Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Crit Care Explor ; 5(5): e0918, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37206374

RESUMEN

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends standard operating procedures for patients with sepsis. Real-world evidence about sepsis order set implementation is limited. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effect of sepsis order set usage on hospital mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four acute care hospitals in the United States from December 1, 2020 to November 30, 2022 involving 104,662 patients hospitalized for sepsis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospital mortality. RESULTS: The sepsis order set was used in 58,091 (55.5%) patients with sepsis. Initial mean sequential organ failure assessment score was 0.3 lower in patients for whom the order set was used than in those for whom it was not used (2.9 sd [2.8] vs 3.2 [3.1], p < 0.01). In bivariate analysis, hospital mortality was 6.3% lower in patients for whom the sepsis order set was used (9.7% vs 16.0%, p < 0.01), median time from emergency department triage to antibiotics was 54 minutes less (125 interquartile range [IQR, 68-221] vs 179 [98-379], p < 0.01), and median total time hypotensive was 2.1 hours less (5.5 IQR [2.0-15.0] vs 7.6 [2.5-21.8], p < 0.01) and septic shock was 3.2% less common (22.0% vs 25.4%, p < 0.01). Order set use was associated with 1.1 fewer median days of hospitalization (4.9 [2.8-9.0] vs 6.0 [3.2-12.1], p < 0.01), and 6.6% more patients discharged to home (61.4% vs 54.8%, p < 0.01). In the multivariable model, sepsis order set use was independently associated with lower hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.73). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In a cohort of patients hospitalized with sepsis, order set use was independently associated with lower hospital mortality. Order sets can impact large-scale quality improvement efforts.

2.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 9(5): 415-20; quiz e49, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21320640

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Most studies of angiodysplasia are small and performed at a single center. We investigated the epidemiology and management of colonic angiodysplasia by using a national endoscopy database. METHODS: Colonoscopy reports (n = 229,727; generated from January 2000 to December 2002) from patients with documented angiodysplasia (n = 4159) were retrieved from the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative. Predictors of occult or overt blood loss and endoscopic treatment were identified by using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Most patients with documented angiodysplasia were older than 60 years (73%) or had right-sided lesions (62%). There was evidence of blood loss in 56% of patients with angiodysplasia. Predictors of blood loss included inpatient status (odds ratio [OR], 8.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.42-14.10), 2-10 angiodysplasias (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.29-1.75), more than 10 lesions (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.69-2.80), black race (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.46-2.62), severe illness (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.62-2.41), Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.32-2.22), and age older than 80 years (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06-1.63). Endoscopic therapy was given to 28% of patients with evidence of blood loss and in 68% with active bleeding. Endoscopic treatment increased among patients in a university practice setting (vs community setting, OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.96-3.27) and decreased in Northwest geographic locations (vs Southwest, OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of blood loss in patients with colonic angiodysplasia include inpatient status, comorbidities, age, race/ethnicity, and lesion number. Endoscopic therapy for angiodysplasia varied according to practice setting and region.


Asunto(s)
Angiodisplasia/complicaciones , Angiodisplasia/patología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiodisplasia/cirugía , Colonoscopía , Endoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
3.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 11(5): 400-5, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19765368

RESUMEN

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the most important cause of nosocomial diarrhea. The emergence of a hypervirulent strain and other factors including antibiotic overuse contribute to the increasing incidence and severity of this potentially lethal infection. CDI has been reported in persons previously considered as low risk, such as young healthy persons without exposure to health care settings or antibiotics, peripartum women, and children. In patients with inflammatory bowel disease, the risk of C. difficile infection is even greater, with higher rates of hospitalization, bowel surgery, and mortality. With increasing incidence and severity of disease, the need for improved diagnostic, treatment, and infection control strategies cannot be overstated.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/cirugía , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Incidencia , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/epidemiología , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/cirugía , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Prevención Secundaria , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Washingtón/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA