Pharmacological concentrations of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor lovastatin decrease the formation of the Alzheimer beta-amyloid peptide in vitro and in patients.

Epidemiological studies demonstrate that hypercholesterolemia is a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). As the generation and accumulation of the beta-amyloid peptide (Abeta) in the brain appears to be significant for the initiation and progression of AD, it is possible that cholesterol levels regulate Abeta formation and/or clearance. To test the effects of altering cholesterol on Abeta formation, we incubated cells with or without lovastatin acid, the active metabolite of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor lovastatin, and measured the fraction of Abeta formed from its precursor under each condition. We observed that treatment with lovastatin acid led to a profound decrease in the levels of Abeta formed. This effect was observed at concentrations of 0.05-5 microM, ranges where this compound is effective at inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase. To examine the effects of lovastatin on Abeta in vivo, human subjects who had elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were treated during a double-blind, randomized study with 10-60-mg once-daily doses of a controlled-release formulation of lovastatin, or matching placebo. Serum Abeta concentrations were measured before and after up to 3 months of treatment. Mean and median changes from baseline in serum Abeta concentrations showed a significant (p < 0.0348), dose-dependent decrease. Differences between the 40- and 60-mg dose groups and placebo were statistically significant (Dunnett's p< 0.05). Our results suggest a mechanism by which hypercholesterolemia may increase risk for AD and indicate that lovastatin reduces Abeta formation and may thereby be effective in delaying the onset and/or slowing the progression of AD.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of donepezil hydrochloride in hepatically impaired patients.

AIMS: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), tolerability and safety of donepezil HCl 5 mg following oral doses for 1 and 24 days in hepatically impaired patients compared with healthy controls under steady-state, multiple-dose conditions. METHODS: In this single-centre, multiple-dose, open-label study, patients with impaired hepatic function (Child-Pugh grade A or B) and healthy controls (matched by gender, age and weight to the hepatically impaired patients) received a single 5 mg dose of donepezil on day 1 and then donepezil HCl 5 mg once daily from days 6 to 29. PK and PD (determination of erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase inhibition) parameters were evaluated on days 1 and 29. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), vital signs, physical examination and clinical laboratory test parameters were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: A total of 35 subjects (18 patients with hepatic impairment and 17 healthy controls) were enrolled and 32 subjects (16 in each group) completed the study. On day 1 (following a single dose) hepatically impaired patients showed a significant decrease in T(max), while t((1/2)) and AUC(0-infinity) were significantly increased compared with the healthy controls. On day 29 (following multiple doses), AUC(0-24 h), C(max), t((1/2)), C(SS), and R(A) were significantly increased in hepatically impaired patients compared with healthy controls. AUC(0-24 h) increased by 47.6% in the patients with hepatic impairment compared with the healthy controls. There were no significant differences in PD between the groups, although at steady state, the mean AChE inhibition was 16.2% higher in the hepatically impaired patients. No serious AEs were reported and no subject withdrew from the study due to AEs. The most common AEs in both groups were headache and diarrhoea. No clinically significant changes from baseline were observed in vital signs, physical examination findings or electrocardiograms. There was a significant difference in the number of hepatically impaired subjects with abnormalities in serum glucose compared with healthy subjects. However, these elevations were not associated with AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that patients with AD and mild to moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh grade A or B) can be safely given donepezil 5 mg once daily and that this dose is associated with a nonsignificantly higher AChE inhibition than age-matched volunteers.

Concurrent administration of donepezil HCl and sertraline HCl in healthy volunteers: assessment of pharmacokinetic changes and safety following single and multiple oral doses.

AIM: This study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of donepezil HCl and sertraline HCl when administered separately and in combination. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, three-period crossover study. In consecutive dosing periods separated by washout periods of > or = 3 weeks, healthy volunteers received either oral donepezil HCI 5 mg once daily for 15 days, oral sertraline HCl 50 mg once daily for 5 days followed by 10 days of once-daily sertraline HCl 100 mg, or the simultaneous administration of oral donepezil HCl and sertraline HCl. Plasma donepezil and sertraline concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Safety was evaluated by physical and laboratory evaluations and the monitoring of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 19 volunteers (16 male and three female) were enrolled. Three male subjects withdrew from the study prematurely due to AEs (one case of nausea/stomach cramps and one case of eosinophilia during combination treatment, and one upper respiratory tract infection during treatment with sertraline HCl alone). In subjects who completed all three treatment periods (n = 16), the concurrent administration of donepezil HCl and sertraline HCl did not alter the steady-state (day 15) PK parameters of donepezil HCl. A small (< 12%) but statistically significant (P = 0.02) increase in donepezil C(max) was seen after single doses of sertraline HCl and donepezil HCl on day 1 but this was not thought to be clinically meaningful. No significant differences in the t(max) or AUC(0-24 h) of donepezil were observed between the donepezil HCl only or donepezil HCl plus sertraline HCl groups on day 1. No significant changes in sertraline PK parameters were observed either on day 1 (single dose) or on day 15 (steady state) when sertraline HCl was co-administered with donepezil HCl. Generally, the concurrent administration of donepezil HCl and sertraline HCl was well tolerated, with no serious AEs reported during the study. Some digestive system AEs tended to occur more frequently during combination treatment than with either treatment alone, but there was no statistically significant increase in the incidence of any individual AE. The most common AEs during the combination therapy were nausea and diarrhoea, which were rated as mild or moderate in severity. These AEs were also reported during the administration of each drug alone. CONCLUSIONS: The co-administration of once-daily oral donepezil HCl 5 mg for 15 days and once-daily oral sertraline HCl (50 mg for 5 days increased to 100 mg for 10 days) did not result in any clinically meaningful pharmacokinetic interactions, and no unexpected AEs were observed.

Concurrent administration of donepezil HCl and levodopa/carbidopa in patients with Parkinson's disease: assessment of pharmacokinetic changes and safety following multiple oral doses.

AIM: The use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of comorbid Alzheimer's disease in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients stabilized on a levodopa regimen may potentially disrupt cholinergic balance. This randomized, double-blind, crossover study investigated the safety of, and possible drug-drug interaction between, donepezil HCl and levodopa/carbidopa. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with PD who were taking physician-optimized doses of levodopa/carbidopa (with daytime dosing intervals of 4-8 h) were administered once-daily doses of either donepezil HCl (5 mg) or placebo for 15 days, in two treatment periods, separated by a washout of at least 2 weeks. Some patients took a second dose of levodopa/carbidopa after 4 h, therefore subanalysis of the levodopa/carbidopa data was conducted up to 4 h and 8 h after dosing. Twenty-six healthy matched controls received open-label donepezil HCl only, for a single 15-day period. Blood samples were collected before, during and after the 15 doses of donepezil HCl for pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments. Pharmacokinetic parameters included maximum attained plasma drug concentration (C(max)), time at which C(max) is attained (t(max)), plasma drug concentration at steady state (C(ss)), and area under the drug concentration-time curve over the dosing interval. Safety assessments included monitoring adverse events, and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor examination. RESULTS: The mean age of all subjects was 72.6 +/- 1.3 years. Donepezil PK assessments of PD patients receiving levodopa/carbidopa were similar to the PK results from healthy controls who received donepezil HCl only (mean AUC(0-12 h)= 281.6 +/- 17.6 and 268.6 +/- 19.9 ng.h ml(-1), respectively). Carbidopa PK were not significantly altered by the concomitant administration of multiple doses of donepezil HCl, compared with when PD patients received placebo (mean AUC(0-8 h)= 921.8 +/- 160 and 821.8 +/- 113 ng.h ml(-1), respectively). Four hours after administration of donepezil HCl in PD patients, AUC(0-4 h), C(max) and C(ss) of levodopa were higher than when PD patients received placebo (P < 0.05). Eight hours after donepezil HCl, however, only C(max) and t(max) were observed to change compared with when PD patients received placebo (mean C(max) = 2652 +/- 429 and 2077 +/- 276 ng ml(-1), respectively; mean t(max) = 1.7 +/- 0.4 and 2.9 +/- 0.5 h, respectively; P< or = 0.05). The number of PD patients who experienced at least one adverse event during the study (13/25) was higher when they received donepezil HCl than when they received placebo (5/25), but was the same as healthy subjects who received donepezil HCl only (13/26). There were no significant differences in change from baseline on the UPDRS motor examination parameters in PD patients when they took donepezil HCl and when they took placebo. CONCLUSIONS: No clinically significant drug-drug interactions between donepezil HCl and levodopa/carbidopa were observed at steady state. The small changes in the pharmacokinetics of levodopa did not result in any change in motor symptoms. Co-administration of the two drugs led to a small increase in adverse events compared with administration of levodopa/carbidopa alone in PD patients. These adverse events, however, were consistent with donepezil's cholinomimetic effect, and their incidence was comparable to that observed following the administration of donepezil HCl alone.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and safety of donepezil HCl in subjects with moderately impaired renal function.

AIMS: To characterize the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety profiles of donepezil in subjects with moderate renal impairment and matched healthy controls during single-dose and multiple-dose phases. METHODS: This open-label study enrolled subjects with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CL(Cr)] 17-33 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) body surface area) and age, weight and sex-matched healthy controls. A single-dose (5 mg donepezil) phase was followed by a 23-day multiple dose (5 mg day(-1) donepezil) steady-state phase. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of donepezil were determined for up to 144 h after the first dose and 168 h after the last dose. RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects were enrolled, 19 renally impaired and 17 healthy controls. All pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were similar between groups after a single dose of donepezil (C(max) 5.17 +/- 0.36 and 6.07 +/- 0.49 ng ml(-1); AUC(0-24) 76.05 +/- 5.54 and 77.45 +/- 4.49 ng.h ml(-1); mean maximum percentage inhibition [I(max)] red blood cell (RBC) AChE activity 32.07 +/- 2.00 and 31.69 +/- 2.45%; for subjects with renal impairment and healthy subjects, respectively). Pharmacokinetic parameters under steady-state conditions did not differ between renally impaired and healthy subjects (C(SS) 20.83 +/- 1.78 and 18.38 +/- 1.52 ng ml(-1); AUC(0-24) 500.0 +/- 42.8 and 441.1 +/- 36.4 ng.h ml(-1); degree of accumulation [R(A)] 6.98 +/- 0.59 and 5.94 +/- 0.53; for subjects with renal impairment and healthy subjects, respectively). Main pharmacodynamic parameters were also similar in renally impaired and healthy subjects at steady state (average percentage inhibition [I(SS)] RBC AChE activity 65.11 +/- 2.52 and 60.62 +/- 2.95, respectively). Protein binding was also similar between groups (% free donepezil 23.54 +/- 1.96 and 20.23 +/- 0.64, respectively). Donepezil was well tolerated by both groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the pharmacokinetics of donepezil are not altered after dosing to steady state, and that donepezil can be administered safely to subjects with moderate renal impairment.

Concurrent administration of donepezil HCl and risperidone in patients with schizophrenia: assessment of pharmacokinetic changes and safety following multiple oral doses.

AIM: This open-label, multiple-dose trial investigated the effect of concurrent administration of donepezil HCl with risperidone on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety profiles of both drugs. METHODS: Sixteen male patients with schizophrenia, who were receiving stable, physician-optimized risperidone (1-4 mg twice daily), and 15 healthy age- and weight-matched male controls, received donepezil HCl 5 mg daily for 7 days. Patients with schizophrenia remained on their physician-optimized dose of risperidone throughout the study. Pharmacokinetic parameters (C(max), t(max) and AUC) were assessed from plasma drug concentrations measured in blood collected before, during and after administration (for 12 h after risperidone on days 0 and 7, and for 24 h after donepezil HCl on day 7). RESULTS: The mean age of all the subjects was 38.5 years. Donepezil PK parameters were similar between patients taking donepezil HCl + risperidone (AUC(0-24 h) = 329.0 +/- 17.2 ng x h ml(-1)) and controls taking donepezil HCl alone (AUC(0-24 h) = 354.7 +/- 28.2 ng x h ml(-1)). Pharmacokinetic parameters for risperidone and 9-OH risperidone were not altered in patients with schizophrenia after 7 days of donepezil HCl administration (AUC(0-12 h) standardized by dose: risperidone = 59.6 +/- 16.3 ng.h ml(-1) at day 0, 56.0 +/- 15.8 ng x h ml(-1) at day 7; 9-OH risperidone = 162.1 +/- 19.2 ng x h ml(-1) at day 0, 163.3 +/- 15.0 ng x h ml(-1) at day 7). The most common adverse event in both treatment groups was diarrhoea (6/16 risperidone + donepezil HCl patients and 9/16 donepezil HCl only subjects). There were no significant changes in physical examination, ECG, vital signs or treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory values associated with either of the treatment regimens. No subject developed extrapyramidal side-effects following donepezil administration. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that once-daily dosing of 5 mg donepezil HCl does not alter the PK of risperidone in patients with schizophrenia. The combination of risperidone and donepezil HCl was well tolerated.