Outcome of primary endorectal pull-through for the treatment of classic Hirschsprung disease.

INTRODUCTION: Endorectal pull-through (ERPT) is a widely accepted procedure for the treatment of Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR). This study was aimed at presenting the long-term results of patients with classic HSCR who were operated on with a laparoscopic-assisted Georgeson procedure and to compare them to patients treated with a Soave-Boley procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated for Hirschsprung disease in the period 1997-2006 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were prospectively included in this study. Demographic details, associated anomalies, surgical technique, length of aganglionosis, and postoperative complications were collected. A questionnaire was submitted to all families to assess general health, bowel adaptation, fecal and urinary continence, cosmetic results, and patients' and parents' perspective of overall outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 162 patients underwent a pull-through procedure: 25 patients treated with Georgeson and 21 with Soave-Boley ERPT were eligible for this study. Conversion was required in 3 of 28 patients approached laparoscopically. Hospitalization was shorter for patients treated laparoscopically (P < 0.05), whereas length of surgery was comparable. Complication rate was similar for both groups, as well as growth that remained within normal ranges for age. Long-term outcome, in terms of bowel movements, was similar. None of the patients experienced fecal and/or urinary incontinence. Cosmetic results proved to be excellent to good in all patients undergoing the Georgeson and in 67% of patients undergoing the Soave-Boley procedure (P < 0.05). Patients' perspective of overall outcome was excellent in more than 90% of patients from both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall results proved to be similar. Likewise, long-term bowel function did not show significant differences. Nonetheless, if we consider hospitalization and cosmetic results, it becomes clear that the minimally invasive approach should be preferred, when possible, to improve patients' comfort, perspective of overall health status, and psychologic acceptance.

Gaslini's tracheal team: preliminary experience after one year of paediatric airway reconstructive surgery.

BACKGROUND: Congenital and acquired airway anomalies represent a relatively common albeit challenging problem in a national tertiary care hospital. In the past, most of these patients were sent to foreign Centres because of the lack of local experience in reconstructive surgery of the paediatric airway. In 2009, a dedicated team was established at our Institute. Gaslini's Tracheal Team includes different professionals, namely anaesthetists, intensive care specialists, neonatologists, pulmonologists, radiologists, and ENT, paediatric, and cardiovascular surgeons. The aim of this project was to provide these multidisciplinary patients, at any time, with intensive care, radiological investigations, diagnostic and operative endoscopy, reconstructive surgery, ECMO or cardiopulmonary bypass. Aim of this study is to present the results of the first year of airway reconstructive surgery activity of the Tracheal Team. METHODS: Between September 2009 and December 2010, 97 patients were evaluated or treated by our Gaslini Tracheal Team. Most of them were evaluated by both rigid and flexible endoscopy. In this study we included 8 patients who underwent reconstructive surgery of the airways. Four of them were referred to our centre or previously treated surgically or endoscopically without success in other Centres. RESULTS: Eight patients required 9 surgical procedures on the airway: 4 cricotracheal resections, 2 laryngotracheoplasties, 1 tracheal resection, 1 repair of laryngeal cleft and 1 foreign body removal with cardiopulmonary bypass through anterior tracheal opening. Moreover, in 1 case secondary aortopexy was performed. All patients achieved finally good results, but two of them required two surgeries and most required endoscopic manoeuvres after surgery. The most complex cases were the ones who had already been previously treated. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of paediatric airway anomalies requires a dedicated multidisciplinary approach and a single tertiary care Centre providing rapid access to endoscopic and surgical manoeuvres on upper and lower airways and the possibility to start immediately cardiopulmonary bypass or ECMO.The preliminary experience of the Tracheal Team shows that good results can be obtained with this multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of complicated cases. The centralization of all the cases in one or few national Centres should be considered.