 93 of /97 (96%) intervention and 30 of 37 (81%) comparison participants completing study protocols. There was a statistically significant increase in patients' HPV vaccine initiation rates after training within the intervention group (54.3%‒72.4%; 18.1% difference [95% CI=11.0, 25.8]; p<0.001) but not within the comparison group (59.5%‒63.4%; 3.9% difference [95% CI= -11.0, 19.0]; p=0.609). In conclusion, HPV vaccine initiation increased after VR training, and further study is warranted.

Development and Implementation of Augmented Reality Enhanced High-Fidelity Simulation for Recognition of Patient Decompensation.

INTRODUCTION: Simulation is a core aspect of training and assessment; however, simulation laboratories are limited in their ability to visually represent mental, respiratory, and perfusion status. Augmented reality (AR) represents a potential adjunct to address this gap. METHODS: A prospective, observational pilot of interprofessional simulation assessing a decompensating patient was conducted from April to June 2019. Teams completed 2 simulations: (1) traditional training (TT) using a manikin (Laerdal SimJunior) and (2) AR-enhanced training (ART) using a manikin plus an AR patient. The primary outcome was self-assessed effectiveness at the assessment of patient decompensation. Secondary outcomes were attitudes toward and adverse effects during the AR training. RESULTS: Twenty-one simulation sessions included 84 participants in headsets. Participants reported improved ability to assess the patient's mental status, respiratory status, and perfusion status (all P < 0.0001) during ART in comparison to TT. Similar findings were noted for recognition of hypoxemia, shock, apnea, and decompensation (all P ≤ 0.0003) but not for recognition of cardiac arrest (P = 0.06). Most participants agreed or strongly agreed that ART accurately depicted a decompensating patient (89%), reinforced key components of the patient assessment (88%), and will impact how they care for patients (68%). Augmented reality-enhanced training was rated more effective than manikin training and standardized patients and equally as effective as bedside teaching. CONCLUSIONS: This novel application of AR to enhance the realism of manikin simulation demonstrated improvement in self-assessed recognition of patient decompensation. Augmented reality may represent a viable modality for increasing the clinical impact of training.

Dose Matters: A Smartphone Application to Improve Asthma Control Among Patients at an Urban Pediatric Primary Care Clinic.

Objective: As the most common chronic condition of childhood, asthma is a frequent target for family education. However, current educational strategies rarely tailor to learning style or literacy level. Thus, we developed and implemented a smartphone application (app) leveraging gamified features entitled CHANGE Asthma ("Clinic, Home, And on the Go Education for Asthma"). We subsequently assessed its impact on asthma control. Methods: Patients aged 4-11 years with a previously documented childhood asthma control test (C-ACT) score of <20, indicating poor control, were recruited to participate in this randomized control pilot study. The intervention group downloaded CHANGE Asthma; asthma control was assessed at enrollment and at follow-up. The changes in C-ACT score in both groups were compared using analysis of covariance (primary outcome). App usage was monitored for 4 months following download, and the relationship between usage time, and the change in C-ACT score was assessed via linear regression. Results: The control and intervention groups both included 20 caregivers with 75% of participants completing follow-up. Although C-ACT scores among intervention participants significantly improved at follow-up, compared to their own baseline (P = 0.04), the change of C-ACT score did not significantly differ from that of the control group (P = 0.78). Among the intervention participants, there was a positive, dose-dependent relationship between app usage time and positive change in C-ACT score (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Usage of a gamified app was associated with a dose-dependent improvement in asthma control over time, suggesting that further evaluation of apps for asthma education, and perhaps for other chronic conditions, is warranted.

Modernizing Training on Social Determinants of Health: A Virtual Neighborhood Tour is Noninferior to an in-Person Experience.

Using innovative technology to teach about social determinants of health might address current training barriers related to standardization, sustainability, and scalability. A virtual tour of an impoverished neighborhood that used 360° videos was noninferior to the previous in-person experience.

A Virtual Reality Curriculum for Pediatric Residents Decreases Rates of Influenza Vaccine Refusal.

OBJECTIVE: Influenza vaccine hesitancy is common in the primary care setting. Though physicians can affect caregivers' attitudes toward vaccination, physicians report uneasiness discussing vaccine hesitancy. Few studies have targeted physician-patient communication training as a means to decrease vaccination refusal. METHODS: An immersive virtual reality (VR) curriculum was created to teach pediatric residents communication skills when discussing influenza vaccine hesitancy. This pilot curriculum consisted of 3 VR simulations during which residents counseled graphical character representatives (avatars) who expressed vaccine hesitancy. Participants were randomized to the intervention (n = 24) or control (n = 21) group. Only residents in the intervention group underwent the VR curriculum. Impact of the curriculum was assessed through difference in influenza vaccine refusal rates between the intervention and control groups in the 3 months after the VR curriculum. RESULTS: Participants included postgraduate level (PL) 2 and PL3 pediatric residents. All eligible residents (n = 45) participated; the survey response rate was 100%. In patients aged 6 to 59 months, residents in the intervention group had a decreased rate of influenza vaccination refusal in the postcurriculum period compared to the control group (27.8% vs 37.1%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Immersive VR may be an effective modality to teach communication skills to medical trainees. Next steps include evaluation of the curriculum in a larger, multisite trial.