Direct-acting antivirals ability to clear intestinal HCV-RNA in liver transplant patients.

The hepatitis C virus mainly infects the liver but is also able to infect and replicate in other body compartments by creating an extra-hepatic reservoir that may influence the persistence of the infection after transplantation. It is unknown whether antiviral drugs affect the viral extra-hepatic sites. We evaluated the ability of pegylated/interferon + ribavirin and sofosbuvir + ribavirin to clear the virus from the gastrointestinal mucosa of liver-transplanted patients with HCV recurrence after transplantation. A total of 51 liver-transplanted patients, 30 treated with pegylated/interferon + ribavirin (ERA1) and 21 treated with sofosbuvir + ribavirin (ERA2), were enrolled, and blood serum and gastrointestinal tissues analyzed for the presence of HCV-RNA. In the ERA1 group, the 46.6% of patients had a sustained viral response to antiviral treatment, and gastrointestinal biopsies were positive for HCV in 73.3% of cases, 54.5% of responders, and 45.5% of non-responders. In the ERA2 group, the 66.6% had a sustained viral response, and gastrointestinal HCV-RNA was present in the 14.3% of patients, all relapsers. Sofosbuvir + ribavirin cleared the intestinal HCV in 85.7% of patients with recurrent HCV infection, while pegylated/interferon + ribavirin cleared it in 26.6% of treated patients, demonstrating the better effectiveness of new direct antiviral agents in clearing HCV intestinal reservoir.

Underwater colorectal EMR: remodeling endoscopic mucosal resection.

BACKGROUND: Underwater EMR (UEMR) has been reported as a new technique for the removal of large sessile colorectal polyps without need for submucosal injection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate (1) outcomes of UEMR, (2) whether UEMR can be easily performed by an endoscopist skilled in traditional EMR without specific dedicated training in UEMR, and (3) whether EUS is required before UEMR. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Single, tertiary-care referral center. INTERVENTION: Underwater EMR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Complete resection and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 72 consecutive patients underwent UEMR of 81 sessile colorectal polyps. EUS was performed before UEMR in 9 cases (11.1%) with a suspicious mucosal/vascular pattern. The mean polyp size was 18.7 mm (range 10-50 mm); the mean UEMR time was 11.8 minutes. Fifty-five polyps (68%) were removed en bloc, and 26 (32%) were removed with a piecemeal technique. Histopathology consisted of tubular adenomas (25.9%), tubulovillous adenomas (5%), adenomas with high-grade dysplasia (42%), serrated polyps (4.9%), carcinoma in situ (13.6%), and hyperplastic polyps (8.6%). Surveillance colonoscopy was scheduled at 3 months. Complete resection was successful in all patients. No adverse events or recurrence was recorded in any of the patients. LIMITATIONS: Limited follow-up; single-center, uncontrolled study. CONCLUSION: Interventional endoscopists skilled in conventional EMR performed UEMR without specific dedicated training. EUS may not be required for lesions with no invasive features on high-definition narrow-band imaging. UEMR appears to be an effective and safe alternative to traditional EMR and could eventually improve the way in which we can effectively and safely treat colorectal lesions.

A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: An inadequate level of bowel preparation can affect the efficacy and safety of colonoscopy. Although some factors have been associated with outcome, there is no strategy to identify patients at high risk for inadequate preparation. We searched for factors associated with an inadequate level of preparation and tested the validity of a predictive clinical rule based on these factors. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 2811 consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy examinations at 18 medical centers; clinical and demographic data were collected before the colonoscopy. Bowel preparation was classified as adequate or inadequate; 925 patients (33%) were found to have inadequate preparation. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with inadequate preparation, which were expressed as odds ratio (OR) and used to build a predictive model. RESULTS: Factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation included being overweight (OR, 1.5), male sex (OR, 1.2), a high body mass index (OR, 1.1), older age (OR, 1.01), previous colorectal surgery (OR, 1.6), cirrhosis (OR, 5), Parkinson disease (OR, 3.2), diabetes (OR, 1.8), and positive results in a fecal occult test (OR, 0.6). These factors predicted which patients would have inadequate cleansing with 60% sensitivity, 59% specificity, 41% positive predictive value, and 76% negative predictive value; they had an under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.63. Assuming 100% efficacy of a hypothetical regimen to address patients predicted to be at risk of inadequate preparation, the rate would decrease from 33% to 13%. CONCLUSIONS: We identified factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy and used these to build an accurate predictive model.

Intraductal aspiration: a promising new tissue-sampling technique for the diagnosis of suspected malignant biliary strictures.

BACKGROUND: Brushing is the most commonly used technique for biliary sampling at ERCP, despite its limited sensitivity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate intraductal aspiration (IDA) as a new combined endoscopic technique for cytodiagnosis, its cellular adequacy, diagnostic accuracy for cancer detection, feasibility, and safety. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Single tertiary referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: IDA cellular adequacy, diagnostic accuracy for cancer detection, feasibility, and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2009 to September 2010, 42 consecutive patients with suspected malignant biliary stricture underwent ERCP, with tissue sampling obtained with IDA. IDA included performance of standard brushing in all patients. After standard brushing, to perform IDA, we removed the brush from its catheter and used the tip of the catheter as a scraping device. The tip was scraped back and forth across the stricture at least 10 times. The catheter and a suction line were connected to a specimen trap to obtain intraductal aspiration of fluids and samplings. RESULTS: Our cytopathologists found adequate cellular yield in 39 of the 42 IDA samples (92.8%) versus 15 of the 42 brushing samples (35.7%) (P < .001). IDA showed a significantly higher sensitivity than brushing (89% vs 78% for adequate samples and 89% vs 37% for all samples) and provided significantly superior cellular adequacy (92.8% vs 35.7%). LIMITATIONS: Observational study, small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: IDA significantly improves brushing cellular adequacy and has high sensitivity for cancer detection. It was also safe, simple, rapid, and applicable during routine diagnostic ERCP, with no additional costs.

Out-of-reach obscure bleeding: single-balloon enteroscopy to diagnose and treat varices in hepaticojejunostomy after pediatric liver transplant.

Obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is defined as bleeding from the GI tract that persists or recurs, with no obvious etiology, after esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), colonoscopy, and radiologic evaluation of the small bowel. We present the case of a 17-yr-old girl who for two years had been suffering from recurrent episodes of melena and/or enterorrhagia. Fifteen yr earlier she had undergone a split-liver transplant with Roux-en-Y biliary reconstruction. A series of endoscopic and radiologic investigations had failed to find the source of the bleeding. Suspecting the presence of ectopic varices, we decided to perform single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE). We observed and aspirated a large amount of fresh red blood in the afferent loop until we found the hepaticojejunostomy. On the edge of the biliary-enteric anastomosis we observed a vascular lesion 5 mm in diameter. Judging this ectopic varix to be the source of bleeding, we placed two endoclips. The second clip placement caused varix rupture with a consequent massive hemorrhage, emergently and successfully treated with cyanoacrylate sclerotherapy. No episodes of rebleeding were observed, and no complications occurred during the entire hospital stay, and after six months of follow-up. This report highlights the importance of afferent loop examination in patients with obscure GI bleeding who have undergone liver transplant with Roux-en-Y biliary reconstruction.

Endoscopy after radiology: two-step combined therapy for biliary stricture after Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy.

Benign postoperative anastomotic strictures after hepaticojejunostomy are difficult to manage. Before interventional techniques were developed, surgical intervention was the only option for treatment. A 28-year-old man underwent Whipple procedure with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for abdominal trauma. Two years later, a late anastomotic biliary stricture was diagnosed. A percutaneous cholangiography showed a severe stricture in the hepaticojejunostomy. Because of the severity and length of the stricture, and the failure of repeated percutaneous balloon-dilations, we percutaneously placed a self-expandable metal stent, a nitinol polytetrafluoroethylene fully covered flared-type stent, 3 cm in length, with 10 mm of diameter. The patient was soon discharged home in good general condition that remained stable in the 6 months of follow up. To remove the biliary stent, we carried out single-balloon enteroscopy. The stent was captured with a standard polypectomy snare. To avoid injury to the mucosa, the stent was removed through the overtube, which remained in situ. Cholangiogram showed a normal biliary tree, with resolution of the anastomotic stenosis. The patient remained stable throughout the 8 months of follow up, and required no further biliary procedures. In cases of failure of standard procedures, this new two-step, combined percutaneous and endoscopic approach can be useful and feasible, avoiding surgery-related morbidity and mortality. However, the fact that these procedures should be carried out only by highly experienced endoscopists and interventional radiologists familiar with these specialized procedures cannot be overstressed.