Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Spine J ; 32(2): 475-487, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36437434

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Microscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) is a minimally invasive technique used in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis and could limit spinal instability and be associated with better clinical outcomes. However, there is ongoing debate regarding its utility compared to conventional laminectomy (CL). The primary objective was to collate and describe the current evidence base for ULBD, including perioperative parameters, functional outcomes, and complications. The secondary objective was to identify operative techniques. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted between January 1990 and August 2022 according to the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Major databases were searched for full text English articles reporting on outcomes following microscopic unilateral laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. RESULTS: Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria. Two studies were randomised controlled trials. Two studies were prospective data collection and the rest were retrospective analysis. Three studies compared ULBD with CL. ULBD preserves the osteoligamentous complex and may be associated with shorter operative time, less blood loss, and similar clinical outcomes when compared to CL. CONCLUSION: This review highlights that ULBD aims to minimise disruption to the normal posterior spinal anatomy and may have acceptable clinical outcomes. It also highlights that it is difficult to draw valid conclusions given there are limited data available as most studies identified were retrospective or did not have a comparator group.


Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Estenosis Espinal , Humanos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Laminectomía/métodos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 165(1): 83-88, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35840732

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Scoliosis in children is the most common spinal deformity seen by general practitioners, paediatricians and spinal surgeons. Progressive scoliosis can result in the development of a worsening deformity and cosmesis. Patients usually present with aesthetic concerns. Progressive scoliosis that fails conservative management may require or be offered surgical intervention. Intramedullary tumours may be associated with scoliosis. Management of patients with these dual pathologies can be challenging. Classical scoliosis instrumentation utilising titanium implants impairs post-operative MRI evaluation with metal artefacts. Carbon fibre instrumentations has the potential to reduce the imaging metal artefacts but has not been described in scoliosis correction. METHODS: Surgical technical note describing correction of scoliosis in two adolescents' with intradural tumours utilising carbon fibre implants. RESULTS: We developed a hybrid approach where we initially used titanium implants to manipulate the deformity then replaced the construct with carbon fibre implants in the same setting to maintain the deformity correction with good follow up outlook. CONCLUSION: Our technique is robust, safe and replicable. It enabled appropriate post-operative MRI evaluation of the neural structures with a reduced risk of metal artefacts.


Asunto(s)
Escoliosis , Fusión Vertebral , Adolescente , Humanos , Niño , Escoliosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Escoliosis/cirugía , Fibra de Carbono , Titanio , Resultado del Tratamiento , Médula Espinal , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 37(6): 1949-1956, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33515056

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Paediatric spine trauma is uncommon and is managed differently from adults due to the anatomical differences of the paediatric spine. The paediatric spine is less ossified, with lax ligaments and a higher fulcrum in the c-spine which results in a different pattern of injuries. The aim of this study is to provide a contemporary audit of paediatric spinal trauma. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted using the Trauma and Audit Research Network database at a major trauma centre (2011-2018). All patients < 18 years old with a spine injury underwent case note and radiology review. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients (37, 51.4% male with an average age of 13.3 (± 5.9) years old) were identified. The most common mechanism of injury was road traffic collisions (n = 39, 54.2%). The most common sporting cause was motocross accidents (n = 6, 8.3%), and a further 6 (8.3%) patients had a suspected inflicted injury. Eight patients (11.1%) sustained a spinal cord injury. Twenty-seven (37.5%) patients underwent surgical intervention to treat their spinal injury. CONCLUSION: This series demonstrates the profile of injury mechanisms causing paediatric spinal injuries. Paediatric spine injuries continue to have the potential for lifelong disability and require careful, specialist management. This series also highlights certain causes such as motocross accidents and suspected inflicted injury which are more frequent than expected and raise potential public health concerns.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Traumatismos Vertebrales , Accidentes de Tránsito , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/epidemiología , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/etiología , Traumatismos Vertebrales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Vertebrales/etiología , Centros Traumatológicos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
4.
Br J Neurosurg ; 35(1): 68-72, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32441143

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The acute management of spinal fractures is traditionally split between neurosurgeons and orthopaedic surgeons and the specialities have varying approaches to management. This study investigates differences between neurosurgeons and spinal orthopaedic surgeons in the management of spinal fractures at a single trauma centre in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A retrospective study at a single trauma centre of patients identified using the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN). Case notes and radiological investigations were reviewed for demographics, fracture classification, clinical management and outcomes. Polytrauma cases and patients managed by non-neurosurgical/orthopaedic specialties were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 465 patients were included in this study (neurosurgery n = 266, orthopaedics n = 199). There were no significant differences between groups for age, gender, Charlson co-morbidity score or distribution of fractures using the AO spine classification. Patients admitted and managed under the orthopaedic surgeons were more likely to undergo a surgical procedure when compared to those admitted under the neurosurgeons (n = 71; 35.7% vs n = 71; 26.8%, p = 0.042, OR 1.56 95%CI 1.056 to 2.31). The median overall length of stay was 8 days and there was no significant difference between teams; however, the neurosurgical cohort were more likely to be admitted to an intensive care unit (24.3% vs 16.2%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This study is the first in the United Kingdom to compare neurosurgical and orthopaedic teams in their management of spinal fractures. It demonstrates that differences may exist both in operating rates and outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Neurocirugia , Ortopedia , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Reino Unido/epidemiología
5.
Br J Neurosurg ; 33(5): 586-590, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29069932

RESUMEN

Calcific discitis is a well recognized entity in the paediatric population but more recently has been increasingly reported in adults. It typically involves the lower thoracic vertebrae and is of unknown aetiology. Herniation of the calcified fragment is rare but typically occurs out through the annulus fibrosus into the canal space. Herein we describe the first reported case of calcific discitis involving the lumbar vertebrae with subsequent herniation of the calcified disc into and through the anterior aspect of the L5 vertebra. The patient first presented with a history of right back pain and leg sciatica. Radiographic imaging demonstrated calcification within the L4/5 interspace, which was managed with simple analgesia. She subsequently re-presented 24-months later with worsening sciatica, right leg weakness and faecal incontinence. No evidence of cord or root compression was noted on MRI. However, an abnormality was noted at the anterior body of L5 with evidence of superior endplate depression and marrow signal change. Subsequent radionucleide bone studies confirmed a solitary focus of increased linear activity extending across the width of the L4-L5 interspace. Her symptoms were managed medically. Serial radiographic imaging demonstrated regression of the disc space calcification and healing of the L5 fracture. Despite its sinister presentation this condition was self-limiting. We describe the radiographic evolution of this pathology and postulate a putative hypothesis through which it may have arisen.


Asunto(s)
Calcinosis/complicaciones , Discitis/complicaciones , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/etiología , Vértebras Lumbares/patología , Anciano , Dolor de Espalda/etiología , Dolor de Espalda/patología , Calcinosis/patología , Discitis/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Imagen Multimodal , Radiografía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
6.
World Neurosurg ; 167: e732-e737, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36030013

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if COVID-19 UK lockdown measures resulted in a delay in the presentation and treatment of patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES). METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients with surgically treated CES across 3 time periods: April-May 2020 (first lockdown), August-September 2020 (no-lockdown group), and January-February 2021 (second lockdown). Data regarding duration of symptoms, time from referral to admission, time from admission to surgery, and postoperative outcomes were collected. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients (male: 26, female: 30, mean age: 44.3 years) were included in the study (n = 14, n = 18, and n = 24 in the 3 time periods, respectively). There was no significant difference in duration of symptoms across the time periods (12.6 days vs. 8.2 days vs. 3.8 days) (P = 0.16). Nearly all the patients were admitted within 48 hours of referral (n = 55, 98.2%). The majority of patients were operated on within 48 hours: first lockdown (n = 12, 85.7%), no-lockdown (n = 16, 88.9%), and second lockdown (n = 21, 87.5%). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the second lockdown (3.3 days) versus the other 2 time periods (4.4 days and 6.4 days) (P = 0.02). Thirteen complications were present, with dural tear being the most common (n = 6, 10.7%). Majority reported symptom improvement (n = 53, 94.6%), with a similar number discharged home (n = 54, 96.4%). CONCLUSION: Despite the pandemic, patients with CES were promptly admitted and operated on with good outcomes. Shorter duration of hospital stay could be attributed to adaptation of spinal services.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Cauda Equina , Cauda Equina , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Síndrome de Cauda Equina/epidemiología , Síndrome de Cauda Equina/cirugía , Síndrome de Cauda Equina/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Cauda Equina/cirugía
7.
World Neurosurg ; 151: e747-e752, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33957284

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sports-related injuries are the third commonest cause of spine fractures. Spinal fractures incurred as a result of partaking in sport by their nature are different from those associated with frailty and road traffic accidents. The patient demographics and nature of fractures associated with sports activities are not well documented. We aim to describe the management and outcome of patients with a sports-related spine fracture in a single U.K. major trauma center in a 6-year time period. METHODS: Patients with sports-related spinal fractures were identified from the Trauma Audit and Research Network database at a U.K. major trauma center between January 2011 and December 2016. Patient notes were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, injury severity score, treatment, complications, and outcomes. RESULTS: In the study period, 122 patients were admitted with a sports-related spinal fracture, sustaining a total of 230 fractures. Of these, 48 (20.9%) were in the cervical, 79 (34.3%) in the thoracic, and 103 (44.8%) in the lumbar regions. The sports most commonly associated with spinal fractures were horse riding (n = 55), cycling (n = 36), and boating (n = 10). Of the 230 fractures, 32 (13.9%) were associated with neurologic injury. Forty-five of the 230 fractures (19.6%) were managed surgically, and the remainder were managed conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: Within our population, sports most commonly associated with spinal fractures were horse riding, cycling, and boating. The majority of cases were managed nonoperatively. Further research is required to establish evidence-based guidelines on the management of sports-related spinal fractures.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Traumatismos en Atletas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Reino Unido
8.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 177: 106-113, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30640139

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Falls from standing are common, particularly amongst the aging population, due to declining mobility, proprioception and vision. They are often complicated by fragility fractures, including vertebral fractures, that are associated with significant morbidity and may represent a pre-terminal condition with high one-year mortality rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of the Trauma Audit and Research Network database for a major trauma centre was conducted for all patients admitted between January 2011 and December 2016. Patients with a spinal fracture and a confirmed fall from standing height were eligible for inclusion. Case notes were reviewed for demographics, Injury Severity Score, Charlson co-morbidity score, treatment, complications and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1408 patients with a spine fracture admitted during the study period, 229 (16.3%) were confirmed to be secondary to a fall from standing height. The average age of this cohort was 76.6 ± 14.5 years and 134 (58.5%) cases were female. The average ISS score was 9.7 ± 5.4. The 229 patients sustained 283 fractures with a distribution of: cervical (n = 140), thoracic (n = 65) and lumbar (n = 78) spine. Fifty-six (24.5%) patients underwent surgical intervention. Forty-three patients (18.7%) died within 6 months of admission and all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients with increasing age and Charlson co-morbidity score. CONCLUSION: Spinal fractures due to a fall from standing height represent one sixth of the fracture workload of the emergency spinal service at a major trauma centre. Whilst the majority of patients can be managed conservatively there are still considerable implications for hospital bed usage and patient mortality.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
J Spec Oper Med ; 19(1): 130, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30859541

Asunto(s)
Cuello , Bosques , Humanos
14.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry ; 48(6): 552-60, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17537071

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that family therapy is an effective treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa. This study aimed to ascertain the long-term impact of two forms of outpatient family intervention previously evaluated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHOD: A five-year follow-up was conducted on a cohort of 40 patients who had received either 'conjoint family therapy' (CFT) or 'separated family therapy' (SFT). All patients were traced and 38 agreed to be reassessed (29 interviewed in person, 3 completed telephone interviews, 6 completed questionnaires and/or agreed for parents/GP to be interviewed). RESULTS: Overall there was little to distinguish the two treatments at 5 years, with more than 75% of subjects having no eating disorder symptoms. There were no deaths in the cohort and only 8% of those who had achieved a healthy weight by the end of treatment reported any kind of relapse. Three patients developed bulimic symptoms but only one to a degree warranting a diagnosis of bulimia nervosa. The one difference between the treatments was in patients from families with raised levels of maternal criticism. This group of patients had done less well at the end of treatment if they had been offered conjoint family meetings. At follow-up this difference was still evident, as shown in the relative lack of weight gain since the end of outpatient treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the efficacy of family therapy for adolescent anorexia nervosa, showing that those who respond well to outpatient family intervention generally stay well. The study provides further support for avoiding the use of conjoint family meetings at least early on in treatment when raised levels of parental criticism are evident.


Asunto(s)
Anorexia Nerviosa/terapia , Terapia Familiar/métodos , Adolescente , Atención Ambulatoria , Anorexia Nerviosa/diagnóstico , Anorexia Nerviosa/psicología , Peso Corporal , Bulimia Nerviosa/diagnóstico , Emoción Expresada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Conducta Materna/psicología , Determinación de la Personalidad , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA