RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ear is one of the face areas most affected by skin cancers, and the surgical reconstruction is often challenging because of tumor- and patient-related factors. Reconstructive options are essentially skin flaps and grafts or their combinations. The use of preauricular translocation (PAT) flap for auricular reconstructions is constantly increasing. AIM AND METHODS: This retrospective study reports the comparison between the PAT flap and the full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) for surgical auricular defect reconstruction in elderly population (≥65 years) that typically shows poor compliance in the postoperative wound care management. RESULTS: A total of 52 FTSGs (Group A) and 39 PAT (Group B) were performed between April 2007 and July 2020. The aim was to investigate, compare, and define advantages and disadvantages of both techniques. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the overall patients' satisfaction. The mean surgical and healing times were longer in Group A (p < 0.05). No complications occurred in the PAT group, and all the flaps survived. In the FTSG group, the overall complication rate was 17.3% (four partial and three total graft failure, and two graft infections). T test was used to compare the VAS scores: Patients with PAT flap were more satisfied than those with FTSG (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Preauricular translocation flap is a reproducible, safe, and quick option for auricular defects reconstruction in the ≥65 years population, associated with an easier patient management, high patient satisfaction, and excellent aesthetic result.