Hinge prostheses in the revision of unicompartmental knee replacement: a descriptive analysis of data from the national joint registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

INTRODUCTION: Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an effective surgical strategy in patients with isolated medial or lateral compartment osteoarthritis. Study aims were to (1) describe the epidemiology of patients undergoing revision of UKR to a hinge knee replacement (HKR); (2) identify factors influencing time to revision; (3) evaluate HKR survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analysis of National Joint Registry data was undertaken, exploring revision of UKR to HKR between 2007 and April 2021. Descriptive analysis of eligible patients and Cox Regression to identify key determinants of time to revision were performed. Failure of HKR post-revision was assessed using survival analysis. RESULTS: 111 patients underwent revision of UKR to HKR. Median age at revision was 70 years and most common indications were instability (n = 42) and infection (n = 22). The most common implant was a rotating HKR. Significant independent factors associated with earlier revision were periprosthetic fracture (p = 0.03) and malalignment (p = 0.03). Progressive osteoarthritis (p = 0.01) and higher ASA grades (3: p = 0.01, 4: p < 0.01) delayed time to revision; patient sex and age were not significant factors. Ten patients required subsequent re-revision; median age at re-revision was 61 years. HKR revised from UKR had an 89.3% revision-free risk at 5 years. Male sex (p < 0.01) and younger age (p < 0.01) were associated with re-revision. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with time to revision may be used to counsel patients prior to UKR. The survivorship of the HKR of 89.3% at 5 years is concerning and careful consideration should be given when using this level of constraint when revising UKR in younger or male patients.

Reliability of patient-reported comorbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Self-reported questionnaires have become a widely adopted method of reviewing patients in clinical practice. This systematic review aimed to determine the reliability of patient-reported comorbidities and to identify which patient factors influence the reliability. Included studies assessed the reliability of at least one patient-reported comorbidity against their medical record or clinical assessment as gold standard. Twenty-four eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. Only endocrine diseases (Cohen's Kappa Coefficient (CKC) 0.81 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.85)), consisting of diabetes mellitus (CKC 0.83 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.86)) and thyroid disease (CKC 0.68 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.86)), showed good-to-excellent reliability. Factors most frequently reported to influence concordance included age, sex and educational level. This systematic review demonstrated poor-to-moderate reliability for most systems, except for endocrine which showed good-to-excellent reliability. Although patient self-reporting can be a useful guide to clinical management, several patient factors were demonstrated to affect reliability therefore it should be avoided as a standalone measure.

Reliability of patient-reported comorbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Self-reported questionnaires have become a widely adopted method of reviewing patients in clinical practice. This systematic review aimed to determine the reliability of patient-reported comorbidities and to identify which patient factors influence the reliability. Included studies assessed the reliability of at least one patient-reported comorbidity against their medical record or clinical assessment as gold standard. Twenty-four eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. Only endocrine diseases (Cohen's Kappa Coefficient (CKC) 0.81 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.85)), consisting of diabetes mellitus (CKC 0.83 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.86)) and thyroid disease (CKC 0.68 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.86)), showed good-to-excellent reliability. Factors most frequently reported to influence concordance included age, sex and educational level. This systematic review demonstrated poor-to-moderate reliability for most systems, except for endocrine which showed good-to-excellent reliability. Although patient self-reporting can be a useful guide to clinical management, several patient factors were demonstrated to affect reliability therefore it should be avoided as a standalone measure.

The alpha defensin lateral flow test is effective in predicting eradication of periprosthetic joint infection after surgical debridement.

The primary aim of this study was to assess the utility of the alpha defensin lateral flow (ADLF) test for predicting the eradication of PJI after surgical debridement. The secondary aim was to describe the reliability of ADLF test in diagnosis of PJI intra- operatively. A prospective observational study was conducted in three independent orthopaedic centres. Twenty-two patients undergoing revision surgery (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR), single or two-stage revision) for PJI were recruited, 13 female and 9 male with an average age of 64 years. Samples were collected intra-operatively at the start of the first surgical procedure and then at the completion of debridement or prior to reimplantation depending on the operation performed. These samples were tested using ADLF and then sent for microbiological analysis. The ADLF result was then compared to the corresponding culture result in order to determine the diagnostic predictive accuracy. The reliability of ADLF test to predict eradication of infection after debridement of PJI was excellent for specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of which both where 100%, but had a poor sensitivity (14.3%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (62.5%). The reliability of ADLF test to predict PJI was poor with only a 50% sensitivity and specificity. The ADLF test has a high specificity and PPV for diagnosing eradication of infection after debridement. In contrast the ADLF testing appears to have poor diagnostic accuracy for PJI when used on intra-operative samples, prior to surgical intervention.

Diagnostic value of routine pre-operative investigations used in combination in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.

The primary aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of joint aspiration culture, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), individually, and in combination for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A consecutive patient series with pre-operative inflammatory marker levels, an aspiration culture of either hip or knee arthroplasty and intra-operative culture samples from subsequent revision surgery was compiled. This retrospective patient cohort analysis included 128 aspiration. The data were analysed to compare pre-operative aspiration cultures, serum ESR and CRP levels to the chosen gold standard for PJI diagnosis of intra-operative culture samples. A diagnostic algorithm was created using the above tests combined with clinical suspicion index. The values that had the highest sensitivity and specificity of predicting PJI were >5 for CRP and >16 for ESR. CRP used individually had the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of any test (75.0% and 75.9%, respectively). ESR + aspirate had the highest specificity and positive predictive value (PPV), of 100% for both. Using all three tests together the specificity and PPV were higher than the test individual values (95.3% and 85.0% respectively). Based on subgroup analyses the combination of ESR or CRP plus joint aspiration has superior PPV compared to individual tests. ESR and CRP had the highest NPV when used in isolation. An algorithm has been developed to guide clinical diagnosis.

Identification of a novel, methylation-dependent, RUNX2 regulatory region associated with osteoarthritis risk.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common, multifactorial and polygenic skeletal disease that, in its severest form, requires joint replacement surgery to restore mobility and to relieve chronic pain. Using tissues from the articulating joints of 260 patients with OA and a range of in vitro experiments, including CRISPR-Cas9, we have characterized an intergenic regulatory element. Here, genotype at an OA risk locus correlates with differential DNA methylation, with altered gene expression of both a transcriptional regulator (RUNX2), and a chromatin remodelling protein (SUPT3H). RUNX2 is a strong candidate for OA susceptibility, with its encoded protein being essential for skeletogenesis and healthy joint function. The OA risk locus includes single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located within and flanking the differentially methylated region (DMR). The OA association SNP, rs10948172, demonstrates particularly strong correlation with methylation, and two intergenic SNPs falling within the DMR (rs62435998 and rs62435999) demonstrate genetic and epigenetic effects on the regulatory activity of this region. We therefore posit that the OA signal mediates its effect by modulating the methylation of the regulatory element, which then impacts on gene expression, with RUNX2 being the principal target. Our study highlights the interplay between DNA methylation, OA genetic risk and the downstream regulation of genes critical to normal joint function.

Fibroblasts Promote Inflammation and Pain via IL-1α Induction of the Monocyte Chemoattractant Chemokine (C-C Motif) Ligand 2.

Fibroblasts persist within fibrotic scar tissue and exhibit considerable phenotypic and functional plasticity. Herein, we hypothesized that scar-associated fibroblasts may be a source of stress-induced inflammatory exacerbations and pain. To test this idea, we used a human model of surgery-induced fibrosis, total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Using a combination of tissue protein expression profiling and bioinformatics, we discovered that many months after TKA, the fibrotic joint exists in a state of unresolved chronic inflammation. Moreover, the infrapatellar fat pad, a soft tissue that becomes highly fibrotic in the post-TKA joint, expresses multiple inflammatory mediators, including the monocyte chemoattractant, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand (CCL) 2, and the innate immune trigger, IL-1α. Fibroblasts isolated from the post-TKA fibrotic infrapatellar fat pad express the IL-1 receptor and on exposure to IL-1α polarize to a highly inflammatory state that enables them to stimulate the recruitment of monocytes. Blockade of fibroblast CCL2 or its transcriptional regulator NF-κB prevented IL-1α-induced monocyte recruitment. Clinical investigations discovered that levels of patient-reported pain in the post-TKA joint correlated with concentrations of CCL2 in the joint tissue, such that the chemokine is effectively a pain biomarker in the TKA patient. We propose that an IL-1α-NF-κB-CCL2 signaling pathway, operating within scar-associated fibroblasts, may be therapeutically manipulated for alleviating inflammation and pain in fibrotic joints and other tissues.

A load-measuring device can achieve fine-tuning of mediolateral load at knee arthroplasty but may lead to a more lax knee state.

PURPOSE: A balanced knee arthroplasty should optimise survivorship and performance. Equilibration of medial and lateral femorotibial load requires guided judicious pericapsular ligament release. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between use of a tensiometer device and a remote load sensor final load transfer across the joint through functional arc of motion. METHODS: A cadaveric study, using eight knees, was performed to define the impact of an established gap distraction device against load sensor-aimed soft tissue release in a TKA setting. Using validated measures of laxity in six degrees of freedom and true real-time load sensing four states were examined: native knee, TKA using spacer blocks (TKA), TKA with soft tissue release aided by a monogram tensiometer (TKA-T) and finally where load across the tibiofemoral articulation remains unbalanced final soft tissue release using a sensor device (TKA-OS). RESULTS: The laxity pattern was equivalent for TKA-T and TKA-OS. However, in only four of these seven knees despite the tensiometer confirming equivalence of rectangular flexion-extension gap dimensions and centralisation of collateral ligament distraction, there remained a > 15lb medial to lateral load difference for at least one point of the flexion arc. This was corrected by further final soft tissue release guided by the OS sensor device in the final three knees. CONCLUSION: Tensiometer-guided soft tissue release at two points of flexion failed to achieve balance for three out of seven knee arthroplasty procedures. Sensor technology guided final soft tissue balancing to equilibrate load across the joint through full arc of motion. This work argues for the role of continuous sensor readings to guide the soft tissue balancing during total knee arthroplasty.

Correction to: The WOMAC score can be reliably used to classify patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty.

Unfortunately, Fig. 1 in the original article contained incorrect information. Hereby, the correct figure is published and we apologise for the inconvenience.

Asynchronous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Predictors of the Functional Outcome and Patient Satisfaction for the Second Knee Replacement.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study is to identify independent preoperative predictors of outcome and patient satisfaction for the second total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 454 patients undergoing an asynchronous (6 weeks or more apart) bilateral primary TKA were identified from an arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Short Form-12 scores were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Overall patient satisfaction was assessed at 1 year. RESULTS: The 1 year WOMAC pain score (P = .01), and improvement in WOMAC pain (P < .001) and functional (P = .002) scores were significantly lower for the second TKA. Worse preoperative WOMAC pain, function, and stiffness scores were demonstrated to be independent predictors of improvement in the WOMAC pain, function, and stiffness scores, respectively, for both the first and second TKA. The overall rate of satisfaction with the first TKA was 94.0% and 94.7% for the second TKA (P = .67). The rate of satisfaction for the second TKA was 77.8% for patients that were dissatisfied with their first TKA, which was an independent predictor of dissatisfaction (P = .02). CONCLUSION: Improvement in pain and function is less with the second TKA, but the satisfaction rate remains similar. There are common independent predictors for change in the WOMAC score for the first and second TKA; however, the predictors of satisfaction were different with no common factors. Patients that were dissatisfied with their first TKA were more likely to be dissatisfied with their second TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: Prognostic retrospective cohort study.

An Overview and Predictors of Achieving the Postoperative Ceiling Effect of the WOMAC Score Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: To describe the ceiling effect for the components of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score and identify preoperative independent predictors for patients who achieve maximal scores (ceiling effect) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 2589 patients undergoing a primary TKA were identified from an established arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, WOMAC and Short Form 12 (SF-12) scores were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent preoperative predictors of patients achieving ceiling scores. RESULTS: The ceiling effect was 26.8% (n = 695) for the pain score, 6.4% (n = 165) for the function score, and 21.2% (n = 548) for the stiffness score. Lower body mass index (P = .001), absence of gastric ulceration (P = .04), absence of anemia (P = .02), absence of depression (P = .004), and absence of back pain (P < .001) and better preoperative WOMAC pain and SF-12 physical (P = .01) and mental (P < .001) scores were associated with a ceiling WOMAC pain score. Male gender (P = .03), lower body mass index (P = .040), absence of gastric ulceration (P = .004), and absence of back pain (P < .001) and better preoperative SF-12 physical (P = .02) scores were associated with a ceiling WOMAC function score. Male gender (P = .001), absence of back pain (P < .001), and better preoperative WOMAC stiffness score (P = .005) and SF-12 mental (P = .001) scores were associated with a ceiling WOMAC stiffness score. CONCLUSION: The WOMAC pain and stiffness components demonstrated a high ceiling effect but in contrast the functional score had a low ceiling effect. The absence of back pain was a common predictive factor for all 3 components and had the greatest impact upon the likelihood of achieving a ceiling score.

Staphylococcal resistance profiles in deep infection following primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a study using the NJR dataset.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to (1) report the rates of resistance against a variety of antibiotics for pure Staphylococcal infections, and (2) examine the impact of ALBC use at primary surgery has on resistance patterns for patients undergoing first-time revision of primary hip and knee arthroplasty for indication of infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the National Joint Registry database for England and Wales were linked to microbiology data held by Public Health England to identify a consecutive series of 258 primary hip and knee arthroplasties performed between April 2003 and January 2014 that went on to have a revision for Staphylococcal deep periprosthetic infection. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to study predictors of microorganism resistance to a range of antimicrobials. RESULTS: After adjusting for patient and surgical factors, multivariate analysis showed the use of gentamicin-loaded bone cement at the primary surgery was associated with a significant increase in the risk of Staphylococcal gentamicin resistance (odds ratio 8.341, 95% CI 2.297-30.292, p = 0.001) and methicillin resistance (odds ratio 3.870, 95% CI 1.319-11.359, p = 0.014) at revision for infection. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians must anticipate the possibility of antibiotic resistance to ALBC utilised at primary surgery.

What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?

BACKGROUND: The WOMAC score is a validated outcome measure for use in patients undergoing TKA. Defining meaningful changes in the WOMAC score is important for sample-size calculations in clinical research and for interpreting published studies. However, inconsistencies among published studies regarding key definitions for changes in the WOMAC score after TKA potentially could result in incorrectly powered studies and the misinterpretation of clinical research results. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) To identify the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the total WOMAC score and its components 1 year after TKA using an anchor-based methodology. (2) To define the minimum important change (MIC) and the minimum detectable change with 95% confidence (MDC95) for the total WOMAC score and its components 1 year after TKA. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2013, 3641 patients underwent primary TKA at one center. Of those, 460 patients (13%) were excluded from this retrospective study for prespecified reasons (mainly secondary OA and bilateral surgery), and 592 patients (16%) were either lost to followup or could not be included because of incomplete questionnaires. WOMAC scores were recorded preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Patient demographics and preoperative Short Form-12 and WOMAC scores were no different for the 16% of patients who were lost to followup or failed to complete 1-year questionnaires and the study cohort (n = 2589). At 1 year, patients were asked "How much did the knee replacement surgery improve the quality of your life?" Their responses were recorded as: a great improvement, moderate improvement, little improvement, no improvement at all, or the quality of my life is worse. The MCID was defined as the difference in the mean change in the WOMAC score between patients with no improvement compared with those with little improvement according to the anchor question. The MIC was defined as the change in the WOMAC score relative to the baseline score for patients who reported a little improvement in their quality of life. The MDC is the smallest change for an individual who is likely to be beyond the measurement error of the scoring tool and represents true change rather than variability in the scoring measure; we report it with 95% confidence bounds defining real change rather than variability in the scoring measure (MDC95). We calculated this with distribution-based methods for the whole cohort. Patients recording a little improvement (n = 211) and no improvement (n = 115) were used as anchor responses to calculate the MCID (using regression analysis to adjust for potential confounding variables such as age, gender, BMI and preoperative Short Form-12 or WOMAC scores) and the MIC (using receiver operative characteristics curves). RESULTS: After adjusting for confounding variables such as age, gender, BMI as well as preoperative Short Form-12 and WOMAC scores, the MCID was 11 for pain, 9 for function, 8 for stiffness and 10 for the total WOMAC score. The MIC was 21 for pain, 16 for function, 13 for stiffness and 17 for the total WOMAC score. The MDC95 was 23 for pain, 11 for function, 27 for stiffness and 12 for the total WOMAC score. CONCLUSIONS: The MCID and MIC for the WOMAC score represent the smallest meaningful effect sizes when comparing the outcome of two groups (difference in mean change between the groups) or when assessing a cohort (a change in score for the group) after TKA, respectively, helping the reader to distinguish between a clinically important effect size and a mere statistical difference. We determined that the error in measurement (based on the MDC95) for the function component and total WOMAC scores were less than the MIC, which suggests changes beyond the MIC are clinically real and not due to uncertainty in the score. These parameters are essential to interpret TKA outcomes research and to ensure clinical research studies are amply powered to detect meaningful differences. Future studies using the WOMAC score to assess TKA outcomes should report not only the statistical significance (a p value) but also the clinical importance using the reported MCID and MIC values. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Internal femoral component rotation adversely influences load transfer in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric navigated study using the Verasense device.

PURPOSE AND HYPOTHESIS: Correct femoral component rotation at knee arthroplasty influences patellar tracking and may determine function at extremes of movement. Additionally, such malrotation may deleteriously influence flexion/extension gap geometry and soft tissue balancing kinematics. Little is known about the effect of subtle rotational change upon load transfer across the tibiofemoral articulation. Our null hypothesis was that femoral component rotation would not influence load across this joint in predictable manner. METHODS: A cadaveric study was performed to examine load transfer using the orthosensor device, respecting laxity patterns in 6° of motion, to examine load across the medial and lateral compartments across a full arc of motion. Mixed-effect modelling allowed for quantification of the effect upon load with internal and external femoral component rotation in relation to a datum in a modern single-radius cruciate-retaining primary knee design. RESULTS: No significant change in maximal laxity was found between different femoral rotational states. Internal rotation of the femoral component resulted in significant increase in medial compartment load transfer for knee flexion including and beyond 60°. External rotation of the femoral component within the limits studied did not influence tibiofemoral load transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Internal rotation of the femoral component will adversely influence medial compartment load transfer and could lead to premature polyethylene wear on the medial side.

The WOMAC score can be reliably used to classify patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to define a classification in the WOMAC score after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) according to patient satisfaction. The secondary aims were to describe patient demographics for each level of satisfaction. METHODS: A retrospective cohort consisting of 2589 patients undergoing a primary TKA were identified from an established arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and short form (SF) 12 scores were collected pre-operatively and 1 year post-operatively. In addition, patient satisfaction was assessed at 1 year with four responses: very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify values in the components and total WOMAC scores that were predictive of each level of satisfaction, which were used to define the categories of excellent, good, fair and poor. RESULTS: At 1 year, there were 1740 (67.5%) very satisfied, 572 (22.2%) satisfied, 190 (7.4%) dissatisfied and 76 (2.9%) very dissatisfied patients. ROC curve analysis identified excellent, good, fair and poor categories for the pain (> 78, 59-78, 44-58, < 44), function (> 72, 54-72, 41-53, < 41), stiffness (> 69, 56-69, 43-55, < 43) and total (> 75, 56-75, 43-55, < 43) WOMAC scores, respectively. Patients with lung disease, diabetes, gastric ulcer, kidney disease, liver disease, depression, back pain, with worse pre-operative functional scores (WOMAC and SF-12) and those with less of an improvement in the scores, had a significantly lower level of satisfaction. CONCLUSION: This study has defined a post-operative classification of excellent, good, fair and poor for the components and total WOMAC scores after TKA. The predictors of level of satisfaction should be recognised in clinical practice and patients at risk of a lower level of satisfaction should be made aware in the pre-operative consent process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Inadequate pre-operative glycaemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus adversely influences functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty : Patients with impaired glycaemic control exhibit poorer functional outcomes at 1-year post-arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Whilst inadequate glycaemic control is associated with an increase in perioperative complications following total knee arthroplasty, the impact of glycaemic control in this at-risk patient group remains ill-defined. Identification of at-risk patients would allow targeted pre-operative glycaemic control intervention. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and one hundred age, sex and BMI matched patients without diabetes undergoing total knee arthroplasty in a single institution were analysed between 2008 and 2013. Inadequate glycaemic control was defined as having an HbA1c of greater than 64 mmol/mol (8.0 % NGSP) measured within the 3 months before surgery. Patient demographics, diabetes management and complications of diabetes were recorded and used as explanatory variables to deliver a generalised linear model. This allows for relationships to be defined between change in patient-reported function (SF-36, WOMAC) and these explanatory variables. RESULTS: The patient group with concomitant diabetes exhibited smaller improvements in WOMAC and SF-36 physical component summary at 1 year after knee arthroplasty. This effect was most pronounced in the subset of patients with inadequate glycaemic control recorded in the early pre-operative period. CONCLUSION: Patients with diabetes, particularly those with inadequate glycaemic control, exhibit less improvement at 1 year following knee arthroplasty than patients without diabetes mellitus. Clinical focus on modulating this factor in this at-risk group is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

An in vitro analysis of medial structures and a medial soft tissue reconstruction in a constrained condylar total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to quantify the medial soft tissue contributions to stability following constrained condylar (CC) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and determine whether a medial reconstruction could restore stability to a soft tissue-deficient, CC-TKA knee. METHODS: Eight cadaveric knees were mounted in a robotic system and tested at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion with ±50 N anterior-posterior force, ±8 Nm varus-valgus, and ±5 Nm internal-external torque. The deep and superficial medial collateral ligaments (dMCL, sMCL) and posteromedial capsule (PMC) were transected and their relative contributions to stabilising the applied loads were quantified. After complete medial soft tissue transection, a reconstruction using a semitendinosus tendon graft was performed, and the effect on kinematic behaviour under equivocal conditions was measured. RESULTS: In the CC-TKA knee, the sMCL was the major medial restraint in anterior drawer, internal-external, and valgus rotation. No significant differences were found between the rotational laxities of the reconstructed knee to the pre-deficient state for the arc of motion examined. The relative contribution of the reconstruction was higher in valgus rotation at 60° than the sMCL; otherwise, the contribution of the reconstruction was similar to that of the sMCL. CONCLUSION: There is contention whether a CC-TKA can function with medial deficiency or more constraint is required. This work has shown that a CC-TKA may not provide enough stability with an absent sMCL. However, in such cases, combining the CC-TKA with a medial soft tissue reconstruction may be considered as an alternative to a hinged implant.

Does Maximal External Tibial Component Rotation Influence Tibiofemoral Load Distribution in the Primary Knee Arthroplasty Setting: A Comparison of Neutral vs Maximal Anatomical External Rotatory States.

BACKGROUND: Tibial component rotation at time of knee arthroplasty can influence conformity, load transmission across the polyethylene surface, and perhaps ultimately determined survivorship. Optimal tibial component rotation on the cut surface is reliant on standard per operative manual stressing. This subjective assessment aims to balance constraint and stability of the articulation through a full arc of movement. METHODS: Using a cadaveric model, computer navigation and under defined, previously validated loaded conditions mimicking the in vivo setting, the influence of maximal tibial component external rotation compared with the neutral state was examined for changes in laxity and tibiofemoral continuous load using 3D displacement measurement and an orthosensor continuous load sensor implanted within the polyethylene spacer in a simulated single radius total knee arthroplasty. RESULTS: No significant difference was found throughout arc of motion (0-115 degrees of flexion) for maximal varus and/or valgus or rotatory laxity between the 2 states. The neutral state achieved equivalence for mediolateral load distribution at each point of flexion. We have found that external rotation of the tibial component increased medial compartment load in comparison with the neutral position. Compared with the neutral state, external rotation consistently effected a marginal, but not significant reduction in lateral load under similar loading conditions. The effects were most pronounced in midflexion. CONCLUSION: On the basis of these findings, we would advocate for the midtibial tubercle point to determine tibial component rotation and caution against component external rotation.

GP contact with patients after treatment for hip fracture: frequency and determinants.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hip fracture have complex medical issues, both at the time of admission and after discharge from hospital. We have observed a surge in patient-initiated and carer-initiated contacts with general physicians (GPs) for periods longer than those usually reported, in a series of patients sustaining fractures from July 2008 to September 2013. OBJECTIVES: To establish (1) the frequency of contact with GPs (primary outcome) and (2) the factors influencing the frequency of different modes of contact. METHODS: Ten GP practices in West Northumberland were asked to retrospectively identify patients sustaining hip fractures, and to provide data on the number of GP contacts (patient visits to GP, telephone consultations, GP visits to patient's home) up to 1 year before and 1 year after fracture. Generalised linear models (GLM) were constructed using number of postfracture GP contacts as response variable; age, gender, residential status, number of prefracture contacts and days to contact postfracture were covariates. RESULTS: Each patient recorded cumulative 8.4 GP contacts before and 10.79 contacts after fracture. There were significantly more telephone contacts with GPs and GP home visits, but significantly fewer patient visits to GP clinics. In the GLM analysis, patient age and number of prefracture GP contacts predicted all types of postfracture contacts, while gender was not. Patients discharged home visited their GPs five times more frequently than those discharged to institutional care. CONCLUSIONS: After hip fractures, telephone contacts and GP visits to patients' homes increase, but patient visits to GP clinics decrease, influenced by age and residential status.

Microorganisms responsible for periprosthetic knee infections in England and Wales.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to delineate epidemiology of infecting microorganism genus in first-time revision knee arthroplasty for indication of periprosthetic joint infection in England and Wales using linked registry data. METHODS: From the National Joint Registry database for England and Wales, a consecutive series of primary knee arthroplasties performed between April 2003 and January 2014 that went on to have a revision for periprosthetic infection were identified (n = 2810). Each case was then linked to microbiology data held by Public Health England in order to identify infecting microorganism at time of revision surgery established from intra-operative cultures. Following data linkage, 403 culture results at time of revision surgery were identified in a group of 331 patients. The demographic characteristics of five microorganism groups were compared: pure staphylococcus (single genus), pure streptococcus (single genus), other gram-positive infections (single genus), gram-negative infections (single genus) and mixed genus infections. RESULTS: Staphylococcus species was the most common organism genus isolated after revision of a primary implant for infection and present in 72 % of cases overall (71.3 % of patients with a single-genus infection and 76.8 % of patients with mixed genus infection). A pure staphylococcal infection was present in 59 % of all cases. A single-genus infection was responsible for infection in 83.1 % of cases, and mixed genera were responsible in 16.9 % of cases. A significant difference was observed for mean age at primary procedure in the cohort of patients where there was an isolated pure streptococcal infection (73.2 years) when compared to gram-negative infections (65.0 years). No other significant differences were observed between microorganism groups in terms of BMI, gender, ASA grade, indication for primary procedure and primary implant characteristics. CONCLUSION: Staphylococci were the most commonly isolated organism species responsible for periprosthetic infection of primary arthroplasty in England and Wales. This information can be used by surgeons to benchmark and audit their own practice against national, publicly available data. Furthermore, this study has shown that even when using the largest national databases available, there is a substantial volume of missing data. Antimicrobial resistance represents a growing clinical problem with significant health and social costs. In order to counteract this threat, this study would advocate the consolidation of national microbial data in order to guide effective strategies towards targeting and combating the threat of antimicrobial resistance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.