Sex-difference of multifactorial intervention on cardiovascular and mortality risk in DKD: post-hoc analysis of a randomised clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Women with type 2 diabetes experience higher cardiovascular and mortality risk than men possibly because of a sub-optimal cardio-protective treatment. We evaluated whether an intensive multifactorial therapy (MT) produces similar protective effect on development of adverse outcomes in women and men. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Nephropathy in Diabetes type 2 study is an open-label cluster randomized trial comparing the effect of Usual Care (UC) or MT of main cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg, HbA1c < 7%, LDL < 100 mg/dL, and total cholesterol < 175 mg/dL) on cardiovascular and mortality risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. In this post-hoc analysis, we stratified patients by sex to compare the occurrence of MACEs (primary endpoint) and all-cause death (secondary endpoint) between women (104 MT and 105 UC) and men (103 MT and 83 UC). RESULTS: Achievement of therapeutic goals was similar by sex, with 44% and 47% of women and men in MT achieving at least 3 targets vs. 16% and 20% of women and men in UC. During a median follow-up of 13.0 years, we recorded 262 MACE (48.5% in women) and 189 deaths (53.6% in women). Compared to the UC group, the risk of MACE in the MT group was reduced by 52% in women and by 44% in men (P = 0.11). Conversely, the reduction in mortality risk by MT was greater in women (44% versus 12%, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: MT similarly reduces the risk of MACEs in either sex. This therapeutic approach is associated with a survival advantage in women as compared with men and it may represent an important rationale to motivate physicians in overcoming their therapeutic inertia often encountered in female patients as well as to encourage patients of both sexes at improving their adherence to multidrug therapy.

Suboptimal monitoring and management in patients with unrecorded stage 3 chronic kidney disease in real-world settings: Insights from REVEAL-CKD.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) recommend regular monitoring and management of kidney function and CKD risk factors. However, the majority of patients with stage 3 CKD lack a diagnosis code, and data on the implementation of these recommendations in the real world are limited. AIM: To assess the implementation of guideline-directed monitoring and management practices in the real world in patients with stage 3 CKD without a recorded diagnosis code. METHODS: REVEAL-CKD (NCT04847531) is a multinational, observational study of patients with stage 3 CKD. Eligible patients had ≥2 consecutive estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements indicative of stage 3 CKD recorded >90 and ≤730 days apart, lacked an International Classification of Diseases 9/10 diagnosis code corresponding to CKD any time before and up to 6 months after the second eGFR measurement. Testing of key measures of care quality were assessed. RESULTS: The study included 435,971 patients from 9 countries. In all countries, the prevalence of urinary albumin-creatinine ratio and albuminuria testing was low. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker and statin prescriptions were highly variable, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor prescriptions remained below 21%. Blood pressure measurements were recorded in 20.2%-89.9% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a large proportion of patients with evidence of stage 3 CKD did not receive recommended, guideline-directed monitoring and management. The variability in standard of care among countries demonstrates a clear opportunity to improve monitoring and management of these patients, most likely improving long-term outcomes.

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: From History to Practice of a Secular Topic.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors are standard care in patients with hypertension, heart failure or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although we have studied the RAAS for decades, there are still circumstances that remain unclear. In this review, we describe the evolution of the RAAS and pose the question of whether this survival trait is still necessary to humankind in the present age. We elucidate the benefits on cardiovascular health and kidney disease of RAAS inhibition and present promising novel medications. Furthermore, we address why more studies are needed to establish a new standard of care away from generally prescribing ACEi or ARB toward an improved approach to combine drugs tailored to the needs of individual patients.

New trials in resistant hypertension: mixed blessing stories.

Resistant hypertension (RH) is linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular and renal complications. Treatment options include non-pharmacological interventions, such as lifestyle modifications, and the use of specific antihypertensive drug combinations, including diuretics. Renal denervation is another option for treatment-resistant hypertension. New compounds targeting different pathways involved in RH-including inhibitors of aminopeptidase A, endothelin antagonists and selective aldosterone synthase inhibitors-have been tested in clinical trials in this condition. The centrally acting drug firibastat, targeting the brain renin-angiotensin system, failed to demonstrate significant effectiveness in reducing blood pressure (BP) in patients with difficult-to-treat and RH in the Firibistat in Resistant Hypertension (FRESH) trial. Aprocitentan, a dual endothelin A and B receptor antagonist, showed a moderate but statistically significant decrease in BP in patients with RH in the Parallel-Group, Phase 3 Study with Aprocitentan in Subjects with Resistant Hypertension (PRECISION) trial. However, concerns remain about potential adverse events, such as fluid retention. The use of baxdrostat, a selective aldosterone synthase inhibitor, showed promising results in reducing BP in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension in the Baxdrostat in Resistant Hypertension (BrigHTN) trial. However, a subsequent trial, HALO, failed to meet its primary endpoint. The unexpected results may be influenced by factors such as patient adherence and white-coat hypertension. Despite the disappointing results from HALO, the potential benefits of inhibiting aldosterone synthesis remain to be fully understood. In conclusion, managing RH remains challenging, and new compounds like firibastat, aprocitentan and baxdrostat have shown varied effectiveness. Further research is needed to improve our understanding and treatment of this condition.

Efficacy and safety of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors in patients with chronic kidney disease: meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials.

Background: Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are new therapeutic agents for anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). We evaluated by meta-analysis and meta-regression the efficacy and safety of HIF-PHIs in patients with CKD-related anaemia. Methods: We selected phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing HIF-PHIs and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in dialysis and non-dialysis patients. Efficacy outcomes were the changes from baseline of haemoglobin, iron parameters (hepcidin, serum iron, TIBC, TSAT, ferritin) and intravenous iron dose; as safety outcomes we considered cancer, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), MACE+ (MACE plus hospitalization for hearth failure or unstable angina or thromboembolic event), thrombotic events (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism), arterovenous fistula (AVF) thrombosis and death. Results: We included 26 RCTs with 24 387 patients. Random effect meta-analysis of the unstandardized mean difference between HIF-PHIs and ESAs showed a significant change in haemoglobin levels from baseline of 0.10 g/dL (95% CI 0.02 to 0.17). Meta-regression analysis showed a significantly higher haemoglobin change for HIF-PHIs in younger patients and versus short-acting ESA (0.21 g/dL, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.29 versus -0.01, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.07 in studies using long-acting ESA, P < .001). No significant effect on heterogeneity was found for type of HIF-PHIs. In comparison with ESAs, HIF-PHIs induced a significant decline in hepcidin and ferritin and a significant increase in serum iron and TIBC, while TSAT did not change; intravenous iron dose was lower with HIF-PHI (-3.1 mg/week, 95% CI -5.6 to -0.6, P = .020). Rate ratio of cancer (0.93, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.13), MACE (1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.07), MACE+ (1.01, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.06), thrombotic events (1.08, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.38), AVF thrombosis (1.02, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.13) and death (1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.13) did not differ between HIF-PHIs and ESAs. Conclusions: HIF-PHIs at the doses selected for the comparisons are effective in correcting anaemia in comparison with ESA therapy with a significant impact on iron metabolism without notable difference among various agents. No safety signals emerge with use of HIF-PHIs.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate in observational and interventional studies in chronic kidney disease.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate is considered the principal measure of kidney function and, together with albuminuria, is a relevant prognostic factor for the development of end-stage kidney disease. Due to the strong association between estimated glomerular filtration rate and clinical events, such as commencement of dialysis, cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause death, estimated glomerular filtration rate is crucial for clinical decision-making in terms of scheduling follow-up and pharmacological interventions, and planning renal replacement therapies in advanced chronic kidney disease. In this review we discuss the available methods for measuring glomerular filtration rate and for estimating it through mathematical equations developed over the last few decades. We summarize the prognostic association of different percentages of estimated glomerular filtration rate decline and the main clinical outcomes, and how treatments modify estimated glomerular filtration rate decline and the risk of future endpoints. We also examine the role of pre-clinical trial slope and that of estimated glomerular filtration rate as a useful biomarker when evaluating patients for inclusion into both observational and interventional studies.

Clinical and Economic Impact of Early Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease in General Practice: The Endorse Study.

Introduction: The underdiagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a significant public health concern. The Early chroNic kiDney disease pOint of caRe Screening (ENDORSE) project aimed to evaluate the clinical and economic implications of a targeted training intervention for general practitioners (GPs) to enhance CKD awareness and early diagnosis. Methods: Data on estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Urinary Albumin-Creatinine Ratio (uACR) were collected by 53 Italian GPs from 112,178 patients at baseline and after six months. The intervention involved six months of hybrid training provided by 11 nephrologists, which included formal lectures, instant messaging support, and joint visits for complex cases. Results: The results demonstrated a substantial increase in the use of eGFR (+44.7%) and uACR (+95.2%) tests. This led to a 128.9% rise in the number of individuals screened for CKD using the KDIGO classification, resulting in a 62% increase in CKD diagnoses. The intervention's impact was particularly notable in high-risk groups, including patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and heart failure. Discussion: A budget impact analysis projected cumulative five-year savings of €1.7 million for the study cohort. When these findings were extrapolated to the entire Italian CKD population, potential savings were estimated at €106.6 million, highlighting significant cost savings for the national health service. The clinical simulation assumed that early diagnosed CKD patients would be treated according to current indications for dapagliflozin, which slows disease progression. Conclusion: The ENDORSE model demonstrated that targeted training for GPs can significantly improve early CKD detection, leading to better patient outcomes and considerable economic benefits. This approach shows promise for broader implementation to address the underdiagnosis of CKD on a national and potentially international scale.