Enhancing foci on breast MRI: Identifying criteria that increase levels of suspicion.

OBJECTIVE: Prior studies evaluating features of foci associated with malignancy have not been conclusive. This study evaluates foci that were deemed suspicious and assesses multiple imaging and clinical findings with the goal of identifying criteria that can increase diagnostic confidence when evaluating foci on breast MRI. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who underwent an image-guided biopsy of an enhancing focus. To be included in the study, a breast MRI performed between 2012 and 2019 must have been classified as suspicious for an enhancing focus or foci, and a biopsy using imaging guidance must have been subsequently performed. Patient and imaging characteristics as well as the corresponding biopsy results were recorded and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: There were 74 patients with 85 foci of enhancement who underwent biopsy within the study period. Thirteen of the 85 foci yielded malignant results for an overall positive predictive value of 15.3% (95% confidence interval: 7.7-22.9%). Additionally, twenty-six of the 85 cases (30.6%) yielded high risk lesions. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between screening breast MRIs and biopsies that yielded cancer or atypia (p = 0.04). There was also a significant association between foci and malignant results if the focus was in the same quadrant of a known malignancy (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Clinical information, such as the indication for a breast MRI or the location of a focus relative to a known cancer, can play an important role in evaluating foci of enhancement. Diagnostic confidence in identifying suspicious foci can be aided by incorporating clinical context with imaging findings deemed suspicious by prior research studies.

Radioembolization complicated by dissection of the common femoral artery.

The common femoral artery is the most frequently used access site for angiographic procedures in interventional radiology. Potential complications of common femoral arteriotomy include hematoma formation, pseudoaneurysm, uncontrolled groin or retroperitoneal bleeding, acute arterial occlusion, dissection, and arteriovenous fistula formation. In a case such as the one described here, with a common femoral artery dissection with intraluminal thrombus and vessel occlusion, the complication may have occurred at the time of access or at the time of closure, with both procedure-associated and patient-specific risk factors affecting the overall risk of complications. Though some studies have shown an increased risk of complications with the use of arterial closure devices, others have found no increase. In any patient with symptoms following a femoral arteriotomy, rapid diagnosis and treatment is necessary to avoid further complications. Both patient-specific and procedure-associated risk factors should be considered prior to arteriotomy and usage of an arterial closure device.

Architectural Distortion on Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Pathologic Outcomes and Indicators of Malignancy.

OBJECTIVE: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has significantly improved cancer detection capabilities through its identification of subtle findings often imperceptible on 2D digital mammography, particularly architectural distortion (AD). The purpose of this study was to analyze of suspicious AD detected on screening DBT to evaluate the incidence of malignancy and to determine other patient or imaging characteristics in these cases as possible predictors of malignancy. METHODS: This was an IRB approved retrospective analysis of subjects with AD detected on DBT screening mammography who were given a biopsy recommendation between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2018. Univariate analysis of various imaging characteristics and patient high-risk factors was performed for statistical correlation with diagnosis of malignancy. RESULTS: In the 218 DBT-detected AD findings with a final BI-RADS assessment of 4 or 5 on diagnostic workup, 94 (43.1%) yielded malignancy, 57 (26.2%) were classified as high-risk, and 67 (30.7%) were benign. There was a strong statistically significant association with malignancy in the cases with an US correlate (P < 0.0001). There was a statistically significant inverse correlation between malignancy and one-view findings (P = 0.0002). The presence of AD on 2D (P = 0.005) or synthetic 2D views (P = 0.002) showed statistically significant correlations with malignancy, whereas breast density or high-risk factors (P = 0.316) did not. CONCLUSION: AD detected on DBT that persists on further workup and has no explainable cause should be considered suspicious for malignancy. Identification of the AD on both standard mammographic views and the presence of an US correlate significantly increase the probability of malignancy.

Reclassification of cytologically atypical thyroid nodules based on radiologic features in pediatric patients.

AIM: In children the percentage of "Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance" ("AUS/FLUS") cases is greater and the risk of malignancy is higher than expected. Our study aimed to determine if cytologically atypical nodules can be better characterized using imaging techniques for appropriate management of pediatric patients. METHODS: Thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) specimens were reclassified using the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC). Cytologic-histologic correlation was performed to determine if the cytopathologic groups had different associations with the surgical outcome. The "AUS/FLUS" lesions were then subdivided based on radiologic features and the outcome was analyzed for each subgroup. RESULTS: Histologically benign follicular nodules showed uniform distribution between the "benign" vs. "AUS/FLUS" (p=0.09) or between the "AUS/FLUS" vs. "follicular neoplasm" ("FN") cytologic groups (p=0.27). The follicular neoplasms were also evenly distributed between the "FN" vs. "AUS/FLUS" categories (p=0.31). "Benign", "AUS/FLUS", and "FN" designations showed comparable associations with papillary thyroid carcinoma classical variant (PTC-cv). Reclassification of atypical lesions based on ultrasound findings yielded two subcategories with different risk of malignancy: one similar to the "benign" group (11% malignancy rate) and one comparable with the "FN" category (28% risk of malignant neoplasm). CONCLUSION: "AUS/FLUS" designation does not add significant value in categorization of pediatric thyroid nodules. These lesions can be reclassified based on radiologic features to provide accurate information for follow-up.