Treatment of cancer-related anemia with epoetin alfa: a review.

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a hematopoietic growth hormone that regulates survival, proliferation, and differentiation of erythroid progenitor cells. A reduction in tissue oxygenation stimulates EPO production, through a complex feedback mechanism. Patients with cancer-related anemia have an inadequate EPO response that is further impaired by cancer treatments such as chemotherapy. Cancer-related anemia substantially impairs patient functioning and may contribute to poor treatment outcomes. A significant number of studies demonstrates that treatment of anemia in cancer patients using recombinant human EPO (rHuEPO, epoetin alfa) significantly increases haemoglobin (Hb) levels, reduces transfusion requirements, and improves quality of life, particularly by relieving fatigue. Recent data also show that epoetin alfa therapy may improve cognitive function in patients receiving chemotherapy. In addition, the correction of anemia may prolong survival by enhancing tumor oxygenation, thus increasing tumor sensitivity to chemotherapy or radiation. The indicated dose of epoetin alfa is 150-300 IU/kg three times per week, but it is commonly dosed at 40,000-60,000 IU once weekly based on trial data and extensive clinical use. Determining the timing of initiation of epoetin alfa is a clinical judgement; however, data suggest that patient functioning declines and the risk of transfusion increases when the Hb level falls under 12 g/dL.

Phase I study of escalating doses of oxaliplatin in combination with fixed dose gemcitabine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Oxaliplatin (OHP) is a new platinum antineoplastic, while gemcitabine (GEM) is one of the most active drugs against non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC). The OHP/GEM combination is interesting because the drugs have different mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles. The primary endpoint of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of OHP/GEM combination in non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. METHODS: Patients with relapsed NSCLC were treated with fixed dose i.v. GEM (1250 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8; followed on day 1 by i.v. OHP over 3 h, starting from 70 mg/m2 with 20 mg/m2 increments, up to 130 mg/m2. We enrolled 19 patients with eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) status 0/1=13/6; male/female=13/6. All had received first-line and four second-line chemotherapy. RESULTS: Four patients dropped out. At dose level 2, one patient died of pulmonary embolism; at level 3, two patients died of disease progression. One patient at level 3, refused to continue treatment after allergic reaction (high fever episode) during infusion of third cycle. Fifteen patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. According to a priori statistical considerations, three patients in each of the first three treatment levels and six in the last level were evaluable. No G3-4 toxicity was observed at levels 1 and 2. G3 neutropenia and anemia occurred in 8% of cycles at level 3. Six patients entered level 4 (OHP 130 mg/m2) with 22 courses delivered: G3-4 neutropenia occurred in 9%, G1-2 thrombocytopenia in 18%; other toxicities were mainly limited to G1-2 flu-like syndrome in about one third of patients and G1-2 nausea and vomiting in 5% of courses. There was no myelo-DLT at the highest dose level. There was no neurotoxicity at any level. Treatment was delayed in 12% and dose reduced in 26% of courses. There were 2/15 PR. CONCLUSIONS: MTD was not reached. OHP and GEM can probably be administered safely at 130 and 1250 mg/m2, respectively, as first-line therapy. The schedule is being used in a phase II trial.

Bone turnover markers and insulin-like growth factor components in metastatic breast cancer: results from a randomised trial of exemestane vs megestrol acetate.

The aim of this randomised study was to compare the effects of progestins and aromatase inactivators on bone remodelling markers and the components of insulin-like growth factor in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Within the framework of a large (769 patients), randomised double-blind clinical trial comparing exemestane (EXE) with megestrol acetate (MA), serum 17 beta-estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), estrone sulphate (E1S), bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) and the components of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) family (IGF-1, IGF-2 and IGFBP-3) were determined in 53 patients (24 randomised to EXE and 29 ramdomised to MA). After eight weeks of treatment, both ICTP and BAP increased (p < 0.01) in the EXE group, but only ICTP in the MA group (p < 0.03). The 8-week suppression of E2 and E1S was more pronounced in the EXE group (to, respectively, 11.2% and 9.9% of baseline values) than in the MA group (33.1% and 29.7%). IGF-1 increased (p < 0.01) in both groups, but more so in the patients treated with MA. Estrogen levels negatively correlated with ICTP in both groups, but were not related to BAP in either. IGF-1 negatively correlated with estrogens in both groups. The results of this study indicate that anti-aromatase therapy is associated with increased osteoclast activity, and suggest the existence of possible differential effects of different hormonal therapies on bone remodelling markers regardless of the estrogen suppression induced by EXE.

Ten-year survival with chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

BACKGROUND: The effects of multimodality treatment on the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma are unclear. The authors performed a prospective, Phase II study to assess the long-term results of chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (RT) on patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: Of 106 consecutive patients who were recruited between 1985 and 1992, 101 patients were evaluable. Cisplatin (100 mg/m2 per day) on Day 1 and fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2 per day) on Days 1-4 were given for two cycles, with concomitant RT (30 grays [Gy] in 15 fractions) over 19 days. Patients with potentially resectable tumors were then assessed for curative surgery; the other patients received two more courses of chemotherapy and further RT (20 Gy in 10 fractions). RESULTS: Of 40 patients who were candidates for surgery, 32 patients underwent surgery, and 24 patients had complete resection; 8 patients (25%) had no residual tumor in the specimen, and 12 patients (37%) had microscopic foci only. Surgical mortality was high (22%). Of 61 nonsurgical patients, 37 patients (61%) achieved complete clinical remission, and 14 patients (23%) achieved partial remission. The median survival for the entire series was 15 months (range, 1-136 months). The overall survival rate was 22% at 5 years and 12% at 10 years. At 10 years, freedom from disease progression was similar in the two groups (24%), whereas the median survival (22 months vs. 12 months) and the overall survival rates (17% vs. 9%) were better in nonsurgical patients compared with surgical patients, respectively, probably in relation to high surgical mortality. The larynx was preserved in 28% of 32 patients with cervical disease sites, with a 10-year disease free survival rate of 31%. Three deaths were attributed to nonsurgical treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Careful multidisciplinary pretreatment evaluation can identify patients who are ineligible for surgery without compromising long-term results. For patients with inoperable disease, chemoradiotherapy can produce relatively good long-term results. The combined approach without surgery can permit laryngeal preservation in a useful fraction of patients.

Induction chemotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by surgery or standard radiotherapy and concurrent daily low-dose cisplatin for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Five-year survival in patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is less than 10%. In the present phase II study, 43 patients with locally advanced stage IIIA or selected IIIB NSCLC were given four courses of carboplatin AUC = 6 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion), every 3 weeks. Responsive patients, when possible, underwent surgery followed by standard radiotherapy (50 Gy) or radiotherapy (60 Gy), with concurrent cisplatin as intravenous continuous infusion of 4 mg/m2/d. Sixteen of the 42 evaluable patients achieved partial response (38%) and 3 complete response (CR) (7%) for an overall response rate of 45% (95% CI 30.1-60.2). R0 resectability rate was 29%, with 21% of pathologic CRs. Three more CRs were achieved with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in responsive but unresected patients. Grade III/IV hematologic toxicity was 9%, while one perioperative death occurred. The median duration of response was 14 months (range: 3-44+); median survival was 15 months (range: 9-47+). One-year and 2-year survival rates were 51% and 22%, respectively. The median survival in the responsive resected patients was 26 months, with 2-year survival of 57%. Carboplatin/paclitaxel represents an effective and well-tolerated induction therapy, suggesting its possible role in combination with radiotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced NSCLC in alternative to cisplatin-based regimens.