RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of serous cystadenofibromas in the adnexa. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients identified in the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) database, who had a histological diagnosis of serous cystadenofibroma and had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination by an experienced ultrasound examiner, between 1999 and 2012. In the IOTA database, which contains data collected prospectively, the tumors were described using the terms and definitions of the IOTA group. In addition, three authors reviewed, first independently and then together, ultrasound images of serous cystadenofibromas and described them using pattern recognition. RESULTS: We identified 233 women with a histological diagnosis of serous cystadenofibroma. In the IOTA database, most cystadenofibromas (67.4%; 157/233) were described as containing solid components but 19.3% (45/233) were described as multilocular cysts and 13.3% (31/233) as unilocular cysts. Papillary projections were described in 52.4% (122/233) of the cystadenofibromas. In 79.5% (97/122) of the cysts with papillary projections, color Doppler signals were absent in the papillary projections. Most cystadenofibromas (83.7%; 195/233) manifested no or minimal color Doppler signals. On retrospective analysis of 201 ultrasound images of serous cystadenofibromas, using pattern recognition, 10 major types of ultrasound appearance were identified. The most common pattern was a unilocular solid cyst with one or more papillary projections, but no other solid components (25.9%; 52/201). The second most common pattern was a multilocular solid mass with small solid component(s), but no papillary projections (19.4%; 39/201). The third and fourth most common patterns were multi- or bilocular cyst (16.9%; 34/201) and unilocular cyst (11.9%; 24/201). Using pattern recognition, shadowing was identified in 39.8% (80/201) of the tumors, and microcystic appearance of the papillary projections was observed in 34 (38.6%) of the 88 tumors containing papillary projections. CONCLUSIONS: The ultrasound features of serous cystadenofibromas vary. The most common pattern is a unilocular solid cyst with one or more papillary projections but no other solid components, with absent color Doppler signals. Most serous cystadenofibromas were poorly vascularized on color Doppler examination and many manifested acoustic shadowing. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Asunto(s)
Anexos Uterinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Cistoadenofibroma/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Anexos Uterinos/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cistoadenofibroma/patología , Quistes/patología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/patología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Periodo Preoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color/métodos , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Chemoradiation-based neoadjuvant treatment followed by radical surgery is an alternative therapeutic strategy for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), but ultrasound variables used to predict partial response to neoadjuvant treatment are not well defined. Our goal was to analyze prospectively the potential role of transvaginal ultrasound in early prediction of partial pathological response, assessed in terms of residual disease at histology, in a large, single-institution series of LACC patients triaged to neoadjuvant treatment followed by radical surgery. METHODS: Between October 2010 and June 2014, we screened 108 women with histologically documented LACC Stage IB2-IVA, of whom 88 were included in the final analysis. Tumor volume, three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler indices and contrast parameters were obtained before (baseline examination) and after 2 weeks of treatment. The pathological response was defined as complete (absence of any residual tumor after treatment) or partial (microscopic and/or macroscopic residual tumor at pathological examination). Complete-response and partial-response groups were compared and receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated for ultrasound variables that were statistically significant on univariate analysis to evaluate their diagnostic ability to predict partial pathological response. RESULTS: There was a complete pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy in 40 (45.5%) patients and a partial response in 48 (54.5%). At baseline examination, tumor volume did not differ between the two groups. However, after 2 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment, the tumor volume was significantly greater in patients with partial response than it was in those with complete response (P = 0.019). Among the 3D vascular indices, the vascularization index (VI) was significantly lower in the partial-response compared with the complete-response group, both before and after 2 weeks of treatment (P = 0.037 and P = 0.024, respectively). At baseline examination in the contrast analysis, women with partial response had lower tumor peak enhancement (PE) as well as lower tumor wash-in rate (WiR) and longer tumor rise time (RT) compared with complete responders (P = 0.006, P = 0.003, P = 0.038, respectively). There was no difference in terms of contrast parameters after 2 weeks of treatment. ROC-curve analysis of baseline parameters showed that the best cut-offs for predicting partial pathological response were 41.5% for VI (sensitivity, 63.6%; specificity, 66.7%); 16123.5 auxiliary units for tumor PE (sensitivity, 47.9%; specificity, 84.2%); 7.8 s for tumor RT (sensitivity, 68.8%; specificity, 57.9%); and 4902 for tumor WiR (sensitivity, 77.1%; specificity, 60.5%). ROC curves of parameters after 2 weeks of treatment showed that the best cut-off for predicting partial pathological response was 18.1 cm3 for tumor volume (sensitivity, 70.8%; specificity 60.0%) and 39.5% for VI (sensitivity; 62.5%; specificity, 73.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound and contrast parameters differ between LACC patients with complete response and those with partial response before and after 2 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment. However, neither ultrasound parameters before treatment nor those after 2 weeks of treatment had cut-off values with acceptable sensitivity and specificity for predicting partial pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Ultrasonografía Doppler/métodos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the ultrasound features that can discriminate between benign and malignant ovarian cysts with papillary projections but no other solid component in pregnant women. METHODS: Thirty-four women with an ultrasound diagnosis of an ovarian cyst with papillary projections but no other solid component that had been removed surgically during pregnancy were identified from the databases of four ultrasound units. Some clinical and ultrasound information was collected prospectively. Missing information was obtained retrospectively from ultrasound images, ultrasound reports and patient records. Using prospectively and retrospectively collected data, the ultrasound appearance of the tumors was described using the terms and definitions of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group. The ultrasound characteristics were compared with the histological diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 34 cases included, 19 (56%) lesions were benign (16 decidualized endometriomas, one cystadenofibroma, one simple cyst, one struma ovarii), 12 (35%) were borderline tumors and three (9%) were primary invasive tumors (two immature teratomas, one endometrioid cystadenocarcinoma). The contour of the cyst papillations was smooth in 79% (15/19) of benign tumors vs 27% (4/15) of malignant tumors (P = 0.002). The cystic content showed ground-glass echogenicity in 74% (14/19) of benign tumors vs 13% (2/15) of malignant tumors (P = 0.0006). All ovarian masses with smooth papillations and ground-glass content (n = 12) were decidualized endometriomas. The papillary projections were vascularized and the color score was 3 or 4 in 88% (14/16) of decidualized endometriomas vs 42% (5/12) of borderline tumors (P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: In pregnant women, ovarian cysts with ground-glass echogenicity and papillations with a smooth contour on ultrasound are most likely to be decidualized endometriomas. Cysts with anechoic or low-level echogenicity and papillations with an irregular contour suggest borderline malignancy. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Asunto(s)
Quistes/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Quistes/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/patología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Ilustración Médica , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Ovario/diagnóstico por imagen , Ovario/patologíaAsunto(s)
Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Abdominal/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Laparoscopía/métodos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/secundario , Embarazo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Vena Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Cava Inferior/patologíaAsunto(s)
Neoplasias Pélvicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumores Fibrosos Solitarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias Pélvicas/patología , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirugía , Periodo Preoperatorio , Espacio Retroperitoneal/patología , Tumores Fibrosos Solitarios/metabolismo , Tumores Fibrosos Solitarios/patología , Tumores Fibrosos Solitarios/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe clinical history and ultrasound findings in patients with tubal carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with a histological diagnosis of tubal cancer who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination were identified from the databases of 13 ultrasound centers. The tumors were described by the principal investigator at each contributing center on the basis of ultrasound images, ultrasound reports and research protocols (when applicable) using the terms and definitions of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group. In addition, three authors reviewed together all available digital ultrasound images and described them using subjective evaluation of gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasound findings. RESULTS: We identified 79 women with a histological diagnosis of primary tubal cancer, 70 of whom (89%) had serous carcinomas and 46 (58%) of whom presented at FIGO stage III. Forty-nine (62%) women were asymptomatic (incidental finding), whilst the remaining 30 complained of abdominal bloating or pain. Fifty-three (67%) tumors were described as solid at ultrasound examination, 14 (18%) as multilocular solid, 10 (13%) as unilocular solid and two (3%) as unilocular. No tumor was described as a multilocular mass. Most tumors (70/79, 89%) were moderately or very well vascularized on color or power Doppler ultrasound. Normal ovarian tissue was identified adjacent to the tumor in 51% (39/77) of cases. Three types of ultrasound appearance were identified as being typical of tubal carcinoma using pattern recognition: a sausage-shaped cystic structure with solid tissue protruding into it like a papillary projection (11/62, 18%); a sausage-shaped cystic structure with a large solid component filling part of the cyst cavity (13/62, 21%); an ovoid or oblong completely solid mass (36/62, 58%). CONCLUSIONS: A well vascularized ovoid or sausage-shaped structure, either completely solid or with large solid component(s) in the pelvis, should raise the suspicion of tubal cancer, especially if normal ovarian tissue is seen adjacent to it.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/patología , Trompas Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagen , Trompas Uterinas/patología , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/patología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Unilocular-solid ovarian cysts are a rare but challenging pathology in young women, with a desire to spare their fertility. In these cases, the risks of borderline and invasive disease are around 10 and 20%, respectively. No ultrasound rule has yet demonstrated the ability to discriminate with high accuracy, a borderline tumor from a benign tumor or 'invasive tumor'. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive performance of different ultrasound parameters in differentiating benign and borderline tumors versus invasive malignant tumors in premenopausal patients with unilocular-solid ovarian masses. METHODS: Women aged ≤ 50 years with unilocular-solid adnexal masses with a maximum diameter ≤ 10 cm, undergoing surgery in our department within 3 months from ultrasound examination, were included in this retrospective study. A standardized ultrasound examination technique and predefined definitions of ultrasound characteristics were used. The results of ultrasound examination using gray scale and color Doppler were compared with the histological examination of the respective surgical specimens. RESULTS: The study included 51 patients. On histological examination, 36 (70%) lesions were classified as benign, 10 (20%) as borderline ovarian tumors and 5 (10%) as invasively malignant tumors. In receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the best cut-off for the largest solid component with regard to discriminating non-invasive (benign or borderline) from invasive tumors was 14 mm. A largest solid component >14 mm, the presence of papillation blood flow and the combination of the two parameters provided a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 63, 63 and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal ultrasound examination seems to be able to discriminate between invasive and non-invasive tumors in the premenopausal patients with unilocular-solid adnexal masses. Because of the retrospective nature of the study, further prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm the accuracy of the selected sonographic parameters in discriminating the invasive and non-invasive adnexal tumors.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/cirugía , Quistes Ováricos/diagnóstico por imagen , Quistes Ováricos/diagnóstico , Quistes Ováricos/cirugía , Adulto , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Oncología Médica/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Ovario/diagnóstico por imagen , Ovario/cirugía , Proyectos Piloto , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Premenopausia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , UltrasonografíaAsunto(s)
Adenoma/patología , Enfermedades de los Anexos/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenoma/cirugía , Enfermedades de los Anexos/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de los Anexos/cirugía , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Laparotomía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler en ColorAsunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/secundario , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/cirugíaAsunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/secundario , Linfoma de Burkitt/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/secundario , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/patología , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfoma de Burkitt/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodosRESUMEN
The role of imaging after surgery is pivotal to drive clinical management of early and/or late onset complications. Most frequently used imaging technique after pelvic surgery is Ultrasound (US), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT). While Ultrasound is a standard procedure, using grey scale and/or colour Doppler evaluation, MRI and CT scan protocols should be derived on the basis of the specific indication of the exam. Correct evaluation of female pelvis after gynaecologic surgery, having in mind the most frequent complications, is based on the correct use of the instruments and on the experience of the examiner, who should be aware of the history of the patient, type of surgery and clinical symptoms for which the exam is required; the clinician should be aware of the possibilities and limits of the different techniques, in order to choose the most appropriate imaging modality and promptly make a correct diagnosis.