Safety and outcome of ultrasound-guided tunneled central venous catheter in children with cancers from low middle-income country: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Central venous access devices (CVAD) are vital for cancer therapeutics in pediatric oncology. Tunneled vascular access devices (TVAD) are preferred in children for prolonged and frequent vascular access. Data on insertion, care, and complications of CVAD in children from low middle-income countries (LMIC) are scarce, heterogeneous, and retrospective. PROCEDURE: This prospective observational study on eligible children <12 years with pediatric malignancies requiring chemotherapy for minimum 6 months from diagnosis excluded children with mucosal bleeding, coagulopathy, and infections. TVAD insertion was ultrasound (USG) guided. Number of catheter-days, surgical and nonsurgical complications, and risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) were noted TVAD removal due to complications, therapy completion, tumor progression, or death. RESULTS: Data from 61 of 86 eligible children with median age 42 months (range 1-144) were analyzed. Hematological malignancy and severe thrombocytopenia were seen in 37/61 (61%) and 18/61 (30%) children, respectively. First-attempt success rate was 74%. Surgical complications were seen in four of 61 (7%). Nonsurgical complications were seen in 33/61 (54%) children; CRBSI was commonest 24/61 (39%), causing removal of TVAD in 14/61 (23%). Incidence per 1000 catheter-days for CRBSI was 3.24. Antibiotic lock therapy could salvage nine of 24 TVAD with CRBSI. Thrombus and accidental removal was seen in six of 61 (10%) and four of 61 (7%). None of the studied risk factors were significantly associated with CRBSI. The mean insertion duration of TVAD was 121 ± 90 days. CONCLUSION: USG-guided TVAD insertion is safe and reliable way for chemotherapy administration with acceptable complications in children with malignancies in LMIC, including children with severe thrombocytopenia.

Anesthetic management of extremely low-birth-weight neonates for laparotomy.

Anesthetic management of extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) neonates is always accompanied by many dilemmas and challenges. Here, we report a case in which 512 g of ELBW newborns underwent exploratory laparotomy for perforation. Anesthesia management of such ELBW infants has not been reported in the literature.

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy - Initial experience from a general surgery center.

BACKGROUND: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is gaining popularity as a relatively painless alternative to conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy. The initial experience from a service hospital is presented along with review of literature. METHODS: 40 cases were managed by stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) over a period of two and half years. The primary outcome measures assessed were the analgesic requirement in the post-operative period and the time taken to resume Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Additional outcome measures studied were; presence of bleeding per rectum, prolapse of mass per rectum, incontinence to flatus/stool, post-operative urinary retention, requirement of a repeat procedure, presence of post-operative anal stenosis, and residual external haemorrhoids at 1 week, 1, 3 and 6 months and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: 40 patients with grade II, III and IV hemorrhoids underwent SH under spinal anesthesia. In the first 24 h 17 patients required a single dose of Injection Diclofenac Sodium while 19 patients required two doses and 4 patients had to be given three doses. 14 patients (35%) achieved Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living score of 6 on the first post-operative day and another 17 (42.5%) on the second post-operative day. By the fourth post-operative day all patients had achieved a score of 6. One patient had a rectal perforation as a complication of the procedure and another required a second procedure for excision of thrombosed external hemorrhoids. CONCLUSION: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with less post-operative pain and early resumption of ADL. Although the procedure appears simple to perform, it can be associated with serious complications and still cannot be considered the standard of care for the operative treatment of internal hemorrhoids.