Myocardial perforation by a guidewire crossing a stenotic aortic valve during cardiac catheterization.

Myocardial perforation by a guidewire after retrograde crossing of a stenotic aortic valve during cardiac catheterization is rare. We present a patient with calcific aortic stenosis who suffered this potentially life-threatening complication and in whom conservative treatment was successful. Early recognition of this complication is important for the operator performing cardiac catheterizations in patients with calcific aortic stenosis.

Medium-term outcome of different surgical methods to cure atrial fibrillation: is less worse?

Different lesion sets and ablation techniques have been performed. We compared these outcomes in search of the best method. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who have undergone AF surgery different from the maze III. The surgical lesion sets were pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone, left atrial maze (LAM) and bi-atrial maze (BAM) and were made with different ablation techniques. During surgery one patient died due to bleeding of a pulmonary vein. The number of patients in the PVI-, LAM-, BAM-groups was 12, 28 and 26, respectively, with freedom from AF at latest follow-up [22.0+/-15.6 (3.1-81.2) months] of 33%, 59% and 60%, respectively. Atrial flutter occurred less in the BAM-group (4%) than in the left-sided procedures (15.4%) (P=0.231). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a higher recurrence of AF for PVI alone (OR 4.42, CL 0.95-20.6, P=0.0583) and a lower recurrence for the 'cut-and-sew' technique (OR 0.13, CL 0.030-0.60, P=0.0084). Left- and bi-atrial maze procedures are equally effective in the suppression of AF, whereas omission of right-sided lesions results in a higher prevalence of atrial flutter. The 'cut-and-sew' technique is superior in terms of freedom from AF compared to bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency.

Freedom from atrial arrhythmias after classic maze III surgery: a 10-year experience.

OBJECTIVES: We studied the persistence of favorable outcome, the occurrence of new atrial arrhythmias, and sinus node dysfunction in patients who underwent the maze III procedure. METHODS: Preoperative, in-hospital, and follow-up data of 203 patients who underwent the maze III procedure between June 1993 and June 2003 were collected. A total of 139 patients underwent the maze procedure for lone atrial fibrillation, and 64 patients underwent the maze procedure and concomitant cardiac surgery. RESULTS: There was no 30-day postoperative mortality. During a mean follow-up of 4.0 +/- 2.6 years, 12 patients (6%) died (2 cardiac related). At the end of follow-up, freedom from supraventricular arrhythmias was 80% for the lone atrial fibrillation group and 64% for the concomitant atrial fibrillation group. Freedom from stroke during follow-up was 100% in the lone atrial fibrillation group and 97% in the concomitant group. Multivariate analysis revealed that rhythm at 1-year follow-up (P < .001; odds ratio 9.56, 95% confidence limits 3.92-23.31) and preoperative left atrium dimension (P = .028; odds ratio 1.06 for every millimeter, 95% confidence limits 1.01-1.12) were predictors of success at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the favorable results of the maze III procedure in terms of freedom from supraventricular arrhythmias persist in most patients for at least 4 years.

Operative risk factors of type A aortic dissection: analysis of 252 consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVE: We examined operative risk factors for postoperative death after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Between 1974 and 1999, 252 patients, 163 men and 89 women (mean+/-SD age, 58+/-12 years) underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Fifty-eight (23.0%) were in cardiogenic shock at time of surgery. Most patients underwent ascending aorta replacement which was combined with aortic valve replacement by means of a composite graft in 30 (11.9%) patients and an isolated aortic valve replacement in 16 (6.3%) patients. RESULTS: The overall operative mortality rate was 25.0% (n=63); 27.0% for patients operated upon with aortic cross-clamping, 23.7% after deep hypotherm circulatory arrest and 23.3% after antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (ASCP) (p=0.73). Multivariate analysis revealed iatrogenic dissection (p=0.0096, odds ratio=5.7), preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation (p=0.0095, odds ratio=5.5) and every quarter of an hour longer extracorporeal circulation (p=0.049, odds ratio=1.1) as independent risk factors for operative mortality. Aortic valve replacement or Bentall procedure (p=0.0185, odds ratio=0.3) were protective factors. There were 44 new postoperative strokes: 4.7% in the group operated upon with and 20.1% in the group without ASCP (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: In order to avoid cardiogenic shock and preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation, patients with acute type A aortic dissection should be treated promptly. The choice to use an aortic valve prosthesis or Bentall procedure when applicable seems to benefit the postoperative early survival. The risk of new postoperative neurological events might be reduced by avoiding the appliance of an aortic cross-clamp and by using ASCP.