Report of the MEDINE2 Bachelor of Medicine (Bologna First Cycle) tuning project.

BACKGROUND: European Higher Education institutions are expected to adopt a three-cycle system of Bachelor, Master and Doctor degrees as part of the Bologna Process. Tuning methodology was previously used by the MEDINE Thematic Network to gain consensus on core learning outcomes (LO) for primary medical degrees (Master of Medicine) across Europe. AIMS: The current study, undertaken by the MEDINE2 Thematic Network, sought to explore stakeholder opinions on core LO for Bachelor of Medicine degrees. METHOD: Key stakeholders were invited to indicate, on a Likert scale, to what extent they thought students should have achieved each of the Master of Medicine LO upon successful completion of the first three years of university education in medicine (Bachelor of Medicine). RESULTS: There were 560 responses to the online survey, representing medical students, academics, graduates, employers, patients, and virtually all EU countries. There was broad consensus between respondents that all LO previously defined for primary medical degrees should be achieved to some extent by the end of the first three years. CONCLUSIONS: The findings promote integration of undergraduate medical curricula, and also offer a common framework and terminology for discussing what a European Bachelor of Medicine graduate can and cannot do, promoting mobility, graduate employability and patient safety.

Endothelin-A receptor antagonism reduces blood pressure and increases renal blood flow in hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure: a comparison of selective and combined endothelin receptor blockade.

BACKGROUND: Endothelin (ET) is implicated in the pathophysiology of chronic renal failure (CRF). We therefore studied the systemic and renal hemodynamic effects of ET receptor antagonists in CRF and examined differences between selective ETA, selective ETB, and combined ETA/B receptor blockade. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 4-way crossover study comparing selective ET receptor antagonists BQ-123 (ETA) and BQ-788 (ETB), given alone and in combination, in acute studies in 8 hypertensive CRF patients and 8 matched healthy controls. BQ-123, alone and in combination with BQ-788, reduced blood pressure in CRF, particularly with BQ-123 alone (mean arterial pressure: controls -4+/-2%, CRF -13+/-2%, P<0.01 versus placebo). In CRF, in the face of this fall in blood pressure, BQ-123 substantially increased renal blood flow (38.8+/-23.9%, P<0.01 versus placebo) and reduced renal vascular resistance (-44.5+/-11.3%, P<0.01 versus placebo) when given alone but not when combined with BQ-788. These changes were accompanied by a reduction in effective filtration fraction. BQ-123, alone or in combination with BQ-788, had minimal effects on the renal circulation in healthy controls, and BQ-788 alone produced both systemic and renal vasoconstriction in CRF and healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: ETA receptor antagonism was highly effective in lowering blood pressure in CRF patients currently treated for hypertension. In addition, there were effects consistent with a renoprotective action. However, because the ETB receptor appears to play a key role in the maintenance of tonic renal vasodilation, combined ETA/B receptor antagonism, although it lowered blood pressure, did not confer these renal benefits.

Fractional urinary excretion of endothelin-1 is reduced by acute ETB receptor blockade.

Evidence suggests that urinary excretion of endothelin-1 (ET-1) reflects renal ET-1 production and is independent of systemic ET-1 activity. The influence of ET receptors on urinary ET-1 excretion has not been studied in humans, yet peritubular ETB receptors are abundant within the kidney. We have studied the effects of acute ETA and ETB receptor blockade with BQ-123 and BQ-788, respectively, on urinary ET-1 excretion in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in 16 subjects with a wide range of GFRs (15-152 ml/min). Plasma ET-1 concentrations (pET-1) and urinary ET-1 excretion rate (uET-1) at baseline correlated inversely with GFR (R2 = 0.18 and 0.36, respectively, P < 0.01). However, changes in pET-1 after ET receptor antagonism were not related to changes in uET-1 (R2 = 0.007, P = 0.18). pET-1 increased only after BQ-788, alone or in combination with BQ-123, consistent with ETB receptor-mediated clearance of ET-1 from the circulation. uET-1 was reduced only after BQ-788 alone [-4.7 pg/min (SD 5.5), P < 0.01]. Because BQ-788 also reduced GFR, fractional excretion of ET-1 (FeET-1) was calculated. FeET-1 fell after BQ-788 alone [-41% (SD 26%), P < 0.01] or in combination with BQ-123 [-40% (SD 29%), P < 0.01]. FeET-1 was not altered by placebo or BQ-123 alone. In conclusion, urinary ET-1 excretion does not appear to relate to the pool of plasma ET-1. Because of the short duration of this study, it is unlikely that ET receptor blockade had significant effects on renal ET-1 production. Therefore, the reduction in FeET-1 after ETB blockade appears to indicate that renal excretion of ET-1 is at least partly facilitated by ETB receptor activation.

Endothelin A receptor antagonism and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition are synergistic via an endothelin B receptor-mediated and nitric oxide-dependent mechanism.

Animal studies suggest that endothelin A (ETA) receptor antagonism and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition may be synergistic. This interaction and the role of ETB receptors and endothelial mediators were investigated in terms of systemic and renal effects in humans in two studies. In one study, six subjects received placebo, the ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123 alone, and BQ-123 in combination with the ETB receptor antagonist BQ-788 after pretreatment with the ACE inhibitor enalapril (E) or placebo. In the other, six subjects who were pretreated with E received placebo, BQ-123, and BQ-123 with concomitant inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) synthase or cyclo-oxygenase (COX). Both were randomized, double-blind, crossover studies. Mean arterial pressure was reduced by BQ-123, an effect that was doubled during ACE inhibition (mean area under curve +/- SEM; BQ-123, -2.3 +/- 1.8%; BQ-123+E, -5.1 +/- 1.1%; P < 0.05 versus placebo). BQ-123 increased effective renal blood flow (BQ-123, -0.1 +/- 2.4%; BQ-123+E, 10.9 +/- 4.2%; P < 0.01 versus BQ-123), reduced effective renal vascular resistance (BQ-123, -1.2 +/- 3.1%; BQ-123+E, -12.8 +/- 3.0%; P < 0.01 versus placebo and versus BQ-123), and increased urinary sodium excretion markedly (BQ-123, 2.6 +/- 12.8%; BQ-123+E, 25.2 +/- 12.6%; P < 0.05 versus BQ-123, P < 0.01 versus placebo and versus E) only during ACE inhibition. These effects were abolished by both ETB receptor blockade and NO synthase inhibition, whereas COX inhibition had no effect. In conclusion, the combination of ETA receptor antagonism and ACE inhibition is synergistic via an ETB receptor-mediated, NO-dependent, COX-independent mechanism. The reduction of BP and renal vascular resistance and associated substantial natriuresis make this a potentially attractive therapeutic combination in renal disease.