Correction of the neuropathogenic human apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) gene to APOE3 in vitro using synthetic RNA/DNA oligonucleotides (chimeraplasts).

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is a multifunctional circulating 34-kDa protein, whose gene encodes single-nucleotide polymorphisms linked to several neurodegenerative diseases. Here, we evaluate whether synthetic RNA/DNA oligonucleotides (chimeraplasts) can convert a dysfunctional gene, APOE4 (C, A and E, T, Cys112Arg), a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease and other neurological disorders, into wild-type APOE3. In preliminary experiments, we treated recombinant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably secreting apoE4 and lymphocytes from a patient homozygous for the epsilon 4 allele with a 68-mer apoE4-to-apoE3 chimeraplast, complexed to the cationic delivery reagent, polyethyleneimine. Genotypes were analyzed after 48 h by routine polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and by genomic sequencing. Clear conversions of APOE4 to APOE3 were detected using either technique, although high concentrations of chimeraplast were needed (> or =800 nM). Spiking experiments of PCR reactions or CHO-K1 cells with the chimeraplast confirmed that the repair was not artifactual. However, when treated recombinant CHO cells were passaged for 10 d and then subcloned, no conversion could be detected when >90 clones were analyzed by locus-specific PCR-RFLP. We conclude that the apparent efficient repair of the APOE4 gene in CHO cells or lymphocytes 48 h post-treatment is unstable, possibly because the high levels of chimeraplast and polyethyleneimine that were needed to induce nucleotide substitution are cytotoxic.

Gene therapy in skeletal muscle mediated by adeno-associated virus vectors.

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is the most promising gene delivery vehicle for muscle-directed gene therapy. AAV's natural tropism to muscle cells, long-term persistent transgene expression, multiple serotypes, as well as its minimal immune response have made AAV vectors well suited for muscle-directed gene therapy. AAV vector-mediated gene delivery to augment muscle structural proteins, such as dystrophin and sarcoglycans, offers great hope for muscular dystrophy patients. In addition, muscle can be used as a therapeutic platform for AAV vectors to express nonmuscle secretory/regulatory pathway proteins for diabetes, atherosclerosis, hemophilia, cancer, etc. AAV vector can be delivered into both skeletal muscle and cardiac muscle by means of local, regional, and systemic administrations. Successful animal studies have led to several noteworthy clinical trials involving muscle-directed gene therapy. In this chapter, we describe the basic methodology that is currently utilized in the area of AAV-mediated muscle-directed gene therapy. These methods include vector delivery route, vector dosage, detection of transgene expression by immunostaining and western blot, determination of vector copy numbers and quantification of mRNA expression, as well as potential immune responses involved in AAV delivery. Technical details and tips leading to successful experimentation are also discussed.

Challenges with advanced therapy medicinal products and how to meet them.

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), which include gene therapy medicinal products, somatic cell therapy medicinal products and tissue-engineered products, are at the cutting edge of innovation and offer a major hope for various diseases for which there are limited or no therapeutic options. They have therefore been subject to considerable interest and debate. Following the European regulation on ATMPs, a consolidated regulatory framework for these innovative medicines has recently been established. Central to this framework is the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) at the European Medicines Agency (EMA), comprising a multidisciplinary scientific expert committee, representing all EU member states and European Free Trade Association countries, as well as patient and medical associations. In this article, the CAT discusses some of the typical issues raised by developers of ATMPs, and highlights the opportunities for such companies and research groups to approach the EMA and the CAT as a regulatory advisor during development.