Vitiligo-like lesions in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with cycline-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors.

PURPOSE: Introduction of cyclin-dependent inhibitors was a milestone in therapeutics for patients with estrogen receptor+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Despite the wide use of such agents and remarkable improvement of survival rates, drug-related adverse events are not yet fully characterized. We describe vitiligo-like lesions as a new adverse event occurring in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with cyclin-dependent inhibitors. METHODS: We performed an international retrospective study including patients with advanced breast cancer who developed vitiligo-like lesions during treatment with cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors, in the period January 2018-December 2019. Patients > 18 years, both males and females, were recruited at six Dermatology Departments located in Italy (3), France (1) and Greece (2). We evaluated epidemiological and clinical characteristics, impact on quality of life and outcome of vitiligo-like lesions in patients treated with cyclin-dependent 4 and 6 inhibitors. The percentage of skin involved by vitiligo-like lesions was assessed using the Body Surface Area (BSA) score. Changes in patients' quality of life were investigated through the evaluation of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixteen women (median age: 62.5 years; range 40-79 years) treated with cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors for advanced breast cancer presented with vitiligo-like lesions during follow-up visits. Cutaneous lesions consisted of white, irregular macules and patches located mainly on sun-exposed areas in 11/16 patients or diffuse to the entire body surface in 5/16. Cutaneous lesions clearly impaired the quality of life of patients tested (DLQI ≥ 10). CONCLUSIONS: We present for the first time, to our knowledge, a case series of vitiligo-like lesions developing in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors. We showed that such lesions further impair the patients' quality of life and their treatment is challenging.

Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Is Associated with Suboptimal Initial Management in a Cohort of 109 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the epidemiological characteristics of patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (A-cSCC). OBJECTIVE AND METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted on a routine care cohort of 109 patients to identify the epidemiological factors associated with A-cSCC. RESULTS: The median age was 83 years (IQR: 73.9-89.8), and the median ECOG was 1 (IQR: 1-2). Sixty percent of the patients had a history of cardiac disease and 22% had cognitive disorders. Seventy-four percent of patients were from rural/semi-rural areas (towns of <15,000 residents) and 17% were living in nursing homes. The cSCC lesions were on the head and neck in 72% of cases. Thirty-seven percent of patients were not diagnosed until the disease was in an advanced stage, indicating a lack of cSCC identification. In the remaining 69 patients, 7% did not received treatment within 3 months of the cSCC being identified, 62% had an incomplete histological report, and 37% had incomplete treatment. CONCLUSION: A-cSCC is associated with incomplete initial treatment in an elderly and rural population with good general condition. We hypothesize that a lack of access to good dermatological expertise may have led to underestimation of the aggressiveness of cSCC and/or therapeutic mismanagement.

Panniculitis Associated with MEK Inhibitor Therapy: An Uncommon Adverse Effect.

The combination of MEK inhibitor (cobimetinib, trametinib) and BRAF inhibitor (vemurafenib, dabrafenib) is now the first-line treatment in patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma. This association reduces cutaneous adverse events induced by BRAF inhibitors alone, including photosensitivity, hand-foot syndrome, hyperkeratosis, alopecia, skin papillomas, keratoacanthomas, and squamous-cell carcinomas. While panniculitis has exceptionally been reported with BRAF inhibitors, this rare side effect has never been described with the use of MEK inhibitors. We present here the first observation of panniculitis strictly induced by MEK inhibitors. Indeed, 10 days after the initiation of combined treatment with cobimetinib and vemurafenib for metastatic melanoma, our patient developed panniculitis predominantly on the upper and lower extremities. These cutaneous nodules disappeared during cobimetinib intermissions and recurred while the molecule was resumed. Recurrence of cutaneous nodules was observed after initiation of trametinib combined with dabrafenib, and resolved once again with trametinib discontinuation. We believe that clinicians should be aware of this cutaneous adverse event in patients treated with combined therapy, which can lead to unfounded BRAF inhibitor treatment discontinuation and compromise the antitumor response. Our case suggests a class effect linked with the MEK inhibition pharmacodynamic activity. Finally, laboratory investigation and histopathological examination are mandatory to exclude other panniculitis etiologies and subcutaneous metastasis of melanoma.