Feasibility of organic micropollutant removal from municipal wastewaters by algal treatment vs. activated sludge treatment: Comparison based on non-targeted organic compound analysis.

Sustainability and life-cycle concerns about the conventional activated sludge (CAS) process for wastewater treatment have been driving the development of energy-efficient, greener alternatives. Feasibility of an algal-based wastewater treatment (A-WWT) system has been demonstrated recently as a possible alternative, capable of simultaneous nutrient and energy recovery. This study compared capabilities of the A-WWT and CAS systems in removing organic micropollutants (OMP). Initial assessments based on surrogate organic measures and fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (FEEM) scans revealed that the A-WWT system achieved higher removals of organics than the CAS system. However, effluents of both systems contained residual organic matter, necessitating further OMP assessment for a rigorous comparison. A novel ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography- Fourier transform mass spectrometry (UPLC-FTMS)-based non-targeted screening approach was adopted here for residual OMP analysis. This approach confirmed that the A-WWT system resulted in better OMP removal, eliminating 329 compounds and partially reducing 472 compounds, compared to 206 eliminations and 410 partial reductions by the CAS system. Mass spectra signal corresponding to some OMPs increased with treatment while some transformation products were observed following treatment. Higher OMP reduction in the A-WWT system with concurrent reductions of biodegradable carbon, nutrients, and pathogens in a single-step while producing energy and nutrient rich algal biomass underscore its potential as a greener alternative for wastewater treatment.

Techno-economic optimization of phosphorous recovery in an algal-based sewage treatment system.

Previous reports have documented the technical viability of an algal pathway for treating primary effluent and recovering its phosphorus-content (P) via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of the resulting biomass. In this pathway, leaching P from HTL-derived biochar was found as the critical step impacting the economics of P-recovery. As such, a process model was developed in the current study to optimize P leaching from biochar as a function of five parameters. Model predictions under various conditions agreed well with measured data (r2 = 0.93; n = 184). The validated process model was then integrated with a cost model to establish the following conditions as optimal for leaching P from biochar: batch leaching time of 72 h; eluent NaOH concentration of 0.5 M; eluent-to-biochar ratio of 20; temperature of 60 °C; and provision of mixing. Under these conditions, 73.5% of P from biochar could be recovered at $5.98/kg P.

Biofertilizer recovery from organic solid wastes via hydrothermal liquefaction.

Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) has emerged as a viable pathway for processing wet organic solid wastes (OSW) to yield biocrude oil which could be upgraded to transportation fuels and specialty chemicals. The HTL process results in two byproducts laden with high levels of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorous. Recovery of phosphates in the byproducts as struvite and ammoniacal-nitrogen (NH4-N) as ammonium sulfate is proposed here as a promising pathway to utilize the HTL byproducts. A case study of this pathway using algal biomass as a model OSW yielded 8.2 g struvite/100 g OSW and 10.7 g ammonium sulfate/100 g OSW. Heavy metal levels in both struvite and ammonium sulfate crystals were below EPA regulations for land application. This biofertilizer recovery pathway could render OSW processing by HTL a greener alternative to anaerobic digestion, offering feedstock versatility, substantially smaller footprint, and a higher degree of OSW valorization.

Removal and recovery of nutrients from municipal sewage: Algal vs. conventional approaches.

This paper presents a pilot scale study of an algal-based sewage treatment and resource recovery (STaRR) system capable of treating municipal sewage and recovering its nitrogen- and phosphorous-content as fertilizer. Core components of the STaRR system include i) mixotrophic cultivation of algal biomass in settled sewage; ii) hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of the resulting algal biomass, and iii) processing of the products of HTL to recover energy in the form of biocrude and nutrients in the form of struvite. Performance of a pilot-scale STaRR system in recovering nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) from settled sewage as struvite is documented and compared with that of existing and emerging technologies. Nutrient removal per unit energy input in the STaRR system is estimated as 257.1 g N/kWh and 36.6 g P/kWh while that in eight full-scale sewage treatment plants (STPs) averaged 74.3 g N/kWh and 135.1 g P/kWh. Energy required to treat primary effluent in the STaRR system (531.5 kWh/MG) is estimated to be lower than the average in the 8 STPs (1,037.9 ± 503.3 kWh/MG). While existing technologies had been originally designed for removal of nutrients rather than any recovery, a review of the literature revealed 12 emerging technologies for nutrient recovery. Nutrient recovery performance of the STaRR system (5.9% N and 71.6% P) is shown to be superior to that of those 12 emerging technologies. Recoveries recorded in the STaRR system translate to a yield of 2.4 kg struvite per 100 m3 of primary effluent. Results of this study imply that the STaRR system deserves due consideration as a greener and sustainable pathway for nutrient removal and recovery from sewage.