Written communication about the use of medications in medical records in a Brazilian hospital.

BACKGROUND: Effective communication regarding the use of medications in hospital environments is a process that contributes to patient safety. Despite its importance, written communication about the medication use process in medical records remains insufficiently investigated. AIM: To describe the documentation in medical records regarding the medication use process by pharmacists, physicians and nurses on admission, during the hospital stay, and at hospital discharge. METHOD: A retrospective cross-sectional chart review study was carried out in medical records of patients admitted to a teaching hospital in Northeast Brazil. The study considered all patients admitted between December 2016 and February 2017, aged 18 or older and hospitalised for at least 48 hours. Clinical notes made by pharmacists, physicians and nurses were examined at three transition points of care. Data were collected using a questionnaire relating to the use of medications prior to hospital admission, changes in the prescribed medications during the hospital stay and discharge, as well as prescription non-conformities. Communication failures between the three healthcare professional groups were analysed and classified. The study was authorised by the Hospital's Board of Directors and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Sergipe. RESULTS: This study included 202 medical records of patients with a mean age of 51.48 (SD 6.42, range: 19-97) years. There was no record of a patient or relative interview on allergies and adverse drug reactions in 54 (26.8%) physician notes, 44 (21.9%) nursing notes, and 9 (25.0%) pharmacist notes. Moreover, 1,588 changes in prescriptions were identified during data collection, and 1,198 (75.4%) of these were unjustified. CONCLUSION: Medication-related information in medical records was incomplete and inconsistent in the clinical notes of the three studied professions, especially in pharmacists' documentation. Future studies should focus on investigating the consequences of interprofessional communication in patient care.

Quality of life and level of satisfaction with pharmacotherapeutic follow-up in a transgender health center in Brazil.

Trans people face numerous barriers to access and permanence in health services, which makes it difficult, among other things, to know about their quality of life and satisfaction with health services related to these users. Thus, the objective was to describle the quality of life and satisfaction with pharmacotherapeutic follow-up in transgender people. A cross-sectional, descriptive, and quantitative study was conducted between January and September 2022 at a specialized outpatient clinic for transgender individuals. The following aspects were describle: sociodemographic and medication profiles; quality of Life, which was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire; and levels of satisfaction with Pharmacotherapeutic Monitoring, assessed through the Pharmacy Services Satisfaction Questionnaire (QSSF). Descriptive analyses employed measures of central tendency, absolute and relative frequencies, while inferential analyses used the Student's t test. A total of 101 transgender individuals participated in the study, with a mean age of 25 years, the majority being single (79.2%/80), having more than 11 years of education (47.5%/n = 48), and comprising 48.5% (n = 49) transgender women. Hormone use was reported by 59.4% (n = 60) of the participants, with 18.3% (n = 11) of self-medication. Testosterone cypionate was the most common hormone used by transgender men (84%), while cyproterone acetate and estradiol represented 60.4% of hormone use among transgender women. Additionally, 36 transgender individuals were taking other drugs (n = 60), mainly antidepressives (28%). The WHOQOL-BREF showed higher scores in the domains of self-rated Quality of Life, and physical, and psychological well-being among transgender women compared to transgender men, but without statistical differences. Income revealed a statistically significant association with psychological domains and overall quality of life. The results of the QSSF indicated that the overall mean and average scores per question were higher than 4, suggesting that 100% of the sample was satisfied with the provided service. No statistically significant differences were observed in the Quality of Life between transgender men and women, but income was associated with the psychological domain and overall Quality of Life. All participants reported satisfaction with the Pharmacotherapeutic Monitoring service; however, there is a need to expand service offerings, such as medication dispensing.

Effectiveness and safety of ultra-low-dose spinal anesthesia versus perineal blocks in hemorroidectomy and anal fistula surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Ultra-low-dose Spinal Anesthesia (SA) is the practice of employing minimal doses of intrathecal agents so that only the roots that supply a specific area are anesthetized. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of ultra-low-dose spinal anesthesia with that of Perineal Blocks (PB). METHODS: A two-arm, parallel, double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing two anesthetic techniques (SA and PB) for hemorrhoidectomy and anal fistula surgery was performed. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain, complementation and/or conversion of anesthesia, and hemodynamic changes. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included in the final analysis. The mean pain values were similar in the first 48 h in both groups (p > 0.05). The individuals allocated to the SA group did not need anesthetic complementation; however, those in the PB group required it considerably (SA group, 0% vs. PB group, 25%; p = 0.005). Hemodynamic changes were more pronounced after PB: during all surgical times, the PB group showed lower MAP values and higher HR values (p < 0.05). Postoperative urinary retention rates were similar between both groups (SA group 0% vs. PB group 3.1%, p = 0.354). CONCLUSION: SA and PB are similarly effective in pain control during the first 48 h after hemorrhoidectomy and anal fistula surgery. Although surgical time was shorter among patients in the PB group, the SA technique may be preferable as it avoids the need for additional anesthesia. Furthermore, the group that received perineal blocks was under sedation with a considerable dose of propofol.