Uncovering the gaps: A systematic mixed studies review of quality of life measures in extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

The health-related quality of life of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is not precisely captured by current patient-reported outcome measures. Although functional impairment is central to their concerns, multiple sources of distress, emotional restoration, coping strategies, and somatic symptoms are crucial in approaching patients with extremity STS.

Psychological functioning, coping styles and their relationship to appraisal of physical limitations following invasive surgical procedures for soft-tissue sarcoma: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study explored psychological functioning and coping styles in adult patients with soft-tissue sarcoma who underwent surgical procedures in a single expert sarcoma medical center in Canada. METHODS: This is a qualitative study with three formats of data collection. The interview guide was based on theoretical health-related quality of life model. We began the investigation with 2 online and 2 in-person focus groups. Four individual semistructured interviews were added to further explore emerging themes. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic networks approach. RESULTS: Twenty-eight adults (13 female, 24-75 years of age) participated. In the domain of psychological functioning we identified three main themes; changes in mood, worry, and body image concerns. In the domain of coping styles, we identified four adaptive coping styles; positive reframing and optimism, finding a purpose, being proactive, and using humor. Among the maladaptive coping styles, we found passive acceptance, and avoidance and denial. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological well-being can be contingent on physical functioning and coping styles in adults with soft-tissue sarcoma. Both psychological and physical function impact quality of life. Patients with more physical limitations, psychological distress and maladaptive coping styles should be monitored for their well-being.

The psychosocial experience of individuals living with osteogenesis imperfecta: a mixed-methods systematic review.

PURPOSE: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetic disorder (prevalence: 1:10,000), leading to bone fragility, frequent fractures, and varying degrees of physical limitations. Despite a substantial amount of research on the genetics, pathophysiology, and treatments related to OI, there remains a paucity of knowledge concerning the lived psychosocial experience of the OI population. This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to review, appraise, and synthesize the literature on the psychosocial experience of children and adults with OI with the goal of identifying implications for research, practice, and policy-making. METHODS: Using a systematic methodology, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies were accessed through database searching, screened, assessed for eligibility, and appraised. Data from the selected studies fulfilling the eligibility and quality criteria were extracted and synthesized using thematic analysis with an inductive approach. RESULTS: A total of four qualitative and 20 quantitative studies, with various study designs and methodologies ranging in quality, were included in the review (n = 800; comprising 610 children and 175 adults with OI types I, III, IV, and V, ten parents and five healthcare professionals). Six themes were identified: intellectual feats, isolation and feeling different, fear of fractures, coping with challenges, adapting by learning new skills, and social relationships. CONCLUSION: These findings highlighted key aspects of the experiences of children and adults with OI and will be essential for improving the quality and direction of research, tailoring clinical interventions addressing the psychosocial needs and quality of life of individuals with OI, and raising awareness among caregivers, healthcare professionals, administrators, and policy-makers associated with the OI population.

Nurses' perceptions of caring for parents of children with chronic medical complexity in the pediatric intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore nurses' perceptions of caring for parents of children with medical complexity [CMC] in the pediatric intensive care unit [PICU]. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: An interpretive descriptive design was used to explore nurses' perceptions of caring for parents of CMC in the PICU. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten nurses. Interview data were collected and analyzed using qualitative inductive content analysis. FINDINGS: Nurses revealed that their experiences of caring for parents of CMC evolved over time as they learned to tailor a caregiving partnership based on trust. Although various circumstances could challenge this partnership, nurses strove to maintain and nurture it through self-reflection and optimal communication. Three themes were identified in the data that captured PICU nurses' perceptions: (i) "Thrown to the wolves": Adjusting to a new caregiving role; (ii) "Getting to know each other": Merging caregiving roles; (iii) "Keeping connected": Working to preserve the partnership. CONCLUSIONS: Findings shed new light on the importance of a trusting nurse-parent partnership in caring for parents of CMC in the PICU. Results will be used to develop strategies to enhance this partnership, with the goal of supporting parents and staff in their caregiving roles.