Prevalence, Management and Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: Insights From the France PCI Registry.

BACKGROUND: Despite the evolution of stent technology, there is a non-negligible risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Large-scale registry data on the prevalence and clinical management of ISR is lacking. METHODS: The aim was to describe the epidemiology and management of patients with ≥1 ISR lesions treated with PCI (ISR PCI). Data on characteristics, management and clinical outcomes were analyzed for patients undergoing ISR PCI in the France-PCI all-comers registry. RESULTS: Between January 2014 and December 2018, 31,892 lesions were treated in 22,592 patients, 7.3 % of whom underwent ISR PCI. Patients undergoing ISR PCI were older (68.5 vs 67.8; p < 0.001), and more likely to have diabetes (32.7 % vs 25.4 %, p < 0.001), chronic coronary syndrome or multivessel disease. ISR PCI concerned drug eluting stents (DES) ISR in 48.8 % of cases. Patients with ISR lesions were more frequently treated with DES than drug eluting balloon or balloon angioplasty (74.2 %, 11.6 % and 12.9 %, respectively). Intravascular imaging was rarely used. At 1 year, patients with ISR had higher target lesion revascularization rates (4.3 % vs. 1.6 %; HR 2.24 [1.64-3.06]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a large all-comers registry, ISR PCI was not infrequent and associated with worse prognosis than non-ISR PCI. Further studies and technical improvements are warranted to improve the outcomes of ISR PCI.

[Our enemy : the clot. Coronary thrombosis : strategy and therapeutic arsenal]. / Notre ennemi : le caillot. Thrombose coronaire : stratégie et arsenal thérapeutique.

Intra coronary thrombus is  frequently encountered during acute coronary syndromes revascularisation procedures. It can also be encountered during angioplasty procedures in a stable angina context, although at a much lesser frequency.In both situations, it harbors a risk of poor angiographic result and poor prognosis. Intracoronnary thrombus may cause coronary occlusion at the angioplasty site or distal embolic  flow obstruction. Per procedure thrombus prevention rests on an prior optimal anti thrombotic treatment and in some circumstances the choice to defer the revascularisation procedure in the complex high risk setting. Treating the initiated thrombus remains controversial concerning thrombectomy and GPIIBIIIa inhibitors which are still in use in common practice. No reflow phenomenon is a particularly complex setting during cornary angioplasties, partially but not solely related to a thrombotic complication. It's treatment remains unclear in the absence of related oriented studies.The current mechanical and pharmacological antithrombotic therapies must remain common practice and used appropriately as of the clinical and angiographic setting, until further scientific outbrakes.

INCREASED EXPOSURE TO X-RAYS DURING CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE MEASUREMENT AND ENDOCORONARY IMAGING TECHNIQUES.

Growing use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intracoronary imaging techniques by optical coherence tomography or intravascular ultrasound has raised concerns about additional exposure during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Using data from the prospective CRAC-France PCI Prospective Multicentre registry, we sought to evaluate the effect of these new techniques on the radiation dose to patients undergoing coronary procedures. Data on Kerma Area Product (PKA), total air kerma (KAr) and fluoroscopy time from 42 182 coronary procedures were retrospectively compared, using multivariable linear regression, according to whether they included FFR and intracoronary imaging. In coronary angiography, FFR was associated with longer fluoroscopy time and higher PKA (21.0 vs. 18.9 Gy.cm2) and KAr (372 vs. 299 mGy) (all p < 0.001). Intracoronary imaging was associated with longer fluoroscopy time, higher contrast volume (both p < 0.001), lower PKA (18.3 vs. 19.0 Gy.cm2, p = 0.02) and similar KAr. In PCI, FFR was associated with a moderate increase in KAr (682 vs. 626 mGy, p < 0.01) but not PKA (35.9 vs. 33.7 Gy.cm2, p = 0.34). For intracoronary imaging, there were no differences between groups, except for contrast volume. Increased patient exposure associated with FFR and intracoronary imaging is moderate in diagnostic coronary angiography and minimal or none in PCI, provided optimization techniques are used. It should not be a limitation on the use of these techniques given the important additional information they provide.

Incidence, delays, and outcomes of STEMI during COVID-19 outbreak: Analysis from the France PCI registry.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on incidence, delays, and outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in France. Methods: We analyzed all patients undergoing PPCI <24 hours STEMI included in the prospective France PCI registry. The 2 groups were compared on mean monthly number of patients, delays in the pathway care, and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, unplanned coronary revascularization, stroke, and major bleeding). Results: From January 15, 2019 to April 14, 2020, 2064 STEMI patients undergoing PPCI were included: 1942 in the prelockdown group and 122 in the lockdown group. Only 2 cases in the lockdown group were positive for COVID-19. A significant drop (12%) in mean number of STEMI/month was observed in the lockdown group compared with prelockdown (139 vs 122, P < 0.04). A significant increase in "symptom onset to first medical contact" delay was found for patients who presented directly to the emergency department (ED) (238 minutes vs 450 minutes; P = 0.04). There were higher rates of in-hospital MACE (7.7% vs 12.3%; P = 0.06) and mortality (4.9% vs 8.2%; P = 0.11) in the lockdown group but the differences were not significant. Conclusion: According to the multicenter France PCI registry, the COVID-19 outbreak in France was associated with a significant decline in STEMI undergoing PPCI and longer transfer time for patients who presented directly to the ED. Mortality rates doubled, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Impact of QRS Duration on Decision of Early Removal of Pacing Catheter After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With CoreValve Device.

The purpose of this study was to determine the predictability of QRS duration (QRSd) for temporary pacing catheter removal in patients implanted with CoreValve. Permanent pacemaker implantation is a known complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) with CoreValve. Although post-TAVI QRSd is highly predictive for advanced atrioventricular block (AVB), management of delayed AVB after TAVI remains unclear. We conducted a multicentric, prospective study of 156 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI with CoreValve between December 2010 and January 2013. Patients who had acute AVB after TAVI were excluded (n = 25). We classified the patients into 2 groups based on the post-TAVI QRSd. Patients with QRSd <120 ms were assigned to early pacing catheter removal group (n = 34), and patients with QRSd ≥120 ms were assigned to keep the pacing catheter with monitoring group (n = 97). No patient required permanent pacemaker implantation in the early pacing catheter removal group, whereas 38 patients with QRSd ≥120 ms had a delayed AVB (QRSd <120 ms vs ≥120 ms: 0% vs 39%, p = 0.0001). The intensive care unit stay length, 30-day mortality, and incidence of complications were lower in the early catheter removal group. Post-TAVI QRSd allows patient selection for early removal of pacing catheter in patients implanted with CoreValve.

Factors predicting Sprint Fidelis lead fracture: Results at 5 years from a French multicentre registry.

BACKGROUND: The small diameter Sprint Fidelis defibrillation lead has not been implanted in patients since 2007 due to its unusually high rate of fracture. Predictors of lead fracture risk were identified in several studies, mainly in North American studies. AIM: We established a multicentre registry to determine the lead fracture rate and predictors of fracture in a large cohort of French patients. METHODS: Nine hundred and eighty-six patients implanted with a Sprint Fidelis lead at six centres between December 2004 and November 2007 were included in this registry. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 51.4±20 months, the mean fracture rate was 11.2%, and increased over time: 1.2% at 1 year, 3.8% at 2 years, 7.4% at 3 years, 13.9% at 4 years, and 20.7% at 5 years. In multivariable analysis, younger age (<40 years) was associated with a higher risk of fracture compared to patients<40 years, patients aged between 40-60 years had a relative risk of 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.98) and patients>60 years had a relative risk of 0.45 (95% CI 0.24-0.84) and subpectoral implantation (at 3 years) with a relative risk of 2.35 (95% CI 1.29-4.28). Lead model 6930 (single-coil, passive-fixation) had a relative risk of 3.47 (95% CI 1.13-10.7) compared with the 6949 model (double coil, active-fixation). No other predictor of fracture was identified. CONCLUSIONS: In a large multicentre cohort of French patients implanted with a Sprint Fidelis electrode, the fracture rate remains high, especially in young patients with submuscular implant and the 6930 electrode model.