Laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair: a 16-year experience at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHr) is a safe and effective procedure for relieving foregut symptoms associated with paraesophageal hernias (PEH). Nonetheless, it is estimated that about 30-50% of patients will have symptomatic recurrence requiring additional surgical intervention. Revision surgery is technically demanding and may be associated with a higher rate of morbidity and poor patient-reported outcomes. We present the largest study of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes among patients who underwent laparoscopic revision PEHr. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair between February 2003 and October 2019, at a single institution was conducted. All revisions of Type I hiatal hernias were excluded. The following validated surveys were used to evaluate quality-of-life outcomes: Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related QOL (GERD-HRQL). Patient demographic, perioperative, and quality-of-life (QOL) data were analyzed using univariate analysis. RESULTS: One hundred ninety patients were included in the final analysis (63.2% female, 90.5% single revision, 9.5% multiple revisions) with a mean age, BMI, and age-adjusted Charlson score of 56.6 ± 14.7 years, 29.7 ± 5.7 kg/m2, and 2.04 ± 1.9, respectively. The study cohort consisted of type II (49.5%), III (46.3%), and IV hiatal hernia (4.2%), respectively. Most patients underwent either a complete (68.7%) or partial (27.7%) fundoplication. A Collis gastroplasty was performed in 14.7% of patients. The median follow-up was 17.6 months. The overall morbidity and mortality rate were 15.8% and 1.1%, respectively. The 30-day readmission rate was 9.5%. Additionally, at latest follow-up 47.9% remained on antireflux medication. At latest follow-up, there was significant improvement in mean RSI score (46.4%, p < 0.001) from baseline within the study population. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in QOL between patients who had a history of an initial repair only or history of revision surgery at latest review. The overall recurrence rate was 16.3% with 6.3% requiring a surgical revision. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic revision PEHr is associated with a low rate of morbidity and mortality. Revision surgery may provide improvement in QOL outcomes, despite the high rate of long-term antireflux medication use. The rate of recurrent paraesophageal hernia remains low with few patients requiring a second revision. However, longer follow-up is needed to better characterize the long-term recurrence rate and symptomatic improvements.

Is there a role for bariatric surgery in patients with severe obesity and type 1 diabetes?

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity in type 1 diabetes has been increasing over the past decades. Multiple studies have demonstrated suboptimal outcomes with dietary control and medical management for obesity and type 2 diabetes. This study's objective was to evaluate insulin and diabetic medication requirements in patients with type 1 diabetes 2 years after bariatric surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective medical-record review study from 2002 to 2019 at Geisinger Health System. Of 4549 total bariatric surgeries, 38 bariatric surgery patients were confirmed to have type 1 diabetes. Type 1 diabetes was confirmed by medical-record review and/or the presence of C-peptide <5 ng/mL. RESULTS: The patient cohort had a mean age of 41 years, with 87% being female. The mean body mass index was 43.0 kg/m2, with a mean HbA1C of 8.4% before surgery. During follow-up, the insulin requirements improved from 114 units preoperatively to 60 units at 1 year postoperatively (SD = 54.5, P = .0018) and 60 units at 2 years postoperatively (SD = 60.3, P = .0033). Though not significant, the number of patients on more than 1 diabetic medication decreased from 66% preoperatively to 53% 1 year postoperatively (P = .343) and 52% at 2 years (P = .149). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated significant improvement in the insulin and total number of diabetic medication requirements after bariatric surgery, suggesting that bariatric surgery may be a viable treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes.

Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Patients on Chronic Opioids: Can Bariatric Surgery Assist with Decreasing Long-term Opioid Utilization?

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to assess long-term opioid use following bariatric surgery in patients on preoperative narcotics. METHODS: We evaluated patients utilizing preoperative opioids (OP) who underwent primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) from 2013 to 2020. Patients were propensity-matched to those without preoperative opioid use (NOP) by demographics and comorbidities. Our objectives were to compare opioid use at 1 and 3 years after surgery and evaluate perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 806 patients, matched 1:1 were evaluated, with 82.7% being females. Mean age was 46.5 years in the OP and 45.6 years in the NOP (p = 0.0018), preoperative BMI was 45.8 in the OP and 46.1 in the NOP (p = 0.695). All patients were followed up for 1 year. In the OP, 156 (38.7%) patients were taking opioids 1 year after surgery as opposed to 27 (6.7%) in the NOP (p < 0.0001). Three years after surgery, 74 (37.5%) patients in the OP and 27 (14.4%) in the NOP were taking outpatient opioids (p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between OP and NOP groups in terms of readmissions (9.4% vs. 5.7% p = 0.06), reinterventions (3.7 vs. 1.7% p = 0.13), reoperations (3.5% vs. 1.5% p = 0.11), or emergency room visits (8.9% vs. 7.2% p = 0.44). There were no mortalities. CONCLUSION: Most patients requiring preoperative opioids can be weaned off after bariatric surgery. Enhanced recovery pathways are key to obtaining these results. Preoperative opioid use is not associated with increased complications compared to opioid-naïve patients.

Quaternary ammonium disinfectants cause subfertility in mice by targeting both male and female reproductive processes.

Alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride (ADBAC) and didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DDAC) are common ingredients in household bathroom and kitchen cleaning sprays. ADBAC+DDAC cause reproductive toxicity in mice. The aim of the present study was to investigate gender-specific reproductive effects from ADBAC+DDAC. Female reproduction was assessed through ovulation, oocyte implantation, and estrus cycling. Male reproductive function was assessed by sperm concentration, motility, and viability. Numbers of corpora lutea were not different after 2 weeks, but decreased after 8 weeks of ADBAC+DDAC exposure. Dams exposed for 5 weeks to ADBAC+DDAC spent significantly less time in estrus. ADBAC+DDAC exposed males exhibited declines in both sperm concentration and motility, but not sperm viability. Subfertility in mice from ADBAC+DDAC exposure is, therefore, mediated through reproductive disturbances in both females and males. While the effect of ADBAC+DDAC exposure on human health is unclear, widespread exposure necessitates further consideration of their potential reproductive toxicity.