A critical brainstem relay for mediation of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls.

The CNS houses naturally occurring pathways that project from the brain to modulate spinal neuronal activity. The noradrenergic locus coeruleus (the A6 nucleus) originates such a descending control whose influence on pain modulation encompasses an interaction with a spinally projecting non-cerulean noradrenergic cell group. Hypothesizing the origin of an endogenous pain inhibitory pathway, our aim was to identify this cell group. A5 and A7 noradrenergic nuclei also spinally project. We probed their activity using an array of optogenetic manipulation techniques during in vivo electrophysiological experimentation. Interestingly, noxious stimulus evoked spinal neuronal firing was decreased upon opto-activation of A5 neurons (two-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc, P < 0.0001). Hypothesizing that this may reflect activity in the noradrenergic diffuse noxious inhibitory control circuit, itself activated upon application of a conditioning stimulus, we opto-inhibited A5 neurons with concurrent conditioning stimulus application. Surprisingly, no spinal neuronal inhibition was observed; activity in the diffuse noxious inhibitory control circuit was abolished (two-way ANOVA, P < 0.0001). We propose that the A5 nucleus is a critical relay nucleus for mediation of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls. Given the plasticity of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in disease, and its back and forward clinical translation, our data reveal a potential therapeutic target.

Distinct brainstem to spinal cord noradrenergic pathways inversely regulate spinal neuronal activity.

Brainstem to spinal cord noradrenergic pathways include a locus coeruleus origin projection and diffuse noxious inhibitory controls. While both pathways are traditionally viewed as exerting an inhibitory effect on spinal neuronal activity, the locus coeruleus was previously shown to have a facilitatory influence on thermal nocioception according to the subpopulation of coerulean neurons activated. Coupled with knowledge of its functional modular organisation and the fact that diffuse noxious inhibitory controls are not expressed in varied animal models of chronicity, we hypothesized a regulatory role for the locus coeruleus on non-coerulean, discrete noradrenergic cell group(s). We implemented locus coeruleus targeting strategies by microinjecting canine adenovirus encoding for channelrhodopsin-2 under a noradrenaline-specific promoter in the spinal cord (retrogradely labelling a coeruleospinal module) or the locus coeruleus itself (labelling the entire coerulean module). Coeruleospinal module optoactivation abolished diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (two-way ANOVA, P < 0.0001), which were still expressed following locus coeruleus neuronal ablation. We propose that the cerulean system interacts with, but does not directly govern, diffuse noxious inhibitory controls. This mechanism may underlie the role of the locus coeruleus as a 'chronic pain generator'. Pinpointing the functionality of discrete top-down pathways is crucial for understanding sensorimotor modulation in health and disease.

Identification and characterisation of spontaneous mutations causing deafness from a targeted knockout programme.

BACKGROUND: Mice carrying targeted mutations are important for investigating gene function and the role of genes in disease, but off-target mutagenic effects associated with the processes of generating targeted alleles, for instance using Crispr, and culturing embryonic stem cells, offer opportunities for spontaneous mutations to arise. Identifying spontaneous mutations relies on the detection of phenotypes segregating independently of targeted alleles, and having a broad estimate of the level of mutations generated by intensive breeding programmes is difficult given that many phenotypes are easy to miss if not specifically looked for. Here we present data from a large, targeted knockout programme in which mice were analysed through a phenotyping pipeline. Such spontaneous mutations segregating within mutant lines may confound phenotypic analyses, highlighting the importance of record-keeping and maintaining correct pedigrees. RESULTS: Twenty-five lines out of 1311 displayed different deafness phenotypes that did not segregate with the targeted allele. We observed a variety of phenotypes by Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) and behavioural assessment and isolated eight lines showing early-onset severe progressive hearing loss, later-onset progressive hearing loss, low frequency hearing loss, or complete deafness, with vestibular dysfunction. The causative mutations identified include deletions, insertions, and point mutations, some of which involve new genes not previously associated with deafness while others are new alleles of genes known to underlie hearing loss. Two of the latter show a phenotype much reduced in severity compared to other mutant alleles of the same gene. We investigated the ES cells from which these lines were derived and determined that only one of the 8 mutations could have arisen in the ES cell, and in that case, only after targeting. Instead, most of the non-segregating mutations appear to have occurred during breeding of mutant mice. In one case, the mutation arose within the wildtype colony used for expanding mutant lines. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that spontaneous mutations with observable effects on phenotype are a common side effect of intensive breeding programmes, including those underlying targeted mutation programmes. Such spontaneous mutations segregating within mutant lines may confound phenotypic analyses, highlighting the importance of record-keeping and maintaining correct pedigrees.

Hearing impairment due to Mir183/96/182 mutations suggests both loss and gain of function effects.

The microRNA miR-96 is important for hearing, as point mutations in humans and mice result in dominant progressive hearing loss. Mir96 is expressed in sensory cells along with Mir182 and Mir183, but the roles of these closely-linked microRNAs are as yet unknown. Here we analyse mice carrying null alleles of Mir182, and of Mir183 and Mir96 together to investigate their roles in hearing. We found that Mir183/96 heterozygous mice had normal hearing and homozygotes were completely deaf with abnormal hair cell stereocilia bundles and reduced numbers of inner hair cell synapses at four weeks old. Mir182 knockout mice developed normal hearing then exhibited progressive hearing loss. Our transcriptional analyses revealed significant changes in a range of other genes, but surprisingly there were fewer genes with altered expression in the organ of Corti of Mir183/96 null mice compared with our previous findings in Mir96 Dmdo mutants, which have a point mutation in the miR-96 seed region. This suggests the more severe phenotype of Mir96 Dmdo mutants compared with Mir183/96 mutants, including progressive hearing loss in Mir96 Dmdo heterozygotes, is likely to be mediated by the gain of novel target genes in addition to the loss of its normal targets. We propose three mechanisms of action of mutant miRNAs; loss of targets that are normally completely repressed, loss of targets whose transcription is normally buffered by the miRNA, and gain of novel targets. Any of these mechanisms could lead to a partial loss of a robust cellular identity and consequent dysfunction.

Functional analysis of candidate genes from genome-wide association studies of hearing.

The underlying causes of age-related hearing loss (ARHL) are not well understood, but it is clear from heritability estimates that genetics plays a role in addition to environmental factors. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in human populations can point to candidate genes that may be involved in ARHL, but follow-up analysis is needed to assess the role of these genes in the disease process. Some genetic variants may contribute a small amount to a disease, while other variants may have a large effect size, but the genetic architecture of ARHL is not yet well-defined. In this study, we asked if a set of 17 candidate genes highlighted by early GWAS reports of ARHL have detectable effects on hearing by knocking down expression levels of each gene in the mouse and analysing auditory function. We found two of the genes have an impact on hearing. Mutation of Dclk1 led to late-onset progressive increase in ABR thresholds and the A430005L14Rik (C1orf174) mutants showed worse recovery from noise-induced damage than controls. We did not detect any abnormal responses in the remaining 15 mutant lines either in thresholds or from our battery of suprathreshold ABR tests, and we discuss the possible reasons for this.