Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Transl Med ; 12: 55, 2014 Feb 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24565030

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mutant Ras oncogenes produce proteins that are unique to cancer cells and represent attractive targets for vaccine therapy. We have shown previously that vaccinating cancer patients with mutant ras peptides is feasible and capable of inducing a specific immune response against the relevant mutant proteins. Here, we tested the mutant ras peptide vaccine administered in combination with low dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) or/and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in order to enhance the vaccine immune response. METHODS: 5000 µg of the corresponding mutant ras peptide was given subcutaneously (SQ) along with IL-2 (Arm A), GM-CSF (Arm B) or both (Arm C). IL-2 was given SQ at 6.0 million IU/m²/day starting at day 5, 5 days/week for 2 weeks. GM-CSF was given SQ in a dose of 100 µg/day one day prior to each ras peptide vaccination for 4 days. Vaccines were repeated every 5 weeks on arm A and C, and every 4 weeks on arm B, for a maximum of 15 cycles or until disease progression. RESULTS: We treated 53 advanced cancer patients (38 with colorectal, 11 with pancreatic, 1 with common bile duct and 3 with lung) on 3 different arms (16 on arm A, 18 on arm B, and 19 on arm C). The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 3.6 and 16.9 months, respectively, for all patients evaluable for clinical response (n = 48). There was no difference in PFS or OS between the three arms (P = 0.73 and 0.99, respectively). Most adverse events were grade 1-2 toxicities and resolved spontaneously. The vaccine induced an immune response to the relevant ras peptide in a total of 20 out of 37 evaluable patients (54%) by ELISPOT, proliferative assay, or both. While 92.3% of patients on arm B had a positive immune response, only 31% of patients on arm A and 36% of patients on arm C had positive immune responses (P = 0.003, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSIONS: The reported data showed that IL-2 might have a negative effect on the specific immune response induced by the relevant mutant ras vaccine in patients with advanced cancer. This observation deserves further investigations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCI97C0141.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/uso terapéutico , Interleucina-2/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/inmunología , Vacunas de Subunidad/uso terapéutico , Proteínas ras/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/efectos adversos , Ensayo de Immunospot Ligado a Enzimas , Humanos , Inmunidad/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Linfocitos T Reguladores/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunas de Subunidad/efectos adversos , Vacunas de Subunidad/química
2.
J Transl Med ; 12: 353, 2014 Dec 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25510844

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The protein products of the early genes E6 and E7 in high-risk HPV types 16 and 18 have been implicated in the oncogenic capability of these viruses. Therefore, these peptides represent attractive vaccine therapy targets. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with advanced cervical cancer (HPV16 or 18 positive) were treated with HPV16 E6 (18-26) (Arm A) or HPV16 E7 (12-20) peptide (Arm B) pulsed on PBMCs in order to illicit immune response against the relevant peptide on both arms. These PBMCs were cultured for a short time (48 hours only) and in the presence of GM- CSF, accordingly, they were identified as "Pre-Immature Dentritic Cells". RESULTS: 51Cr release assay and ELISPOT demonstrated evidence of specific immune response against the relevant peptide in 10/16 (63%) evaluable patients in arm A and 7/12 (58%) in arm B. HPV16 E6 was found to be homologous to HPV18 E6 in both vivo and vitro. The median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) for the full cohort was 10.0 and 3.5 months, respectively. There were no RECIST responses in any patient. The majority of toxicities were grade I and II. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the feasibility and ability of Pre-Immature Dentritic Cells pulsed with HPV16 E6 (18-26) or HPV16 E7 (12-20) to induce a specific immune response against the relevant peptide despite the advanced disease of the cervical cancer patients treated on this trial. We believe that this observation deserves further investigations.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Proteínas Oncogénicas Virales/administración & dosificación , Proteínas E7 de Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Represoras/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia , Adulto , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Oncogénicas Virales/inmunología , Proteínas E7 de Papillomavirus/inmunología , Proteínas Represoras/inmunología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/inmunología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA