Quality of Life and Real-time Patient Experience During Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To use a customized smartphone application to prospectively measure QOL and the real-time patient experience during neoadjuvant therapy (NT). BACKGROUND: NT is increasingly used for patients with localized gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. There is little data assessing patient experience and quality of life (QOL) during NT for GI cancers. METHODS: Patients with GI cancers receiving NT were instructed on using a customized smartphone application through which the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire, a validated measure of health-related QOL, was administered at baseline, every 30 days, and at the completion of NT. Participants also tracked their moods and symptoms and used free-text journaling functionalities in the application. Mean overall and subsection health-related QOL scores were calculated during NT. RESULTS: Among 104 enrolled patients, the mean age was 60.5 ± 11.5 years and 55% were males. Common cancer diagnoses were colorectal (40%), pancreatic (37%), and esophageal (15%). Mean overall FACT-G scores did not change during NT ( P = 0.987). While functional well-being scores were consistently the lowest and social well-being scores the highest, FACT subscores similarly did not change during NT (all P > 0.01). The most common symptoms reported during NT were fatigue, insomnia, and anxiety (39.3%, 34.5%, and 28.3% of patient entries, respectively). Qualitative analysis of free-text journaling entries identified anxiety, fear, and frustration as the most common themes, but also the importance of social support systems and confidence in health care providers. CONCLUSIONS: While patient symptom burden remains high, results of this prospective cohort study suggest QOL is maintained during NT for localized GI cancers.

Segmentectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: National benchmarks for nodal staging and outcomes by operative approach.

BACKGROUND: Segmentectomy is increasingly used for parenchyma sparing anatomical resection for small stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study characterizes the national outcomes for lymph node assessment and perioperative outcomes of segmentectomy for clinical stage I NSCLC by robotic-assisted surgery (RATS), video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and open thoracotomy approach. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients who underwent segmentectomy for clinical stage I NSCLC captured in the national Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database between years 2012 and 2018. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Lymph node (LN) staging and 30-day outcomes were compared by approach. RESULTS: A total of 3680 patients (VATS 61.9%, RATS 20%, open 18%) underwent segmentectomy. The IPTW adjusted rate of pathologic LN upstaging (pN1/pN2) was 6.2% (RATS 6.3%, VATS 5.6%, open 8.6%; P = .05). On multivariate analysis, there was no differences in pN1/N2 upstaging between RATS (odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-1.49) or VATS (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.57-1.63) with open segmentectomy. The RATS and VATS approach was associated with fewer postoperative events (RATS 31.3%, VATS 28.8%, open 38.3%; P < .001) and shorter length of stay (RATS 4.3 days, VATS 4.4 days, open 5.2 days; P < .001) as compared with thoracotomy. RATS segmentectomy-specific complications included a higher rate of pneumothorax after chest tube removal and discharge with chest tube. Major complications were lower after RATS and VATS as compared with open segmentectomy (RATS 5.9%, VATS 4.5%, open 7.2%; P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: Segmentectomy by VATS and robotic approach resulted in similar high rates of lymph node upstaging as a global marker of the quality of lymph node dissection and were associated with lower overall morbidity and shorter length of stay as compared with open thoracotomy. These national outcomes may serve as benchmarks for future comparative studies.

Racial disparities in provider recommendation for esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities currently exist for the utilization rate of esophagectomy for Black patients with operable esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: A total of 37 271 cases with the American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage I, II, and III esophageal carcinoma that were reported to the National Cancer Database were analyzed between 2004 and 2016. A multivariable-adjusted logistic regression model was used to evaluate differences in the odds ratio of esophagectomy not being recommended based on race. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to evaluate differences in overall survival. Propensity score methodology with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline differences in patient demographics. RESULTS: After IPTW adjustment, we identified 30 552 White patients and 3529 Black patients with clinical stage I-III esophageal carcinoma. Black patients had three times greater odds of not being recommended for esophagectomy (odds ratio: 3.03, 95% confidence interval: 2.67-3.43, p < 0.0001) compared to White patients. Black patients demonstrated significantly worse 3- and 5-year overall survival rates compared to White patients (log-rank p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Black patients with clinical stage I-III esophageal cancer were significantly less likely to be recommended for esophagectomy even after adjusting for baseline demographic covariates compared to White patients.

A successful clinical pathway protocol for minimally invasive esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with significant morbidity, which can substantially influence the hospital length of stay for patients. Anastomotic leak is the most devastating complication. Minimizing major postoperative complications can facilitate adherence to a clinical pathway protocol and can decrease hospital length of stay. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 130 patients who underwent an elective laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma between August 2014 and June 2018. A total of 112 patients (86%) underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation. All of the 130 patients underwent a laparoscopic gastric devascularization procedure a median of 15 days prior to the esophagectomy. The target discharge date was postoperative day number 8. RESULTS: Thirty patients (23.08%) had postoperative complications. Atrial fibrillation (20 patients) [15.38%] was the most frequent complication. Four patients (3.1%) developed an anastomotic leak. There was one postoperative death (0.77%) in the cohort of patients. The median length of stay was 8 days. The mean length of stay for patients without complications was 8 days ± 1.2 days and 12.4 days ± 7.1 days for patients with one or more complications (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The development of postoperative complications after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy significantly increases hospital length of stay. Performing the operation with a specialized tandem surgical team and including preoperative ischemic preconditioning of the stomach minimizes overall and anastomotic complications and facilitates on time hospital discharge as defined by a perioperative clinical pathway protocol.

Defining the learning curve of robotic thoracic surgery: what does it take?

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to what constitutes a learning curve to achieve competency, and how the initial learning period of robotic thoracic surgery should be approached. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature published prior to December 2018 using PubMed/MEDLINE for studies of surgeons adopting the robotic approach for anatomic lung resection or thymectomy. Changes in operating room time and outcomes based on number of cases performed, type of procedure, and existing proficiency with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were examined. RESULTS: Twelve observational studies were analyzed, including nine studies on robotic lung resection and three studies on thymectomy. All studies showed a reduction in operative time with an increasing number of cases performed. A steep learning curve was described for thymectomy, with a decrease in operating room time in the first 15 cases and a plateau after 15-20 cases. For anatomic lung resection, the number of cases to achieve a plateau in operative time ranged between 15-20 cases and 40-60 cases. All but two studies had at least some VATS experience. Six studies reported on experience of over one hundred cases and showed continued gradual improvements in operating room time. CONCLUSION: The learning curve for robotic thoracic surgery appears to be rapid with most studies indicating the steepest improvement in operating time occurring in the initial 15-20 cases for thymectomy and 20-40 cases for anatomic lung resection. Existing data can guide a standardized robotic curriculum for rapid adaptation, and aid credentialing and quality monitoring for robotic thoracic surgery programs.

National learning curves among robotic thoracic surgeons in the United States: Quantifying the impact of procedural experience on efficiency and productivity gains.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize the aggregate learning curves of US surgeons for robotic thoracic procedures and to quantify the impact on productivity. METHODS: National average console times relative to cumulative case number were extracted from the My Intuitive application (Version 1.7.0). Intuitive da Vinci robotic system data for 56,668 lung resections performed by 870 individual surgeons between 2021 and 2022 were reviewed. Console time and hourly productivity (work relative value units/hour) were analyzed using linear regression models. RESULTS: Average console times improved for all robotic procedures with cumulative case experience (P = .003). Segmentectomy and thymectomy had the steepest initial learning curves with a 33% and 34% reduction of the average console time for proficient (51-100 cases) relative to novice surgeons (1-10 cases), respectively. The hourly productivity increase for proficient surgeons ranged from 11.4 work relative value units/hour (+26%) for lobectomy to 17.0 work relative value units/hour (+50%) for segmentectomy. At the expert level (101+ cases), average console times continued to decrease significantly for esophagectomy (-18%) and lobectomy (-23%), but only minimally for wedge resections (-1%) (P = .003). The work relative value units/hour increase at the expert level reached 50% for lobectomy and 40% for esophagectomy. Surgeon experience level, dual console use, system model, and robotic stapler use were factors independently associated with console time for robotic lobectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The aggregate learning curve for robotic thoracic surgeons in the United States varies significantly by procedure type and demonstrate continued improvements in efficiency beyond 100 cases for lobectomy and esophagectomy. Improvements in efficiency with growing experiences translate to substantial productivity gains.

Utilization of an Endobronchial Blocker Through a Double-Lumen Tube as Rescue for Inadequate One-Lung Ventilation.

Failure to provide one-lung ventilation can prohibit minimally invasive thoracic surgeries. Strategies for one-lung ventilation include double-lumen endotracheal tubes or endobronchial blockers, but rarely both. Inability to provide lung isolation after double-lumen endotracheal tube placement requires troubleshooting and sometimes the use of extra equipment. This case describes using a unique Y-shaped endobronchial blocker placed through a left-sided double-lumen endotracheal tube after failure to achieve lung isolation with a double-lumen endotracheal tube alone.

Thoracic Emergencies for the General Surgeon.

In this review article, we aim to provide an overview of common and uncommon general surgery thoracic emergencies as well as basic thoracic anatomy, common diagnostic tests, and operative positioning and access considerations. We also describe specific thoracic procedures. We hope that this article simplifies some of the challenges associated with the management of thoracic emergencies.

Single Anesthesia Strategy for Definitive Management of Bilateral Ground Glass Opacities Using Robotic Bronchoscopic Localization and Resection.

This case series describes 2 patients who underwent a single anesthesia strategy for definitive management of bilateral ground-glass opacities harboring adenocarcinoma-spectrum lesions using robotic navigational localization paired with robotic thoracoscopic resection.

Analysis of trends in perioperative outcomes in over 1000 robotic-assisted anatomic lung resections.

Robotic-assisted surgery is gaining popularity as a minimally invasive approach for anatomic lung resection. We investigated the temporal changes in case volume, costs, and postoperative outcomes for robotic-assisted anatomic lung resection in over 1000 cases. We reviewed our institutional STS database for patients who had undergone robotic-assisted lobectomy, bi-lobectomy, or segmentectomy as the primary procedure between years 2009-2021. The patients were divided into two groups: first 500 cases (n = 501) and second 500 cases (n = 500). Temporal trends of case volume, surgical indications, hospital length of stay, costs, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. A total of 1001 patients were analyzed, of which 968 (96.7%) patients underwent robotic-assisted lobectomy, 21 (2.1%) patients underwent bi-lobectomy, 10 (1.0%) patients underwent segmentectomy, and 3 (0.3%) patients underwent sleeve lobectomy. Primary lung cancer was the most common indication (87.7%), followed by metastatic lung tumors (7.1%), and benign diagnosis (5.2%). The overall postoperative complication rate decreased from 46.1% for the first 500 cases compared to 29.6% for the second 500 cases (p < 0.0001). The median hospital length of stay was down trending, which was 4 days [IQR: 3-7] for the first 500 cases and 3 days [IQR: 3-5] (p = 0.0001) for the second. The inflation-adjusted direct and indirect hospital costs were significantly lower in the second 500 cases (p < 0.0001). The complications rates, hospital costs, and hospital length of stay for robotic-assisted anatomic pulmonary resection decreased significantly over time at a single institution. Continuous improvement in perioperative outcomes may be observed with increasing institutional experience.

Lymph Node Upstaging for Robotic, Thoracoscopic, and Open Lobectomy for Stage T2-3N0 Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: There may be equivalent efficacy of the lymph node evaluation for minimally invasive lobectomy compared with open lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. We sought to compare the lymph node evaluation for lobectomy by approach for patients with larger tumors who are clinically node negative. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 24 257 patients with clinical stage T2-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer from the National Cancer Database. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance baseline characteristics. The rates of pathologic lymph node upstaging were compared. A Cox multivariable regression model was performed to test the association with overall survival. RESULTS: After IPTW adjustment 20 834 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 1996 patients underwent robotic lobectomy, 5122 patients underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy, and 13 725 patients underwent open lobectomy from 2010 to 2017. The IPTW-adjusted N1 upstaging rate was similar for robotic (11.79%), thoracoscopic (11.49%), and open (11.85%) lobectomy (P = .274). The adjusted N2 upstaging rates were 5.03%, 5.66%, and 6.15% for robotic, thoracoscopic, and open lobectomy, respectively (P = .274). On IPTW-adjusted multivariable analysis, robotic and thoracoscopic lobectomy were associated with improved survival compared with open lobectomy (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in N1 and N2 lymph node upstaging rates between surgical approaches for patients with clinical stage T2-3N0 non-small cell lung cancer, indicating similarly effective lymph node evaluation. Overall survival after robotic and thoracoscopic lobectomy was significantly better compared with open lobectomy in this patient population with a high propensity for occult nodal disease.

Wedge Resection vs Lobectomy for Clinical Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Occult Lymph Node Disease.

BACKGROUND: Sublobar resection is increasingly performed for stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer, but pathologic lymph node upstaging remains a common clinical scenario. This study compares the long-term prognosis of patients with clinical stage Ia disease and occult lymph node disease undergoing wedge resection vs lobectomy. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients treated with wedge resection or lobectomy for clinical stage Ia (cT1N0) non-small cell lung cancer and who were pathologically upstaged with either pN1/pN2 disease. Overall survival (OS) was compared by extent of resection using inverse probability treatment weighting-adjusted Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 5437 clinical stage Ia patients included, 3408 (62.7%) were found to have occult pN1 and 2029 (37.3%) to have occult pN2. Of 5437 patients, 93.5% (5082) were treated with lobectomy and 6.5% (355) underwent wedge resection. Lobectomy was associated with improved OS compared with wedge resection for patients with occult pN1 disease (median OS, 70.0 months [95% CI, 66.6-77.4] vs 36.4 months [95% CI, 24.2-45.6]; P < .001) but not for pN2 disease (median OS, 48.2.1 months [95% CI, 43.8-52.9] vs 43.7 months [95% CI, 31.2-62.4]; P = 0.24). On inverse probability treatment weighting-adjusted multivariable analysis, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, margin status, and pathologic T and N stage, lobectomy remained associated with improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89; P = .0016). CONCLUSIONS: Lobectomy is associated with improved survival in clinical stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer patients with occult lymph node disease. These data may aid the decision for completion lobectomy for patients with unanticipated N1 lymph node upstaging.

Prevalence and Predictability of Occult Satellite Nodules in Clinical Stage Ia Non-small Cell Lung Cancer following Lobectomy.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to assess the prevalence and clinical predictors of satellite nodules in patients undergoing lobectomy for clinical stage Ia disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients who underwent lobectomy for clinical stage cT1N0 NSCLC. Collaborative staging information was used to identify patients who were pathologically upstaged based on having separate tumor nodules in the same lobe as the primary tumor. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association of clinical factors with the detection of separate nodules. RESULTS: A separate tumor nodule was recorded in 2.8% (n = 1284) of 45,842 clinical stage Ia patients treated with lobectomy or bilobectomy. Female gender (3.1% vs. male 2.5%; P = .002) and non-squamous histology (adenocarcinoma 3.2% and large cell neuroendocrine 3.0% vs. squamous cell 1.9% tumors; P < .001) were associated with the presence of separate nodules. The frequency increased for tumors larger than 3 cm (≤ 3cm, 2.7% vs. > 3cm, 3.8%; P < .001). Other factors associated with separate nodules were upper lobe location, pleural and/or lymphovascular invasion and occult lymph node disease. The best predictive model for separate nodules based on the available clinical variables resulted in an area under the curve of 0.645 (95% CI 0.629-0.660). CONCLUSION: Separate tumor nodules may be detected with a low but relatively consistent frequency across the spectrum of patients with clinical stage Ia NSCLC. The predictive ability using basic clinical factors in the database is limited.

Analysis of Outcomes for Robotic-assisted Lobectomy With an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol.

BACKGROUND: The impact on cost relative to clinical efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients who undergo robotic-assisted lobectomy is currently unknown. The objective of this study was to compare cost and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted lobectomy before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 574 patients who underwent robotic-assisted lobectomy for primary lung carcinoma from May 1, 2017 to June 1, 2021. The ERAS protocol was implemented on October 17, 2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting of propensity scores was used to balance baseline characteristics. The primary outcomes of the study were mean direct and indirect hospital costs, complication rates, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Three hundred fifteen patients underwent robotic-assisted lobectomy before implementation of the ERAS protocol, and 259 patients were enrolled on the protocol. A significantly higher percentage of patients were discharged home in less than 3 days after the ERAS protocol implementation (24.5% vs 9.8%, P = .001). There were significant decreases in the inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted mean direct hospital costs (P < .001) and mean indirect costs (P = .018) for the total hospital stay after ERAS protocol implementation. The mean initial discharge opioid medication dose (morphine equivalent dose) was significantly lower (P < .001) after the ERAS protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Increased early discharge and decreased hospital costs were observed for robotic-assisted lobectomy after implementation of an ERAS protocol. There was also an observed significant decrease in the discharge opioid medication doses prescribed.

Comparison of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Surgery with objective performance indicators for the assessment of skill during robotic-assisted thoracic surgery.

BACKGROUND: The Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills is a popular but ultimately subjective assessment tool in robotic-assisted surgery. An alternative approach is to record system or console events or calculate instrument kinematics to derive objective performance indicators. The aim of this study was to compare these 2 approaches and correlate the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills with different types of objective performance indicators during robotic-assisted lobectomy. METHODS: Video, system event, and kinematic data were recorded from the robotic surgical system during left upper lobectomy on a standardized perfused and pulsatile ex vivo porcine heart-lung model. Videos were segmented into steps, and the superior vein dissection was graded independently by 2 blinded expert surgeons with Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills. Objective performance indicators representing categories for energy use, event data, movement, smoothness, time, and wrist articulation were calculated for the same task and compared to Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills scores. RESULTS: Video and data from 51 cases were analyzed (44 fellows, 7 attendings). Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills scores were significantly higher for attendings (P < .05), but there was a significant difference in raters' scores of 31.4% (defined as >20% difference in total score). The interclass correlation was 0.44 for 1 rater and 0.61 for 2 raters. Objective performance indicators correlated with Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills to varying degrees. The most highly correlated Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills domain was efficiency. Instrument movement and smoothness were highly correlated among objective performance indicator categories. Of individual objective performance indicators, right-hand median jerk, an objective performance indicator of change of acceleration, had the highest correlation coefficient (0.55). CONCLUSION: There was a relatively poor overall correlation between the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills and objective performance indicators. However, both appear strongly correlated for certain metrics such as efficiency and smoothness. Objective performance indicators may be a potentially more quantitative and granular approach to assessing skill, given that they can be calculated mathematically and automatically without subjective interpretation.

Comparison of the long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted and video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for resectable non-small cell lung carcinoma.

The current oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted lobectomy compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy are currently not well defined. This study compares the overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates between the two approaches for patients with resectable non-small cell lung carcinoma. This is a retrospective review of 200 patients diagnosed with resectable primary lung carcinoma who underwent minimally invasive lobectomy from March 2014 to May 2018. A total of 100 patients underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy and 100 patients underwent robotic-assisted lobectomy by a single surgeon. The data collected included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical margin status, total number of lymph nodes harvested, lymph node upstaging rate, and overall survival and recurrence-free survival. The patients in each group were similar in age, gender, smoking status, pulmonary function, tumor histology, and pathologic stage. The postoperative mortality and complication rates were similar as well. The median number of total lymph nodes and N2 lymph nodes were significantly higher in the robotic lobectomy group (p < 0.0001). The Kaplan-Meier survival rates of overall survival (p = 0.097) and recurrence-free survival (p = 0.769) were similar between the two surgical approaches. The results of this report suggest that thoracoscopic and robotic-assisted lobectomy have similar long-term oncologic outcomes. There may be an advantage for robotic-assisted lobectomy in the total number of lymph nodes harvested during lobectomy.

National Trends and Outcomes of Segmentectomy in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.

BACKGROUND: Segmentectomy is gaining popularity as a parenchyma-sparing alternative for anatomic lung resection. This study sought to investigate temporal changes in patient selection, case volume, and outcomes for segmentectomy using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Database. METHODS: The STS General Thoracic Database was queried for patients who had undergone segmentectomy as the primary procedure between 2002 and 2018. The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group definition of high-risk patients on the basis of pulmonary function and major cardiovascular comorbidities was applied. Annual trends of case volume, patient risk profile, surgical indication, approach, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 10 629 patients were analyzed from 310 contributing centers. The annual segmentectomy volume more than doubled from <4 per center in 2009 to 8.6 per center by 2017. Lung cancer was the most common indication (70.1%), followed by benign disease (15.6%) and metastatic tumors (14.3%). Although the operative indication remained constant, the subset of high-risk patients (24.5%) decreased gradually over time (slope, -0.6% per year; P = .001). After 2012, segmentectomies were most commonly performed minimally invasively (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, 58.3%; robotic surgery, 19.4%), with a steadily declining use of thoracotomy (overall, 22.3%; slope, -2.4%/y; P = .001). Overall complication rates decreased over the study period from 41.7% to 26.1% (slope, -0.57%/y; P = .001). The overall major complication rate was 4.6% (range, 2.0%-7.1%), 30-day mortality was 1.0% (range, 0.7%-5.0%), and both have been trending downward since 2009 (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Segmentectomies are increasingly performed nationally, with a steady decline in the subset of high-risk patients over time. Complication rates have decreased significantly, parallel to the increasing use of minimally invasive techniques by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic surgery.

Pulmonary artery size on computed tomography is associated with major morbidity after pulmonary lobectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of pulmonary artery diameter (PAD) measured by computed tomography (CT) with outcomes following lobectomy. METHODS: Records of patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer between 2011 and 2018 were reviewed. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcome data were derived from the institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Luminal diameter of the central pulmonary arteries and ascending aorta were measured on preoperative CTs. Logistic regression analyses were performed to test the association of PAD with complications. RESULTS: A total of 736 lobectomy patients were included, who had a preoperative CT scan (25% with contrast, 75% noncontrast) available for review. A total of 141 (19.2%) patients had an enlarged main PAD ≥30 mm, and 58 (7.9%) patients had a main PAD that was larger than the ascending aorta (PA/ascending aorta ratio > 1). The right or left PAD on the surgical side was associated with major complication (odds ratio per mm, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.18; P < .001), unexpected intensive care unit admission (odds ratio per millimeter, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.19; P = .002), and 30-day mortality (odds ratio per millimeter, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.46; P = .007). On multivariable analysis, adjusted for cardiovascular comorbidities, pulmonary function, and the operative approach, surgical side PAD remained an independent factor associated with major complication. CONCLUSIONS: CT-based measurements of the PAD on the operative side may inform of the about the risk of major complications after lobectomy. Review of PA size on preoperative CT scans may help identify patients who would benefit from formal evaluation of PA pressures to improve the operative risk assessment.

Preventable operating room delays in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery: Identifying opportunities for cost reduction.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to characterize the types of intraoperative delays during robotic-assisted thoracic surgery, operating room staff awareness/perceptions of delays, and cost impact of delays on overall operative costs. METHODS: Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery cases from May to August 2019 were attended by 3 third-party observers to record intraoperative delays. The postoperative surveys were given to operating room staff to elicit perceived delays. Observed versus perceived delays were compared using the McNemar test. Direct costs and charges per delay were calculated. RESULTS: Forty-four cases were observed, of which a majority were lobectomies (n = 38 [86%]). A total of 71 delays were recorded by observers, encompassing 75% of cases (n = 33), with an average delay length of 3.6 minutes (±5.3 minutes). The following delays were observed: equipment failure (n = 40, average delay length 5.0 minutes (±6.5 minutes), equipment missing (n = 15, 2.2 minutes [±1.4 minutes]), staff unfamiliarity with equipment (n = 4, 3.4 minutes [± 1.5 minutes]), and other (n = 12, 4.5 minutes [±5.3 minutes]). The detection rates for any intraoperative delay were consistently lower for all of the operating room team members compared with observers, including surgeons (34.3% vs 77.1%; P = .0003), first assistants (41.9% vs 74.2%; P = .0075), surgical technologists (39.4% vs 72.7%; P = .0045), and circulating nurses (41.18% vs 76.47% minutes; P = .0013). The average operating room variable direct cost of delays based on the average total delay length per case was $225.52 (±$350.18) and was 1.6% (range 0-10.6%) of the total case charges. CONCLUSION: The lack of perception of intraoperative delays hinders operating teams from effectively closing the variable cost gaps. Future studies are needed to explore methods of increasing perception of delays and opportunities to improve operating room efficiency.