RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Post-kala-azar-dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is an infectious skin disease that occurs as sequela of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) and causes cutaneous lesions on the face and other exposed body parts. While the first-line drug miltefosine is typically used for 28 days to treat VL, 12 weeks of therapy is required for PKDL, highlighting the need to evaluate the extent of drug penetration at the dermal site of infection. In this proof-of-concept study, we demonstrate the use of a minimally invasive sampling technique called microdialysis to measure dermal drug exposure in a PKDL patient, providing a tool for the optimization of treatment regimens. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One PKDL patient receiving treatment with miltefosine (50 mg twice daily for 12 weeks) was recruited to this proof-of-concept study and consented to undergo dermal microdialysis. Briefly, a µDialysis Linear Catheter 66 for skin and muscle, a probe with a semi-permeable membrane, was inserted in the dermis. A perfusate (a drug-free physiological solution) was pumped through the probe at a low flow rate, allowing miltefosine present in the dermis to cross the membrane and be collected in the dialysates over time. Protein-free (dialysates) and total (blood and skin biopsies) drug concentrations were analysed using LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: and conclusions: Using microdialysis, protein-free miltefosine drug concentrations could be detected in the infected dermis over time (Cmax ≈ 450 ng/ml). This clinical proof-of-concept study thus illustrates the potential of dermal microdialysis as a minimally invasive alternative to invasive skin biopsies to quantify drug concentrations directly at the pharmacological site of action in PKDL.
Asunto(s)
Antiprotozoarios , Leishmaniasis Cutánea , Leishmaniasis Visceral , Fosforilcolina/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Leishmaniasis Visceral/complicaciones , Leishmaniasis Visceral/tratamiento farmacológico , Cromatografía Liquida , Microdiálisis/efectos adversos , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/tratamiento farmacológico , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/etiología , Antiprotozoarios/uso terapéutico , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem , Soluciones para Diálisis/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Background: Palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK) is a heterogeneous group of hereditary or acquired disorders characterised by excessive epidermal thickening of the palms and soles. Proper knowledge about the aetiology of the disease and clinico-demographic profile helps in planning management and predicting outcomes. Aims and Objective: To determine the prevalence of different dermatoses and describe their clinico-histological correlation in acquired palmoplantar keratoderma. Materials and Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study conducted after obtaining Ethics-Committee permission and consent from participants. Patients of any age or gender presenting with acquired PPK were recruited. The calculated sample size was 67 by using the prevalence rate (p) of 22.2%, allowable error (L) of 10%, the confidence level of 95% (z = 1.96), and an infinite population size of 20,000. Patients were evaluated by taking demographic and clinical data in a pre-designed case record form, necessary laboratory investigations and histopathological examination that wereevaluated by three blinded experts. The pooled data were analysed with statistical software. Results: Among the 67 participants, Psoriasis was diagnosed clinically in 39 (58.2%) and histologically in 7 (10.4%), Lichen planus (LP) clinically in 16 (23.9%) and histologically in 9 (13.4%), Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) in 8 (11.9%) patients clinically and 7 (10.4%) histologically and Hyperkeratotic eczema (HKE) in 4 (6%) clinically and 43 (64.2%) histopathologically. There was very poor inter-rater agreement (Kappa = 0.148, SE 0.0047, 95% CI 0.057 to 0.24). The clinico-pathological correlation was found to be agreeable in 17.9% Psoriasis, 56.2% LP and 87.5% PRP. HKE was commonly misdiagnosed as Psoriasis in 65.1% of patients. Conclusion: Hyperkeratotic lesions of the palm and sole often present with overlapping clinical features and a skin biopsy has to be done to aid in diagnosis. Limitation: Stratification of the clinical expertise of clinicians was done during the analysis.