RESUMEN
Pertussis is quite frequent and severe among infants; therefore, rapid diagnosis and timely targeted therapy are essential. Although a molecular test for etiological diagnosis is now available, it may not be available everywhere, and therefore adjunctive diagnostic tests are still useful for presumptive diagnosis. We describe the use of procalcitonin (PCT) and lymphocyte count to discriminate among pertussis, bacterial and viral infections. Fourteen infants per group were studied. The decision tree, built considering all available variables, showed a major role of PCT in predicting the different groups. A PCT value equal to or greater than 0.75 ng/ml selected for bacterial infections. A PCT value lower than 0.75 ng/ml and a lymphocyte count equal to or greater than 10,400/mm3 selected the subjects with pertussis, while a lymphocyte count lower than 10,400/mm3 selected for viral etiology. PCT should be used in the diagnosis of infants suspected of having pertussis.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , Recuento de Linfocitos , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina , Tos Ferina , Infecciones Bacterianas/sangre , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/sangre , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/sangre , Virosis/sangre , Virosis/diagnóstico , Tos Ferina/diagnósticoRESUMEN
As of 15 June, there have been, globally, a total of 2103 laboratory-confirmed cases and one probable case of Monkeypox, including one death. We report two cases of vesicular infectious diseases, one of those is the first case of Monkeypox in the Campania Region. The report, therefore, highlights a recrudescent infection disease that could represent a challenge in differential diagnosis with other vesicular infectious diseases such as Varicella Zoster Virus, during a pandemic season that does not seem to end. Indeed, varicella should be carefullu considered in differential diagnosis according to its vesicular or pustular rash to have a prompt diagnosis and public health response in case of monkeypox infection.
RESUMEN
Polyclonal preparation of IgM as an adjuvant therapy has been reported as a relevant immunomodulant therapy in several infectious diseases, exhibiting, in most cases, improvement of the clinical course. No drug has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy for COVID-19. Immunomodulatory treatment with hydroxychloroquine and biologics as tocilizumab, in fact, has not proven to show satisfactory results in several reports. We therefore treated a selected patient with interstitial multifocal pneumonia, positive to COVID-19, with polyclonal preparation of immunoglobulins as an adjuvant therapy, obtaining in few days clinical remission and improvements in radiological findings. Based on this case report, we suggest that clinical trials are conducted to test the efficacy and safety of polyclonal immunoglobulins for adjunctive therapy of COVID-19.
RESUMEN
AIM: To check the safety and efficacy of boceprevir/telaprevir with peginterferon/ribavirin for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 in the real-world settings. METHODS: This study was a non-randomized, observational, prospective, multicenter. This study involved 47 centers in Italy. A database was prepared for the homogenous collection of the data, was used by all of the centers for data collection, and was updated continuously. All of the patients enrolled in this study were older than 18 years of age and were diagnosed with chronic infection due to HCV genotype 1. The HCV RNA testing was performed using COBAS-TaqMan2.0 (Roche, LLQ 25 IU/mL). RESULTS: All consecutively treated patients were included. Forty-seven centers enrolled 834 patients as follows: Male 64%; median age 57 (range 18-78), of whom 18.3% were over 65; mean body mass index 25.6 (range 16-39); genotype 1b (79.4%); diagnosis of cirrhosis (38.2%); and fibrosis F3/4 (71.2%). The following drugs were used: Telaprevir (66.2%) and PEG-IFN-alpha2a (67.6%). Patients were naïve (24.4%), relapsers (30.5%), partial responders (14.8%) and null responders (30.3%). Overall, adverse events (AEs) occurred in 617 patients (73.9%) during the treatment. Anemia was the most frequent AE (52.9% of cases), especially in cirrhotic. The therapy was stopped for 14.6% of the patients because of adverse events or virological failure (15%). Sustained virological response was achieved in 62.7% of the cases, but was 43.8% in cirrhotic patients over 65 years of age. CONCLUSION: In everyday practice, triple therapy is safe but has moderate efficacy, especially for patients over 65 years of age, with advanced fibrosis, non-responders to peginterferon + ribavirin.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and troponin I (TnII) are useful markers of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and initial myocardial injury in acute pulmonary embolism. The aim of this study was to evaluate biohumoral activation and right ventricular function in patients with acute pulmonary embolism diagnosed at pulmonary scintigraphy. METHODS: We observed 12 patients with massive pulmonary embolism (MPE), 8 with non-massive pulmonary embolism (NMPE) and RVD, 6 with NMPE without RVD. All the patients with MPE and 5 patients with NMPE-RVD received thrombolytic therapy (urokinase or recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator), the others were treated with heparin. At the beginning and after pharmacological treatment all the 26 patients underwent standard echocardiography and blood test analysis. RESULTS: BNP and Tn1 were significantly high in MPE (BNP p < 0.001 and Tn1I p < 0.005 vs NMPE) and in NMPE-RVD (BNP p < 0.03 and Tnl p < 0.02 vs NMPE). MPE and NMPE-RVD had similar RVD (p = NS), thrombolysis significantly reduced BNP, TnI, systolic pulmonary pressure, both in MPE (p < 0.001) and in NMNPE-RVD (BNP and Tnl p < 0.05, systolic pulmonary pressure p < 0.001). COULSION: Our data sustain the utility of BNP and Tnl as markers of RVD in acute pulmonary embolism; they focus on patients with NMPE-RVD and high levels of BNP and Tnl in whom an aggressive therapy as the thrombolytic one is necessary; they suggest the importance of biohumoral markers as indicators of the efficacy of pharmacological treatment in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.