RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory skin diseases, such as psoriasis, atopic eczema, and contact dermatitis pose diagnostic challenges due to their diverse clinical presentations and the need for rapid and precise diagnostic assessment. OBJECTIVE: While recent studies described non-invasive imaging devices such as Optical coherence tomography and Line-field confocal OCT (LC-OCT) as possible techniques to enable real-time visualization of pathological features, a standardized analysis and validation has not yet been performed. METHODS: One hundred forty lesions from patients diagnosed with atopic eczema (57), psoriasis (50), and contact dermatitis (33) were imaged using OCT and LC-OCT. Statistical analysis was employed to assess the significance of their characteristic morphologic features. Additionally, a decision tree algorithm based on Gini's coefficient calculations was developed to identify key attributes and criteria for accurately classifying the disease groups. RESULTS: Descriptive statistics revealed distinct morphologic features in eczema, psoriasis, and contact dermatitis lesions. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated the significance of these features, providing a robust differentiation between the three inflammatory conditions. The decision tree algorithm further enhanced classification accuracy by identifying optimal attributes for disease discrimination, highlighting specific morphologic criteria as crucial for rapid diagnosis in the clinical setting. CONCLUSION: The combined approach of descriptive statistics, multivariate logistic regression, and a decision tree algorithm provides a thorough understanding of the unique aspects associated with each inflammatory skin disease. This research offers a practical framework for lesion classification, enhancing the interpretability of imaging results for clinicians.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Psoriasis , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Humanos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Psoriasis/diagnóstico por imagen , Psoriasis/patología , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico por imagen , Dermatitis Atópica/patología , Algoritmos , Femenino , Masculino , Dermatitis por Contacto/diagnóstico por imagen , Dermatitis por Contacto/patología , Adulto , Piel/diagnóstico por imagen , Piel/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Lupus erythematosus (LE) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease, that can affect the skin to varying degree. In particular, discoid LE (DLE) and the rare form of lupus panniculitis/profundus are associated with scarring alopecia. The heterogeneity of the clinical, dermatoscopic, and histologic presentation poses a major challenge to the clinician in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of other forms of scarring alopecia. OBJECTIVE: While noninvasive imaging techniques using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) have proven to be helpful in the diagnosis of scarring alopecia in the context of LE, this study aimed to investigate line-field confocal OCT (LC-OCT) to identify characteristic features of cicatricial alopecia in LE. METHODS: Fifteen patients with cicatricial alopecia in LE were included and the most affected/inflamed areas of the scalp were prospectively examined. In analogy to histopathology and previously reported criteria in RCM, all images were evaluated according to seven established criteria and underwent descriptive analyses. RESULTS: LC-OCT revealed characteristic features of cicatricial alopecia, such as lymphocytic interface dermatitis (14/15; 93.3%) and basal cell vacuolization (13/15; 86.7%). The most impressive feature was the occurrence of prominent hyperreflective fibers in 14/15 patients (93.3%). CONCLUSION: LC-OCT imaging can noninvasively detect morphologic criteria such as lymphocytic and vacuolar interface dermatitis of cicatricial alopecia due to LE. In particular, the presence of hyperreflective collagen fibers appears to be a characteristic easily recognizable feature that may facilitate differential diagnosis with other forms of cicatricial alopecia. Further studies are mandatory to differentiate other forms of scarring alopecia.
Asunto(s)
Alopecia , Cicatriz , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Humanos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Alopecia/patología , Alopecia/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Cicatriz/diagnóstico por imagen , Cicatriz/patología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Microscopía Confocal/métodos , Adulto Joven , Lupus Eritematoso Discoide/patología , Lupus Eritematoso Discoide/diagnóstico por imagen , Lupus Eritematoso Discoide/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Lupus Eritematoso Cutáneo/patología , Lupus Eritematoso Cutáneo/diagnóstico por imagen , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Onychomycosis is common and important to distinguish from other nail diseases. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is necessary for optimal patient treatment and outcome. Non-invasive diagnostic tools have increasing potential for nail diseases including onychomycosis. This study evaluated line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) as a rapid non-invasive tool for diagnosing onychomycosis as compared to confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and conventional methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study 86 patients with clinically suspected onychomycosis and 14 controls were examined using LC-OCT, OCT, and CLSM. KOH-preparation, fungal culture, PCR, and histopathology were used as comparative conventional methods. RESULTS: LC-OCT had the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value of all methods used, closely followed by PCR and OCT. Specificity and positive predictive value of LC-OCT were as high as with CLSM, while OCT scored much lower. The gold standard technique, fungal culture, showed the lowest sensitivity and negative predictive value. Only PCR and culture allowed species differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: LC-OCT enables quick and non-invasive detection of onychomycosis, with advantages over CLSM and OCT, and similar diagnostic accuracy to PCR but lacking species differentiation. For accurate nail examination, LC-OCT requires well-trained and experienced operators.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Uña , Onicomicosis , Humanos , Onicomicosis/diagnóstico , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Uñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Uñas/patología , Microscopía ConfocalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The histological PRO score (I-III) helps to assess the malignant potential of actinic keratoses (AK) by grading the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) undulation. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) provides non-invasive real-time PRO score quantification. From LC-OCT imaging data, training of an artificial intelligence (AI), using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for automated PRO score quantification of AK in vivo may be achieved. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CNNs were trained to segment LC-OCT images of healthy skin and AK. PRO score models were developed in accordance with the histopathological gold standard and trained on a subset of 237 LC-OCT AK images and tested on 76 images, comparing AI-computed PRO score to the imaging experts' visual consensus. RESULTS: Significant agreement was found in 57/76 (75%) cases. AI-automated grading correlated best with the visual score for PRO II (84.8%) vs. PRO III (69.2%) vs. PRO I (66.6%). Misinterpretation occurred in 25% of the cases mostly due to shadowing of the DEJ and disruptive features such as hair follicles. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that CNNs are helpful for automated PRO score quantification in LC-OCT images. This may provide the clinician with a feasible tool for PRO score assessment in the follow-up of AK.
Asunto(s)
Queratosis Actínica , Humanos , Queratosis Actínica/diagnóstico por imagen , Queratosis Actínica/patología , Inteligencia Artificial , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Piel/patología , Redes Neurales de la ComputaciónRESUMEN
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been able to establish itself in recent years not only in academic-scientific, but also in everyday dermatological practice. Its focus lies on epithelial tumors of the skin, which can be diagnosed intuitively and within a few seconds. Thus, basal cell carcinomas, actinic keratoses, and different stages of field cancerization can be diagnosed and monitored for response to therapy or possible recurrence. This often helps to avoid invasive sample extraction. Recently, the field of OCT and its latest advancement, dynamic OCT (D-OCT), has been expanded to include non-oncologic dermatological diseases. This encompasses inflammatory dermatoses and the analysis of physiological skin parameters such as hydration. Thanks to automated vascular imaging and the measurement of objective parameters such as epidermal thickness, blood flow at depth, optical attenuation coefficient, and skin roughness, more and more characteristics of the skin can be studied in a noninvasive and standardized way. New potential areas of application are eczema, contact allergic dermatitis, psoriasis, rosacea, telangiectasia, acute and chronic wounds, melasma and nevus flammeus but also melanocytic lesions.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular , Queratosis Actínica , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Queratosis Actínica/diagnóstico por imagen , Piel/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía de Coherencia ÓpticaAsunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Pruebas del ParcheRESUMEN
Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common skin cancer in situ that can progress to invasive SCC. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) has emerged as a non-invasive imaging technique that can aid in diagnosis. Recently, machine-learning algorithms have been developed that can automatically assess the PRO score of AKs based on the dermo-epidermal junction's (DEJ's) protrusion on LC-OCT images. A dataset of 19.898 LC-OCT images from 80 histologically confirmed AK lesions was used to test the performance of a previous validated artificial intelligence (AI)-based LC-OCT assessment algorithm. AI-based PRO score assessment was compared to the imaging experts' visual score. Additionally, undulation of the DEJ, the number of protrusions detected within the image, and the maximum depth of the protrusions were computed. Our results show that AI-automated PRO grading is highly comparable to the visual score, with an agreement of 71.3% for the lesions evaluated. Furthermore, this AI-based assessment was significantly faster than the regular visual PRO score assessment. The results confirm our previous findings of the pilot study in a larger cohort that the AI-based grading of LC-OCT images is a reliable and fast tool to optimize the efficiency of visual PRO score grading. This technology has the potential to improve the accuracy and speed of AK diagnosis and may lead to better clinical outcomes for patients.
RESUMEN
Diagnosing clinically unclear basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) can be challenging. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) is able to display morphological features of BCC subtypes with good histological correlation. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of LC-OCT in diagnosing clinically unsure cases of BCC compared to dermoscopy alone and in distinguishing between superficial BCCs and other BCC subtypes. Moreover, we addressed pitfalls in false positive cases. We prospectively enrolled 182 lesions of 154 patients, referred to our department to confirm or to rule out the diagnosis of BCC. Dermoscopy and LC-OCT images were evaluated by two experts independently. Image quality, LC-OCT patterns and criteria, diagnosis, BCC subtype, and diagnostic confidence were assessed. Sensitivity and specificity of additional LC-OCT were compared to dermoscopy alone for identifying BCC in clinically unclear lesions. In addition, key LC-OCT features to distinguish between BCCs and non-BCCs and to differentiate superficial BCCs from other BCC subtypes were determined by linear regressions. Diagnostic confidence was rated as "high" in only 48% of the lesions with dermoscopy alone compared to 70% with LC-OCT. LC-OCT showed a high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (80%) compared to histology, and these were even higher (100% sensitivity and 97% specificity) in the subgroup of lesions with high diagnostic confidence. Interobserver agreement was nearly perfect (95%). The combination of dermoscopy and LC-OCT reached a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 81.2% in all cases and increased to sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 94.9% in cases with a high diagnostic confidence. The performance of LC-OCT was influenced by the image quality but not by the anatomical location of the lesion. The most specific morphological LC-OCT criteria in BCCs compared to non-BCCs were: less defined dermoepidermal junction (DEJ), hyporeflective tumor lobules, and dark rim. The most relevant features of the subgroup of superficial BCCs (sBCCs) were: string of pearls pattern and absence of epidermal thinning. Our diagnostic confidence, sensitivity, and specificity in detecting BCCs in the context of clinically equivocal lesions significantly improved using LC-OCT in comparison to dermoscopy only. Operator training for image acquisition is fundamental to achieve the best results. Not only the differential diagnosis of BCC, but also BCC subtyping can be performed at bedside with LC-OCT.
RESUMEN
Until now, the clinical differentiation between a nevus and a melanoma is still challenging in some cases. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) is a new tool with the aim to change that. The aim of the study was to evaluate LC-OCT for the discrimination between nevi and melanomas. A total of 84 melanocytic lesions were examined with LC-OCT and 36 were also imaged with RCM. The observers recorded the diagnoses, and the presence or absence of the 18 most common imaging parameters for melanocytic lesions, nevi, and melanomas in the LC-OCT images. Their confidence in diagnosis and the image quality of LC-OCT and RCM were evaluated. The most useful criteria, the sensitivity and specificity of LC-OCT vs. RCM vs. histology, to differentiate a (dysplastic) nevus from a melanoma were analyzed. Good image quality correlated with better diagnostic performance (Spearman correlation: 0.4). LC-OCT had a 93% sensitivity and 100% specificity compared to RCM (93% sensitivity, 95% specificity) for diagnosing a melanoma (vs. all types of nevi). No difference in performance between RCM and LC-OCT was observed (McNemar's p value = 1). Both devices falsely diagnosed dysplastic nevi as non-dysplastic (43% sensitivity for dysplastic nevus diagnosis). The most significant criteria for diagnosing a melanoma with LC-OCT were irregular honeycombed patterns (92% occurrence rate; 31.7 odds ratio (OR)), the presence of pagetoid spread (89% occurrence rate; 23.6 OR) and the absence of dermal nests (23% occurrence rate, 0.02 OR). In conclusion LC-OCT is useful for the discrimination between melanomas and nevi.