Drug-coated balloons reduce the risk of recurrent restenosis in arteriovenous fistulas and prosthetic grafts for hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study was to evaluate the early and mid-term outcomes of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in hemodialysis patients with recurrent stenosis of arteriovenous fistula and previously treated with plain balloon angioplasty (PBA). METHODS: Between July 2013 and June 2016 38 hemodialysis patients with recurrent stenosis of arteriovenous fistula underwent endovascular treatment with a DCB at our center. All patients were previously treated at the target lesion with a PBA. The intervals in months between the standard PBA and the procedure with DCB (time PBA-DCB) and between the procedure with DCB and the restenosis at the target lesion (time DCB-restenosis) were evaluated and compared with T-test. Estimated outcomes at 2 years in terms of patient survival, primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and freedom from target lesion restenosis were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Intraprocedural technical success was obtained in 97.4% of the cases. During the follow-up (mean duration 14.3 months, range 2-33) 19 patients (50%) developed a restenotic lesion at the target lesion with an estimated 2-year freedom from target lesion restenosis of 32.8%. Mean time PBA-DCB was 6.4 months, and the mean time DCB-restenosis was 7.9 months with a statistically significant difference at T-test (P<0.001). Estimated 2-year rates of primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency were 40.8%, 73.1%, and 82.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience DCBs were safe and effective in the treatment of recurrent stenosis in patients with failing arteriovenous fistula. The time to restenosis at the target lesion was longer respect to that necessary to have a recurrent restenosis after PBA.

Conservative management of chronic kidney disease stage 5: role of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Benefits and risks of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are controversial. We tested the role of ACE-I in slowing the progression of renal damage in a real-world elderly population with CKD stage 5. METHODS: We evaluated all patients consecutively referred to our CKD stage 5 outpatient clinic from January 2002 to December 2013. Chronicity was defined as two consecutive estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements below 15 ml/min/1.73 m2. We retrieved parameters of interest at baseline and assessed eGFR reduction rate during follow-up. We estimated GFR by the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. RESULTS: Mean age of the 342 subjects analyzed was 72 years and eGFR 10 ml/min/1.73 m2. In the 188 patients on ACE-I at baseline, the subsequent annual rate of eGFR reduction was less than a third of that found in the 154 patients off ACE-I. Across phosphate quartiles, baseline eGFR significantly decreased while its annual reduction rate significantly increased. Of the original cohort, 60 patients (17 %) died, 201 (59 %) started dialysis and 81 (24 %) were still in conservative treatment at the end of the study. Multivariate analysis identified age, phosphate, proteinuria, baseline eGFR and its rate of progression as independent risk factors directly or inversely predictive of progression to dialysis. ACE-I use significantly reduced by 31 % the risk of dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that proteinuria independently predicts further renal damage progression even in end-stage renal disease patients not yet in dialysis. In our cohort of elderly patients with very advanced CKD, ACE-I was effective in slowing down further renal damage progression.