Use, response and outcomes of second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers.

INTRODUCTION: First-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancers has been established as gemcitabine and cisplatin; however, there is currently no recognized standard second-line chemotherapy. The purpose of this study is to review and evaluate the outcomes of second-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancers. METHODS: Patients who received chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancers at BC Cancer between August 2009 and December 2015 were retrospectively studied to identify second-line chemotherapy treatments used and to determine overall survival, time-to-treatment discontinuation and characteristics predicting for improved overall survival. RESULTS: Of 325 patients who received first-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer, 90 (30%) received second-line chemotherapy. Median overall survival for patients who received only first-line chemotherapy was 9.5 months versus 17.3 months for patients who received second-line chemotherapy. Median time-to-treatment discontinuation for second-line chemotherapy was 2.0 months. Common drugs used in second-line chemotherapy treatments included capecitabine (30%), 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (17%) and 5-fluorouracil monotherapy (15%). There was no difference in overall survival for patients who received single-agent second-line chemotherapy compared to doublet second-line chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are fit enough to receive second-line chemotherapy may benefit in terms of overall survival and should be offered treatment with single-agent therapy. Capecitabine was the most common second-line chemotherapy treatment. The improved median overall survival for patients who received second-line chemotherapy may be impacted by independent patient-specific factors which are unknown at this time.

Real-world experience supporting the role of oncologic resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in biliary tract cancers.

Background: Complete resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the gold standard for patients with localized cholangiocarcinoma (CC) or gallbladder cancer (GBC). However, this is not always feasible, and recurrence rates remain high. Objectives: To understand the real-world proportions and reason for treatment failure in resected biliary tract cancers. Design and methods: We performed a retrospective population-based review of patients with GBC or CC [intrahepatic (IHCC) or extrahepatic (EHCC)] resected between 2005 and 2019 using the BC Cancer provincial database. A chart review was conducted to characterize demographics, treatments received and outcomes. Results: In total, 594 patients were identified of whom 416 (70%) had disease recurrence. Most GBCs (96%) were diagnosed incidentally, and repeat oncologic resection was performed in 45%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was received in 51% of patients diagnosed after 2017 (mostly capecitabine). Patient co-morbidities, disease progression and patient preference were the commonest reasons for not proceeding with adjuvant chemotherapy. One-third of patients did not complete all planned cycles. Median overall survival was significantly higher in those with complete (R0) versus incomplete (R1) resection [31.6 versus 18 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35-0.53] and in those with versus without re-resection for GBC [29.4 versus 19 months, HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.41-0.73]. There was a trend towards improved survival with versus without adjuvant therapy (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.61-1.02). Only 25% in the more contemporary cohort (2017-2019) had an R0 resection and completed adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion: Complete resection, including reresection for incidentally diagnosed GBCs, and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with improved outcomes in this retrospective cohort, yet many patients were not able to complete these treatments. Neoadjuvant strategies may improve treatment delivery and ultimately, outcomes.

Treatment journey of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma using real-world data in British Columbia, Canada.

Aim: This study examined treatment patterns, survival outcomes and healthcare costs related to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in British Columbia. Methods: The study utilized data from two physician databases (HCC and MOTION) and the provincial British Columbia transplant database. Results: The analysis revealed diverse treatment approaches and identified the varying treatment journeys of patients. Liver transplant and systemic therapies demonstrated improved survival rates. However, there was a scarcity of Canadian-specific cost data. Conclusion: The research emphasizes the complexities of managing HCC and underscores the need for personalized treatment strategies to enhance patient outcomes. These findings contribute valuable insights into HCC management and provide a foundation for future studies and interventions aimed at optimizing care and resource allocation.

This study looked at how people diagnosed with liver cancer in British Columbia were treated, how long they lived and how much treatment cost. Treatment records were reviewed, and depending on the extent of the disease, treatments could include surgery, treatments directed at the liver and/or anti-cancer therapy. The average survival time varied from 21­33 months, with an average cost per patient of $94,000. This helps us understand the patient journey and future studies would include current treatment options.

Evaluation of Clinical and Pathological Factors to Predict High Risk of Recurrence in Patients With Stage II Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The ability to predict patients with stage II colon cancer at high risk of recurrence is currently limited to certain clinicopathologic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This population-based study reviewed various prognostic factors to identify those associated with worse time to recurrence (TTR) and improved disease-specific survival (DSS), and to subsequently develop a prognostic index (PI) to identify high risk cancers. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses revealed factors significant for TTR and DSS. A PI derived from the TTR risk factors identified 3 risk groups using 5-year rate without relapse: 88% for low-risk, 81% for intermediate-risk, and 59% for high risk. CONCLUSION: This model was better at identifying high risk patients than using equally weighted standard risk factors.

Characterizing the KRAS G12C mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort and assessment of expression differences in The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Introduction: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), RAS mutations impart inferior survival and resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies. KRAS G12C inhibitors have been developed and we evaluated how KRAS G12C differs from other RAS mutations. Patients and Methods: This retrospective review evaluated patients in British Columbia, Canada with mCRC and RAS testing performed between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018. Sequencing information from The Cancer Genome Analysis (TCGA) was also obtained and analysed. Results: Age at diagnosis, sex, anatomic location and stage at diagnosis did not differ by RAS mutation type. Progression free survival on first chemotherapy for patients with metastatic KRAS G12C tumours was 11 months. Median overall survival did not differ by RAS mutation type but was worse for both KRAS G12C (27 months) and non-G12C alterations (29 months) than wildtype (43 months) (p = 0.01). Within the TCGA, there was no differential gene expression between KRAS G12C and other RAS mutations. However, eight genes with copy number differences between the G12C and non-G12C RAS mutant groups were identified after adjusting for multiple comparisons (FITM2, PDRG1, POFUT1, ERGIC3, EDEM2, PIGU, MANBAL and PXMP4). We also noted that other RAS mutant mCRCs had a higher tumour mutation burden than those with KRAS G12C mutations (median 3.05 vs 2.06 muts/Mb, p = 4.2e-3) and that KRAS G12C/other RAS had differing consensus molecular subtype distribution from wildtype colorectal cancer (CRC) (p < 0.0001) but not each other (p = 0.14). Conclusion: KRAS G12C tumours have similar clinical presentation to other RAS mutant tumours, however, are associated with differential copy number alterations.

Impact of Tumor Location on Patient Outcomes in Small Bowel Cancers.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel cancers are rare gastrointestinal malignancies and tumor location impact on outcomes is unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on stage I to IV small bowel cancer cases from 2000 to 2017 in British Columbia, Canada. Baseline patient characteristics, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by tumor location and systemic therapy use patterns were summarized. RESULTS: Of 340 patients included, primary tumor distribution was: duodenum (51.2%), ileum (19.1%), jejunum (18.5%), and unspecified (11.2%). Median DFS for stage I to III disease was 37.7, 49.1, and 26.7 months for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal tumors (P = .018). Median OS was 9.6, 35.2, and 20.1 months for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal tumors (P < .0001). Compared to duodenal primaries, both jejunal and ileal tumors were associated with significantly improved OS (HR 0.43, P < .001 for jejunal; HR 0.71, P = .035 for ileal). Adjuvant therapy was given to 21.6% of stage II and 50.6% of stage III cancers. Among patients with metastatic disease, median OS was 4.2, 11.4, and 6.9 months for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal tumors (P = .0019). Jejunal tumors had the best prognosis (HR 0.48, P = .001 vs. duodenum). CONCLUSION: Survival differences exist when small bowel cancers were assessed by tumor location, and jejunal tumors portended better prognosis overall.

Current Role of Immunotherapy in Gastric, Esophageal and Gastro-Esophageal Junction Cancers-A Report from the Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference.

Gastric, esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancers are associated with inferior outcomes. For early-stage disease, perioperative chemotherapy or chemoradiation followed by surgery is the standard treatment. For most patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal tract cancers, platinum-based chemotherapy remains a standard treatment. Recently, several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of immunotherapy involving checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with gastro-esophageal cancer and have changed the treatment landscape. The Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference (WCGCCC), involving experts from four Western Canadian provinces, convened virtually on 16 June 2021 and developed the recommendations on the role of immunotherapy in patients with gastro-esophageal cancer.

To share or not to share: communication of caregiver-reported outcomes when a patient has colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The importance of patient-centered measurement in cancer care has led to recognition of the potential for caregiver-reported outcomes to improve caregiver, patient and healthcare system outcomes. Yet, there is limited evidence to inform caregiver-reported outcome implementation. Our purpose was to generate evidence to inform the meaningful and constructive integration of caregiver-reported outcomes into cancer care to benefit caregivers, including exploration of the question of the extent to which these assessments should be shared with patients. We focused on caregivers of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) because CRC is common, and associated caregiving can be complex. RESULTS: From our Interpretive Description analysis of qualitative interview data from 78 participants (25 caregivers, 37 patients, and 16 healthcare providers [HCPs]), we identified contrasting perspectives about the sharing of caregiver-reported outcome assessments with patients with CRC. Those who preferred open communication with both the patient and caregiver present considered this essential for supporting the caregiver. The participants who preferred private communication without the patient, cited concern about caregiver- and patient-burden and guilt. Recognizing these perspectives, HCPs described strategies used to navigate sensitivities inherent in preferences for open versus private communication. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of caregiver-reported outcomes into cancer care will require careful consideration of caregiver and patient preferences regarding the communication of caregiver assessments to prevent additional burden.

Report from the Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Consensus Cancer Conference-Management of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer.

An educational session related to the Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference (WCGCCC) was held virtually on 14 October 2020. The WCGCCC is an interactive multidisciplinary conference attended by health care professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba), who are involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists; pathologists, radiologists, and allied health care professionals participated in presentation and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses current issues in the management of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.

Systemic Therapy and Its Surgical Implications in Patients with Resectable Liver Colorectal Cancer Metastases. A Report from the Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference.

The Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference (WCGCCC) convened virtually on 4 November 2021. The WCGCCC is an interactive multi-disciplinary conference attended by health care professionals, including surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists; pathologists; radiologists; and allied health care professionals from across four Western Canadian provinces, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba, who are involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. They participated in presentation and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing recommendations on the role of systemic therapy and its optimal sequence in patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

Lynch syndrome-associated extracolonic tumors are rare in two extended families with the same EPCAM deletion.

OBJECTIVES: The Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited cancer syndrome showing a preponderance of colorectal cancer (CRC) in context with endometrial cancer and several other extracolonic cancers, which is due to pathogenic mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Some families were found to show a LS phenotype without an identified MMR mutation, although there was microsatellite instability and absence of MSH2 expression by immunohistochemistry. Studies of a subset of these families found a deletion at the 3' end of the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EPCAM) gene, causing transcription read-through resulting in silencing of MSH2 through hypermethylation of its promoter. The tumor spectrum of such families appears to differ from classical LS. METHODS: Our study of two large families (USA Family R and Dutch Family A) with an EPCAM deletion was carried out using each institution's standard family study protocol. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and EPCAM deletion analysis was performed. RESULTS: Both families were found to harbor the same deletion at the 3' end of EPCAM. Analysis showed that the deletion originated from a common ancestor. Family R and Family A members showed segregation of CRC with the presence of this EPCAM mutation. Compared with classic LS, there were almost no extracolonic cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Members of Family R and Family A, all with the same EPCAM deletion, predominantly presented with CRC but no LS-associated endometrial cancer, confirming findings seen in other, smaller, LS families with EPCAM mutations. In these EPCAM mutation carriers, cancer surveillance should be focused on CRC.

Phase I trial of vinflunine and pemetrexed in refractory solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Vinflunine is a novel vinca alkaloid with promising single agent clinical activity. Pemetrexed has at least additive activity with other vincas. A phase I trial was undertaken to assess the safety of vinflunine and pemetrexed in patients with refractory solid tumors. METHODS: A standard 3-patient cohort dose escalation scheme was used to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the vinflunine/pemetrexed combination. Pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) was given with vinflunine 280 mg/m(2) (cohort 1), 300 mg/m(2) (cohort 2) or 320 mg/m(2) (cohort 3) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: 19 patients were enrolled, median age 58 years (range 32 to 77) and had a median of 3 (range 1-6) prior therapies. DLT occurred 1 of 6 pts in cohort 1 (thrombocytopenia, hyponatremia), 2 of 10 pts in cohort 2 (febrile neutropenia, hyponatremia, hyperbilirubinema; febrile neutropenia), and 2 of 3 pts in cohort 3 (febrile neutropenia, hypokalemia; febrile neutropenia). 1 pt in cohort 2 died prior to completion of cycle 1 likely from disease progression. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (7), leukopenia (5). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 4 patients (21%). No objective responses were seen. Two patients (breast and lung) had prolonged stable disease for 25 and 20 cycles respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this experience we recommend vinflunine 300 mg/m(2) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) in combination every 3 weeks for future study. At these doses, the combination of vinflunine and pemetrexed was tolerable in this heavily pretreated population. Hematologic toxicity, including febrile neutropenia, was prominent.

A phase I evaluation of the combination of vinflunine and erlotinib in patients with refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition may overcome chemotherapy resistance by inhibiting important anti-apoptotic signals that are constitutively activated by an overstimulated EGFR pathway. METHODS: This phase I dose escalation trial assessed the safety and efficacy of vinflunine, a novel vinca alkaloid microtubule inhibitor, with erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with refractory solid tumors. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were treated, 10 with continuous erlotinib, and 7 with intermittent erlotinib. At dose level 1, vinflunine 280 mg/m(2) IV day 1 and erlotinib 75 mg PO days 2-21 ("continuous erlotinib") in 21 day cycles, two of four patients experienced DLTs. At dose level -1 (vinflunine 250 mg/m(2) every 21 days and erlotinib 75 mg/day), two of six patients experienced DLTs. The study was amended to enroll to "intermittent erlotinib" dosing: vinflunine day 1 and erlotinib days 2-15 of a 21 day cycle. Two of seven experienced DLTs and the study was terminated. One patient with breast cancer had a partial response; three had stable disease ≥ 6 cycles. All were treated in the continuous erlotinib group. CONCLUSIONS: Given the marked toxicity in our patient population, the combination of vinflunine and erlotinib cannot be recommended for further study with these dosing schemas.

The Impact of Geography in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Population Based Study.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) includes different therapeutic modalities and multidisciplinary tumor board reviews. The impact of geography and treatment center type (quaternary vs. non-quaternary) on access to care is unclear. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on HCC patients who received sorafenib in British Columbia from 2008 to 2016. Patients were grouped by Statistics Canada population center (PC) size criteria: large PC (LPC), medium PC (MPC), and small PC (SPC). Access to specialists, receipt of liver-directed therapies, and survival outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Of 286 patients, the geographical distribution was: LPC: 75%; MPC: 16%; and SPC: 9%. A higher proportion of Asians (51% vs. 9% vs. 4%; p < 0.001), Child-Pugh A (94% vs. 83% vs. 80%; p = 0.022), and hepatitis B (37% vs. 15% vs. 4%; p < 0.001) was observed in LPC vs. MPC vs. SPC, respectively. LPC patients were more likely referred to a hepatologist (62% vs. 48% vs. 40%; p = 0.031) and undergo transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (43% vs. 24% vs. 24%; p = 0.018). Sixty percent were treated at a quaternary center, and the median overall survival (OS) was higher for patients treated at a quaternary vs. non-quaternary center (28.0 vs. 14.6 months, respectively; p < 0.001) but similar when compared by PC size. Treatment at a quaternary center predicted an improved survival on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR): 0.652; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.503-0.844; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Geography did not appear to impact OS but patients from LPC were more likely to be referred to hepatology and undergo TACE. Treatment at a quaternary center was associated with an improved survival.

Impact of surveillance among patients with resected pancreatic cancer following adjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma carries a high risk of recurrence even after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Current guidelines do not endorse routine surveillance imaging due to lack of evidence supporting a survival benefit. With current first-line palliative chemotherapy options, it is unclear whether surveillance allows for early detection of asymptomatic disease and therefore an improved opportunity to offer chemotherapy to fit patients. We sought to describe patterns of surveillance of resected pancreatic cancer at British Columbia (BC) Cancer and determine whether utilization of computerized tomography (CT) scans affected likelihood of receiving palliative chemotherapy at the time of recurrence. METHODS: A retrospective review was completed to identify patients treated at BC Cancer centres between 2010-2016 who had undergone curative intent resection and received at least one cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy. Information was collected on baseline characteristics, imaging scans done between adjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence, and receipt of palliative chemotherapy. Two cohorts were defined based on number of scans done between completion of adjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence: those with only 1 scan were defined as "symptomatic" recurrences and patients who had undergone more than 1 scan were considered "surveillance" recurrences. RESULTS: In total, 142 patients were included of which 115 (81%) patients developed recurrence. There were 22 patients (19%) in the "symptomatic" cohort and 93 patients (81%) in the "surveillance" cohort. Median time to recurrence 274 days (9.1 months) in the symptomatic cohort compared to 471 days (15.7 months) in the surveillance group. Patients who underwent surveillance scans were more likely to receive palliative chemotherapy at the time of recurrence, though statistical significance was not reached: 51% in surveillance group versus 27% in symptomatic group [odds ratio (OR) 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-6.58, P=0.17]. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the absence of surveillance recommendations, the majority of patients underwent surveillance imaging. We demonstrated a non-significant increase in the likelihood of receiving palliative chemotherapy among patients who underwent surveillance scans. With more efficacious palliative chemotherapy options available, studies to determine whether receipt of chemotherapy in asymptomatic recurrences translates into improved survival and/or quality of life are warranted.

Report from the Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference Virtual Education Series-Transition from Local to System Therapy and Optimal Sequencing of Systemic Therapy for HCC.

The Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference (WC-5) convened virtually on 10 February 2021. The WC-5 is an interactive multidisciplinary conference attended by health care professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) who are involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists; pathologists; radiologists; and allied health care professionals participated in presentation and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses current issues in the management of hepatocellular cancer (HCC). Recommendations have been made for the transition from local to systemic therapy and the optimal sequencing of systemic regimens in the management of HCC.

Report from the 21st Annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference; Calgary, Alberta; 20-21 September 2019.

The 21st annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference (WCGCCC) was held in Calgary, Alberta, 20-21 September 2019. The WCGCCC is an interactive multi-disciplinary conference attended by health care professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and allied health care professionals such as dietitians and nurses participated in presentation and discussion sessions to develop the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses current issues in the management of hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) cancers.

Optimum chemotherapy regimens for neoadjuvant therapy of hepatic colorectal metastases.

Resection of metastatic colorectal cancer hepatic lesions has gained support as surgical advances have made resections safer. Subsequently, the use of neoadjuvant therapy to cytoreduce tumors coupled with improved medical therapy has enhanced resection rates leading to improved outcomes. In "unresectable" disease, the addition of biologic therapies has further enhanced antitumor response, resulting in successful disease resection in certain patients. This review examines approaches to the neoadjuvant management of colorectal liver metastases with systemic therapies.

The impact of primary sclerosing cholangitis or inflammatory bowel disease on cholangiocarcinoma phenotype, therapy, and survival.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), with or without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), confers the risk of cholangiocarcinoma. Isolated IBD may be an independent risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma. We sought to compare cholangiocarcinoma phenotype and outcomes between patients with PSC, IBD, and neither. METHODS: Patients with malignancy were separated into cohorts by the presence of PSC and IBD. Data regarding demographics, clinical presentation, therapeutic regimens, and survival were collected. Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad and R-Studio. RESULTS: Of 946 patients, 22 had PSC, and 18 had isolated IBD. PSC and IBD patients were younger than controls (P < 0.001, P = 0.01). Cholangiocarcinoma prevalence was estimated at 0.01% for IBD patients, 0.6% for PSC patients, and 0.002% for all other patients. All cohorts most often presented at stage 4. PSC patients presented more often at stage 3 (P = 0.04) and with perihilar disease (P = 0.001). Patients with PSC or IBD received less chemotherapy (P = 0.004, 0.01). Median overall survivals were 15 months (PSC), 11 months (IBD), and 10 months (controls) (P = 0.79). Patients with intrahepatic tumors had longer survival (P < 0.001). Curative intent resection improved survival in all cohorts (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression identified resection as a predictor of improved survival. Extrahepatic, perihilar, gallbladder, and unspecified biliary tumors were predictors of death. CONCLUSIONS: Cholangiocarcinoma presents at a late stage and portends dismal survival regardless of PSC or IBD status. Survival was dependent on tumor location and surgical resection. These data suggest that efforts should focus on developing protocols that are able to detect and treat cholangiocarcinoma in high-risk populations (PSC) at an early stage.